Referendum

http://www.eureferendum.blogspot.com/

Yet again, we see evidence of public approval for an event that did not happen - Cameron's "veto" – being translated into a lead in the opinion polls. We also see what is in fact a relatively small majority calling for a referendum on whether we should leave the European Union.

Now addressing the political realities, one cannot avoid the view that, if public opinion is so easily and cynically manipulated on the "veto" issue, then it would be relatively easy to manipulate an in-out referendum, producing a politically "acceptable" result.

At the very least, one would expect Cameron to muddy the waters, offering the meaningless option of "renegotiation". And recent evidence indicates that there are more than sufficient people out there who would believe what they are told and go for this moonshine, blunting the force of a straight in-out poll.

It is very comforting nevertheless, to opt for fantasy politics in preference to the real thing. By all means, one can live in hope of Cameron giving us a nice straight referendum which delivers a clear majority for leaving the EU, followed by the repeal of the European Communities Act, and a quick exit.

But it ain't going to happen.

And even if you had a government wholly committed to leaving the EU, it would take some considerable time and effort to work out the precise mechanics of how we would do it.

Let us here, just for a short period, reside in the real world. Say we left the EU, suddenly, unilaterally, on the basis of the repeal of the ECA. What would happen to our trade with the EU member states?

Well, the cheerleaders for the "outers" assure us that trade would be unaffected. After all, the continental states have a surplus on their balance of trade, and would not wish to see this change. And if they took measures against our exports, we could appeal to the WTO or take retaliatory measures.

That is all very good – but let's have a look at that real world, a world in which Britain is not a member of the EU, and has not yet negotiated membership of the EEA, or an equivalent trade deal.

Further, on leaving the EU – we assume – Britain is no longer bound by EU single market rules and, of special importance, we no longer accept the jurisdiction of the EU commission or the ECJ, in enforcing the rules. Thus, even if we adopt the rules temporarily, there is no mutually agreed mechanism for ensuring enforcement.

In that real world, the Customs Union that is the European Union permits the free movement of goods within its borders. But at the periphery, it has inspection points at designated ports, where goods are examined and checked before they are allowed entry into the EU area – the so-called Single Market area. No goods are allowed entry without checking and inspection.

And, at the stroke of a pen, we are outside that Single Market area. Thus, perfectly legitimately – and entirely within WTO rules, the EU can insist that all exports from the UK are routed via designated ports, for the checking and inspection that is applies to all goods from without the EU and EEA, applicable to those nations where special rules have not been negotiated.

Here, we have a very slight problem. There are no designated ports. Furthermore, you cannot magic them out of thin air. Checking and inspection requires space, a corps of inspectors and officials, offices, computer systems and the whole paraphernalia of border inspection regimes.

There are no such facilities at Calais, or any of the other Channel ports in France … or Belgium, or Holland. And there are none on the German seaboard. And nor are any airports in the mainland EU equipped to deal with the inspection of goods arriving from the EU. It would take years to build such facilities – at the cost of billions.

Thus, perfectly legitimately, from the day we leave the EU, British exports to the EU would stop. They would stop immediately and remain stopped until we had negotiated alternative arrangements for their entry to the EU. And, given a complete absence of good will, how long do you think that will take?

Of course, we can retaliate. But the EU would have been acting perfectly legitimately, within WTO rules. We would be breaking the rules. Legitimately, the EU could then retaliate against us, and we are immediately in a trade war – just what we need.

And, when (or if) it comes to a referendum campaign, do you really think that the Europhiles are not going to point out problems such as these? Do you really think that, after months of such propaganda – backed by a Europhile Cameron and the bulk of British industry – the British people are going to rush to the polls to commit what they have been told is economic suicide?

Yet we do not need a referendum. A British government committed to leaving the EU can do so without one. But what we do need – will always need - is a detailed evaluation of the mechanics of leaving, providing us with a realistic exit plan, a timescale and a reassurance that the disruption and damage (and there will be some of both) can be minimised.

But, if we do have a referendum, in order to win, we should still need such an exit plan, otherwise the Europhiles stand a good chance of carrying the day – as they did in 1975.

Thus, the priority is not a referendum, especially when, in the real world, it would be a very brave (or stupid) man who guaranteed a win. The priority has to be an exit plan, and one based on expert knowledge – not the superficial and misleading efforts we have so far seen.

These are the facts of (political) life. But one senses that the British people are not too fond of confronting reality, preferring fantasy politics to the real thing – which is perhaps why we continue to oscillate between Labour and the Conservatives, and are currently lumbered with the coalition.

Nevertheless, that does not stop the grown-ups from dealing with the issues. Going along with the fantasy, it seems to me, is not a winning strategy.

Saturday Into Monday Essay 3-Predictions

Guy Leven-Torres

12/13^th December 2011

I have tried to limit my output of scribbles but the situation we now face is so dire, One cannot in all good grace remain silent, knowing what is about to hit us. The figures alone are frightening; 30% unemployment in Spain, nearly 40% in Greece and in Italy and Portugal, there too figures will rise, as will hardship and cuts so sending the unemployment higher, bringing with it all the endemic risks of deep social unrest and perhaps, as Nigel Farage suggests, armed rebellion by these countries' armed services. Mr Farage referred to Greece only in his video but I will extend his prediction- a correct assessment in my humble opinion of what lays in store for the benighted peoples of these countries of the South, exacerbated by German and French demands for complete Germano-Franco hegemony over all the others, in what is in fact finally the success of Hitler's and Napoleon's dreams of the age old 'Continental System' they sought to establish against England. Anybody who now doubts this was the intended plan all along, is either being plain stupid or lying to themselves. The whole 'European Project' was always about the triumph of Germany and France over the rest. Stupidly Cameron has been bounced out of the system altogether, leaving us now even more prone to the revenge that Merkel and Sarkozy will seek to 'punish' the UK for not doing as it was told. A French economist chum of mine tells me that 'Germany is the senior partner and France simply a bankrupt client, whose banks are totally overexposed due to the monies they gave out to the failed southern states. This is why Sarkozy is so determined, even frantic to ensure the new Treaty is brought into being ensuring German continental hegemony. Without Germany France and its economic system will fail completely with all the inherent risks political, social and economic stability problems that normally ensue from such situations.'

Listening to the ramblings and foolish utterances of the elite this morning on the radio, it is all to clear we are led by people with not the slightest understanding of history or its lessons but who persist in pursuing what amounts to their own narrow ideological foibles, in almost deliberate total ignorance of what is waiting to deluge Europe and its peoples. It is akin to offering a deck chair on the sinking Titanic to a befuddled passenger in order for them to sit down in comfort as the ship goes down. The passenger oblivious to the water at his feet berates a waiter for not serving his food on time. 'Sir the ship is sinking!' cries the waiter but the passenger turns his gaze upon the poor man 'What time do we dock in New York?' Such is the level of idiocy and delusion.

Europe is in its greatest peril from continental wide civil insurrection and violence and revolution as national armies may well seek to save some order and civil discourse, in a fast moving unpredictable situation. I fully expect martial law to be called into being in several countries. It seems Mr Farage, alone of all the elite understands fully what is beckoning at our gates and the insidious, now unavoidable crises. Like this author he has been demonised and mocked by the usual suspects as 'extremist', even mad and accused of actually causing the crisis by his 'exaggerated statements' to quote one commentator. As a man fully familiar with history I would say the Mr Farage is 'spot on', in his predictions even if the fools that permeate the elite in large measure wish to delude themselves otherwise. UKIP will do splendidly in the polls, especially as Cameron is exposed for the straw man he is- in many ways a direct result of his failure and that of other Tory leaders of the past to confront the European issue head on, instead of kowtowing to the Leftist-Green-Europhile multicultural Mafia that has terrified and stifled all debate for nigh on 30 years.

Cameron will not be able to do anything to prevent the Germans destroying the City or imposing EU law- as the Lisbon Treaty allows for the Euro elite to rule Britain- in spite of anything Westminster tries to do in order to stop it. The real power in the UK is in the local authorities and public services stuffed to the gunnels with activist Marxist Common Purpose types. Cameron will shortly face a Liberal Democrat revolt and a General Election and Labour, may well be returned and they will sign up to German hegemony, so sealing our fate. That is a worse case scenario but depends upon events in Europe, who with the British finally removed will rush to form a proper United Europe run by Germany and France. It depends especially upon the attitude of the national populations in Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Eire but especially France and Germany. One of the greatest weaknesses of the EU bureaucrats and their puppet leaders like Merkel and Sarkozy, is their megalomanic inability to face reality. This will be their undoing since it is just possible that Standard and Poor may downgrade Germany's credit rating, which will really irritate the already uneasy German population. Rebellion may even ensue in this place too as well as in France. Unemployment will blossom as will interest rates.

Then we have the largely alienated migrant populations across both countries who without state support and largesse, may simply revolt and cause mayhem. The state police and army will already have their hands full. I not only think this a possibility but a practical certainty and the people that rioted across France and in parts of Germany in 2005/6, did so in order to test the Police and army in the event of the coming situation, to be taken advantage of forcing the besieged German and French states to concede territory and cash to keep the inner city areas quiet, where most of the migrants live. We may even see the first Islamic statelets declared with official recognition, simply to buy time for the authorities to re-establish some form of order. Banks will close as the citizens try to withdraw their deposits, as will hoarding and looting.

No doubt the usual dreamers will accuse me, as they have Nigel Farage of scaremongering and even causing the events by my above statements. In truth though, we are now on a downward spiral into chaos and the longer the elite hatch 'sticking plaster' solutions the worse, the situation will be for all. Thank God that Britain is not in the Euro. We are to some extent protected but for the rest of the Continent, it would be kinder to do what Iceland did three years ago and let not only the banks fail of their own accord but the whole European dream itself. It is finished- that is the judgement of history, even if silly people do not want to see the truth. Of course they will not....as always... they will persist until they get the required answer. If left alone and Nature to take its course, individuals will arise strong enough and original enough, with the right type of entrepreneurial skills to achieve a recovery within five years, maybe sooner. However I hear dangerous rumblings of 'stronger methods' in the offing if the countries left to suffer the consequences of the German and French megalomania, in that they are unable to break free from the straitjacket of the new fiscal Union, fail to heed the strictures placed upon them. I pray to God that the elite, as stupid and dumb in such matters as it is do not go down that road......

I have a suspicion they might well do and bring down upon Europe a conflagration that could very easily engulf us all with all the problems that presents to the UK as a potential safe haven. It might also, dependent on the timing and scale of events involve us directly too, which as I have said in the first two parts of this essay, could entail serious civil and social insurrection even here and all that goes with such situations. I was not advocating civil war, as one of my detractors accused me of but warning that we may have no choice if the elite, being the Communists they actually are- decide to do what such regimes have done in the past. Do not dismiss this scenario lightly- desperate people will do very dangerous things......

Guy

SUMMON THE WITENAGEMOT TO INVOKE THE MAGNA CARTA

The Magna Carta is a direct contract between the Monarch and the People, and nothing whatsoever to do with Parliament, neither the House of Commons nor the House of Lords, which did not exist in 1215 AD.

According to the procedures, if the people are being “unjustly governed”, they cannot directly petition the Monarch, but must ask 25 hereditary peers of the realm, NOT members of Parliament, to petition the monarch on the people's behalf.

The 25 peers must choose 4 of their number to present the petition to the monarch, who is obliged to accept it. If the monarch fails to act upon the petition within 40 days, the people have the right to form a new Magna Carta Government. That's it, in a nutshell

Brussels discreetly prepares a coup d'état

I received an email yesterday http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=25455 I then went to this site http://www.courtfool.info/en_Out_of_the_euro.htm

Looks a bit complicated for most of us, but the truth is, it would as we have not been told what they are doing.

Brussels discreetly prepares a coup d'état in the 17 countries of the euro-zone.

A new treaty will allow Brussels to take unlimited money from the states' vaults to rescue the euro. The treaty must be ratified by the national parliaments before 31 December 2011.

Of course, the European Union does not want the citizens to learn about it. (I have not heard our Prime Minister talk about this, In fact I have not heard any one Talk about it or any news paper or News channel talk about it.)

On the internet they made available only one copy of the text of this treaty: in English!

(96,5% of the euro-citizens speak other languages!)

This new European Treaty has been signed 11 July '11. Curiously, not a single newspaper, not nationally nor internationally has spent a title on this treaty.

If this treaty gets ratified, it is the end of the sovereign democracies in the euro-zone. (Meaning no more countries can rule them selves, only Brussels will run all 17 Countries)

Brussels want the national Parliaments to agree to the treaty before 31 December 2011.

If we hurry, we can still alert the public opinion and try to wake up the Parliamentarians in time! 

The Vatican is now also calling for a one world Bank http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zftslLvIcLI&feature=uploademail

All Part of the long planned ONE WORLD ORDER.

Please pass on to every one, so we can stop this in its tracks...

I hopefully have passed this on to most on my list, it is up to you what type of future you want....

Treason in U.K.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI_mAbAoiY4

Why Iceland Should Be in the News, But Is Not

Why Iceland Should Be in the News, But Is Not

By Deena Stryker

Date posted: 15 August 2011
View this article online here: http://sacsis.org.za/site/article/728.1

An Italian radio program's story about Iceland’s on-going revolution is a stunning example of how little our media tells us about the rest of the world. Americans may remember that at the start of the 2008 financial crisis, Iceland literally went bankrupt. The reasons were mentioned only in passing, and since then, this little-known member of the European Union fell back into oblivion.

As one European country after another fails or risks failing, imperiling the Euro, with repercussions for the entire world, the last thing the powers that be want is for Iceland to become an example. Here's why:

Five years of a pure neo-liberal regime had made Iceland, (population 320 thousand, no army), one of the richest countries in the world. In 2003 all the country’s banks were privatized, and in an effort to attract foreign investors, they offered on-line banking whose minimal costs allowed them to offer relatively high rates of return. The accounts, called IceSave, attracted many English and Dutch small investors. But as investments grew, so did the banks’ foreign debt. In 2003 Iceland’s debt was equal to 200 times its GNP, but in 2007, it was 900 percent. The 2008 world financial crisis was the coup de grace. The three main Icelandic banks, Landbanki, Kapthing and Glitnir, went belly up and were nationalized, while the Kroner lost 85% of its value with respect to the Euro. At the end of the year Iceland declared bankruptcy.

Contrary to what could be expected, the crisis resulted in Icelanders recovering their sovereign rights, through a process of direct participatory democracy that eventually led to a new Constitution. But only after much pain.

Geir Haarde, the Prime Minister of a Social Democratic coalition government, negotiated a two million one hundred thousand dollar loan, to which the Nordic countries added another two and a half million. But the foreign financial community pressured Iceland to impose drastic measures. The FMI and the European Union wanted to take over its debt, claiming this was the only way for the country to pay back Holland and Great Britain, who had promised to reimburse their citizens.

Protests and riots continued, eventually forcing the government to resign. Elections were brought forward to April 2009, resulting in a left-wing coalition which condemned the neoliberal economic system, but immediately gave in to its demands that Iceland pay off a total of three and a half million Euros. This required each Icelandic citizen to pay 100 Euros a month (or about $130) for fifteen years, at 5.5% interest, to pay off a debt incurred by private parties vis a vis other private parties. It was the straw that broke the reindeer’s back.

What happened next was extraordinary. The belief that citizens had to pay for the mistakes of a financial monopoly, that an entire nation must be taxed to pay off private debts was shattered, transforming the relationship between citizens and their political institutions and eventually driving Iceland’s leaders to the side of their constituents. The Head of State, Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, refused to ratify the law that would have made Iceland’s citizens responsible for its bankers’ debts, and accepted calls for a referendum.

Of course the international community only increased the pressure on Iceland. Great Britain and Holland threatened dire reprisals that would isolate the country. As Icelanders went to vote, foreign bankers threatened to block any aid from the IMF. The British government threatened to freeze Icelander savings and checking accounts. As Grimsson said: “We were told that if we refused the international community’s conditions, we would become the Cuba of the North. But if we had accepted, we would have become the Haiti of the North.” (How many times have I written that when Cubans see the dire state of their neighbor, Haiti, they count themselves lucky.)

In the March 2010 referendum, 93% voted against repayment of the debt. The IMF immediately froze its loan. But the revolution (though not televised in the United States), would not be intimidated. With the support of a furious citizenry, the government launched civil and penal investigations into those responsible for the financial crisis. Interpol put out an international arrest warrant for the ex-president of Kaupthing, Sigurdur Einarsson, as the other bankers implicated in the crash fled the country.

But Icelanders didn't stop there: they decided to draft a new constitution that would free the country from the exaggerated power of international finance and virtual money. (The one in use had been written when Iceland gained its independence from Denmark, in 1918, the only difference with the Danish constitution being that the word ‘president’ replaced the word ‘king’.)

To write the new constitution, the people of Iceland elected twenty-five citizens from among 522 adults not belonging to any political party but recommended by at least thirty citizens. This document was not the work of a handful of politicians, but was written on the internet. The constituent’s meetings are streamed on-line, and citizens can send their comments and suggestions, witnessing the document as it takes shape. The constitution that eventually emerges from this participatory democratic process will be submitted to parliament for approval after the next elections.

Some readers will remember that Iceland’s ninth century agrarian collapse was featured in Jared Diamond’s book by the same name. Today, that country is recovering from its financial collapse in ways just the opposite of those generally considered unavoidable, as confirmed yesterday by the new head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde to Fareed Zakaria. The people of Greece have been told that the privatization of their public sector is the only solution. And those of Italy, Spain and Portugal are facing the same threat.

They should look to Iceland. Refusing to bow to foreign interests, that small country stated loud and clear that the people are sovereign.

That’s why it is not in the news anymore.



Stryker is an American writer that has lived in six different countries, is fluent in four languages and a published writer in three. She looks at the big picture from a systems and spiritual point of view.

Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson This is amazing. There are two parts. Be sure to read the 2nd part (in RED). Thomas Jefferson was a very remarkable man who started learning very early in life and never stopped. At 5, began studying under his cousin's tutor. At 9, studied Latin, Greek and French. At 14, studied classical literature and additional languages. At 16, entered the College of William and Mary. At 19, studied Law for 5 years starting under George Wythe. At 23, started his own law practice. At 25, was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses. At 31, wrote the widely circulated "Summary View of the Rights of British America ” and retired from his law practice. At 32, was a Delegate to the Second Continental Congress. At 33, wrote the Declaration of Independence .. At 33, took three years to revise Virginia 's legal code and wrote a Public Education bill and a statute for Religious Freedom. At 36, was elected the second Governor of Virginia , succeeding Patrick Henry. At 40, served in Congress for two years. At 41, was the American minister to France , and negotiated commercial treaties with European nations along with Ben Franklin and John Adams. At 46, served as the first Secretary of State under George Washington. At 53, served as Vice President and was elected president of the American Philosophical Society. At 55, drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, and became the active head of Republican Party. At 57, was elected the third president of the United States .. At 60, obtained the Louisiana Purchase , doubling the nation's size. At 61, was elected to a second term as President. At 65, retired to Monticello . At 80, helped President Monroe shape the Monroe Doctrine. At 81, almost single-handedly created the University of Virginia , and served as its first president. At 83, died on the 50th anniversary of the Signing of the Declaration of Independence, along with John Adams Thomas Jefferson knew because he himself studied the previous failed attempts at government. He understood actual history, the nature of God, his laws and the nature of man. That happens to be way more than what most understand today. Jefferson really knew his stuff. A voice from the past to lead us in the future: John F. Kennedy held a dinner in the white House for a group of the brightest minds in the nation at that time. He made this statement: "This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence ever to gather at one time in the White House with the exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone." "When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe ." -- Thomas Jefferson "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." -- Thomas Jefferson "It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world." -- Thomas Jefferson "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." -- Thomas Jefferson "My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government." -- Thomas Jefferson "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- Thomas Jefferson "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson "To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson said in 1802: "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." I wish we could get this out to everyone!!! I'm doing my part. Please do yours.

Letter to Bernard Hogan-Howe

Bernard Hogan-Howe                                                                       Albert Burgess

Commissioner of the Metropolis                                                      15 Parliament Road

New Scotland Yard                                                                           Thame

Broadway                                                                                           OX9 3TE

SW1A 1AA                                                                                        30-10-2011

Sir

You will be aware that Mr Cameron Her Majesty’s Prime Minister, has been talking to the other heads of Commonwealth countries about changing the Bill of Rights 1689 to allow the sovereign to marry a Roman Catholic. You are probably not aware of the history surrounding this Major Constitutional Law so if you will forgive my trying to teach granny to suck eggs, I will explain the history and reasoning behind this most important constitutional law. I realise fully our police are not taught constitutional law it being only very rarely that it raises its head, however it is not only law it is higher law which parliament are required to legislate within the restrictions imposed upon them by the English Constitution, and which our police are duty bound to enforce. The Act of Settlement 1701 is a simple clarification on the rules of accession and in no way amends the Declaration or Bill of Rights 1689.

The Police service use Blackburn vs the Commissioner of the Metropolis 1968 as a lets get out of doing our job under the law, this court ruling is in fact ultra vires the court having no authority to allow an enquiry to be dropped into an allegation of crime, which effectively grants a dispensation to those who break the law from suffering the penalty for their criminal activity. I would refer you to the judgement on the dispensing powers of the King in Thomas vs Sorrel 1674 Chief Justice Vaughn of the Common Pleas. Whose explanation is very clear as to the powers of the King to grant a dispensation from a penalty for a crime? Because this Ruling is dealing with the powers of the King to act or not act as the case may be it is by its very nature a constitutional ruling on higher constitutional law. Queen Elizabeth I demonstrated this dispensing power perfectly when she forgave the Earl of Essex a personal treason against her, but she removed his head when his treason was against her subjects. 

King James II was ruling outside the rule of law and appointing Roman Catholics to positions of authority in the armed forces which the law forbad him the right to do, Parliament spoke to King James about this and asked him to change his ways, his response was to prorogue parliament and carry on as before.

 The now out of office politicians and the Peerage asked Prince William of Orange if he would come to England to protect the Protestant faith as established by law. William landed at Torbay with a much smaller army than James but James army deserted in droves forcing James to send his wife and son to France. James attempted to follow them but was captured and taken to William who placed him in a palace on the banks of the Thames and James took a boat down river to France.

William was asked to take on the administration of the country, but he despised the English and sacked a lot of our prominent military leaders and civil servants replacing them with Dutchmen. The still out of work politicians spoke to the Aldermen and 50 of the common council about this, and William hearing about this ordered that writs should be sent to every borough in England for representatives to be sent to Westminster to tell him how we the English wished to be ruled. A convention not a parliament took place at Westminster in January 1689 and a document the Declaration of Rights was drawn up and shown to William and Mary and they were told that if they wanted the Crown they could have it conditional upon them accepting the terms laid down by the representatives of the people. William and Mary accepted the terms and were jointly offered the Crown which they accepted, William them called a parliament consisting of the representatives of the People and the Baronage and the Declaration of Rights was passed into law as the Bill of Rights 1689. With two codicils. Any amendments to this Bill must be made before 23 September 1689 or they are void and not lawful, and this Bill is for all time. Because this was put through parliament by people who were specifically sent to tell William how we the English wanted to be ruled and not by a properly elected parliament, and as the will of the people in England is supreme over parliament and the sovereign, under English law and custom and practice this Bill can never be repealed or amended by any normal parliament only by another convention of the people.  

I am enclosing a copy of the oath taken on that occasion if you read the oath you will discover that this oath from the Bill of Rights 1689 refuses the right of parliament to sign any EEC or EU treaty’s which transfer powers to govern away from the Queen in Parliament to any foreign power. What Her Majesty is forbidden by law to do parliament who operate in Her Majesty’s name can not do without Committing High Treason. Just as David Cameron’s actions constitute an act of High Treason against the Sovereign and Constitution of this country.

William III and Queen Mary accepted terms offered to them and the Bill of Rights is not a parliamentary act in the normal sense it is a binding contract between the sovereign and people of England, a contract Her Majesty can not break without forfeiting the Crown. If she does the law is quite clear the next in line will become King the second the contract is broken and it is as if Her Majesty had died.

This letter constitutes a formal allegation against David Cameron Prime Minster of Her Majesty’s United Kingdom of Great Britain, of High Treason against Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and the Constitution of England by attempting to amend the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701 which lays down the inheritance of the Crown, and which if done will forcefully remove Her Majesty from her titles and temporalities as Queen of England. As though she were dead. This is consistent with David Cameron imagining her death which is an act of High Treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act.

You Sir took an oath to uphold the laws of England to the best of your ability, and without favour, fear, malice, or ill will. You took that oath to Her Majesty and Her Majesty took an oath to her subjects. To rule England according to our laws. You have a clear duty to do every thing in your power to assist her in keeping her oath taken before God to her subjects.

Sir you are on record as saying it is not for the police but the victim to decide if a crime is investigated. Any assault on Her Majesty’s honour and the constitution are an assault upon all Her Majesty’s subjects you included we are all victims in Mr Cameron’s act of High Treason. You are therefore requested and required to fulfil your oath and deal with Mr Cameron for his High Treason against Her Majesty the English Constitution and subjects of Her Majesty’s. For your information I am enclosing a copy of my book Layman’s Guide to the Edednglish Constitution. Which I hope you find to be a good read and informative.

Respectfully submitted

Albert Burgess. SPC 5119 QK Retired

                          W/N 508157

Roger Hayes

Sent: Sunday, 30 October 2011, 11:17 Subject: Fw: UPDATE: WIRRA

The true and correct:

the outcome of Roger Hayes' hearing on the 28th of October was as follows.

The story so far. Roger Hayes has refused to pay his council tax... until the council provide a contract so that he can hold them to account (democracy) and justify the massive amount of money they are spending (wasting). Council's response has been 'Pay up or else' - Roger chose the 'or else' option - the council obliged by trying to bankrupt him... Roger had the evidence on his side (justification for non-payment)... so the council employed the services of a corrupt judge Michael Peake. (This was the Judge arrested in the 7th March in Birkenhead - orchestrated by The British Constitution Group and many other groups/friends).

The bankruptcy was pushed through on a day when Roger could not attend. (cowards) The official receiver wrote to Roger telling him that he had been made bankrupt... and to fill in various documents. Roger wrote back saying he wasn't bankrupt... and that it was the legal fiction that had been made bankrupt and not his responsibility and NO he would not be filling in their documents. The Official receiver then told Roger... fill in the documents 'OR ELSE'... Being a true believer in consistency... Roger chose the 'OR ELSE' option. The court case on the 28th was an application for the court to ORDER Roger to complete their forms or be done for CONTEMPT OF COURT... i.e. prison.

10 mins before the court hearing at 10 am... the Official receiver approached Roger and asked... " Before we go in....?" - Roger anticipating the question and before they could finish... answered "NO" (they then confirmed they were going to ask if Roger would complete their docs).

Roger had also written to the court and the official receiver to advise that he would not consent to the hearing... but would attend to assist.

They then advised Roger that because he was so passionate in his beliefs... (meaning they knew he was right) and they BACKED DOWN. They asked the court for an indefinite adjournment (that must be a first)... which avoids them having to admit they have NO AUTHORITY over Roger Hayes THE MAN. Roger thus did not fill in their forms and remains a free man.

Conclusion.
1). The court avoided having to deal with the legal fiction issue (Whew for the court). 2). Roger controlled the outcome by withholding consent. 3). The Official receiver has confirmed that they have no authority... and finally 4). Roger does not have to pay his council tax because the council have no way of forcing him through the courts.

This is a victory and should be hailed as one. BUT... do not try this unless you are 1) PREPARED and 2) aware of all the implications.

Best wishes... and thanks for all the support. Now lets get on and win the war.

Roger Hayes. Chairman. The British Constitution Group. www.thebcgroup.org.uk

Enough is enough

Original Message -----

From: Gordon Leonard

To: BaldryT@parliament.uk

Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 11:21 PM

Subject: Peoples Voice

The People’s Voice

We Have Had Enough.

This letter is a warning - from the people. It is not a request that requires an answer, but it does require a response - by way of action on your part that demonstrates that you understand its substance and the seriousness of our intent.

The collective political establishment has betrayed the British people by transferring our national sovereignty to a foreign power without our consent. This is in defiance of our constitution and an act of treason.

You do not need to know how many people we represent today, only how many we might represent tomorrow and you should know that our numbers grow daily. This letter thus serves as your window of opportunity to make amends and give remedy for the crimes committed against us. We will show compassion for those who recant and we will be ruthless with those who do not concede to the wishes of the people.

Ignoring this letter is not an option... if you think it is, then this serves only to demonstrate that your intellect is subservient to your arrogance. You may feel that you can ignore it because you are too powerful, but to do so is to underestimate the seething resentment that the people feel for the political establishment in general.

I, the undersigned, did not write this letter, but it expresses what I think about the way that we are being misgoverned. You have acted in contempt of the principles of democracy and shown total disregard for our right to govern ourselves. It does not matter who penned the words of this letter, what matters is what it says.

For the past several decades the British people have been treated with extraordinary and total contempt by the collective political establishment. It has not mattered which political party has been in office or ‘power’ as you insist on calling it, nothing ever changes. We are continually subjected to the same global agenda. We have been used and abused like pawns in your game of supremacy in which a dynastic ruling class see themselves as ordained to rule as masters - with impunity, whilst we the people, as virtual slaves, are supposedly destined to obey – without question. You have persistently and consistently undermined our democracy by agreeing to treaties with foreign political elites who have no business in our affairs.

You have rewarded yourself with the trappings of office - high salaries, luxuries denied most of us, privileges, pensions, prestige and benefits that we can only dream of... whilst burdening us with ever-higher taxes, derisory pensions and declining standards of public services. It is we who pay the price for your malfeasance.

The story of Britain over the past several decades that will be told in the history books of tomorrow is the story of betrayal, greed, corruption, nepotism, treason and modern day fascism – the latter of which manifests itself in the global agenda being imposed upon us against our will.

The European Union - a step process towards global governance is now fully exposed. Built on lies and deceit is being hoisted by its own petard - the edifice is crumbling but still the political elite like demented fools, continue to feed on their own delusions. The docile masses, mesmerised by trivia, propaganda, complacency and ignorance have still somehow managed to grasp some basic elements of the truth, alerted almost certainly by the blatant and arrogant refusal of the political elite to tell the truth even when it stands proud in the rubble of political deceit and betrayal.

The political class are discredited at every level. They rant about the benefits of our subjugation to a foreign enterprise, peace, prosperity and democracy where in reality chaos, dictatorship and corruption reign supreme. European economies are on the brink of collapse because of the corrupt banking cartels, there is visible resistance on the streets and people call for lawful rebellion. But less known, there is clandestine resistance behind closed doors. Whilst the majority advocate a peaceful uprising, the extremes will always be in the mix and when passion and anger are fused and those aggrieved can find no remedy... violent resistance is as understandable as the passion for life itself.

The police and militia that you currently rely on to defend yourselves against the people’s retribution... are made up of our own, they are not your people – and when they learn about your betrayal and your intent.... AND THEY WILL - they will turn against you. Their awakening, which you cannot stop, is your Achilles heel. Your greatest fear must be that we will impose upon you the regimes and repression that you had planned for us.

People are meeting in groups across the country, talking across oceans... they are disparate, disorganised and without an effective plan to repel the global agenda... as yet. BUT a leadership is emerging... organisers are co-ordinating and small groups are linking to form larger groups. The dichotomies of left v right, Christian v Muslim, , black v white, Catholic v Protestant, which have been used to great effect to divide and conquer in the past, will find no favour in this war. The call to arms that will unite us will be ‘the people v the global elite’ – the cry will cascade street to street and find easy passage and universal support – for our common purpose has greater value and strength than yours.

We have a constitution – which you ignore. We have been denied our democratic rights, regardless, we have clearly expressed our wishes, in one opinion poll after another, that we do not want to be governed by a foreign unelected officialdom, but still you disregard us. We are promised a referendum on our future, but then you recant. You speak in support of our views when in opposition, but act to the contrary when we elect you.

You consult with corporate executives, international bankers, non-government organisations, international charities, academia, foreign dignitaries, political elites, think tanks and lobbyist – collectively a tiny minority, who do not represent us. These groups all emanate from the same social strata, with their own agendas to satisfy and all funded by the same cartel. You take note of their every whim, but you care not a jot for what we think or what we want. Your children are given jobs, with big salaries fresh from university and then rapidly climb the corporate ladder as reward by the same corporate bodies who you have favoured with your decisions. Our children must make their own way in an increasingly desperate world. Your corporatism suppresses our freedoms with deliberate and malicious intent.

You accommodate tyrants, dictators, arms dealers and all manner of dubious characters, with whom you are happy to keep company. You turn a blind eye when the smell of money wafts your nostrils... it suppresses the stink of corruption and evil. Your moral compasses are defunct... your values deplorable and motives despicable. Our soldiers die to service your corporate agenda – their blood is on your hands.

You are educated at the same elite schools and members of the same elite clubs and you allow these influences to override the consideration which should be paramount in service of the people. You have adopted the “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” philosophy... because you have learnt from your predecessors that corruption and deception do indeed pay. The European Union is awash with it and you have determined to get your snout in the same trough. You take comfort from the fact that you control those who have the authority to indict you for your criminality... because they too have fallen prey to the corruption. You have sold off our national resources to your friends, divided communities, deprived villages and towns, undermined, destroyed and bulldozed. You have laid waste where once prosperity was enjoyed. But you have not suffered... you have remained aloof, disengaged, uninvolved - removed from the debris and the misery that you have wreaked upon the rest of us.

We have seen our three billion annual fishing industry handed over to foreign control for nil reward. Our farms no longer feed us, crippled by regulations made to favour foreign farmers. Our ship-building has been dismantled and our merchant fleet whittled to nothing. Our armed forces are under strength and we see foreign troops being trained on our own soil on the pretence that they may be needed to protect us... when the reality is they are being trained to subdue us... to protect you from our vengeance. Our children are victims of social engineering in the schools and declining standards of education. They are being sexualised by explicit exposures before they have the emotional maturity to be able to cope. You are destroying their minds and their childhoods.

You have engineered a police state with legislation that empowers you at our expense and you have been blatant in your contempt for our democratic and constitution rights and our common law, which have been known to us for centuries. You deny us our rights and our freedoms and contemptuously imply that you can provide us with a new Bill of Rights. Would we seriously trust a thief with our wallets? You have corrupted our courts by appointing judges who are contemptuous of our common law and you have bowed to the pressure of foreign elites who have inflicted their inferior system of justice upon us... without our consent. You have not defended our interests... you have conspired merely to enhance your own.

You have dissected our nation and sold off our infrastructure. We buy our own water from foreign corporations who grow rich on the back of our suffering. Pensioners die of cold because they are unable to afford their heating bills visited upon them by foreign corporate greed. You are then rewarded by them with lucrative directorships when you slip quietly from office with your bulging pensions. You remain oblivious, unconcerned... disconnected. We will no longer be ignored as you go about you globalist agenda. We will resist your controlling and petty rules and regulations... we will resist your fines and penalty charges and challenge your corrupt and biased judges, we will defy the over-zealous police, and your oppressive and unlawful taxes.

It is our intention to govern ourselves... we do not seek your permission – this is our right. You have had your opportunity and you have failed. We will take control of our own lives in stages, as and when it suits us. Our numbers will grow as we show by example that prosperity is the natural consequence of honest and fair governance. We will expose you for the parasites you are.

This country has a constitution – which you ignore. We have Magna Carta, the declaration and the Bill of Rights... we have trial by jury, habeas corpus, the coronation oath. We have our customs, traditions and common law. We have the right of petition, free speech, and free movement and above all... we have the right to govern ourselves. These are our inalienable rights – they are not privileges granted to us by you or your ilk. They cannot be taken away or extinguished at the whim of political diktat or through corrupt judicial process and certainly not at the behest of foreign undemocratic institutions. You have no authority to dictate... your duty is to serve.

We do not recognise regions imposed upon us by Europeans to affect their control over us - to divide and to conquer us. We are a sovereign nation... a proud people. We have watched our country slowly destroyed... by you - we now see clearly what you have done... your purpose and you betrayal. We will honour our inheritance – the freedoms fought for and secured for us, and we will ensure that we will pass this on to the next generation, to our children and theirs.

You have been sent this letter by a constituent. On sending a copy to you, they have also registered your name with the co-ordinators. This will remain with us as evidence for your trial... for treason, should it be necessary. It’s your choice

We are many – you are few... and our leaders are emerging.

You have been warned.

Signature ............Gordon Leonard...........................................................................................

Address: ...."Stonelea", Bainton Road, Bucknell, Bicester, Oxon OX27

UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FA I L

Dear Friend and Colleague



It is my fervent hope that you would forward this to as many people as you feel will read and receive its message.



There are now a number of political organisations in Britain standing independently for the survival of England or Britain as a nation. All of them seek Britain’s escape from the EU. With their many widespread supporters, they collectively embrace a large number of deeply sincere, patriotic, intelligent and discerning people who want their country back and who affirm that Britain can be great and successful again as the independent country it once was. Only because of insidious deceit, lies and trickery have our political “elite” duped the British public into thinking that Britain should give up and allow itself to be scrapped; that Westminster knows best and that we cannot survive without the EU. They are absolutely and precisely wrong.



But what if all of these organisations stood together ?

What if it were possible for all these like minded people to join forces in their common cause of uniting the British population against the tyranny we face ? Wouldn’t we then prove unstoppable ? Every one of these organisations has the same political goal - the survival of Britain as a Christian, self governing nation and the return of our country to the British people from those who claim the right to do just whatever they like. If all these many thousands of people could be heard collectively - by the press, Westminster, the wider Establishment, the electorate - wouldn’t the collective and louder voice be more clearly, effectively and consistently heard than the individual statements and demonstrations that pop up now and then ?



Some 99% of British people want out of the EU (Daily Express)./ They want the benefit of our money spent on our own country and not wastefully frittered elsewhere, reversal of immigration and the increased crime it leads to, an end to foreign labour and the looting of British jobs for Europeans, an end to the overfilling of our country with more people than Britain can sustain, removal of the Islamification threat to Britain’s and the increasing sectarianism of our cities and the reversal of political correctness, destruction of our British culture and our appeasement of all others so not to offend anybody in the world.



But nobody is listening because we do not speak loudly enough. Together. Moreover, it seems that anybody who stands for England, Britain or for Britishness is incessantly targeted and smeared as racists and extremists reviled by society (and the Establishment purposely incites such feelings in the public) when in fact we are ordinary everyday British people from all walks of life who simply want our country back. A large proportion of the British electorate still believe the devious governmental misinformation and that we are to be ignored at all cost. And they still feel alone in their deep conviction that Westminster and Europe are raping our nation for others’ benefit. “United we stand, divided we fall”. Wouldn’t all those silent majority realise the truth and willingly join our British cause if they saw and heard the united influence of all of the pro-British organisations speaking and acting as one ?



Another point to consider is this.

The Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats (in other words, the “the nasty party”, “the saviours of Britain who did far more to destroy it” and the “also-rans”) have ingratiated themselves upon the British public for far too long. They arrogantly believe they have the sole right to govern us. All three pursue the same agenda. Whichever of Lib/Lab/Con one votes for, one votes ultimately for a multicultural Islamic state, British people reduced to second class citizens, destruction of our Britishness, values and culture, our capitulation to EU domination and our being made a minor fringe province of the great European super-state ruled by anybody but ourselves. All three parties are blindly unpatriotic, treasonous, unlistening, out of touch, outdated, untouchable, dubiously funded and old fashioned. They no longer serve any useful purpose but their own gratification. They cling tenaciously to their questionable past and self-serving principles. Cameron’s “let’s pass control back to the volunteering public” big society is none other than “we have no idea and cannot think what to do next but we yearn to be liked and will fight tooth and nail to stay in office”. I believe it also demonstrates an intention to get the British public on-side before they introduce dictatorship. And we are paying them handsomely for this.



It is time for entirely new politics. Politics that put Britain first. If all of the pro-English / British groups and their supporters came together and spoke freely and loudly with one voice, wouldn’t we get Britain back far sooner ? Wouldn’t the electorate feel re-awakened and revitalised with new hope after years of apathy in the political wilderness because it was always “more of the same” ? And wouldn’t the British people feel liberated to speak their minds after so many years of being politically cowed, downtrodden and ignored ? Even more importantly, it would be far more difficult for the Establishment to shut us all up, to over-talk us at every opportunity and attempt to nullify our efforts with bigger, wider more dazzling election campaigning funded by all sorts of non-British-minded financiers who’re in it for the limelight, prestige and the money.



Bear in mind that Britain faces a comprehensive battle.

We are about to be consumed by the overwhelming might of EU power-grab whose icy fingers already clutch at our money no matter how desperately Cameron may try to convince us otherwise. Direct EU taxation is forthcoming in addition to the many existing rip-offs and fake causes, while ever more stringent laws and regulations and increasing donations to the un-needy or undeserving are all set only to rise under EU rule. We are under constant immigrant invasion and are losing our cities and our British society to immigrants and their foreign cultures, here specifically to take us over. They strive to liken our homeland to those they fled. Our Britishness is being systematically dismantled by our own “government” who insist we reduce ourselves to others’ levels in "multiculturalism" that does not work anywhere in the World. We are obliged to offend nobody on Earth and we face colonisation by far higher immigrant birth rates (while ours declines) and angry foreign intolerance of us and our ways. And our hands are tied behind our backs by those we employ to run our country. They even intentionally repealed the laws on treason before setting out on this devastating attack upon us. How corrupt is that ?



How long will it be before Britain will have been taken so far down the road to ruin that escaping its effects would even be possible ? Our government targets the British in favour of all-comers even from the Third World whom we are to welcome and befriend. And Government persistently attacks anybody who stands for the country and the rights we once enjoyed. These are being showered upon the new-comers. They even seek to prove links between us and Norwegian killer Anders Breivik for the sake of deterring the British electorate from our British cause.



Unity

So how could Britain’s supporters come together ? Initially there might be inter-group differences. But weren’t all of these organisations created with essentially the same ideal, striving for the same thing ? Getting Britain back and ensuring that it is run for the benefit of the British people ? What deep differences can there really be ? Surely any such differences can be overcome because we all seek the same success. There may already be some form of contact between groups anyway because they all have the same purpose in life. Certainly it would need a new name for the combined organisation. One that breaths fresh air into the electorate’s minds and enables them to feel far better able and willing to join in and give support because they too want their country back as we see on a daily basis. But it needs more than just that. There has to be commitment. Commitment to speak as one, act as one and to stand as one. Commitment to be heard. Commitment to succeed - for our country's sake. All of these organisations already think as one - don’t they ?



If Britain is to survive as we wish, it will require far more than is presently being achieved by anybody in isolation. You will doubtless be aware of Brian Gerrish, the UK Column (http://www.ukcolumn.org/), his frequent appearance on Controversy TV’s “On The Edge” programmes (Sky channel 200) and not least his videos on Youtube exposing the truths of “Common Purpose”. While his research articles uncover a great many activities of our scandalous Government it nonetheless shows just how dangerous a situation Britain is in. Even more importantly still, it shows how vital it now is for us all to unite if we are to achieve anything in getting our country back.



And precisely how long have we to get our country back before we are too late ? While we all speak independently of one another and achieve little, our country is slowly being forced into cultural subjugation, bankruptcy, failure and collapse. Our Armed Forces and our police are being determinedly dwindled to such an extent that in a very short time, our total reliance upon European participation will be inevitable. So isn’t it for the various organisational leaders to communicate and talk about how most usefully and beneficially so many people across Britain can unite into one working administration ? Between them, the basic infrastructure is already in place. The policy makers, secretaries, organisers, leaders, fund holders and treasurers, printing and posting facilities, computer and digital communications experts. Surely it is only a matter of having the will and the intention to bring it all together - isn’t it ? Because until we do, nobody is listening. Not Government, the press, the Establishment nor the electorate are going to listen unless we show we are sincere and determined enough, capable enough and that we mean what we say. Also that we convince them that what we say is the truth. Divided, we are of no consequence to anybody - least of all Westminster or the EU. But together, we would be very much larger, very much more forceful and very noticeable. We’d truly be the voice of our country and our people - wouldn’t we ?



And if as is well known, people always join those who are sincere, acting for the right reasons, achieving and moving in the right direction, wouldn’t all 99% of the electorate follow and join the one party that stands for what they truly want in their heart of hearts ? After all, it is about our survival and that of our country. The well-being of our children and our grandchildren in their own country. It is about what we hand over to them when they are old enough, just as our parents handed over to us.



But this is not a trial effort. This is the only and last chance there will ever be.

Britain’s time is fast running out. Continuing independently as we are, each of the pro-British organisations is achieving little daily when compared with what needs to be done to secure our country and turn it around. Hundreds of thousands of British lives were sacrificed in two world wars to fight off the very dangers we now face. Do we not owe it to our children and their children to preserve our country for them ? So how much longer can we independent organisations afford to stand alone while few listen, we accomplish little and the Establishment does its very best to systematically destroy us, our culture and our country ?

What are we actually going to have achieved even in five or ten years’ time ? And where will Britain be then if Lib/Lab/Con continue to have their way ? Will Britain still be able to survive ? The Lib Dems alone, would have us immersed and unrecognisably lost in the EU tomorrow if they could. Isn’t that treasonous ?

How long will it take for all of these organisations to come together with any effect and what will have happened to Britain during that time ? And in ten years or so, shall we not be out-voted in our own country by the rapidly proliferating foreign cultures already here and that we continue to allow in under EU law ? With their multiple wives and higher birth rates, they are confident of Westminster's support and our benefits system. And they are determined. Their freely stated intention is to take our country. So our time left is shorter than we think and each day counts. Our combined action is necessary now.



It’s simply not good enough to dismiss this argument for unity saying, “it’ll never happen” or, “we’re making inroads”. The sad fact is, we aren’t making inroads. Britain is sinking deeper by the day. Remember, the bigger we become, the more that the British people will join in. We desperately need their support and their voice. But equally, they desperately need us. If 99% of British people think the same way, when they hear us speaking loudly as one, see us standing together, having increasing influence, making ground, how quickly will they join us then ?



This is our country and we all want it back. Don’t we ? But THIS is our only and last chance.



I have written similarly to as many other of Britain’s pro-English / British organisations as I can find with the hope of acting purely as a facilitator in suggesting this unification to regain control of our country. So my question to you is, “Do you agree with the above. And would you be willing to unite with all the other organisations toward a more effective, combined political movement to get our country back ?"



In all of the above, please remember that I do not seek to antagonise anybody. I seek no recognition. But I offer it in the sincere desire that our country survive and be returned to us. That we wrest control of Britain back to the British people - whose it is. For our children’s and grandchildren’s sake.



Kind regards,



Rex Poulton

r.poulton1@tiscali.co.uk