Do NOT accept a new Magna Carta

A NEW Magna Carta proposed by this Government. 

ALL those in that House know-without doubt- that if the people accept the NEW (which is what this is all about) they will over-ride their very own LONG STANDING Common law Constitutional Documents.  Once that is done-this Country may well become just REGIONS of the European Union that Mr Cameron introduced when he came into Government.  Having then thus destroyed their own longstanding Common Law Constitution, yes! Their very own Common Law Constitution by accepting the new-may well find that the NEW Written Constitution or constitutional Documents will be repealed and ALL will/may be under the EU and its Treaties for “all time coming”.  The people will/may have been seen to have chosen to destroy completely their very own Common Law Constitution that so many gave THEIR lives for-in the keeping of it, in that last World War.  Perhaps that was why our Constitution has indeed lasted over so very many years, for Government could not be seen to destroy the people’s Common Law Constitution..  The people had to destroy it for themselves by accepting a NEW Constitution, for the present Constitutional Documents are indeed protected by ‘Acts of Treason’. Certain Laws re Treason state that, “To destroy the Constitution is indeed an “ACT of TREASON” and although on Prime Minister tried to remove a couple of those ‘protecting Acts’-they remain in full for no temporary Government can in truth destroy them, for to do so may indeed be seen as an act of treason in the doing.

Here for you below is perhaps the greatest betrayal a Government can bestow on an unsuspecting people that take the trouble to place their trust in those they elect to sit in that once highly respected House of Commons.

You are all invited to accept a proposed NEW Magna Carta  In accepting the new-will the people be destroying the old, and once that has been done, will the government GET RID OF the new?

Is it indeed Treason to destroy our long standing Common law Constitutional Documents which in this case is our GREAT Magna Carta?   The Treason laws remain so why are they not being used?  See http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/consultation-new-magna-carta/

For papers  http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/consultation-new-magna-carta/commons-written-submission-form/

Consultation on a New Magna Carta-send here for papers

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/news/new-inquiry-consultation-magna-carta/

The consultation closes on 1 January 2015.  The Committee will report on the responses from the public in time for them to be taken into account ahead of the general election.

                                ****************************

There is no doubt at all that if the people accept any NEW Magna Carta or any NEW Written Constitutional Documents, in the doing, will destroy the original Common Law Constitutional Documents that two World Wars in recent memory have been fought to protect and keep-FOR ALL TIME COMING. Probably no Government or Members of Parliament would do this for laws re treason would also prevent them so doing, plus, parts of our Common Law are especially for the people, and because it is mostly the people that have to don Amy. Navy, Air-force clothing and fight anyone that starts a war with this Country. As all those in those Houses of Parliament-both houses- that put this forward, even though they so swear a solemn Oath of Allegiance to the British Crown- the present wearer of the Crown, our belovéd Queen, donned a Uniform-and did her bit in fighting for Her Country in the same way the Forces so did in that 1939-1945 World War.  Her father, His Majesty King George V1 along side of Winston Churchill, although most certainly not in the best of Health travelled to many cities and towns to boost the spirits up of the British people whose home towns and cities were being bombed night after night.

People my age were taught about their Constitution and why they were being bombed in that last war-some-time day and night. It makes me wonder why children of TEDAY are not taught about their own once longstanding Common law Constitution TODAY.

Magna Carta Debate  House of Lords 7^th November 2013  Debating whether to bring all four remaining copies of Magna Carta together? MY Comments on this- I most certainly do not think it wise to bring all four Copies together-for maybe an accident may happen thus destroying all four copies.  ALL FOUR GONE FOREVER. 

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/131107-0003.htm

Anne

Letter to Cameron

This letter has been circulated

Dear Prime Minister David Cameron,

Seeing you sporting the representation of blood spilled in two World Wars, on your lapel sickens me, because it represents sacrificed life to keep our country out of the clutches of the predatory nations we fought against, in order to keep our country able to manage it’s own affairs.

Meanwhile you are still lying to us about what you can do within the EU every day, and trying to keep us in those very same powers clutches, insulting the sacrifices of those men and women, which is grossly hypocritical, rendering your position untenable and the lowest of the low in my eyes. (1.  See the EU Commission’s own enabling clause below – you have no power to change things!)

Those forces fought for you, but you will not stand up to fight for this country by withdrawing from EU, and making sure we can manage our own affairs without interference from our illegal membership of the EU, which is impoverishing this nation.

Your perfidy in maintaining this position when there is legislation to remove us from the EU without penalty, is ignorant at best, and treacherous at worst.

Our parliament has been Null and Void, since the European Communities Act 1972 was entered into illegally, against every Constitutional restraint and under coercion, making the ECA1972 void and of no legal force (2. see Vienna Convention extracts below).

No parliament may bind it’s successors, yet no parliament since 1972 has corrected this treason against Queen and people, while more and more taxpayers' money is  poured into the failed corrupt EU experiment illegally according to the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (3. see extracts below).

1.  Commission’s enabling clause hidden under disingenuous gobbledygook (Who decides what is urgent? Who exactly do they consult? Do they really care about ‘burdens’ on members?):

LISBON TREATY

C 306/150 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.12.2007

PROTOCOL

ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF SUBSIDIARITY

AND PROPORTIONALITY

___

Article 1

Each institution shall ensure constant respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, as laid down in Article 3b of the Treaty on European Union.

Article 2

Before proposing legislative acts, the Commission shall consult widely. Such consultations shall, where appropriate, take into account the regional and local dimension of the action envisaged. In cases of exceptional urgency, the Commission shall not conduct such consultations. It shall give reasons for its decision in its proposal.

Article 5

Draft legislative acts shall be justified with regard to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. Any draft legislative act should contain a detailed statement making it possible to appraise compliance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. This statement should contain some assessment of the proposal's financial impact and, in the case of a directive, of its implications for the rules to be put in place by Member States, including, where necessary, the regional legislation. The reasons for concluding that a Union objective can be better achieved at Union level shall be substantiated by qualitative and, wherever possible, quantitative indicators. Draft legislative acts shall take account of the need for any burden, whether financial or administrative, falling upon the Union, national governments, regional or local authorities, economic operators and citizens, to be minimised and commensurate with the objective to be achieved.

____________________________________________________

2. Under the   (If the provisions of the founding treaty ECA1972 are void and have no legal force neither do those that were ratcheted and built up on it )

1969 and 1986 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

PART V 

SECTION 2. INVALIDITY OF TREATIES

Article 49

Fraud

If a State has been induced to conclude a treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another negotiating State, the State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent to be bound by the treaty.

Article 50

Corruption of a representative of a State

If the expression of a State’s consent to be bound by a treaty has been procured through the corruption of its representative directly or indirectly by another negotiating State, the State may invoke such corruption as invalidating its consent to be bound by the treaty.

Article 51

Coercion of a representative of a State

The expression of a State’s consent to be bound by a treaty which has been procured by the coercion of its representative through acts or threats directed against him shall be without any legal effect.

SECTION 3. TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF TREATIES  (extract)

Article 62

Fundamental change of circumstances

1. A fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, may not be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty unless:

(a) the existence of those circumstances constituted an essential basis of the consent of the parties to be bound by the treaty; and

SECTION 5. CONSEQUENCES OF THE INVALIDITY, TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF A TREATY

Article 69

Consequences of the invalidity of a treaty

1. A treaty the invalidity of which is established under the present Convention is void. The provisions of a void treaty have no legal force.

________________________________________________________________

3.   Under

Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000

'Section 6 (1) (a, b & c) and 6 (3) (a & c) Resource accounts scrutiny' and 7 (4) (a,b & c) 'other departmental accounts' of that act which are relevant to the EU accounts not being signed off by auditors and constituting corruption and fraud:

snipped

6. Resource accounts: scrutiny.

(1) The Comptroller and Auditor General shall examine any resource accounts which he receives from a department under section 5(5) with a view to satisfying himself—

(a) that the accounts present a true and fair view,

(b) that money provided by Parliament has been expended for the purposes intended by Parliament,

(c) that resources authorised by Parliament to be used have been used for the purposes in relation to which the use was authorised, and

(d) that the department’s financial transactions are in accordance with any relevant authority.

(3) Where the Comptroller and Auditor General has conducted an examination of accounts under subsection (1)—

(a) he shall certify them and issue a report,

(b) he shall send the certified accounts and the report to the Treasury not later than 15th January of the financial year following that to which the accounts relate, and

(c) if he is not satisfied of the matters set out in subsection (1)(a) to (d), he shall report to the House of Commons.

7. Other departmental accounts.

(1) The Treasury may direct a government department to prepare for each financial year accounts in relation to any specified matter.

(2) Accounts under subsection (1) shall be prepared in accordance with directions issued by the Treasury.

(4) The Comptroller and Auditor General shall carry out his examination of accounts under subsection (3)(b) with a view to satisfying himself—

(a) that money provided by Parliament has been expended for the purposes intended by Parliament,

(b) that resources authorised by Parliament to be used have been used for the purposes in relation to which the use was authorised, and

(c) that the department’s financial transactions are in accordance with any relevant authority.

Information courtesy of Ashley Mote

_______________________________________________________

The evidence and grounds to invoke the above legislation can be found on:

http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/

I demand that you restore this country’s Constitutional Royal Law and Common Law enshrined in Her Majesty’s Coronation Oath, and discard Corpus Juris, all and any Acts, laws and regulations, which have been imposed on this country by the EU in any of it’s guises.

Time to take the country back for the people of this country, and close down the sale of the country’s assets to private ownership and foreign buyers, something Edward III tried to guard against in his wisdom.

yours sincerely

Mrs Jane Birkby
15 DN20 0DF
ENGLAND

Dementia, Targets, £55 per patient – Who benefits?

OPEN LETTER FOR CIRCULATION   

We will all get old one day even those making these decisions. So ask yourselves whether you would wish for what you are proposing or condoning.

 

Dementia, Targets, £55 per patient – Who benefits?

 

Dear Simon Stevens, CEO NHS England and Dr Michael McBride Chief Medical Officer NICE,

 

Under FOI:

1) Please tell me the origin of this latest edict using targets to diagnose Dementia, and whether the pharmaceutical companies are already offering prescription drugs to ‘treat’ it?

2) Do any of the senior executives and officials involved have any links to funding from Pharmaceutical companies?

3) This decision as badly flawed, especially given the expectation that there WILL BE more people with dementia, and could this be because Geoengineering Aerosol Spraying in our atmosphere (aka Chemtrails), has been bombarding the population with Barium and Aluminium amongst other things?

 

*****

As a patient of 66 years old, who is as old as our NHS itself, I have seen the best and the worst of that service, and the damage that greedy politicians and individuals in various governments have done to it.

It seems to have become Big Pharma and Private Healthcare’s puppet, and totally overrun by unchecked immigration and health tourism.

 

It has been degraded from once excellent and world beating, to impoverished mediocrity, while the loyal and dedicated front line staff struggle to give good service to patients, with managers, executives, and CEOs paying themselves unacceptable salaries and perks in readiness for creeping privatisation of the service.

 

At one time I had a personal view that NICE stood for National Institute for Clinical Euthanasia, as the Liverpool Care Pathway and DNR was enthusiastically adopted on wards for the Elderly, without the public’s knowledge or consent.

In all probability because the elderly have had the affrontery to live too long, and shock horror actually draw the pensions they had paid for, on top of being considered past their usefulness to commerce, and therefore useless eaters.

 

The NHS under greedy ‘Common Purpose’ managers and executives has lacked Common Decency, Ethical Decisions, Care and Compassion, something the essence of the Hippocratic Oath, and our Royal Common Laws enshrined in the Christian Coronation Oath try to uphold.

 

Now the latest wheeze, possibly to make more money for Big Pharma, is to bribe GPs to hit targets in diagnosing Dementia, for which there is probably a harmful drug just waiting in the wings to prescribe, reducing our poor overstretched GPs to little more than drug pushers.

I can tell you now that there are some GPs in certain parts of this country, who will be rubbing their hands with glee, and worshipping Mammon at the prospect of inventing dementia patients just to claim the bribe, because they lack the honest and ethical standards of the majority of decent GPs around the country.

 

I therefore ask that you answer my questions on this issue, and think again about what you are proposing.

The money earmarked for this flawed project, must be ploughed into frontline help and service for those already experiencing dementia, not satisfying useless targets.

 

yours sincerely

Mrs Jane Birkby
15 DN20 0DF

birkby370@btinternet.com

 

left-wing opinion and the "liberal consensus",

Article written by Kevin Myers

Kevin Myers (born 30 March 1947) is an Irish journalist and writer. He writes for the Irish edition of the Sunday Times, having previously been a columnist for the Irish Independent and a former contributor to The Irish Times, where he wrote the "An Irishman's Diary" opinion column several times weekly. Until 2005, he wrote for the UK Sunday Telegraph.
His articles criticise left-wing opinion and the "liberal consensus", sometimes incorporating hyperbole, sarcasm and parody. This essay recently appeared in The Irish Independent:

Somalia is not a humanitarian disaster; it is an evolutionary disaster. The current drought is not the worst in 50 years, as the BBC and all the aid organisations claim.

It is nothing compared to the droughts in 1960/61 or 73/74.And there are continuing droughts every 5 years or so.

It's just that there are now four times the population; having been kept alive by famine relief, supplied by aid organisations, over the past 50 years. So, of course, the effects of any drought now, is a famine. They cannot even feed themselves in a normal rainfall year.

Worst yet, the effects of these droughts, and poor nutrition in the first 3 years of the a child's life, have a lasting effect on the development of the infant brain, so that if they survive, they will never achieve a normal IQ . Consequently, they are selectively breeding a population, who cannot be educated , let alone one that is not being educated; a recipe for disaster

We are seeing this impact now, and it can only exacerbate, to the detriment of their neighbours, and their environment as well. This scenario can only end in an even worse disaster; with even worse suffering, for those benighted people, and their descendants.
Eventually, some mechanism will intervene, be it war, disease or starvation.

So what do we do? Let them starve?
What a dilemma for our Judeo/ Christian/Islamic Ethos; as well as Hindu/Buddhist morality.
And this is beginning to happen in Kenya, Ethiopia, and other countries in Asia, like Pakistan.
Is this the beginning of the end of civilisation?

AFRICA is giving nothing to anyone outside Africa -- apart from AIDS and new diseases.
Even as we see African states refusing to take action to restore something resembling civilisation in Zimbabwe, the Begging bowl for Ethiopia is being passed around to us out of Africa, yet again.
It is nearly 25 years since the famous Feed The World campaign began in Ethiopia, and in that time Ethiopia's population has grown from 33.5 million to 78+ million today.
So, why on earth should I do anything to encourage further catastrophic demographic growth in that country?
Where is the logic? There is none.

To be sure, there are two things saying that logic doesn't count.
One is my conscience, and the other is the picture, yet again, of another wide-eyed child, yet again, gazing, yet again, at the camera, which yet again, captures the tragedy of children starving.

Sorry. My conscience has toured this territory on foot and financially.
Unlike most of you, I have been to Ethiopia; like most of you, I have stumped up the loot to charities to stop starvation there. The wide-eyed boy-child we saved, 20 years or so ago, is now a low IQ, AK 47-bearing moron, siring children whenever the whim takes him and blaming the world because he is uneducated, poor and left behind.

There is no doubt a good argument why we should prolong this predatory and dysfunctional economic, social and sexual system but I do not know what it is.

There is, on the other hand, every reason not to write a column like this.
It will win no friends and will provoke the self-righteous wrath of, well, the self-righteous hand wringing,
letter writing wrathful individuals; a species which never fails to contaminate almost every debate in Irish life with its sneers and its moral superiority.

It will also probably enrage some of the finest men in Irish life, like John O'Shea, of Goal; and the Finucane brothers, men whom I admire enormously.

So be it.
But, please, please, you self-righteously wrathful, spare me mention of our own Irish Famine, with this or that lazy analogy. There is no comparison. Within 20 years of the Famine, the Irish population was down by 30%. Over the equivalent period, thanks to western food, the Mercedes 10-wheel truck and the Lockheed Hercules plane, Ethiopia's population has more than doubled.

Alas, that wretched country is not alone in its madness.
Somewhere, over the rainbow, lies Somalia, another fine land of violent, AK 47-toting, khat-chewing, girl-circumcising, permanently tumescent layabouts and housing pirates of the ocean.

Indeed, we now have almost an entire continent of sexually hyperactive, illiterate indigents, with tens of millions of people who only survive because of help from the outside world or allowances by the semi-communist Governments they voted for, money supplied by borrowing it from the World Bank!

This dependency has not stimulated political prudence or common sense.
Indeed, voodoo idiocy seems to be in the ascendant, with the president of South Africa being a firm believer in
the efficacy of a little tap water on the post-coital penis as a sure preventative against AIDS infection.
Needless to say, poverty, hunger and societal meltdown have not prevented idiotic wars involving Tigre, Uganda, Congo, Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea etcetera.
Broad brush-strokes, to be sure.

But broad brush-strokes are often the way that history paints its gaudier, if more decisive, chapters.
Japan, China, Russia, Korea, Poland, Germany, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia in the 20th century have endured worse broad brush-strokes than almost any part of Africa.
They are now -- one way or another -- virtually all giving aid to or investing in Africa, whereas Africa, with its vast savannahs and its lush pastures, is giving almost nothing to anyone, apart from AIDS.

Meanwhile, Africa's peoples are outstripping their resources, and causing catastrophic ecological degradation.
By 2050, the population of Ethiopia will be 177 million; the equivalent of France, Germany and Benelux today,
but located on the parched and increasingly Protein-free wastelands of the Great Rift Valley.
So, how much sense does it make for us actively to increase the adult population of what is already a vastly over-populated, environmentally devastated and economically dependent country?

How much morality is there in saving an Ethiopian child from starvation today, for it to survive to a life of brutal circumcision, poverty, hunger, violence and sexual abuse, resulting in another half-dozen such wide-eyed children, with comparably jolly little lives ahead of them?

Of course, it might make you feel better, which is a prime reason for so much charity!

But that is not good enough.
For self-serving generosity has been one of the curses of Africa. It has sustained political systems which would otherwise have collapsed.
It prolonged the Eritrean-Ethiopian war by nearly a decade. It is inspiring Bill Gates' programme to rid the continent of malaria, when, in the almost complete absence of personal self-discipline, that disease is one of the most efficacious forms of population-control now operating.
If his programme is successful, tens of millions of children who would otherwise have died in infancy will survive to adulthood, he boasts.

Oh good: then what? I know, let them all come here (to Ireland) or America. (not forgetting Australia!)