A LONG TERM PLAN

Subject: Fifth Column

A LONG TERM PLAN ?

The mass invasion of Europe by immigrants is  difficult to explain, it’s not through War , we have had many refugees in the past because of War ,but not on this scale.

Could it be interpreted as a long term “take-over” orchestrated ,under cover of assisting  refugees ?

We are persuaded  “People Traffic’s” are to blame, it is too organised to be just that.

Lives lost in trying to enter  Europe are of little consequence  to those orchestrating this invasion , The long term aim must be the objective.

Immigrants looking for a so called better life could be nothing more than pawns in a sinister plot to take over the Western world.  .

These people  when  called upon, will in the end be true to their religious belief, Christians and other religions but theirs will have little future.

.

If U.K.  is to survive we must close our boarders now or lose our Heritage, memorials and even our heads.

The present immigration into the United Kingdom must be brought under control, we can’t house them, educate them ,give them benefits, mediclne , and employment at the expense of our own future.

Step one.  close our boarders. ( Don’t say it can’t be done, they have said that about Revolutions ! ).

Step two.  leave the EU.

Step three.  deport all non UK citizens that have entered illegally.

Step four.  ban all from returning to UK after “visiting” terrorists.

Step Five.  get out of the European Court of Human Rights.

Step Six . Make  English the first language.

Step Seven.  Make English Law the only law.

Add a few of your own, there are many more !

Finally.  vote for the party that will do this (There is one ! ).

A.H.Lawton.

98-08-2015

17 ST18 9ND

Stafford.

Migrant table and solution

THE SOLUTION TO BRITAIN'S IMMIGRATION PROBLEM

Our rulers - Mrs Merkel and Hollande - have demanded that all
European countries take their "fair share" of the (mainly Muslim)
migrant hordes (Swarms?) over-running Europe's apparently
unguarded borders.

But how do you decide what a "fair share" is? Merkel and Hollande
will probably try to link the number of migrants to each country's GDP
as that will ensure Britain gets landed with most of the flood of human
beings, pouring into Europe.

But I've got a better idea. Why not link the number of refugees each
country takes to its population density?

Not only that, but I've even worked out the numbers for Merkel and her
French colleague.

Here's how I've done it. I've started with Europe's most densely
populated country - England. England's population density is 413 people
per square kilometre (413 ppl/km2). Then I've worked out how many
refugees the main European countries could take for them to reach the
same population density as Europe's most densely populated country -
England (see table attached)


This shows that to reach the same population density as England (413
ppl/km2), Germany could take 67 million migrants, France could
accommodate a whopping 160 million and Spain and even larger 161
million. And our close neighbours in Scotland have room for over 25
million! That should please socialist Sturgeon.

In all, just the thirteen European countries (on my table above) could
accommodate more than 680 million migrants before reaching the same
population density as England.

Well. That seems to solve the problem of deciding how countries should
take their "fair share" of the migrant swarm. So, using my
calculations, there's no need for Europe's most densely populated
country - England - to take any migrants at all and our friends in
these thirteen countries can comfortably absorb over 680 million
migrants.

That seems to me to be giving each country the "fair share" that Merkel
and Hollande demand!

It's pity that Dave has neither the brains to think up such a solution, nor
the balls to protect our national interests by standing up to Merkel and
Hollande.

England is full! Let the migrant deluge go somewhere else!

Albert Mangelsdorff.

However, the growing hysteria in the mainstream press and blogosfear masks the fact that the population density of England is several orders of magnitude greater than any other major european nation as the below table illustrates based on House of Commons, UK and EU statistical agencies data.

	Population Density / sq km	New Migrants to Match England's Density
England	419
Holland	408	.45mill
Belgium	370	1.5mill
Wales	258	1.8mill
Germany	226	68.8mill
Italy	205	62.6mill
Poland	130	85.6mill
Portugal	116	27.4mill
Hungary	108	28.8mill
France	105	197mill
Spain	94	161mill
Romania	89	74mill
Greece	82	44.3mill
Bulgaria	66	38.8mill

What stands out from the table is the overwhelming disparity in capacity to accommodate migrants, especially for depopulated eastern european nations many of whom are demonstrating ZERO inclination to offer asylum to refugees despite having exported many millions of their own people westwards. For instance Poland would need to experience an influx of 85 million migrants to equal the population density of England.

Meanwhile the finger wagging Germans could allow 68 million migrants to settle in Germany and still be less densely populated than England. Whilst France would need to increase its population by near 200 million! Even a constantly bleating Greece would require a 44 million jump in its population to equal the state of over crowding in England.

Therefore the migration crisis debate needs to seriously take into account the huge disparity in population density that has brought public services such as health, housing and education in many areas of southern England to the brink of collapse.