UN's Green plot to destroy the middle class, end industrialization, is unfolding now

From: DONALD HANK

Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 2:52 PM

Subject: Fw: UN's Green plot to destroy the middle class, end industrialization, is unfolding now

Think about it. The "green" elitists who salivate over world domination have said it themselves. They want to depopulate the planet and redistribute wealth (we used to call that communism. You may still call it that).

Do you think they could get away with it? Silly question. Look around you:

Around a half-dozen of Obama's pet "green" companies, starting with Solyndra, have gone belly up. They were propped up with tax payer money, which went into the pockets of Obama supporters.

Wealth redistribution is a red herring. The Soviet Union didn't practice it. Instead, it took ALL property from everyone and every entity and gave it to the government, which KEPT it, rather than redistributing it.
That is what is happening now, but chances are you are sleeping through it.
Look, major US banks were once enjoined under the CRA to lend to the "underserved communities," ie, minorities. Slick talking Keynesians now claim that this law made little difference. They don't want you to notice that the law was not intended to be enforced, for the most part, but rather to provide an incentive to all banks to engage in the reckless practice of lending mortgages to people with no downpayment or even identification.
It was an implicit promise that the government (via the working staff tax payer) would bail out banks that failed, as a result of this veiled incentive. It was a recipe for disaster, a disaster that became manifest in 2007.
Note that the target group, the poor, got little or nothing. Typically they were evicted from the cheaply purchased homes. The banksters and their cronies in government took the spoils. That is the equivalent of the Soviet Union's taking all property and keeping it rather than redistributing it. See?
Then there is Europe. Wealth redistribution there follows the same broad pattern. Pretending to "help" poor Greece and Spain, the eurozone pays billions to the bankers and keeps their own treasury full. Little or none is lent to business startups.
Spain is a typical example of a "green" disaster, the model that Obama has followed. It follows Agenda 21 to a t.
Prime Minister Zapatero embarked on an ambitious green jobs program. After this had been in place for some time, he hired researchers at the King Carlos University to find out how "successful" it was. Result: each "green" job (typically not permanent) cost the government 800,000 euros and 2.5 private sector jobs.
Like Obama, he filled the country with immigrants who also helped take jobs from the nationals. Likewise, the EU is filling Europe with immigrants who do not assimilate and who soak up billions in social assistance, for a net benefit of less than zero. Greece did the same, until the crash.
The final cost to Zapatero: he lost his job and was replaced by a man who is now helpless to undo the damage (could this be Romney's fate if he is elected?).
The impoverishment of Spain and Greece are not out of keeping with the UN's depopulation and wealth redistribution Agenda 21. They fit it like a glove.
If enough people could see through this thinly veiled stealth project intended to destroy the middle class, de-industrialize first world economies and funnel wealth into a growing central government, it wouldn't happen. Once the people catch on to the plot, there can be no more of the mandatory ingredient stealth.
Therefore, our task is to research this plot and its stealthy implementation, understand it and spread the word.

The article below is a contribution to that understanding.

Everything depends on your understanding this. (OK, we understand - now what? - Stan)

Don Hank

UN's "Virtuous Green Path" Leads Straight To Mass-Death

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
October 17, 2012

All arms of the scientific dictatorship appear to move in unison. As of late we hear repeated calls for de-industrialization of the developed world by the global elite. In addition an attempt is being made by the elite to integrate so-called "population issues" into other issues such as poverty, "climate change" and other phantoms of doom necessary to fulfill the ancient eugenic utopia. With the objective of plunging mankind into a new agrarian age, and depopulating the planet while they're at it, the global elite have set up a broad approach which self-described ecosocioeconomist professor Ignacy Sachs has euphemistically dubbed a "virtuous green path", more commonly known as Agenda 21.

A 1991 policy paper prepared for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) outlines a strategy for the transfer of wealth in name of the environment to be implemented in the course of 35 to 40 years. As it turns out, it is a visionary paper describing phase by phase the road to world environmental dictatorship. As professor Sachs states in his paper:

"To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span."

In his paper The Next 40 Years: Transition Strategies to the Virtuous Green Path: North/South/East/Global, Sachs accurately describes not only the intended time-span to bring about a global society, but also what steps should be taken to ensure "population stabilization":

"In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient."

In the first part of the (in retrospect) bizarrely accurate description of current events as they unfold, Sachs points out redistribution of wealth is the only viable path towards population stabilization and- as he calls it- a "virtuous green world". The professor:

"The way out from the double bind of poverty and environmental disruption calls for a fairly long period of more economic growth to sustain the transition strategies towards the virtuous green path of what has been called in Stockholm ecodevelopement and has since changed its name in Anglo-Saxon countries to sustainable development."

"(.) a fair degree of agreement seems to exist, therefore, about the ideal development path to be followed so long as we do not manage to stabilize the world population and, at the same time, sharply reduce the inequalities prevailing today.", the professor states.

"The bolder the steps taken in the near future", Sachs asserts, "the shorter will be the time span that separates us from a steady state. Radical solutions must address to the roots of the problem and not to its symptoms. Theoretically, the transition could be made shorter by measures of redistribution of assets and income."

Sachs points to the political difficulties of such proposals being implemented (because free humanity tends to distrust any national government let alone transnational government to redistribute its well-earned wealth). He therefore proposes these measures to be implemented gradually, following a meticulously planned strategy:

"The pragmatic prospect is one of transition extending itself over several decades."

In the second sub-chapter "The Five Dimensions of Ecodevelopment", professor Sachs sums up the main dimensions of this carefully outlined move to make Agenda 21 a very real future prospect. The first dimension he touches upon is "Social Sustainability":

"The aim is to build a civilization of being within greater equity in asset and income distribution, so as to improve substantially the entitlements of the broad masses of population and of reduce the gap in standards of living between the have and the have nots."

This of course means, reducing the standards of living in "The North" (U.S., Europe) and upgrading those of the developing nations ("The South and The East"). This would have to be realized through what Sachs calls "Economic Sustainability": "made possible by a more efficient allocation and management of resources and a steady flow of public and private investment."

The third dimension described by the professor is "Ecological Sustainability" which, among other things, limits "the consumption of fossile fuels and other easily depletable or environmentally harmful products, substituting them by renewable and/or plentiful and environmentally friendly resources, reducing the volume of pollutants by means of energy and resource conservation and recycling and, last but not least, promoting self-constraint in material consumption on part of the rich countries and of the privileged social strata all over the world;"

In order to make this happen Sachs stresses the need of "defining the rules for adequate environmental protection, designing the institutional machinery and choosing the mix of economic, legal and administrative instruments necessary for the implementation of environmental policies."

Dimension 4: "Spatial Sustainability":

"directed at achieving a more balanced rural-urban configuration and a better territorial distribution of human settlements and economic activities (.)".

The fifth and last dimension described in the UN policy paper is "Cultural Sustainability": "looking for the endogenous roots of the modernization processes, seeking change within cultural continuity, translating the normative concept of ecodevelopment into a plurality of local, ecosystem-specific, culture-specific and site-specific solutions."

But to realize such a dramatic new direction for the world, Sachs once again stresses the importance of incremental implementation. A matter of boiling the frog slowly as opposed to throwing the poor animal into a boiling-hot cooking pan:

"Even if we know where we want to get, the operational question is how do we proceed to put humankind on the virtuous path of genuine development, socially responsible and in harmony with nature. It is submitted that UNCED 92 should give considerable attention to the formulation of transition strategies that could become the central piece of the Agenda 21."

Agenda 21: the UN strategy for redistributing the wealth accumulated by the "North" in order to create a completely "balanced" world society- under auspices of the United Nations of course and the private central banks controlling it. This can only come about by destroying the middle-class. A sudden redistribution and industrialization would not do- for the middle-class would undoubtedly rise in defiance against it. Therefore, Sachs argues for an incremental and carefully planned dissolution of the middle-class phase by phase:

"To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span. The retooling of industries, even in periods of rapid growth, requires ten to twenty years. The restructuration and the expansion of the infrastructures requires several decades and this is a crucially important sector from the point of view of environment."

Then Sachs plunges into his most shocking statement:

"However, the single most important reason to consider the transition strategies over a minimum of thirty-five to forty years stems from the non-linearity of these strategies; they should be devised as a succession of changing priorities over time. A good illustration is provided by the population transition. In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient."

Sachs argues that "an accelerated programme of social and economic development of the rural areas should be the utmost priority in the first phase of a realistic population stabilization scheme."Who or what is to coordinate all this, according to Sachs, and how exactly is the UN to take control?

"The solutions", says Sachs, "can vary in terms of their boldness and take the form of global, multilateral or bilateral arrangements." These arrangements should as far as Sachs is concerned ensure "at least partially the automacity of financial transfers by some form of fiscal mechanisms, be it a small income tax or an array of indirect taxes on goods and services whose production and consumption has significant environmental impacts."

Over time, gradually, these taxes should increase:

"Starting the operation with a one per ten thousand tax and increasing it so as to reach one per thousand in ten to twenty years seems a fairly realistic proposal, the more so that the scheme creates an interesting market for the private enterprises involved in R and D."

Reading all this, the question as to what entity should take charge is not difficult to answer. Sachs:

"In order to generate maximum synergies between the national strategies and global action, the United Nations should create a forum for the periodical discussion and evaluation of these strategies and a research, monitoring and flexible planning facility to put them in a global perspective.(.). The forum should have a fair representation of all the main actors involved: governments, parliaments, citizen movements and the business world. Given its importance, it should be lifted from specialized agencies to a central place in the UN system."

This almost literally echoes the recent call by a group of scientists for the 2012 UN Earth Summit to create "a Sustainable Development Council within the UN system to integrate social, economic and environmental policy at the global level."

The "fair representation" Sachs is talking about is of course only a pretext to get everybody on board. As the "Danish Text", drafted for the Copenhagen conference in late 2009, clearly illustrates, the IMF and World Bank will always have final say in the construction of any international system.

The other, more sinister element of Agenda 21 is of course the concerted effort on the part of the global elite, through multilateral treaties and regulations, to not only control the populations of the world but to cull them.

Jurriaan Maessen's blog is Explosivereports.com

Similar/Related Articles

1. The Ultimate Euphemism: UN Calls Its Blueprint For Mass Death A "Virtuous Green Path"
2. Unelected European "Green" Commissioner Says Markets Must be Governed
3. 1991 UN Policy Paper Describes Exact Purpose and Trajectory of Current Copenhagen Treaty
4. UN Policy Paper Describes Incremental Steps Toward World Government
5. Green Madness: $205,075 spent to 'Translocate' One Shrub from Path of Stimulus Project
6. Agenda 21 Behind The Green Mask of Death
7. The "Green" Agenda Is All About Mass-Sacrifice
8. State Seizes Property Under 'Green' Zoning Laws, Terrorizes Man To Death
9. Two children should be limit, says green guru
10. Melinda Gates: Worrying About Population Control "Has Led To Much Suffering And Death"
11. Revolt Against Vaccines Leads to Mass Exodus From Texas Colleges
12. Obama Mind Control Offensive Straight Out of UNESCO Eugenics Playbook

SUPER STORMS OF CONSCIOUSNESS – THE SEDUCTIVE WINDS OF ARMAGEDDON

By Paul McGuire
October 22, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

Although, there are enough significant differences to make it important to vote, Obama and Romney, are in many respects, controlled by the same invisible elite. The attack on Iran will happen whether or not, Obama or Romney wins. Council on Foreign Relations member, and scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, David Rothkopf, wrote in the CFR publication, “Foreign Policy,” that the White House and Israeli officials “assert that the two sides behind the scenes have come closer together, regarding Iran.”

A convergence of political, economic and spiritual forces, has gained the momentum to produce what I call “Super Storms of Consciousness.” First we have the predictions of the Ezekiel 38, or War of Gog and Magog War, predicted in precise detail by the prophet Ezekiel, thousands of years ago. In this prophecy, Israel is invaded by nations like Russia, Iran and an alliance of the Middle Easter nations. There is a dispute among scholars, if the present situation involving the buildup of an Iranian nuclear program and a massive armada of naval ships in the Strait of Hormuz, could lead to Ezekiel 38? Then later on in what is called the “Time of Jacob’s Trouble,” or “The Tribulation Period,” is the final war against Israel and its Messiah, called Armageddon. Armageddon will involve all the nations of earth, as three demonic spirits like frogs gather the nations together at Armageddon.

The idea of “Super Storms of Consciousness,” leading up to Armageddon, has to do not only with Bible prophecy, but it has to do with visions and ideas, apparently from another realm of consciousness, outlining a plan for mankind’s global battle, on some supernatural level of consciousness. For example, The Fabian Socialists, like H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russell and others made plans about this massive conflict, which they believed would destroy billions of people through nuclear and biological weapons, would have a secondary effect, of reducing the world’s population. General Pike, the Confederate General, and Freemason leader had a vision of three World Wars, including World War III, which would involve Islam and Israel. 1947-1948, wee the years that the,” The Super Storms of Consciousness,” appear to have ripped the dimensions of time and space. Science Fiction author and Scientology founder, L. Ron Hubbard, allegedly participated in some kind of Aleister Crowley, ritual called, “Babalon Working.” In this ritual, at the mansion of the rocket scientist Jack Parson’s, who Werner Von Braun, called the father of the U.S. rocket program, Hubbard and Parson’s attempted to produce and elemental being called the “Moonchild.”
Around this same time period, atomic bomb tests happened in New Mexico. In 1947, there was a flying saucer crash in Roswell, New Mexico and it was the year that the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. In 1947, the United Nations, helped birth the modern state of Israel as a nation in 1948 . It was also the year, Aleister Crowley died.

The Middle East crisis, which was born the year Israel, was born, in 1948, has accelerated to a point of planetary convergence. Although, the term, “New World Order,” is not used openly by U.S. Presidents, it is used by their CFR advisors like Kissinger and Brzezinski. The threat of nuclear war and the crash of the global economy is driving force for the building up of the United Nations and a one world government. The U.N. is also, the institution of appeal to overturn the U.S. Constitution, in matters like the right to bear arms. The U.N. is a globalist institution that serves the interests of secret elite, composed of men and institutions like the CFR, Bilderberg, Club of Rome, Bohemian Grove and the U.N. There are two parallel streams emerging out of the Middle East. One is the re-emergence of a global peace movement, whose real goal is eradicate the constitutions of sovereign nations, remove the guns from the citizen’s and redistribute the wealth of the Middle Class.

The secretive elite install their leaders all over the world, under the guise of democracy in order to accomplish the consolidation of their wealth and power! The movie, “2016 Obama’s America,” was a good movie. But, there was a glaring omission from the film. A guy like Obama just doesn’t walk into the White House! He is deliberately placed there by very powerful elite to accomplish their agenda. The problem is not Obama, which is what they want you to believe. The problem is George Soros and the people he represents, who want to transfer the wealth of the Middle Class. Through Obama and a Republican and Democratic Congress, they have accomplished an “Open Revolution,” and have re-invented the U.S. The average wealth of the American Middle Class, has been reduced somewhere between 40-60%.

We now live in the world of Big Brother, “1984,” and “Brave New World.” As Aldus Huxley said, “the most efficient dictatorship is one where the people love their servitude.” This is America today. Drugs both legal and illegal, porn, hypnotic religion, sports and new technological toys, to occupy mass consciousness.

I am not a scientologist, but in the early days of L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard fully understood the “twelve men,” who controlled the world and how they did financially and with mind control. Whether you like Hubbard or not, L. Ron Hubbard understood, “Battlefield Earth,” a lot better than most Christian ministers like, Billy Graham. I know these words are going to step on the toes of the idolatrous sacred cow of Evangelical Christianity. The name of that cow is“Apis,” and it is the god of the ancient Egyptians. When Moses was up on the mountain talking to God, the Hebrews had melted all their gold, into the form of a golden calf called “Apis,” and had orgies around it.

That same Egyptian religious system is alive and well today, stemming from Babylon. The only way we can have a Third Great Awakening, which will ignite the atomic-bomb-like energy necessary for blowing open the frozen consciousness of a generation frozen in time and infected with the “zombie apocalypse,” is to come into direct contact with truth, not religion, but truth.
A short glimpse of a video I put together entitled, “Moon into Blood – Israel, Iran and Armageddon,” may give you an idea what to expect in the near future.”

“What will the social order of the future be like? Comrade, I will tell you. There will be a class of overlords, after them the rank and file of the party members in hierarchical order, and then the great mass of anonymous followers, servants and workers in perpetuity, and beneath them again all the conquered foreign races, the modern slaves. And over and above all these will rein a new and exalted nobility of whom I cannot speak. But of all these plans the militant members will know nothing. The new man is living amongst us now! He is here. Isn’t that enough for you? I will tell you a secret. I have seen the new man. He is intrepid and cruel. I was afraid of him” –Adolf Hitler

To watch the new movie teaser, visit www.chaosreaction.com

© 2012 Paul McGuire - All Rights Reserved

THE EUSSR: Its blueprint was designed in 1940's Germany

 

THE EUSSR: Its blueprint was designed in 1940's Germany, but implemented by the Marxist/Leninist Left!!!!

By Daniel HannanPoliticsLast updated: October 19th, 2012

I used to find the EUSSR trope tedious, but now…

Take a close look at this promotional poster. Notice anything? Alongside the symbols of Christianity, Judaism, Jainism and so on is one of the wickedest emblems our species has conceived: the hammer and sickle.

For three generations, the badge of the Soviet revolution meant poverty, slavery, torture and death. It adorned the caps of the chekas who came in the night. It opened and closed the propaganda films which hid the famines. It advertised the people's courts where victims of purges and show-trials were condemned. It fluttered over the re-education camps and the gulags. For hundreds of millions of Europeans, it was a symbol of foreign occupation. Hungary, Lithuania and Moldova have banned its use, and various former communist countries want it to be treated in the same way as Nazi insignia.

Yet here it sits on a poster in the European Commission, advertising the moral deafness of its author (I hope that's what it is, rather than lingering nostalgia). The Bolshevist sigil celebrates the ideology which, in strict numerical terms, must be reckoned the most murderous ever devised by our species. That it can be passed unremarked day after day in the corridors of Brussels is nauseating.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100185609/you-thought-the-whole-eussr-thing-was-over-the-top-have-a-look-at-this-poster/#disqus_thread

Treason

In 1972, Edward Heath signed the European Communities Act knowingly betraying the British people into European rule. His was an act of outright High Treason and his government thus became an unlawful assembly. Governments cannot bind successors. Though each successive government had the opportunity to rectify his treachery, none did. Each thus became an unlawful assembly also. In 1992, John Major signed the Maastricht Treaty knowingly and wilfully stripping Her Majesty of Her Sovereignty, Honour and Style and rendering her and her subjects mere “citizens” of Europe. His act was ultra vires and one of outright High Treason. No law can result from treasonous acts, much less unlawful assemblies. It is struck down by our Common Law. Every statute, EU treaty, diktat and influence since 1972 is consequently null and void. Britain has therefore never been part of the EU and our British law stands as it was before the 1972 Act. In consequence, those who affirm and uphold EU law, diktat or influence are openly treasonous and liable to prosecution.

Rex Poulton

POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONERS

The following letter has been sent to 1300 newspaper editors and reporters, each and every MP (640) and each and every Police Authority and Police Federation in the country. It has also gone to each Police Commissioner and Chief Constable.

Should you wish to write similarly, please feel free to use any part of the letter if it helps. I can provide email addresses if required.

Rex

Dear Sir or Madam

The forthcoming role of Police and Crime Commissioner (election 15 November) is unlawful.

You will know that successful candidates will be required to swear an oath of office and impartiality. This oath includes promises to “serve the people” and to be “held to account by the public” but it conspicuously and importantly excludes allegiance or service to Her Majesty, a major part of the oath sworn by the police whom commissioners will oversee.

Replacing police authorities whose representatives are local authority nominations, independent members and magistrates, the intent to politicise overarching control of the police is clear. Party political considerations would inevitably taint impartiality and this will be particularly true due to our illegal (thus non-existent) membership of the European Union.

Our Constitutional Law forbids any foreign interference whatsoever. We the voting public, fully expect our law enforcement agencies to protect us from such interference so it cannot be permissible for commissioners to have loyalty to two conflicting masters - the public at large and the Prime Minister who effectively serves a foreign power. Even though Privy Councillors currently and treasonously serve two sovereigns, commissioners cannot believably serve these two conflicting masters.

Absence of allegiance to the Queen would doubtless prove to mean serving political obligation. As the police serve Her Majesty, it is untenable that they be accountable through commissioners to the Prime Minister who has no lawful power over them. Allegiance to the Crown (not Parliament) is paramount in any service to the nation. The Monarch is the nation, Parliament is not. Parliament is not sovereign nor is it lawfully empowered to rule the nation. Parliament serves the Crown so it cannot control the Crown’s police.

The very real danger is, that in commissioners being short term political appointees, their individual public accountability will be very short while their power will inevitably come under long term control of the Prime Minister. Why else are candidates generally drawn from the political parties ? It will be entirely unacceptable therefore, that commissioners could bring the Police Service under the control of the Prime Minister. This puts the security of the public at serious risk through political interference and it will be unconstitutional, political dictatorship and an act of High Treason. Moreover, such a move will place the Prime Minister above the Monarch which is also outright High Treason.

In law, the police can never answer to the Prime Minister. They answer to the Queen and her subjects, who are above Parliament. The House of Commons therefore has no business seeking to interfere with control of the police as becomes clear when studying the comparison between police authorities and commissioners who replace them. Despite claimed impartiality, political appointment of commissioners will ensure control of the police according to Party political diktat.

The principle of Police and Crime Commissioners is nothing but a cynical attempt by a treasonous Government to further control the public and to consolidate its power over the police. The public are fully aware of this and steps have been taken to seek the arrest of those politicians who would harm the security of this country. Once we have our country back, we will make sure the police are properly manned, properly resourced and fully independent of all political interference.

Yours sincerely,

Rex Poulton

r.poulton1@tiscali.co.uk

Yet they still voted him in. :*(.

Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do.

Few were listening.

The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised "Meet The Press."

From Sunday's 07 Sept. 2008, 11:48:04 EST, Televised "Meet the Press" the then Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag.

General Bill Ginn, USAF (ret.), asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.

The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171...

During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention, facing the flag, with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, "Stand and Face It".

NOW GET THIS !!

'Senator' Obama replied:

"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides....." "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression...." "The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air, and all that sort of thing."

(ARE YOU READY FOR THIS???)

Obama continued:, "The National Anthem should be 'swapped' for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like To Teach the World To Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as 'redesign' our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It's my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails - - - perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ......"
 
"When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts . We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice,which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag, and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past."

"Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path. My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country's First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America."

WHAAAAT, is that???

Yes, you read it right.

I, for one, am speechless!!!
Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post

EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NEEDS TO READ THIS, KEEP IT GOING ! !   SAVE AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE ! !

                                                                         IN GOD WE TRUST !

Bilderberg meeting 2012: Everyone not invited


Bilderberg meeting 2012: Everyone not invited - English pravda.ru

Conspiracy Realism by Srdja Trifkovic • July 5, 2012

Anyone claiming that international bankers, multinational company executives, members of the Bilderberg Group, elite academics, senior judges, United Nations officials and European Union strategists are working together to undermine the remnants of sovereignty and identity of old Christian nations through mass Third World immigration would be dismissed by our bien pensants as a conspiracy theorist. A wacko unfit for polite society.

Enter Peter Sutherland (66), a remarkable man. Addressing the House of Lords sub-committee on immigration on June 21, Mr. Sutherland said that the EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states in order to make them truly multicultural.

He was addressing the peers in his capacity of head of the Global Forum on Migration and Development, but that is only one of Peter Sutherland’s many affiliations. He is also: · the UN’s special representative for migration; · non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International who made $200 million from the bank’s flotation in 1999; · former chairman of Allied Irish Bank, the biggest in the country; · former member of the European Commission; · “Consulter of the Extraordinary Section of the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See,” offering advice on the Vatican’s finances; · former Director General of The World Trade Organization (WTO); · former chairman of oil giant BP, with a salary of $1,000,000 a year; · former Attorney General of Ireland; · Chairman of the Council of the London School of Economics; and last but by no means least, · a regular participant in meetings of The Bilderberg Group, which the BBC report on his remarks to the Lords tactfully described as “a top level international networking organization often criticized for its alleged secrecy.”

The future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming “multicultural,” Sutherland told the peers, “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states.” An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument … for the development of multicultural states,” he said. “It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them,” according to Sutherland. “At the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice” because anyone should have the right to work or study in the country of his or her preference.

Criticizing the UK government's current attempt to cut net immigration to “tens of thousands” a year through visa restrictions, Mr. Sutherland urged EU member states to adopt “a global approach to the issue” and “accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds.” He bewailed the fact that many Europeans “still nurse a sense of [their] homogeneity and difference from others… And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.” This is the most explicit statement of intent to date by an authoritative member of what is de facto world government. Nations should disappear by being cured of the sense of difference from others, dissenters should be coerced into submission, and everyone in the world is entitled to live anywhere in the world.

It is noteworthy that, in Sutherland’s view, the EU has not done enough to advance his agenda. As it happens, Brussels has decreed many years ago that countries of the European Union no longer have the power to decide on who comes or stays within their borders. In 1999, the Treaty of Amsterdam transferred responsibility for immigration policies from individual member-countries to the EU Council of Ministers, acting on proposals from the unelected European Commission.

The all-out EU effort to undermine “homogeneity” is over a decade old. Its founding document is the European Council agreement signed in Tampere (Finland) in October 1999, which mandated granting immigrants all those rights enjoyed by host-country citizens. It also demanded relaxation of asylum policy, since European freedoms should not be regarded “as the exclusive preserve of the Union’s own citizens” and will not be denied to those “whose circumstances lead them justifiably to seek access to our territory.”

The European Union Presidency statement on racism of March 21, 2002, declared that the EU “bases its very existence in the idea that “all peoples and individuals constitute one human family.” With his plea that “individuals should have a freedom of choice,” Sutherland is knocking on an open EU door, and he knows it. For a cultural radical like him no given status quo is ever satisfactory, however. Brussels can and should do more, for as long as there are Britons, Germans or Italians who are still proud of who they are and who still believe that their countries should somehow belong to them and their offspring.

It is to be feared that Europeans may get physically eradicated well before their “sense of difference” is destroyed though state education and judicial fiat. Even on current form Europe is well on the way to population replacement. In France—to take the most drastic example—of close to 800,000 live births in a nation of just under 60 million, Muslim immigrants (predominantly from North Africa) and their French-born descendants currently account for close to one-third.

Short of a sudden reversal of policies and demographic curves, even without Sutherland’s radical measures there will be no “Europeans” a century from now. They will literally disappear as members of ethnic groups that share the same language, culture, and ancestors, and inhabit lands associated with their names.

Peter Sutherland embodies the Western elite class: he is deracinated, authoritarian, rich, arrogant, contemptuous of the common people, powerful and dangerous.

In other words, a few details of the physique notwithstanding, he is Barack Obama’s older brother. It is therefore unsurprising that in his remarks to the House of Lords he praised the United States as the model of multicultural openness that Europe would be well advised to emulate.

Queen Elizabeth II Albert Burgess

Buckingham Palace 15 Parliament Road

London Thame

SW1A 1AA OX9 3TE

31 May 2012

You’re Majesty

I am sitting here listening to Simon Sharma introducing his talking book on British history talking about the great pageantry of your Coronation, a young Queen taking over from a Great King your Majesty’s father King George VI who had just led this Island Kingdom through its greatest challenge ever against the Monster that was Hitler’s Germany. As a result you took the Reigns as Queen of this Island people suffering under the strain of paying for a war which had to be fought to ensure the freedom of the rest of the world not to mention our own.

A new Queen with a country justly proud of defeating Germany and saving the world from tyranny, a new Queen already loved by her subjects who would all have died in her service, partly for love of yourself and partly from love of your Mother and Father who had together steered this country through its greatest trial and come out the other side Victorious.

Your Majesty’s Reign started with such promise a young and beautiful Queen who had herself done her bit during the war. But that promise has been dashed on the rocks of ignorance, ignorance of the English Constitution both by Your Majesty and our politicians. In 1967 you gave the assent to the repeal of the 1351 Act of Praemunire which had for 616 years protected this country from the imposition of foreign law into this Kingdom, and which protected your subjects from being in the words of King Edward III “Drawn out of his Kingdom to be tried in foreign Courts” from then within 6 years you had allowed Edward Heath the greatest traitor this country has ever known selling your Kingdom to be enslaved by a foreign power led by Germany who we had so recently shed an inestimable amount of the blood of your fathers loyal subjects to defeat. Now by the greatest act of betrayal ever you gave the assent to the 1972 EEC Act which has allowed a German led European Union to buy up and destroy our industry, to destroy our Fishing industry and impose so much stupid and unnecessary foreign law which is with increasing speed killing our Farming industry, and causing a number of farmers your Majesty’s loyal subjects to kill themselves because they can see no way to turn to get out of the strangling tentacles of the German led EU.

An increasing number of your subjects want to hang you from a lamp post for what they consider you have done to betray this ancient Kingdom, a Kingdom who your forefathers have kept free at the expense of rivers of the blood of their subjects, just as your father and grandfather kept it free.

Speaking for myself I subscribe to the view that this has happened as a result of your ignorance of (a) your lack of understand of what it is to be a King of England. And (b) an almost complete lack of knowledge of the English Constitution, it is not as Vernon Bogdanor claims “what the Queen does in parliament is the law”

That may well suit a group of politicians who like to think they can do whatever they like and screw the lot of you and that includes the Queen. Who has allowed herself to be turned from a Sovereign Prince of England into a mere cypher to be used by traitors not fit to clean the shoes of your lowest dustman, but a dustman who would if asked shed his blood for England and his Queen. Just as his ancestors who rode with Boadicea and every King and Queen of England since have shed theirs. We see our politicians talking to your service men in war zones as yet I have not seen one who has offered to lead a patrol into an area strewn with mines and people who would be happy to kill them.

You do not have the authority to place your prerogative in the hands of parliament, we your people grant you the prerogative so that you may act as our last line of defence short of the sword against despotic government. The prerogative is granted to you to use on our behalf and no other may use it.

If you understood the Constitution and Kingship you would know that. We have slime like Tony Blair known to your subjects as BLIAR telling us how you are wise and knowledgeable who by your wisdom is able to direct government. We your loyal subjects on the other hand believe you are the unwitting tool of those who purely for the kudos that goes with election to the Commons and for personnel financial gain into an offshore account can’t betray this country and its Queen fast enough.

YOU yes YOU Your Majesty are our Queen no one else just YOU. Our plea to you is that you become a Queen as Great as your great forebear the good Queen Elizabeth I open the Tower as the jail it has traditionally been and incarcerate the front benches of all the political parties inside whilst we sharpen the axe. For it is right that a freedom bought by the blood of English Scots Irish and Welsh men and women loyal to your forefathers, should be repaid with the blood of those whose disloyalty has betrayed all that our forefathers blood had paid for. It is fast approaching the time when your subjects will take no more treason from these overgrown and arrogant school boys. We are suffering the results of their financial mismanagement of the economy which has bankrupted this Kingdom which the war never did.

The NHS is on its knees, the police are disgruntled and on the point of walking out, and are restrained by senior officers who answer to politicians and not the law largely because they understand the constitution no more than government. The armed forces badly equipped with unserviceable tanks, due to a lack of spares because government are giving away the money they are borrowing in foreign aid and to the EU.

A Royal Navy so short of ships and men and now without air cover is on its knees, and is now reduced to a coastal defence force, Nelson is without doubt spinning in his grave with fury, the wholesale destruction of our Nimrods a criminal waste amounting to the crime of misconduct in public office, but then what have these governments done which is not truly misconduct in public office, all their treasons surely are. How could the Dean of Westminster not only hold a service to the EU but plan to desecrate the abbey with a memorial to that greatest of all traitors Heath and why have you not withdrawn his knighthood and sacked the Dean? Whose actions at the very least contravene the 1559 Act of Supremacy by praising a foreign power led by our traditional enemies in the most important Church in the Kingdom.

Other nations squander our money whilst there are not enough nurses in our hospitals and as a result your subjects suffer.

Wounded soldiers crippled by loss of limbs and post-traumatic stress syndrome obtained in your serviceare not treated by government as the hero’s they are, but are cut adrift by government too rich and too stupid to repay the dept. of honour so richly deserved. Honour I should remember is something your ministers know nothing about. Greed Avarice a grasping for Power these your ministers know only too well.

Not one of them nor I believe does our Queen understand that power they do not now and never have had, instead we grant them authority to govern according to the Constitutional and Common Laws and Customs of this Realm.

The very thing you swore an oath before God and to your subjects to do. An oath which for whatever reason is foresworn and foresworn with a vengeance.

You may ask how can this man write to me in this manner. The answer is simple I am a free born Englishman I love my Queen but I love England more, and what I see of what is happening to my England under the hand of my Queen I ask myself where does my main loyalty belong? Kings and Queens come and go, England is here forever.

My clear duty is to see it is kept intact for those who follow on. This I must say is your greatest duty, you as Queen of England have the last minute right and duty to assume direct command of your Kingdom under times of great danger, this right is granted to you by the Constitutional and Common Law and Customs of England. Use it.

You will see from the coat of arms enclosed how we see this Kingdom under attack from a ferocious wolf, with the pure Unicorn which represents your Kingdom not yet down but under attack.

Your Majesty we your subjects need you to pick up the mantle of being a King of England and to do it before the Unicorn lies dead with its throat and its belly ripped out by the Black Forest Wolf and your subjects end up in the same camps as the Jews of the last war but with more efficient ovens. For make no mistake Hitler may be dead but his Germany is not.

I pray Your Majesty hears my plea.

Albert Burgess

BILDERBERG PARTICIPANTS.....OUR QUEEN IS NO LONGER HEAD OF THIS COUNTRY, SHE IS IN FACT JUST AN ILLUSION. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE FABIANS WANT AND ARE ACHIEVING AND THIS IS TREASON.

04.05.12, 1:57pm

The Pledge - Successive governments using automatic assent.

The Turn - Completely ignoring constitutional law but making out what they are doing is legal.

The Prestige - Sovereignty destroyed, Constitution destroyed, Democracy destroyed, England destroyed.

The Fabians in government are doing their utmost to destroy our constitution and fool us into believing, that if the people become sovereign, the people themselves will govern our country - when the reality is the people will be governed by the EU and the EU will destroy this country.


Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: EU plot to scrap Britain


The Bilderberg group, the powerbrokers and bankers, have been accused of plotting the future of the world in their meetings, which are held in secret and behind locked doors.

Now, we know why their promises of retaining our national identity and sovereignty have been a carefully constructed collusion of lies.


• Posted by: Angry_Old_Git • Report Comment


Bilderberg meetings.

Even though Mrs Windsor herself never attended,she is a FABIAN.

United Kingdom
Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, United Kingdom (1986)
Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (1965, 1967)

The Great Betrayal of the British People The Fabian War from within.
.-------------------------------

For goodness sake start an English Sovereign Law party, or something similar, and enter :The Informed Juror, into your browser and discover our most potent weapon of all, the Government Slayer - Jury nullification.
• Posted by: Angry_Old_Git • Report Comment

Will Mrs Windsor be on OUR side ,the EU,S or HER GOVERNMENTS?
That,s all i want to know?
Otherwise she is just an ornament.
.

The Great Betrayal of the British People The Fabian War from within.

www www.tpuc.org/node/62

"A right of every Englishman is that of applying to the Courts of Justice for redress of injuries. Since the law in England is the supreme arbiter of every man's life, liberty and property, Courts of Justice must at all times be open to the subject, and the law be duly administered therein."

The Cambridge Law Journal, 1955, referring to (now Professor Sir, QC) William Wade's The Basis of Legal Sovereignty, said that: "sovereign legislation depends for its authority on (what Salmond calls) an 'ultimate legal principle', i.e.: a political fact for which no purely legal explanation can be given. If no statute can establish the rule that the courts obey (the UK) parliament, similarly no statute can alter or abolish that rule. It is above and beyond the reach of statute…because it is itself the source of the authority of statute.