All arms of the
scientific dictatorship appear to move in unison. As of late we hear repeated
calls for de-industrialization of the developed world by the global elite. In
addition an attempt is being made by the elite to integrate so-called
"population issues" into other issues such as poverty, "climate change" and
other phantoms of doom necessary to fulfill the ancient eugenic utopia. With the
objective of plunging mankind into a new agrarian age, and depopulating the
planet while they're at it, the global elite have set up a broad approach which
self-described ecosocioeconomist professor
Ignacy Sachs has
euphemistically dubbed a "virtuous green path", more commonly known as Agenda
21.
A 1991 policy
paper prepared for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED) outlines a strategy for the transfer of wealth in name of the
environment to be implemented in the course of 35 to 40 years. As it turns out,
it is a visionary paper describing phase by phase the road to world
environmental dictatorship. As professor Sachs states in his
paper:
"To be
meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades.
Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give
enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought
about by the lengthening of the time-span."
"In order to
stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics,
mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved
fairly inefficient."
In the first part
of the (in retrospect) bizarrely accurate description of current events as they
unfold, Sachs points out redistribution of wealth is the only viable path
towards population stabilization and- as he calls it- a "virtuous green world".
The professor:
"The way out from
the double bind of poverty and environmental disruption calls for a fairly long
period of more economic growth to sustain the transition strategies towards the
virtuous green path of what has been called in Stockholm ecodevelopement and has
since changed its name in Anglo-Saxon countries to sustainable
development."
"(.) a fair
degree of agreement seems to exist, therefore, about the ideal development path
to be followed so long as we do not manage to stabilize the world population
and, at the same time, sharply reduce the inequalities prevailing today.", the
professor states.
"The bolder the
steps taken in the near future", Sachs asserts, "the shorter will be the time
span that separates us from a steady state. Radical solutions must address to
the roots of the problem and not to its symptoms. Theoretically, the transition
could be made shorter by measures of redistribution of assets and
income."
Sachs points to
the political difficulties of such proposals being implemented (because free
humanity tends to distrust any national government let alone transnational
government to redistribute its well-earned wealth). He therefore proposes these
measures to be implemented gradually, following a meticulously planned
strategy:
"The pragmatic
prospect is one of transition extending itself over several
decades."
In the second
sub-chapter "The Five Dimensions of Ecodevelopment", professor Sachs sums up the
main dimensions of this carefully outlined move to make Agenda 21 a very real
future prospect. The first dimension he touches upon is "Social
Sustainability":
"The aim is to
build a civilization of being within greater equity in asset and income
distribution, so as to improve substantially the entitlements of the broad
masses of population and of reduce the gap in standards of living between the
have and the have nots."
This of course
means, reducing the standards of living in "The North" (U.S., Europe) and
upgrading those of the developing nations ("The South and The East"). This would
have to be realized through what Sachs calls "Economic Sustainability": "made
possible by a more efficient allocation and management of resources and a steady
flow of public and private investment."
The third
dimension described by the professor is "Ecological Sustainability" which, among
other things, limits "the consumption of fossile fuels and other easily
depletable or environmentally harmful products, substituting them by renewable
and/or plentiful and environmentally friendly resources, reducing the volume of
pollutants by means of energy and resource conservation and recycling and, last
but not least, promoting self-constraint in material consumption on part of the
rich countries and of the privileged social strata all over the
world;"
In order to make
this happen Sachs stresses the need of "defining the rules for adequate
environmental protection, designing the institutional machinery and choosing the
mix of economic, legal and administrative instruments necessary for the
implementation of environmental policies."
Dimension 4:
"Spatial Sustainability":
"directed at
achieving a more balanced rural-urban configuration and a better territorial
distribution of human settlements and economic activities
(.)".
The fifth and
last dimension described in the UN policy paper is "Cultural Sustainability":
"looking for the endogenous roots of the modernization processes, seeking change
within cultural continuity, translating the normative concept of ecodevelopment
into a plurality of local, ecosystem-specific, culture-specific and
site-specific solutions."
But to realize
such a dramatic new direction for the world, Sachs once again stresses the
importance of incremental implementation. A matter of boiling the frog slowly as
opposed to throwing the poor animal into a boiling-hot cooking
pan:
"Even if we know
where we want to get, the operational question is how do we proceed to put
humankind on the virtuous path of genuine development, socially responsible and
in harmony with nature. It is submitted that UNCED 92 should give considerable
attention to the formulation of transition strategies that could become the
central piece of the Agenda 21."
Agenda 21: the UN
strategy for redistributing the wealth accumulated by the "North" in order to
create a completely "balanced" world society- under auspices of the United
Nations of course and the private central banks controlling it. This can only
come about by destroying the middle-class. A sudden redistribution and
industrialization would not do- for the middle-class would undoubtedly rise in
defiance against it. Therefore, Sachs argues for an incremental and carefully
planned dissolution of the middle-class phase by phase:
"To be
meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades.
Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give
enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought
about by the lengthening of the time-span. The retooling of industries, even in
periods of rapid growth, requires ten to twenty years. The restructuration and
the expansion of the infrastructures requires several decades and this is a
crucially important sector from the point of view of
environment."
Then Sachs
plunges into his most shocking statement:
"However, the
single most important reason to consider the transition strategies over a
minimum of thirty-five to forty years stems from the non-linearity of these
strategies; they should be devised as a succession of changing priorities over
time. A good illustration is provided by the population transition. In order to
stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics,
mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved
fairly inefficient."
Sachs argues that
"an accelerated programme of social and economic development of the rural areas
should be the utmost priority in the first phase of a realistic population
stabilization scheme."Who or what is to coordinate all this, according to Sachs,
and how exactly is the UN to take control?
"The solutions",
says Sachs, "can vary in terms of their boldness and take the form of global,
multilateral or bilateral arrangements." These arrangements should as far as
Sachs is concerned ensure "at least partially the automacity of financial
transfers by some form of fiscal mechanisms, be it a small income tax or an
array of indirect taxes on goods and services whose production and consumption
has significant environmental impacts."
Over time,
gradually, these taxes should increase:
"Starting the
operation with a one per ten thousand tax and increasing it so as to reach one
per thousand in ten to twenty years seems a fairly realistic proposal, the more
so that the scheme creates an interesting market for the private enterprises
involved in R and D."
Reading all this,
the question as to what entity should take charge is not difficult to answer.
Sachs:
"In order to
generate maximum synergies between the national strategies and global action,
the United Nations should create a forum for the periodical discussion and
evaluation of these strategies and a research, monitoring and flexible planning
facility to put them in a global perspective.(.). The forum should have a fair
representation of all the main actors involved: governments, parliaments,
citizen movements and the business world. Given its importance, it should be
lifted from specialized agencies to a central place in the UN
system."
This almost
literally echoes the recent call by a group of scientists for the 2012 UN Earth
Summit to create "a Sustainable Development Council within the UN system to
integrate social, economic and environmental policy at the global
level."
The "fair
representation" Sachs is talking about is of course only a pretext to get
everybody on board. As the "Danish Text", drafted for the Copenhagen conference
in late 2009, clearly illustrates, the IMF and World Bank will always have final
say in the construction of any international system.
The other, more
sinister element of Agenda 21 is of course the concerted effort on the part of
the global elite, through multilateral treaties and regulations, to not only
control the populations of the world but to cull them.
Similar/Related
Articles
- The Ultimate Euphemism: UN Calls Its Blueprint For Mass
Death A "Virtuous Green Path"
- Unelected European "Green" Commissioner Says Markets Must be
Governed
- 1991 UN Policy Paper Describes Exact Purpose and Trajectory
of Current Copenhagen Treaty
- UN Policy Paper Describes Incremental Steps Toward World
Government
- Green Madness: $205,075 spent to 'Translocate' One Shrub
from Path of Stimulus Project
- Agenda 21 Behind The Green Mask of
Death
- The "Green" Agenda Is All About
Mass-Sacrifice
- State Seizes Property Under 'Green' Zoning Laws, Terrorizes
Man To Death
- Two children should be limit, says green
guru
- Melinda Gates: Worrying About Population Control "Has Led To
Much Suffering And Death"
- Revolt Against Vaccines Leads to Mass Exodus From Texas
Colleges
- Obama Mind Control Offensive Straight Out of UNESCO Eugenics
Playbook
