Copenhagen - a dangerous deception?
By Nathan Allonby
Submitted for publication on Information Clearing House www.informationclearinghouse.info
Why do I feel so uncomfortable about the Copenhagen treaty? As an environmentalist, for decades, I have wanted action to stop the destruction of the planet. Why am I so unhappy now that, finally, it is proposed something should be done?
It’s because it’s phoney. We can‘t believe any of it - we can‘t believe the people, the leaders - we can‘t believe in their good faith; we can’t believe in the solution they are offering; we can‘t believe they have identified the right problem; we can‘t believe the science that supports it; we can‘t believe they can be trusted with the new powers they demand; we can‘t believe they won‘t make things worse instead of better; we can’t believe this isn’t just an excuse for yet more corporate looting; we can‘t believe in the phoney cheerleading, or that there is real public support for any of this.
Yes, it’s true that the science behind the claims has been exposed, but that is the least of the issues. It is, however, deeply symptomatic of everything that’s wrong.
If you think you are going to get anywhere by arguing about science, then think again. This is no longer about reason - it’s about feelings and adrenaline.
There is a well-orchestrated chorus, cheering for Copenhagen. Lots of attractive, young people, are shouting in the street.
Copenhagen is claimed to be about justice; about redistribution of wealth, from rich to poor; about protecting the planet; about protecting the future. Copenhagen is claimed to be about saving people's lives, indeed saving the whole of humanity.
The Copenhagen treaty is seen to be a good thing, with good objectives, desirable regardless of whether climate change is real,
whether it is man-made, or whatever. When the cause is just, the science doesn't matter.
There is no debate - we have entered a situation where no rational debate is possible. This is a very dangerous situation for democracy.
The Copenhagen treaty will overturn the very concepts of democracy, national self-government and the right of self-determination. The Copenhagen treaty will overturn traditional democracy and bring in a new trans-national process of decision-making, with authority over large areas of public policy, with no democratic control or accountability, in a system to be controlled by the very people that have been responsible for serial wars, economic exploitation and famines.
There should be an outcry, but instead this is being greeted with fanfares. Why is this?
We could mention that, for years, our leaders have talked about encouraging these demonstrations, in support of government action. Governments capable of organising colour revolutions in hostile nations would have no problem organising pro-government rallies in their own home-towns.
More than half the UK population doesn't believe the official story of man-made global warming. But you wouldn’t think that, to look at newspaper coverage, or "protests" on climate change.
It all feels so unreal - it is unreal. What this situation needs is a healthy dose of realism.
Here is the message that needs to be put across to Copenhagen activists.Firstly
, if you are looking for a solution, do you go to the people who made the problem? If you wanted economic and social justice, would you go to be people who have carefully installed a rapacious system of exploitation? If you wanted to protect the environment, would you go to the people who systematically dismantled environmental protection, to make greater profits? In short, how will it fix the system to give these failed leaders more power, by creating a new world authority, run by them, with no elections, no democratic accountability, no checks and balances? Wouldn't that make things worse, not better?
Secondly
, at every democratic election, these people let you down, and did something different, often opposite, to what they
promised. Why would you trust them now? Isn't it more reasonable to expect them to disappoint you again?
How does it feel to be duped, time after time? Do you really want to invite this again, only this time on a disastrously larger scale?
Thirdly
, look at the current plans our global leaders - what they plan is the opposite of what they say.
The Copenhagen treaty is supposed to provide money and investment to provide new lifestyles for people displaced "by climate change".
Most population displacement worldwide is not due to climate change, but due to engineered events - such as government action (land seizure, grant of mining rights, special economic zones, etc.), financial policies and war. In most of these events, the West is implicated, even the wars (Congo is a good example).
Around the world, billions of people will be displaced from sustainable lifestyles, that have endured for thousands of years, to be forced into urban slums, living in indescribable squalor, to work in sweatshops. They will be forced from zero-impact lifestyles into dependency on mineral fuel and scarce resources. In India alone, at least 400 million people - roughly equivalent to the population of Europe - will be displaced from farming into urban slums. This is planned and engineered, not the by-product of natural forces, such as climate change. Our world leaders plan this, to force these innocent victims to work in service to the Western economy, to fuel global economic growth.
"Aid" to Third World nations - who does it help? Do the people who live sustainable lifestyles need financial investment? No –
they need to be left alone. They haven't needed investment for thousands of years - that's what 'sustainable' means. Is it lack of investment that threatens indigenous people around the world? Or is it the investment itself that threatens to displace them - the new dams, roads and development projects? Is this investment actually creating the infrastructure of exploitation? Is it helping to build the slums and sweatshops into which its victims will be forced?
Fourthly
, we know that Copenhagen will actually create a whole new multi-trillion $ economy in trading carbon credits - money
that will ultimately come from us.
We have already had leaks of the world leaders' bad faith - from the G20 conference - they plan to turn aid into exploitation, and
to use their new powers to transfer wealth from the poor to the rich.
Now we have the leak of the so-called Danish text, which will permanently enforce inequality between rich and poor nations, and freeze developing nations out of decision-making power.
Fifthly
, we have seen how international bodies work already. How many environmentalists think the WTO has been a good
thing? So why ask for more of the same? Governments hide behind such bodies and use them as the opportunity to "launder" policies - at WTO meetings, our governments can press, unseen and unreported, for policies that would be unacceptable to their voters at home, but go back and pretend "It's not our fault, the WTO forced us to do it".
Finally
, this is time to ask, what have we learned about democracy? Have we learned anything from all the mistakes we made
in the past? Have we learned anything from all the leaders who lied to us? Do we want to trust our leaders with unlimited power, and ask no questions, or have we learned we tie them down with checks and balances, and force them to make specific commitments?
Let's look at the things we want, and ask whether we could achieve them without trans-national government. (Some of these issues were discussed in an earlier article)
We already want lower fuel consumption - we don't want high fuel bills - we want better insulated homes. We want old people to be able to afford to keep warm, to get help to insulate their homes, so they don't freeze in the winter. Hey, we can already have that, with home insulation grants! Do we need world government to solve this?
We want cars that can do 200 miles per gallon, instead of 30 mpg. Hey, we could already do that! Engineers kept on bringing cars like that to motor shows, but the car companies didn't want to sell them. Now we own the car companies, via bail-out, we could insist they build the cars we really want.
We want the money from higher fuel bills, instead of going into record corporate profits, to go into investment in alternative energy technology, to reduce dependence on oil. Hey, we could do that, without world government! We need a windfall tax on energy profits, combined with a tax-break on investment in renewable-energy.
There is every reason to be concerned about our planet: - destruction of the rainforests, the oceans dying, breaks in our food chain, toxic pollution, exhaustion of resources, extinction of species, the disappearance of songbirds. These are the real issues that lie behind the activists’ concern about global warming. Man’s impact on the planet is real and undeniable - action is needed. In the eyes, hearts and minds of activists, global warming is the issue that encapsulates and symbolises all the others. They feel that action on global warming will lead to action on all those other issues. But they are wrong - those activists should notice how global warming has pushed all other issues aside, out of discussion. Copenhagen doesn’t address any of the other, arguably more real, issues. Action on global warming could end up as a substitute, displacing action on every other problem.
To a large extent, we have to blame the environmental campaign organisations for their lack of focus, in failing to promote attainable, specific, realistic solutions. Instead, they have led us, directly and indirectly, into the arms of Copenhagen, a broad, indiscriminate and, ultimately, a false solution - a deception. This is exactly the type of chimera or mirage that real campaigners should have warned us against, instead of cheering on.
We don't need Copenhagen - we need to master our existing democracies, to make our politicians deliver the policies we really want. We need to bring our politicians to heel, not give them more power. The Copenhagen treaty will make it less likely we will get what we really want - that should be the message for all environmental activists.
__._,_.___
Friday, 11 December 2009
Sunday, 29 November 2009
Miseocracy
Miseocracy
Guy Leven-Torres
29th November 2009
The Telegraph, my favourite newspaper wrote of the crooks and fraudsters who lay behind Climate-Gate, who now are complacently denying any criminal behaviour even in the face of hard forensic evidence and cold hard fact. Like I have have always said, the Left do not know Right from Wrong.
"This is business as usual for them. The world might be surprised but I am not. These guys have an attitude." Prof Jones, who has refused to quit despite calls even from within the green movement, said last week in a statement issued through University of East Anglia, "My colleagues and I accept that some of the published emails do not read well. I regret any upset or confusion caused as a result. Some were clearly written in the heat of the moment, others use colloquialisms frequently used between close colleagues." He suggested the theft of emails and publication first on a Russian server was "a concerted attempt to put a question mark over the science of climate change in the run-up to the Copenhagen talks".
He added: "Our global temperature series tallies with those of other, completely independent, groups of scientists working for NASA and the National Climate Data Centre in the United States, among others. Even if you were to ignore our findings, theirs show the same results. The facts speak for themselves; there is no need for anyone to manipulate them."
As I also said, watch out for an attempt to smear the hackers who managed to enter into the hallowed halls of Climate Deceit in East Anglia. What these ‘academics’ have done is in scholarly terms appalling and disgusting- the damage to real scholarship real and lasting, especially in the minds of an already ignorant apathetic public, now highly suspicious of a Scientific caucus seemingly populated and controlled by lunatics, who think not eating a sausage a day will ‘Save the Planet’ or that we all become ‘Vegans’- indeed the stuff of insanity that even twenty years ago, would have more credibility in an acute ward for the dangerously insane than a ‘respectable’ academic Department worthy of the name.
Now with the upsurge in religious extremism and especially ‘Last Days’ scenarios as the Mob screams for blood, led on by religious faith demagogues and rabble rousers from white supremacy fanatics, ‘Born Again’ cranks, to their fellow clowns in the likes of Anjem Choudary, science will become the new Witch to be hunted by the forming Inquisition and Scientist Finder generals of The Popular People’s Front of Untruth and Ignorance, as public anger grows- and it has only just started- followed of course by the bureaucrats and politicians, already mired in expenses fraud and worse seeing the rising wrath, will jump on the political bandwagon and try to take over from the likes of Lord Pearson and the rest of us who have for years been warning what was afoot. However, it was not Science and God that caused all this but corrupt lying criminals masquerading as ‘academics’.
I am impressed with UKIP’s new leader Lord Rannock of Pearson who has exposed this whole rotten edifice and confirmed what most of the informed knew, or suspected was going on. However a very strong word of caution- I know the Left inside out and why they hate us. So far they ignore us or at least try to, when not abusing us all as racists etc! However, things are changing. Things will become unpleasant beacuse they will not go quietly, without a fight and use of nasty tactics, even utilising Police and other agencies to maintain their grip.
Meanwhile UKIP have done themselves a great favour, by selecting the above as new leader- a man who shoulders the Truth- unafraid to speak out on controversial subjects, for fear of causing offence to minorities. He is now saying things and warning people about matters I presented to my local UKIP man years ago but who told me I was ‘scary’and simply ignored, what I had to show after all my research. In the face of such danger, the life saving Truth was suppressed for fear of alienating voters. I do not dislike the man and he is doing well locally where I live but he and his kind, have allowed the enemy to further its aims and establish its grip to the point, it now feels it can blithely ignore the growing public anger. The populace are not children and not as ignorant as some believe, that they need to be protected from ‘scary’ people like me. Forewarned– Forearmed my old C.O. used to say! I am just the unfortunate Messenger.
The necessity of knowing what kind of enemy we face and its strength allows one to defend with a fair chance of Reality- appeasement and hiding the ‘scary’ Truth and even abusing those like us, that have laboured for years to alert and save the siutaion is no excuse. Churchill was abused terribly, even by his own side who knew the reality of Hitler and the Nazi threat. Thank God Churchill gained friends within the elite, who covertly helped him to get the Truth out! Lord Pearson is a worthy leader who invited Geert Wilders to show his film ‘Fitna, about the Islamist threat. He has also spoken on film of the dangers of Islamisation, stating on Canadian TV and other Media that ‘Britain has 18 months’ to prevent the final victory of Islam in the UK.
I know that others in UKIP also tried in vain to get their views across, one of whom a very brave and incredibly well informed-educated astute man is suffering from cancer. I hope when he sees the news it will ease his pain somewhat! Lord Pearson is a man who will have my vote in the next election as he should yours! He tells the truth as does Nick Griffin who should also be getting a lot more credit. I may not like some of his policies but by God the man has courage! The hounding of the BNP by the elite is an absolute disgrace, as is the deliberate attempt to destroy UKIP by fining it for fraud and even imprisoning its MEPs on trumped up charges- all activities familiar in the Third Reich and USSR.
The title of this post is 'Miseocracy' from the Classical Greek for ‘hate’. The current elite hate Humanity and wish to reduce not just western economies and their wealth to harvest and enrich themselves from, while stearing some of the illicit takings towards ‘Third World’ dupes who in fact have the most to fear from these creeps and their murderous schemes but also to reduce their populations to a class of serfs in the Global Feudal System in which the elite will be a new caste of god, aided and abetted by their beauracratic Byzantine orders of lesser ‘nobility’ like the crooks who faked the Climate models above. Don’t they just love titles?
I have termed this New Age Global Elite, ‘The NAGE’ and invented the term Nagism in order to describe it and its octupus like features. It is in fact very much like Nazism, in that it uses bureaucratic terror and endless officialdom to thwart public dissent and rebellion. Indeed there were many states within states in the 3rd Reich, the most dangerous being the SS State of one ex-chicken farmer, turned bureaucrat, Heinrich Himmler whose name even today inspires fear and loathing across the globe. People that met him before and during his rise to power, described him as a ‘dapper almost feminine innocuous inoffensive figure, more bespectacled clerk than rising politician. Well mannered and the epitome of German respectability!’ Today we have just had our own ‘dapper almost feminine innocuous inoffensive figure, more bespectacled clerk than rising politician’ foisted upon us in the name of Van Rumpuy, that even his own sister calls ‘a clown’.
I am not laughing and neither should you! Van Rumpuy was chosen simply because his disarming appearance and character- a seeming nonentity- is exactly the quality of being that Hitler saw in Himmler.
Guy
Guy Leven-Torres
29th November 2009
The Telegraph, my favourite newspaper wrote of the crooks and fraudsters who lay behind Climate-Gate, who now are complacently denying any criminal behaviour even in the face of hard forensic evidence and cold hard fact. Like I have have always said, the Left do not know Right from Wrong.
"This is business as usual for them. The world might be surprised but I am not. These guys have an attitude." Prof Jones, who has refused to quit despite calls even from within the green movement, said last week in a statement issued through University of East Anglia, "My colleagues and I accept that some of the published emails do not read well. I regret any upset or confusion caused as a result. Some were clearly written in the heat of the moment, others use colloquialisms frequently used between close colleagues." He suggested the theft of emails and publication first on a Russian server was "a concerted attempt to put a question mark over the science of climate change in the run-up to the Copenhagen talks".
He added: "Our global temperature series tallies with those of other, completely independent, groups of scientists working for NASA and the National Climate Data Centre in the United States, among others. Even if you were to ignore our findings, theirs show the same results. The facts speak for themselves; there is no need for anyone to manipulate them."
As I also said, watch out for an attempt to smear the hackers who managed to enter into the hallowed halls of Climate Deceit in East Anglia. What these ‘academics’ have done is in scholarly terms appalling and disgusting- the damage to real scholarship real and lasting, especially in the minds of an already ignorant apathetic public, now highly suspicious of a Scientific caucus seemingly populated and controlled by lunatics, who think not eating a sausage a day will ‘Save the Planet’ or that we all become ‘Vegans’- indeed the stuff of insanity that even twenty years ago, would have more credibility in an acute ward for the dangerously insane than a ‘respectable’ academic Department worthy of the name.
Now with the upsurge in religious extremism and especially ‘Last Days’ scenarios as the Mob screams for blood, led on by religious faith demagogues and rabble rousers from white supremacy fanatics, ‘Born Again’ cranks, to their fellow clowns in the likes of Anjem Choudary, science will become the new Witch to be hunted by the forming Inquisition and Scientist Finder generals of The Popular People’s Front of Untruth and Ignorance, as public anger grows- and it has only just started- followed of course by the bureaucrats and politicians, already mired in expenses fraud and worse seeing the rising wrath, will jump on the political bandwagon and try to take over from the likes of Lord Pearson and the rest of us who have for years been warning what was afoot. However, it was not Science and God that caused all this but corrupt lying criminals masquerading as ‘academics’.
I am impressed with UKIP’s new leader Lord Rannock of Pearson who has exposed this whole rotten edifice and confirmed what most of the informed knew, or suspected was going on. However a very strong word of caution- I know the Left inside out and why they hate us. So far they ignore us or at least try to, when not abusing us all as racists etc! However, things are changing. Things will become unpleasant beacuse they will not go quietly, without a fight and use of nasty tactics, even utilising Police and other agencies to maintain their grip.
Meanwhile UKIP have done themselves a great favour, by selecting the above as new leader- a man who shoulders the Truth- unafraid to speak out on controversial subjects, for fear of causing offence to minorities. He is now saying things and warning people about matters I presented to my local UKIP man years ago but who told me I was ‘scary’and simply ignored, what I had to show after all my research. In the face of such danger, the life saving Truth was suppressed for fear of alienating voters. I do not dislike the man and he is doing well locally where I live but he and his kind, have allowed the enemy to further its aims and establish its grip to the point, it now feels it can blithely ignore the growing public anger. The populace are not children and not as ignorant as some believe, that they need to be protected from ‘scary’ people like me. Forewarned– Forearmed my old C.O. used to say! I am just the unfortunate Messenger.
The necessity of knowing what kind of enemy we face and its strength allows one to defend with a fair chance of Reality- appeasement and hiding the ‘scary’ Truth and even abusing those like us, that have laboured for years to alert and save the siutaion is no excuse. Churchill was abused terribly, even by his own side who knew the reality of Hitler and the Nazi threat. Thank God Churchill gained friends within the elite, who covertly helped him to get the Truth out! Lord Pearson is a worthy leader who invited Geert Wilders to show his film ‘Fitna, about the Islamist threat. He has also spoken on film of the dangers of Islamisation, stating on Canadian TV and other Media that ‘Britain has 18 months’ to prevent the final victory of Islam in the UK.
I know that others in UKIP also tried in vain to get their views across, one of whom a very brave and incredibly well informed-educated astute man is suffering from cancer. I hope when he sees the news it will ease his pain somewhat! Lord Pearson is a man who will have my vote in the next election as he should yours! He tells the truth as does Nick Griffin who should also be getting a lot more credit. I may not like some of his policies but by God the man has courage! The hounding of the BNP by the elite is an absolute disgrace, as is the deliberate attempt to destroy UKIP by fining it for fraud and even imprisoning its MEPs on trumped up charges- all activities familiar in the Third Reich and USSR.
The title of this post is 'Miseocracy' from the Classical Greek for ‘hate’. The current elite hate Humanity and wish to reduce not just western economies and their wealth to harvest and enrich themselves from, while stearing some of the illicit takings towards ‘Third World’ dupes who in fact have the most to fear from these creeps and their murderous schemes but also to reduce their populations to a class of serfs in the Global Feudal System in which the elite will be a new caste of god, aided and abetted by their beauracratic Byzantine orders of lesser ‘nobility’ like the crooks who faked the Climate models above. Don’t they just love titles?
I have termed this New Age Global Elite, ‘The NAGE’ and invented the term Nagism in order to describe it and its octupus like features. It is in fact very much like Nazism, in that it uses bureaucratic terror and endless officialdom to thwart public dissent and rebellion. Indeed there were many states within states in the 3rd Reich, the most dangerous being the SS State of one ex-chicken farmer, turned bureaucrat, Heinrich Himmler whose name even today inspires fear and loathing across the globe. People that met him before and during his rise to power, described him as a ‘dapper almost feminine innocuous inoffensive figure, more bespectacled clerk than rising politician. Well mannered and the epitome of German respectability!’ Today we have just had our own ‘dapper almost feminine innocuous inoffensive figure, more bespectacled clerk than rising politician’ foisted upon us in the name of Van Rumpuy, that even his own sister calls ‘a clown’.
I am not laughing and neither should you! Van Rumpuy was chosen simply because his disarming appearance and character- a seeming nonentity- is exactly the quality of being that Hitler saw in Himmler.
Guy
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
Salute to Denmark
Politicians wake up too late to their errors
Why the hell didn't they listen to our warnings?
*************************************************************************************
SALUTE to Denmark .. This could very well happen here on our Continent...
Susan MacAllen is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org)
Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen
In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark . But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.
The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.< The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.
Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?
By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.
An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecast, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:
'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.'
'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.'
'Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.'
'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem .'
'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a
not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.'
It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.
In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe . (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)
If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test .
You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.
You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.
You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't.
In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration'.
'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said.
A large thorn in the side of Denmark's Imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, 'The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,' Hvilshoj says, 'There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, 'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.'
Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical Imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.
The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.
Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.
And meanwhile, Canadians clamour for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history ..we would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own..
Why the hell didn't they listen to our warnings?
*************************************************************************************
SALUTE to Denmark .. This could very well happen here on our Continent...
Susan MacAllen is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org)
Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen
In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark . But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.
The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.< The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.
Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?
By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.
An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecast, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:
'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.'
'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.'
'Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.'
'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem .'
'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a
not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.'
It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.
In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe . (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)
If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test .
You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.
You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.
You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't.
In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration'.
'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said.
A large thorn in the side of Denmark's Imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, 'The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,' Hvilshoj says, 'There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, 'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.'
Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical Imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.
The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.
Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.
And meanwhile, Canadians clamour for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history ..we would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own..
Tuesday, 1 September 2009
WHY OBAMA WON THE ELECTION
ONE OF THE BEST EXPLANATIONS OF WHY OBAMA WON THE ELECTION
From a teacher in the Nashville area
"We are worried about "the cow" when it is all about the "Ice Cream"
The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching third grade this year. The presidential election was heating up and
some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have
an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech
and the class would vote. To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students
should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and
Olivia were picked to run for the top spot. The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids. I thought Jamie might have an advantage because
he got lots of parental support. I had never seen Olivia's mother. The day arrived when they were to make their speeches.
Jamie went first. He had specific ideas about how to make our class
a better place. He ended by promising to do his very best. Everyone
applauded and he sat down. Now it was Olivia's turn to speak. Her speech was concise. She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give
you ice cream." Then she sat down.
The class went wild. "Yes! Yes! We want ice cream." She surely would say more, but she did not have to.
A discussion followed. Questions were asked, like "How did she plan to
pay for the ice cream?" She wasn't sure. "Would her parents buy it
or would the class pay for it." She didn't know. What's more, the class
really didn't care. All they were thinking about was ice cream. It didn't mean that Olivia was bad, or that it was wrong to want ice cream.
The fact remained, however, that Jamie was forgotten and Olivia won by
a landslide. Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he essentially offered ice cream
and 52 percent of the people reacted like nine year olds. WE THE PEOPLE
wanted ice cream! The other 48 percent know they're going to have to
feed the cow and clean up the mess." Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone --- that
they have not first taken away from someone else.
History Lesson
The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775 - they've had 234 years to get it right; it is broke, and even though heavily subsidized, it can't compete with private sector FedExp and UPS services.
Social Security was established in 1935 - they've had 74 years to get it right; it is broke.Fannie Mae was established in 1938 - they've had 71 years to get it right; it is broke..
Freddie Mac was established in 1970 - they've had 39 years to get it right; it is broke.
Together Fannie and Freddie have now led the entire world into the worst economic collapse in 80 years.The War on Poverty was started in 1964 - they've had 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our hard earned money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor"; it hasn't worked to better the poor at all.Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965 - they've had 44 years to get it right; they are both broke; and now our government dares to mention them as the models for all
US health care.
AMTRAK was established in 1970 - they've had 39 years to get it right; last year they bailed it out ...and it still continues to run at a loss!
This year, a trillion dollars was committed in the massive political payoff called the Stimulus Bill of 2009; it shows NO sign of working. It's been used to increase the size of governments across
America and raise government salaries while the rest of us suffer from economic hardships. It has yet to create a single new private sector job. Added to that is the fact that our national debt projections (approaching $10 trillion) have already increased 400% in the last six months!!
"Cash for Clunkers" was established in 2009 and went broke in 2009 ....after 80% of the cars purchased turned out to be produced by foreign companies! And dealers nationwide are buried under bureaucratic paperwork demanded by a government that still is not yet paying them what was promised.
So .....with a perfect 100% failure rate, and a record that proves that each and every "service" shoved down our throats by an over-reaching government turns into disaster, how could any well-informed American trust our government to run or even set policies for America's health care system - - 17% of our economy?
Maybe ....no, CERTAINLY ....each and every one of us has a personal responsibility to let others in on this brilliant governmental record before the elections in 2010. Then help to remove from office those idiots on BOTH sides of the aisle who are voting to destroy capitalism and destroy our grandchildren's future! If we do not succeed in turning this government around, the USA will be Socialistic by 2016.
From a teacher in the Nashville area
"We are worried about "the cow" when it is all about the "Ice Cream"
The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching third grade this year. The presidential election was heating up and
some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have
an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech
and the class would vote. To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students
should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and
Olivia were picked to run for the top spot. The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids. I thought Jamie might have an advantage because
he got lots of parental support. I had never seen Olivia's mother. The day arrived when they were to make their speeches.
Jamie went first. He had specific ideas about how to make our class
a better place. He ended by promising to do his very best. Everyone
applauded and he sat down. Now it was Olivia's turn to speak. Her speech was concise. She said, "If you will vote for me, I will give
you ice cream." Then she sat down.
The class went wild. "Yes! Yes! We want ice cream." She surely would say more, but she did not have to.
A discussion followed. Questions were asked, like "How did she plan to
pay for the ice cream?" She wasn't sure. "Would her parents buy it
or would the class pay for it." She didn't know. What's more, the class
really didn't care. All they were thinking about was ice cream. It didn't mean that Olivia was bad, or that it was wrong to want ice cream.
The fact remained, however, that Jamie was forgotten and Olivia won by
a landslide. Every time Barack Obama opened his mouth he essentially offered ice cream
and 52 percent of the people reacted like nine year olds. WE THE PEOPLE
wanted ice cream! The other 48 percent know they're going to have to
feed the cow and clean up the mess." Remember, the government cannot give anything to anyone --- that
they have not first taken away from someone else.
History Lesson
The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775 - they've had 234 years to get it right; it is broke, and even though heavily subsidized, it can't compete with private sector FedExp and UPS services.
Social Security was established in 1935 - they've had 74 years to get it right; it is broke.Fannie Mae was established in 1938 - they've had 71 years to get it right; it is broke..
Freddie Mac was established in 1970 - they've had 39 years to get it right; it is broke.
Together Fannie and Freddie have now led the entire world into the worst economic collapse in 80 years.The War on Poverty was started in 1964 - they've had 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our hard earned money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor"; it hasn't worked to better the poor at all.Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965 - they've had 44 years to get it right; they are both broke; and now our government dares to mention them as the models for all
US health care.
AMTRAK was established in 1970 - they've had 39 years to get it right; last year they bailed it out ...and it still continues to run at a loss!
This year, a trillion dollars was committed in the massive political payoff called the Stimulus Bill of 2009; it shows NO sign of working. It's been used to increase the size of governments across
America and raise government salaries while the rest of us suffer from economic hardships. It has yet to create a single new private sector job. Added to that is the fact that our national debt projections (approaching $10 trillion) have already increased 400% in the last six months!!
"Cash for Clunkers" was established in 2009 and went broke in 2009 ....after 80% of the cars purchased turned out to be produced by foreign companies! And dealers nationwide are buried under bureaucratic paperwork demanded by a government that still is not yet paying them what was promised.
So .....with a perfect 100% failure rate, and a record that proves that each and every "service" shoved down our throats by an over-reaching government turns into disaster, how could any well-informed American trust our government to run or even set policies for America's health care system - - 17% of our economy?
Maybe ....no, CERTAINLY ....each and every one of us has a personal responsibility to let others in on this brilliant governmental record before the elections in 2010. Then help to remove from office those idiots on BOTH sides of the aisle who are voting to destroy capitalism and destroy our grandchildren's future! If we do not succeed in turning this government around, the USA will be Socialistic by 2016.
Monday, 3 August 2009
How the elite control your mind
How the Elite control your mind & your life
"The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England in 1919 [and] believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." - Barry Goldwater
Have you ever thought something is wrong? Have you ever thought you were being lied to by your politicians, government, teachers? Have you ever thought you were being manipulated by the television? Have you ever wondered about how the world really works? Have you ever caught the media in a lie? Do you want to know how money really works? Have you ever wondered what the elite of this world believe & where they are taking us? Here you will have an opportunity to at least start to find the true nature of the world & how we have been misled & deceived at every level.
The Globalist Agenda represents a plan to bring all of Earth's inhabitants under the control of a single, global state. There is a small, but powerful group of individuals who are the architects & instigators behind the formation & implementation of this "New World Order". Using their influence through international organisations such as the World Bank, the IMF, the CFR, the United Nations & NATO, the objective of these internationalists is nothing less than the subjugation of everyone on the planet to a one world government. Under the guise of keeping us all safe with anti-terrorist laws, citizens will lose their civil liberties preventing any dissent against Big Brother. The purpose of this website is to first provide a concise base of knowledge explaining the historical origins & mechanisms of the "one-world government" plan, & second, to provide avenues of resistance & methodologies for survival within the Chaos purposely imposed within this plot to enslave all of humanity.
"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words & money." - Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in "Foreign Affairs", July/August 1995.
What would you do if you knew all the things we know, would you stand up for truth, or would you turn away too? And then what if you saw all of the things that's wrong would you stand tall & strong or would you turn & walk away? - Musician Paris from his song "What Would You Do?" featuring Pink
“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 17th February, 1950
- (from Neil Gilmour)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)