GLOBAL TAKEOVER:
WHY WE ARE FOREWARNED… BUT STILL TAKE NO ACTION
A general awareness of some, if not all, of the seventeen strategies of
globalisation has permeated the bulk of the Australian population and so the
critical factor of forewarning is no longer the issue it was five years ago. We are
faced now with a much more serious issue: response diffusion.
Response diffusion is the nurtured product of two hundred years of intense
propagandisation by the coalition of bankers, aristocrats, media-owners and
other architects of re-feudalisation (which, philosophically speaking, is what this is
really all about). Knowing full well that you cannot fool all of the people all of the
time, the globalists sowed seeds of distraction and energy dispersal in the form of
reactive and institutionalised salvation. The most obvious of these are: redefining
political language, constitutions, bills of rights, insurrection, alternative media,
leadership forums, law reform, electoral reform, and political parties.
Exploiting dubious definitions of democracy, various optional and
preferential systems of voting were devised which ensure that a
tweedledum/tweedledee two party system prevails, thereby denying all
citizens access to policy formulation. Monopolisation of the media replaced
candidate door-knocking which, prior to 1973, stimulated at least minimal
voter influence on politicians.
Redefining democracy, away from that which was so well understood by
Thucydides, the Irish Monks, Thomas Paine, Abraham Lincoln, and Lord
Acton (government by the people); and replacing this with the
understanding that electing a politician to do our thinking for us is the same
thing, was probably the most pivotal strategic achievement by the global
elitists.
Many people see constitutions as the answer, the penny never dropping
that no constitution contains the world democracy; not very surprising
considering that globalists edited every constitution ever written. Likewise,
bill-of-rights enthusiasts rarely comprehend that the US version was a
massive ooops when it was realised that the crucial words of Thomas Paine
(from The Rights of Man) had been removed from the American
Constitution prior to ratification. The 27 amendments were prevented from
containing he critical clauses.
Insurrection has always been a globalist fear, but with the population
disarmed this is without potential in Australia.
As to the various legal reforms, lawyers are always in place to castrate such
efforts; and in fact to use these to further alienate private ownership or
citizen's rights, as we saw with Aboriginal land rights. It should be noted
that those Aborigines who had always lived on their spirit-sourced land
have actually experienced cultural and social destruction at a more rapid
rate than those who were not so fortunate; yet preventing this was the
rationale for land rights in the first place. Once again, lawyers intervened
(ie the Law Reform Commission and Land Councils). The single act that
would have genuinely empowered Aborigines, engaging all consultation in
their own languages, has been adamantly refused for 224 years.
We have massively underestimated the organisational extensiveness and
creativity of the globalists. We should have just presumed that any obvious
weapon placed at our disposal will somehow be used against us. But there
is a single exception... the Internet. This was not anticipated, and as a
vehicle to accumulate people power, expression of which is what the
globalists really fear, it is now realised by the globalists that we must be
disarmed. We have perhaps one or two years before the Internet is closed
to us forever, so this prospect should create some urgency. We do not
have the luxury of strategies that will take longer than one year to
implement.
Another factor is that the international situation that so preoccupies many
of us, is irrelevant to Australian redemption. Why? Because we live in the
only country in the world that is potentially self-sufficient; which means we
can walk away from all trade and international banks; which means that we
are impervious to attack by trade embargoes and sanctions; and to
financial strangulation. As to military punishment: which since 1946 has
already been meted out to 44 nations who dared to be non-compliant,
Australia is the world's most difficult country to successfully attack and
occupy. Not only is it a logistical nightmare for any invader, we are host to
the US/NATO spy and navigation satellite relay bases, which can be taken
over at will and used to run aircraft-carriers aground, to make aircraft fall
out of the sky, and to make missiles boomerang.
In other words, the only thing stopping us Australians from saving our
country is our own timidity and indecisiveness.
Having said that, there must be a single first action we can take that:
1. Will be widely supported by the national electorate;
2. That will create instant enabling and investment wealth;
3. That will disarm the international enemy;
4. That costs nothing to launch;
5. That can be implemented within a year.
That we all do not know this already illustrates just how successful the enemy has been in sowing discord and confusion. We are all waving different banners and charging in disparate directions. Yet the means of defeating the enemy has been in front of our noses all along... a unanimous national demand that all Australian manufacturing and domestic food production be protected from unfair foreign competition.
In other words, Bring Back Tariffs. This means revoking the unmandated secret
treaties that purportedly tied us to the Lima Agreement, the WTO, the WB, all
FTAs, the IMF, and more recently, to the Rothschild-owned Bank for International
Settlements.
Restoring tariffs will immediately recreate our manufacturing sector and return
Australian foods to our tables. Manufacturing will re-create the three million full
time jobs lost to tariff removal, and will quickly create at least two million more.
Our second move should be to dissolve the Oil Price Parity Agreement and fuel
tax, which would reduce bowser prices to 12 cents per litre (or 25 cents, if Lyndon LaRouche is correct). Meanwhile, manufacturers will move swiftly to making gas-fuelled motors. The effect of this will be to create among the world's lowest industry and food production overheads, and knock $100 off each family's
domestic budget.
Obviously, this new expression of people power would lead to the breakup of the media monopoly, grocery duopoly, major political parties, and then to all the
reforms that the electorate supports, but the very first enabling move must be to
Bring Back Tariffs. Our most recent survey of the national demographic (July
2010) shows that 86% of Australians already support the restoration of tariffs, so
what are we waiting for?
Tony Ryan
WHY WE ARE FOREWARNED… BUT STILL TAKE NO ACTION
A general awareness of some, if not all, of the seventeen strategies of
globalisation has permeated the bulk of the Australian population and so the
critical factor of forewarning is no longer the issue it was five years ago. We are
faced now with a much more serious issue: response diffusion.
Response diffusion is the nurtured product of two hundred years of intense
propagandisation by the coalition of bankers, aristocrats, media-owners and
other architects of re-feudalisation (which, philosophically speaking, is what this is
really all about). Knowing full well that you cannot fool all of the people all of the
time, the globalists sowed seeds of distraction and energy dispersal in the form of
reactive and institutionalised salvation. The most obvious of these are: redefining
political language, constitutions, bills of rights, insurrection, alternative media,
leadership forums, law reform, electoral reform, and political parties.
Exploiting dubious definitions of democracy, various optional and
preferential systems of voting were devised which ensure that a
tweedledum/tweedledee two party system prevails, thereby denying all
citizens access to policy formulation. Monopolisation of the media replaced
candidate door-knocking which, prior to 1973, stimulated at least minimal
voter influence on politicians.
Redefining democracy, away from that which was so well understood by
Thucydides, the Irish Monks, Thomas Paine, Abraham Lincoln, and Lord
Acton (government by the people); and replacing this with the
understanding that electing a politician to do our thinking for us is the same
thing, was probably the most pivotal strategic achievement by the global
elitists.
Many people see constitutions as the answer, the penny never dropping
that no constitution contains the world democracy; not very surprising
considering that globalists edited every constitution ever written. Likewise,
bill-of-rights enthusiasts rarely comprehend that the US version was a
massive ooops when it was realised that the crucial words of Thomas Paine
(from The Rights of Man) had been removed from the American
Constitution prior to ratification. The 27 amendments were prevented from
containing he critical clauses.
Insurrection has always been a globalist fear, but with the population
disarmed this is without potential in Australia.
As to the various legal reforms, lawyers are always in place to castrate such
efforts; and in fact to use these to further alienate private ownership or
citizen's rights, as we saw with Aboriginal land rights. It should be noted
that those Aborigines who had always lived on their spirit-sourced land
have actually experienced cultural and social destruction at a more rapid
rate than those who were not so fortunate; yet preventing this was the
rationale for land rights in the first place. Once again, lawyers intervened
(ie the Law Reform Commission and Land Councils). The single act that
would have genuinely empowered Aborigines, engaging all consultation in
their own languages, has been adamantly refused for 224 years.
We have massively underestimated the organisational extensiveness and
creativity of the globalists. We should have just presumed that any obvious
weapon placed at our disposal will somehow be used against us. But there
is a single exception... the Internet. This was not anticipated, and as a
vehicle to accumulate people power, expression of which is what the
globalists really fear, it is now realised by the globalists that we must be
disarmed. We have perhaps one or two years before the Internet is closed
to us forever, so this prospect should create some urgency. We do not
have the luxury of strategies that will take longer than one year to
implement.
Another factor is that the international situation that so preoccupies many
of us, is irrelevant to Australian redemption. Why? Because we live in the
only country in the world that is potentially self-sufficient; which means we
can walk away from all trade and international banks; which means that we
are impervious to attack by trade embargoes and sanctions; and to
financial strangulation. As to military punishment: which since 1946 has
already been meted out to 44 nations who dared to be non-compliant,
Australia is the world's most difficult country to successfully attack and
occupy. Not only is it a logistical nightmare for any invader, we are host to
the US/NATO spy and navigation satellite relay bases, which can be taken
over at will and used to run aircraft-carriers aground, to make aircraft fall
out of the sky, and to make missiles boomerang.
In other words, the only thing stopping us Australians from saving our
country is our own timidity and indecisiveness.
Having said that, there must be a single first action we can take that:
1. Will be widely supported by the national electorate;
2. That will create instant enabling and investment wealth;
3. That will disarm the international enemy;
4. That costs nothing to launch;
5. That can be implemented within a year.
That we all do not know this already illustrates just how successful the enemy has been in sowing discord and confusion. We are all waving different banners and charging in disparate directions. Yet the means of defeating the enemy has been in front of our noses all along... a unanimous national demand that all Australian manufacturing and domestic food production be protected from unfair foreign competition.
In other words, Bring Back Tariffs. This means revoking the unmandated secret
treaties that purportedly tied us to the Lima Agreement, the WTO, the WB, all
FTAs, the IMF, and more recently, to the Rothschild-owned Bank for International
Settlements.
Restoring tariffs will immediately recreate our manufacturing sector and return
Australian foods to our tables. Manufacturing will re-create the three million full
time jobs lost to tariff removal, and will quickly create at least two million more.
Our second move should be to dissolve the Oil Price Parity Agreement and fuel
tax, which would reduce bowser prices to 12 cents per litre (or 25 cents, if Lyndon LaRouche is correct). Meanwhile, manufacturers will move swiftly to making gas-fuelled motors. The effect of this will be to create among the world's lowest industry and food production overheads, and knock $100 off each family's
domestic budget.
Obviously, this new expression of people power would lead to the breakup of the media monopoly, grocery duopoly, major political parties, and then to all the
reforms that the electorate supports, but the very first enabling move must be to
Bring Back Tariffs. Our most recent survey of the national demographic (July
2010) shows that 86% of Australians already support the restoration of tariffs, so
what are we waiting for?
Tony Ryan
No comments:
Post a Comment