Sunday, 13 April 2014

Cowboy takes on US government, wins first battle

Subject: Cowboy takes on US government, wins first battle
To:
zoilandon@msn.com

I am sending this message only to my European and UK friends.
What happened yesterday may be the biggest event in our history in terms of property rights, federal lawlessness, and the people's ability and resolve to fix America. It is a template for other Western countries.
Cliven Bundy is a 67 year old rancher whose family had used a 600,000 acre plot of semidesert land for grazing since 1887. Under common law, land use is very important in determining ownership.
However, the US government started taking land from the states decades ago. The land grab was greatly increased under Clinton. The Bureau of Land Management was created decades ago to manage federal land, but as time went on, it was used increasingly to simply remove farmers and ranchers from land that had been used by their ancestors for many generations.
Obama is a statist and central government radical who seems to believe that Sates' rights and even individual rights are subordinate to federal law and power. No president has ever transferred more power from states and indiduals to the federal government than Obama.
The BLM descended on the Bundy ranch earlier this week with 200 men armed with assault rifles. They set up sniper posts and told Bundy that his cows were "trespassing" on federal land. Previously, Bundy was paying them to manage his ranch land, which had been leased to his family for 140 years but they did nothing. So he stopped paying years ago.
They rounded up 700 head of his cattle and were going to ship it away to an auction. Bundy's family tried to take photos of this and some, including a woman, were wrestled to the ground and roughed up. The news of this abuse spread through the internet and informal state militias and other groups went in and confronted the BLM thugs.
Some brave cowboys went in and released the cattle held by the BLM. More groups vowed to travel to the ranch and help.
The next day, BLM men took positions behind their patrol vehicles, while the citizens' groups advanced toward them on foot and horseback. Many of them had been in the military and in police work. They too were armed and one of the militia leaders had ealier said "We are armed and not afraid to shoot."
The BLM men warned the crowd not to come any closer or they would shoot these civilians. But the crowd continued to advance, knowing that the entire scene was being videotaped and that the BLM would not dare to shoot civilians for fear of triggering a civil war, which some Americans feel is imminent already due to government lawlessness and abuse of citizens.
The BLM backed down. They then entered into negotiations with the Bundys and the standoff ended when the BLM said they were calling off the operation.
Some state officials and even judges sided with the Bundys.
This could lead to a shakeup of American law under pressure from those of us who believe in the Constitution and feel we have had enough.
This is not by any means the whole story. Please go to InfoWars and search for if. Probably you will not find anything BUT this story today.
It reminded me of the way Putin took Crimea. He understood that what the Western powers had done in Ukraine was unlawful and he did what he thought was necessary to right the wrong. The world is starting to say enough.
You folks don't have guns but you can avail yourselves of civil disobedience in different ways to oppose the EU and their puppets.. Maybe it is time for the world to fight back. Carpe diem, seize the moment.
Don Hank
 
 
----- Original Message -----

 
Friday, 11 April 2014 20:15

Last Man Standing: Nevada Ranch Family in Fedgov Face-off

Written by  
http://www.thenewamerican.com/media/k2/items/cache/49f2cdbf417452a0c4c74376dd6d36a4_XL.jpg
Tensions are rising and the potential for violence is escalating in Nevada’s Mohave Desert. Last week more than 200 armed federal agents from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and other agencies, many decked out in camouflage uniforms, descended on the area around Bunkerville, a small town 70 miles northeast of Las Vegas, near Nevada’s borders with Arizona and Utah. According to coverage one is likely to see from the Establishment media, the show of force is necessary to remove Cliven Bundy’s cattle from “public lands” where they are, allegedly, damaging the “fragile” habitat of the protected desert tortoise. That is the story that is being dispensed by the BLM and retailed in most media accounts.
Cliven Bundy (shown) and his family, friends and neighbors, as well as some legal scholars, tell a different story. According to Bundy, whose family has been ranching in the area since the 1800s, the BLM’s armed invasion and occupation of Nevada has nothing to do with protecting the tortoise and everything to do with running him off the land, as it has already done to all of the other ranchers in Clark County. He notes that more than 50 other ranchers have been bankrupted, intimidated, and forced to give up their land and legal property rights. He is, he points out, “the last man standing”; and now that generations of ranching families have been driven out, federal officials have dropped the pretense that it is all about saving the “endangered” tortoise and have actually been killing the reptiles by the hundreds.
Yes, that is true; as reported by the liberal Huffington Post and other media outlets last year, the BLM began “euthanizing” the tortoises, claiming the agency did not have sufficient funds in its budget to manage the habitat. How then, critics point out, can the BLM justify the $1 million or more that it will spend rounding up the Bundy family’s cattle. And if the tortoise habitat is so precious and sensitive that the sparse cattle population — which had co-existed with the turtles for generations — had to be removed, why has the BLM been selling the former ranch land to developers?


The World is Watching
On a closer examination, the case against Cliven Bundy is not the open-and-shut case the federal government, the media, and the environmental activist groups, such as the Center for Biological Diversity, make it out to be. As California State University criminology professor Jason Kissner pointed out in a column for American Thinker yesterday, it is the Obama administration’s BLM and Attorney General Eric Holder that are engaged in “brazen lawlessness.” Federal officials are exploiting the fact that few Americans understand the legal complexities of the “split estate,” “prior appropriation doctrine,” and other principles governing water rights, grazing rights, and other land use/property rights on “public” and private lands, that are different in the arid West than in other parts of the country.
The current battle between the Bundys and the Feds is a replay of the decades-long confrontation between various federal agencies and the late Wayne Hage, the Nevada rancher/liberty activist/scholar who won multiple court victories and landmark decisions against federal overreach. In an interview with The New American in 2002, Hage explained the important legal distinctions that govern property rights in the West, particularly as they apply to so-called public lands.
For years, the Hage family had been subjected to threats, intimidation, and fines, and — like the Bundys — had their cattle illegally confiscated by federal agents. And, as with the Bundys, the Hages were portrayed by the Feds and their compliant media shills as scofflaws and environmental criminals who deserved to be thrown into the slammer. Last year, as we reported, a federal court once again vindicated the Hages, although by that time Wayne Hage and his wife, former Congresswoman Helen Chenoweth-Hage, had both passed away six years earlier.
Chief Judge Robert C. Jones of the Federal District Court of Nevada issued a blistering decision that charged officials of the BLM and other agencies with malicious and criminal conduct, and actually engaging in a decades-long “conspiracy” against the Hages.
Judge Jones said he found that “the government and the agents of the government in that locale, sometime in the ’70s and ’80s, entered into a conspiracy, a literal, intentional conspiracy, to deprive the Hages of not only their permit grazing rights, for whatever reason, but also to deprive them of their vested property rights under the takings clause, and I find that that’s a sufficient basis to hold that there is irreparable harm if I don’t ... Restrain the government from continuing in that conduct.”
"In the present case,” declared Judge Jones, “the Government's actions over the past two decades shock the conscience of the Court."
The findings of Judge Jones in the Hage case should be borne in mind as tensions mount in Clark County, where the actions of the BLM are shocking the conscience of the entire nation. Thanks to hundreds of the Bundy family’s friends, neighbors, and relatives who are posting videos of the federal “occupation” on social media, as well as the widespread attention being focused on this case by independent media, the actions of the BLM and the Obama administration cannot remain hidden behind the barricades, road blocks, and armed agents.
The angry face-offs between the federal agents and outraged residents and supporters evoke images of the deadly confrontations at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992 and Waco, Texas in 1993.
Over the past week, federal agents were filmed using tasers against 39-year-old Ammon Bundy, one of Cliven’s sons, setting their K-9 unit dogs on other supporters, and manhandling others, including tackling one of Cliven Bundy’s sisters. Another of Bundy’s sons, Dave Bundy, was arrested and cited for “failing to disperse” and “resisting arrest.” He was reportedly held overnight and released the next day.
(The article continues after the two videos below.)




Cliven Bundy may be the last rancher standing in Nevada’s Clark County, but he and his family are not standing alone; patriots from across the country are rallying to their support. Many are being spurred to do so by the disturbing videos that have gone viral.
“Watching that video last night created a visceral reaction in me,” Arizona state Representative Kelly Townsend, a tea party Republican, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “It sounds dramatic, but it reminded me of Tiananmen Square. I don’t recognize my country at this point.”
Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore (R-Las Vegas) called the footage “horrifying.”
“I’m highly offended by the feds coming in as aggressively as they have,” Fiore said in an interview with the Review-Journal.
Sheriff Richard Mack, who heads the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA), along with military and police members of Oath Keepers, as well as elected legislators from the states of Nevada, Arizona, Utah, and Washington, are headed to Clark County to stand with the Bundy family. With the growing presence of supporters and the increasing media attention this is causing, hopefully there will be less chance of federal police agencies escalating this standoff into another deadly “Waco” tragedy.
Photo: Cliven Bundy
Related articles:
 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.
—Dietrich Bonhoeffer
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUogxO8UFqrAeP0dmLPyoR9v4rihBv1_BzQr_zXSvh4NtR9Mmr0QAel_n6_najTnEyA8xQ-vHaWpvmObfXgAOWMdxeXKEMXVIPqY2v64aAYrP-Dis-Y8wnvKXmSJWDzkpxqmpjY7KfSr1R/s1600/freedom-for-all.jpg

Sunday, 6 April 2014

Goodbye Brussels - hello progress

Alvechurch Bugle  4 – 021  ( 6 – 4 – 14 )
 
 
Is the dam of British frustration with the EU about to burst and drown the dwindling band of traitorous career politicians who even now, would have us believe that the EU benefits Britain ?  
Today, David Davis MP,  urges the electorate not to fear severing our links with Brussels,  as it would he believes, be good for Britain, and would start a national revival.
No cigar there David I’m afraid, the man in the street spotted that years ago, most MP’s didn’t.   
Was his statement the result of the recent confrontations between arch europhile Nick Clegg, and arch eurosceptic Nigel Farage, which drew huge audiences, eager to learn the truth about the true nature of our EU involvement today  ?.
Few of today’s under sixties are aware of the 1970s plot to mislead us into joining the Common Market, by a devious and desperate clique who knew that the real aim was to integrate us into a political union, run by an un-elected Commission.
The entire EU Commission ( which had introduced the euro ) was forced to resign in 1999, for corruption, including our own Leon Brittan   
The break WILL happen eventually,  as Holland, France and Germany already have rapidly growing eurosceptic movements,  and now is the time to start drawing up the indictments of those whose treachery brought about this disastrous association.
Heath of course has escaped the hangman, but many of those who aided and abetted him, are still hanging around Westminster and Whitehall.
The British taxpayer will need to remain very vigilant as the break from Brussels approaches,  as the Westminster mafia, and the Brussels mafia, will collude to impose very heavy financial severance terms on us, without a mandate to so do.
A Royal Commission to look into the events leading up to the signing of the Treaty of Rome, is forty years overdue.
 
 
Ed. -   -   -   Bromsgrovia.  

Saturday, 5 April 2014

They never seem to learn

They never seem to learn-or WE DON’T,  for some keep voting for them!


We, the 'little people' pay taxes.  Those taxes may go towards the "WAGES" and "Expenses" our MP's may claim.  Claims according to their new rules, although it is doubtful that any employee in other places of work has ever been able to make their own rules on conditions of their "wages" and ‘claims’ for vast expenses.  However, we are where we are and obviously the method is not working very well, and who knows, all involved may soon be out of work, especially now that there is indeed an extra layer of EU Governance here in the UK that our taxes have to be stretched towards, I refer to the EU REGIONS, of course, put in place by this present Government.

If the people do not pay their taxes or make claims to prevent paying what they should, they would/may be brought before the Courts and either be 'fined' or depending on why they do not pay their taxes-or maybe because they may have no intention of paying them- might be sent to work for a while in another place and without pay, as some of course have. 

Baring in mind the people have no "Committee" to advise them what to do, to make the rules on the amount of expenses they may claim-yet it is doubtful employee's in any other place of Work could do that. All should pay their taxes as a contribution for being allowed to live here in the UK or more importantly, have the luck to be born here.

Maybe some of our taxes contribute towards those MP's Wages and Expenses for after-all without the people's free votes, none would have been elected or “set on”.  In other words, they are our employees and we their employers.

What if (MANY or ALL) the people decided not to pay any taxes at all? Because they may be absolutely fed up of being taken for fools. Maybe because they have to go to work and work hard-some in factories-some knowing that the heavy work they have to do may cause health problems or shorten their lives, yet they have to do those jobs, or were brought up to do for some indeed do have to do such jobs.  Many before them worked down Coal Mines (PITS) Factories etc.  Yet none of those could decide what they could claim in expenses in the first place.
Finally, why are we continuing to vote and pay, plus expenses, to have anyone in those Houses of Parliament when most of the time, all they can do is obey the same EU Orders like the rest of us are supposed to do?  The one thing against that of course-which I accept- is that our Constitution forbids any one of us obeying the orders of foreigners.  It is only by electing MP’s that transpose EU Directives (Foreign Legislation) into the UK that it is allegedly lawful in this Country, yet will that be Lawful/Legal if they agree to allow foreigners speak on our behalf on all matters and forever (and on behalf of any new Government that may follow this present one-(No Parliament may bind-I doubt will apply to this) if they ratify this new legislation below.  Yet almost any new Legislation that is brought forward by our Government, we can find the “EU DIRECTIVE” which has to be obeyed, one of the latest,  (Which I mention for proof of what is written above) which is being debated now in our Parliament, will allow the EU to speak for all Nation States in the EU to the United States of America-forever and on all matters-if it is accepted by this Government, of course is, “The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership” (TTIP) some papers of which are “RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED.

I ask now, should the people indeed continue to vote for anyone to sit in those two Houses of Parliament, pay them plus expenses?  For what exactly?   What is the point any more?  When those we take on trust?  Vote for? For them to “take advantage” of us, again and again?   We are all indeed being taken for fools. 

Anne Palmer. 4/4/2014