Anonymous letter

No one mentions the law of treason which covers all of this.

For anyone to live in this country and enjoy the Queen’s Peace you are automatically required to give her your allegiance. The essence of treason is the breaking of that allegiance. To adhere to the Queen’s enemies, or to give them aid and comfort here or elsewhere, is an act of treason. Abu Qatada, for example, was involved in actions on all these counts and should have been arrested and charged with treason.

However the clever defence lawyer would have required it to be proved in court that the Queen remains our Sovereign, despite her being an EU citizen subject to the law and government of the EU, in her own country. It is very difficult to have allegiance to someone who has been created your equal as a citizen of the EU. This would bring the whole house of cards tumbling down much to the embarrassment of our politicians who are equally guilty of treason.

What we have to remember is that our Constitution is a series of contracts with our Sovereign, which tell us and promises us, how we are to be governed. If we now do not have a Sovereign, then our Constitution becomes null and void.

This was a very clever way of doing, what the politicians have done - and while she plays the part of our Sovereign, fulfilling the public role and as she has undoubtedly accepted mediatisation and thus she keeps the titular and privileged position, she has given up any governmental role.

This is precisely what the Fabian Society of Socialists, of which Blair was the chairman, as was Attlee and from where all the Labour party Prime Ministers originated, have planned from the outset, in 1894, when the Society was formed. Remember, too, that the Labour Party and the London School of Economics are Fabian Society creations. They also planned, at the same time, to “infiltrate, permeate and penetrate”(their words) all of our institutions and offices of state.

If they have achieved the abolition of the Monarchy as they have planned, is it too far fetched to consider that they have also been successful with our institutions and offices of state?

If you think Dame Helen Mirren, as the Queen, is an Oscar winning performance then how will you adjudge the performance of the lady who has the key to the Royal Dressing Up Box and delivers a very heart stirring speech that has been written for her?

DB.

Letter exchange on treason.

In the event that you might be interested.

 

Chloe Smith,  MP for Norwich,  advocates an EU referendum in 2017  -  long after the Lisbon Treaty has outlawed any such thing.  Her letter is two down.

 

Though lengthy (the points cannot be covered in less),  you might find my response of interest.

 

Rex

 -----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: 12 July 2013 11:55
To: Smith, Chloe
Subject: RE: Let Britain Decide

 

Dear Chloe

 

So many thanks for your email though I regret to say you overlook several inescapable facts.

 

First,  what do you call it when the British people are knowingly and wilfully deceived,  tricked and betrayed into foreign rule by their own Parliament ?  (For that as you well know,  is what we have).

 

It is High Treason.  That is why Heath and every politician since 1972 has withheld this vital truth from the people.  Britain has gone to war many times to prevent her takeover by foreigners and it is still clear that the British public would never accept or go along with the European connection if they knew the true intention was to destabilise,  weaken and undermine this country into rule by Brussels. 

 

Treason is the most serious and heinous crime in Britain.  It cannot become law nor can it oblige obedience.  It is illegal.  Any political discussion that ignores this basic truth of Heath’s and every following Parliament’s treason cannot be entertained as it has lost touch with reality,  is a sham and it cannot bind the nation or her people.

 

Second,  under English Constitutional and Common Law,  Britain is not (and has never been) part of the EU.  That simple fact in law cannot be changed merely by parliamentary pretence or wishful thinking.  As this law is beyond the reach of Parliament to alter or repeal,  it is inviolable.  And even though attempts to nullify it have naturally failed,  it cannot be simply ignored.  The Attorney General concedes it to be that by which we ultimately live.

 

Third,  my previous letter provides evidence that has been readily accepted by police forces across the country for prosecution.  It clearly exposes the ongoing and wilful parliamentary deceit and betrayal and the outrageous pretence that the British people knowingly signed up to foreign rule.  They did nothing of the sort.  They agreed to a trading arrangement only  -  for that is all they were permitted to know.  The rest was kept strictly secret,  that they should never find out until it was too late.  That is blanket corruption up to the highest levels. 

 

As public servants,  no parliament has the power to autocratically sign its people to foreign rule.  Particularly not,  when the people are deliberately tricked and mislead about the true intention.  But that is what has happened  -  several times with the EU Treaties that politicians so calculatingly signed.  Not so many years ago,  William Joyce (“Lord Haw-Haw”) was hanged for the lesser treasonable offence of simply broadcasting anti-British material. 

 

Fourth,  in repeated surveys over 80% of British people want no part of the EU.  That does not mean negotiated membership,  it means no part at all.  They see the EU precisely for the European Soviet that it is.  It derives as you know,  from Hitler’s Nazi party.  Those fewer who support joining the EU do so out of ignorance of the truth.  They simply do not know or comprehend the Union’s real aims and what it would mean for them.  Nobody in their right mind would knowingly vote to join a dictatorship.  And their numbers dwindle with time as the truth becomes known. 

 

Fifth,  even if Britain were part of the EU,  it is very unlikely that the 27 member states (particularly Greece,  Italy,  Spain,  Ireland and Portugal) would ever agree Britain’s negotiated terms as they too will demand the same  -  but not get them.  I think you know as well as I do,  that Mr Cameron’s planned negotiation is unlikely to succeed as one cannot negotiate with an autocracy.

 

Sixth,  you cannot have a referendum for something that is not factual and is an illegal pretence. 

 

So you see unlike the beliefs in your letter,  the British people have never been consulted over EU membership,  given its true meaning.  Surveys consistently show that the vast majority do not and would never accept it.  And as widely foreseen,  any referendum would not offer an In-Out choice,  only “Which terms do you want ?”.  That too,  would be deeply undemocratic. 

 

Not only has Mr Cameron reneged repeatedly on his referendum “cast-iron guarantee” to voters upon his becoming Prime Minister (since May 2010),  but he reportedly admits the intention “never to allow Britain to leave the EU”.  Given his track record,  does he really expect to be re-elected in 2015 and especially when the Lisbon Treaty comes into full force in November 2014 ? 

 

This 294 page document finalises the three tier politburo EU dictatorship,  among other things to abolish the Conservative,  Labour and Liberal Democrat Parties and to extinguish all possibility of an EU referendum as that process is not recognised by the European Council.  This rather strongly suggests that the Prime Minister uses his referendum dithering to calm the public until the matter is beyond possibility and thus out of his hands.  I am deeply sorry to have to say that your 2017 “right time for a referendum” appears similarly fraudulent as it will not by then be a possibility.  He will not then have a job anyway.  And unfortunately,  neither will you.

 

It is regrettable that with events over the last 30 or 40 years,  public trust in Britain’s politicians has never been lower.  While the deceit and betrayal continues to beggar belief,  it is clear that people are continually fobbed-off with yet more sleight of hand and lies of democratic pretence.  I fully recognise however,  that you strive to serve the people.  Some Members do,  though the generality of Parliament is quite different and fixates on the Lib-Lab-Con ideology of Bilderberg domination policy. 

 

With your clear intelligence and political ability,  I am sad that you choose to support this when Britain so desperately needs independent members of Parliament to properly follow our laws (not the imported European obligations),  people’s wishes (not an entirely different agenda) and look after our country’s needs (instead of aiding in its systematic destruction). 

 

I urge you to re-read my earlier letter below for your clear understanding of the inescapable truths that it contains. 

 

Kindest regards,

 

Rex Poulton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Chloe [mailto:chloe@chloesmith.org.uk]
Sent: 09 July 2013 11:05
To: R
Subject: Re: Let Britain Decide

 

 

 

Dear Mr Poulton,

 

I am always pleased to receive correspondence from constituents who feel passionately about issues that affect us in Norwich, and indeed the wider UK. Recently, many of you have written to me regarding the European Union and more specifically, a referendum to give the British public their voice on this historic issue.

 

On 5th July, Parliament debated the Private Member’s Bill brought forward by James Wharton MP on the issue of an EU referendum. The Bill outlines the terms for a Referendum that would take place in 2017, once the Prime Minister has completed negotiations on the UK’s membership of the EU.

 

I wanted to write to you to explain in more detail why I voted for the Bill and to give you detailed information about how our relationship with the EU impacts so many areas of our lives in the UK.

 

What has been clear from the letters, emails and survey responses that I have received in recent months, is that there is a broad range of views in Norwich on the EU. Many of you are eager for a referendum to show your support for our membership of the EU; many are equally in favour of the referendum, but wish to vote against our membership of the EU. Some do not feel there is a need for a referendum at all.

 

It is because of this diverse and passionate strength of feeling that I believe that such an historic decision, with far-reaching consequences must be made by the British people themselves.

 

It has been 40 years since the British public were last consulted, and in that time, the UK, the EU and the wider world has changed immeasurably. I believe it is now time to renegotiate our membership terms to secure a better deal for Britain. It is this new deal that will be put before the public for their say.

 

Personally, I have always been Eurosceptic. For me, the question is about when is the right time to have the referendum. I believe that 2017 is the right time, allowing for renegotiation and proper debate, as well as of course our own economic efforts.

 

I have been asked by some constituents for more information on how the relationship with the EU affects the UK to help them better understand the complex issues before a referendum takes place. The Parliamentary library, which is strictly impartial, has written a very detailed report on our membership of the EU and how it affects a range of policy areas. You can find the full report on my website via this link: http://chloesmithmp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/EU-Library-Paper.pdf

 

I look forward to continuing the spirited debate on the EU with constituents and in Parliament, and giving people in Norwich their deserved say on such a historic issue.

 

With best wishes,

 

Chloe

 

 

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:52 PM, R <alpha14@wewantourcountryback.co.uk> wrote:

 

 

Dear Chloe

 

Many thanks for your email. 

 

Britain does not actually need a referendum to leave the European Union.  Because Britain is not actually IN the European Union.  I will explain.

 

When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972,  Edward Heath knowingly and wilfully deceived and betrayed the British people into the hands of a foreign power, the EEC/EU.  THAT was high treason.  Upon signing, his treason instantly removed him from lawful office and his treasonous act failed to become legally binding because treason cannot do that.  Moreover, his then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly because a treasonous government is not lawful.  It is an illegal pretence.

 

No parliament can bind a successor.  Each following parliament therefore,  has been free to reverse Heath’s treachery.  None has.  Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and deliberately lied and continued Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had signed up to EEC/EU rule.  Every parliament since Heath’s therefore,  is and has been an unlawful assembly committing treason.  Not only has every parliament deliberately furthered Heath’s criminal intent,  but they have each conspired to deceitfully conceal the truth of their illicit activities from the British public as it has always been known that the British people would object most violently were they ever to find out.  Massive documentary evidence of this exists.  (http://www.acasefortreason.org.uk/index.php/the-evidence-files and Hansard).

 

No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or action by an unlawful assembly.  British law (and absolute supremacy of our imperial system of measurement, for example) therefore stand as they were immediately prior to signing of the 1972 Act.  Britain is thus not part of the EU as every Treaty and all statute law since 1972 whether or not given the Royal Assent,  is unlawful, null and void.  In consequence,  the European Union has no lawful influence in Britain whatsoever.  Neither has European (Napoleonic) Law.  It is all make believe.  Most notably, the Attorney General acknowledges this summary.

 

It is therefore high treason to pretend or assert that Britain is part of the EU and many in Westminster are guilty of that.  Treason is the most serious crime in English law as it is committed (generally deliberately) against the sovereign interests,  national security and collective political will of the British people  -  solely for political or other eventual gain of others not necessarily of this country.

 

So as you can see,  Britain has never been part of the European Union in the first place.  It needs only a responsible,  sincere,  trustworthy and truthful government that will for a change,  put our country first and will act in the genuine interests of our country that current MPs have solemnly sworn a lifetime oath of allegiance to serve,  in order for our once Great Britain to get back on its feet and become the world leader it used to be.  If the more than £65 billion (2008 figure) frivolously thrown away into the unaccountable EU bottomless pit every year by Ministers were spent on Britain instead,  we’d have that Great Britain back in a trice.

 

Kindest regards,

 

Rex Poulton

 

 

Chloe Smith
Member of Parliament for Norwich Northwww.chloesmith.org.uk

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Constitution is the property of a nation, not of those who exercise government.

For those who are angered at the progressive loss of our country at the hands of our own politicians,  there is something we can all do about it.

 

Reporting politicians’ crimes of treason against their own country of solemnly sworn allegiance and duty to serve,  is having increasing affect as police forces acknowledge the evidence provided to them.  But we need many more people to submit treason reports. 

 

The most effective way of spreading the word is through the people who know us and who trust our judgement. 

 

This is to ask you all to forward the attached email (below) to everyone you know and to ask them to do the same,  please.

 

Kindest regards,

 

Rex

=================================================

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972,  Edward Heath knowingly and wilfully deceived and betrayed the British people into foreign rule by the EEC/EU.  THAT was high treason.  Upon signing, his treason instantly removed him from lawful office and his treasonous act failed to become legally binding because treason cannot do that.  Moreover, his then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly because a treasonous government is not lawful.  It is an illegal pretence.

 

No parliament can bind a successor.  Each following parliament therefore,  has been free to reverse Heath’s treachery.  None has.  Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and deliberately lied,  faithfully pursuing Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly signed up to EEC/EU rule.  In any case,  neither he nor they ever had the power to make such an undertaking over the people’s heads.  Every parliament since Heath’s therefore,  is and has been an unlawful assembly committing treason of the highest order.  Not only has each parliament deliberately furthered Heath’s criminal objective,  but they have conspired to deceitfully conceal the truth of their illicit activities from the British public whom they have always known would object most violently were they ever to find out.  Massive documentary evidence of this exists.  (http://www.acasefortreason.org.uk/index.php/the-evidence-files and Hansard).

  

No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or action by an unlawful assembly.  Britain and her English Constitutional and Common Law stand unaltered and as they were immediately prior to signing of the 1972 Act.  Indeed,  our Constitutional and Common Law cannot be altered or repealed because it is beyond Parliament’s reach to do so. 

 

Britain is thus not part of the EU as every Treaty and all statute law since 1972 whether or not given the Royal Assent,  is unlawful, null and void.  In consequence,  the European Union has no legitimate influence in Britain whatsoever.  Neither has European (Napoleonic) Law.  It is all parliamentary make believe.  Interestingly, the Attorney General (himself,  a politician) concedes this summary.

 

Government has no right to make itself a party in any debate respecting the principles or modes of forming or of changing constitutions.  It is not for the benefit of those who exercise the powers of government,  that constitutions and the governments issuing from them,  are established.  In all those matters, the rights of judging and acting are in those who pay,  not those who receive.

 

A Constitution is the property of a nation,  not of those who exercise government.

 

So many politicians past and present have committed high treason against the British people.  This can be resolved by reporting their offences to the nation’s police forces.  For more on that,  please watch the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ry5cmO9CXw and then visit the websites http://www.acasefortreason.org.uk/ and http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/

 

Rex Poulton

Is this a trap?

   You cannot have a referendum on something that is illegal in the first place, which the EU is.

http://tinyurl.com/c3dzrqq

  Since Parliament acts on behalf of the people, to have a referendum would effectively be asking the British people to rewrite the Constitution and if we lost, which we would because they would make sure of it, as they did in 1975... we would have lost everything else as well.

  Is this what Cameron is up to, making 'us' rewrite the Constitution, he wouldn't be that devious - or would he? 

 

Be careful what you wish for folks, this could well be a trap.

LISBON TREATY IN FULL EFFECT NOV 2013

Is anti-democratic EU the Fourth Reich Hitler dreamed of?
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=164216#164216

The Lisbon Treaty will come into full effect in November 2014 which is
why Cameron offered a 2015 Referendum
Lisbon Treaty summary
The 294 page Treaty of Lisbon sets up a three tier politburo
dictatorship, and came into force on 1st January 2009. It gives the EU
more powers than the 465 page EU Constitution by amending and adding
the missing clauses to the existing five treaties. So you need to read
all six treaties together, thousands of unreadable pages which
includes Maastricht; and then see through its concealment and
deception to get the full picture. There will be no more treaties: the
six complete the EU.
http://www.eutruth.org.uk/lisbononepage.html

Article 1-1a Unlike Britain, the EU nation is atheist; its laws are
not based on Christianity.
1-4 New article 2. It is the EU's values that count, not the wishes of
the people. The state comes first, soviet style.


1a and Article 2.1-6 make it very clear our new nation will be the
European Union, not Britain.


2-2 and 2.3 Our former borders will mean nothing.


2-4 Gives the EU the power to force Britain into the Euro.


3a Puts the EU's former nations into the same position Soviet
satellite states enjoyed.


3a-3 Compels former nations to obey the EU. They shall carry out the
EU's tasks, and may not oppose it.


3b-1 Conferral - the EU will not exceed the powers it has taken in the
Treaties. Negated by 3b.3:


3b-3 If local powers can better be used by the EU, the EU will use them.


3b-4. Proportionality: The EU will not use more force than is
necessary to compel us to comply with the Treaties.
Article 6 The EU recognises its own Charter of the EU's Rights of 2007.


6-2 The EU accedes to the EU Convention on Human Rights, but not where
it affects the EU's power.


6-3.c Paves the way for The European Council to become independent of
Heads of State, and become a politburo.


Article 8. Equality. In glorious Soviet style. And we are forced to
accept EU citizenship.


Article 8A-1 to 4 Prepares the way for the abolition of Westminster:
8A-2 Heads of state can be bypassed in favour of "government;"
National Parliaments bypassed direct to citizens.


8A-3. Decisions to be taken as close as possible to the citizen.
Eurospeak for Regions, not Parliaments.


8A-4. Will be used to abolish our Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem
Parties. It's the old EU constitution I-46-4 word for word: Political
parties to be at the European level. The Madrid conference defined
this in 1999 as parties with voters in 10 or more former nations. Our
parties count voters in just one nation. Goodbye to the Lib-Lab-Con.


8B-3. The Commission may use consultation. Ballots, elections,
referendums or democracy are not to be its way.


8B-4 One million citizens may petition the Commission to implement the
glorious EU Treaties. We can only agree, Soviet style. Old EU
constitution clause I-47-4.


9 and 9A Implement EU constitution clauses I-19 to I-27 List of
Institutions. Confirms their interest in the Regions.


There are three governing bodies which are unelected politburos,
soviet style, each with up to 27 members:
9B The European Council is made up of heads of state, or "government"
which could be any politician of their choosing. It meets 4 times a
year, and chooses (and can fire) its President for 2.5 years, two
terms maximum. He can be anyone from anywhere but not a head of state;
he can fire a Commissioner.
9C The Council of Ministers, now The Council, is senior bureaucrat
level; controls laws, the budget and policy.


9D The third level is the Commissioners, 20 people, anyone, from each
country, provided (clause 3) he is not anti-EU. The Commission is the
executive, the government or bureaucracy.


These three are politburos where EU politicians choose politicians;
there are no elections to positions of power. Unlike Westminster, the
EU Parliament in Brussels, the only elected body, has no executive
power; it is a sham.
9E An EU foreign minister shall be appointed, and will be a Vice
President of the Commission.


9F EU courts and EU judges shall enforce the six EU Treaties and
former nations shall comply.


Article 10 Enhanced Cooperation: Former nations may wish to reinforce
the EU's integration using any powers remaining outside the EU's
absolute power. If they don't, the Council can enforce enhanced
cooperation if former nations won't cooperate. Clause 3: Only
cooperating nations may vote in the council.
10-4 We must obey the acquis communautaire, 170,000 pages of active EU
law. (EU regulations millions of pages)


10A c-3 Scores of clauses like this one confirm the EU is a military
union. A military dictatorship.



That is just the first 26 pages of the 294. The six treaties
repetitively remove all Westminster's powers.
There are no provisions for elections to Westminster, which will
close. The EU's 120,000 regulations will close most of Britain's 4.5
million small businesses and control our lives more closely than were
Soviet citizens. Harmonising our laws with the EU over 36 years has
given us the laws of a police state, which the EU will enforce. Lisbon
(illegally) 'took primacy' over the British Constitution, which it
nullifies, and as far as the EU, their puppet government in
Westminster and our corrupted courts are concerned, the EU became our
nation, and Britain was abolished as a nation on 1st January 2009.

+44 (0)7786 952037

www.thisweek.org.uk

www.dialectradio.co.uk

Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered that shall not be
revealed; and nothing hid that shall not be made known. What I tell
you in darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye hear in the
ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27


www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org

www.mediafor911truth.org

www.pilotsfor911truth.org

www.mp911truth.org

www.ae911truth.org

www.rl911truth.org

www.stj911.org

www.l911t.com

www.v911t.org