Europe being destroyed

Europe being destroyed

As we near the centenary of the start of the Great War, and the inevitable media led reappraisal of events leading to it, this may be a very opportune time to assess our forty year flirtation with another man made folly, that has arguably damaged us - and Europe’s constituent nations, far more than two world wars combined!

The European Union, has in fact united no one and its existence will haunt this continent for generations, and primarily those who have criminally mislead millions into acquiescence, as their governments handed the people’s sovereignty to a clique that they knew very little about.

No single EU state ( despite the rhetoric ) has escaped the depredation resulting from their membership and a rich kaleidoscopic patchwork of diverse states, forged into nations over centuries, lies wounded and bleeding at the feet of this lunatic body.

Italy, birthplace of the Roman Empire, which was able to pass a priceless legacy to the artists and sculptors of the Renaissance is now bankrupt and administered by EU appointed accountants.

Greece, that taught the world civilisation, is now run by a troika of money counters and reduced to desperation and civil unrest.

Spain, that once ruled a gold-laden South American empire, along with pioneering colonists Portugal, impoverished as never before.

Today, even the most ardent EU protagonists are becoming alarmed and a Telegraph article recently quoted from a report by EU Commissioner Laszlo Andor, saying : "The single currency is fuelling inequality and the loss of sovereignty entailed by eurozone membership, has led to increased unemployment and hardship, in many countries.

 

In fact, the report would seem unable to find any aspect of the EU and its workings, that is of benefit to its member states, something that many here were pointing out thirty years ago.

 

The EU’s rapidly shrinking band of fanatical adherents, will assert that this ill-starred, fraud riddled project, was a noble, altruistic endeavour, that deserved to succeed, BUT IT WAS NOT, or even if it was, we know the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

 

NO, its seeds were sown in 1943 Nazi Germany, planted by devious fanatics, who saw their Third Reich being destroyed by the Allies and the Red Army and so sought an alternative route to their ends, by political machination.

After Germany’s surrender and as arrangements were being made to spirit leading Nazis to South America, they were passing the EU foetus to an equally devious, well connected band, who later found our gullible post war politicians as easy to fool as those we have today.

Ed. --- --- --- --- Bromsgrovia.

1st of November 2014

From the 1st of November 2014 , The European Rule of Law will stand greater than British Law. THIS IS TREASON

Most British laws will now have to be voted by the European Parliament, if wished to be altered or eliminated.

The European Parliament now has reigns over :
Assylum and border controls
Civil Protection
A common Defence policy
Law and Order
Energy
Culture
The European Budget
The European Central Bank
Open Border Immigration within the EU
A European court of Justice
Common Agricultural Policy etc, etc

1st November 2014 is the death of the United Kingdom They're offering a referendum after this date ask them all why. Do they think we we are all stupid and came down in the last shower?

 2017 is a joke and they know it - they obviously don't know that we know it too.

How Politicians and Monarchy Betrayed the British People

Original article at Namaste Publishing http://namastepublishing.co.uk/how-the-politicians-and-monarchy-have-betrayed-the-british-people/

We ALLOWED this to happen, we put our TRUST in LIARS, THIEVES and TRAITORS. Do we continue to acquiesce NOW that we know the truth?

Read Bob’s comment below and WATCH the Film then read his important article exposing the FAKE JUBILEE which further explains how we have be duped and BETRAYED.

COMMENT:- “I ask you and indeed urge you to watch this video right through. It is the clearest presentation and explanation of the great betrayal of this nation I have ever seen…When you have viewed it then again look at the pictures below as a reminder… as to all who gave their lives to defend for us that which the Conservative Party stole from us and gave away to our former enemies.”Bob Lomas.

Where were they - why did they not act?

Sunday, 12 January 2014

Where were they - why did they not act?

 

There is much about our ill-starred association with the euphemistically named European Union, that demands explanation, and turns the spotlight directly on two important offices within our political and parliamentary system.

Perhaps the most perplexing aspect of our involvement for many is, why, when we joined : The Common Market trading partnership in 1973, do we now today find ourselves in an unelected, fraud riddled, organisation that sits in Belgium and France, and is costing us £ 150 billion pounds per year?

Were this to be shown on the balance sheet as such, it would be the second largest call on the UK’s total budget of £ 850 billion, and coming second only to the amount required to fund : work, benefits and pensions, which is Ian Duncan Smith’s ministry.

So surely the first question is, how did this political sleight of hand come about, and why were there no checks and balances operating, that prevented so costly a change without the electorates knowledge or approval?

The first check to fail, would seem to be the Commons itself, and its failure to carry out parliamentary scrutiny, but surely the Lords should have been watching and prompting the Lower House.

The answer to this may lie in the immediate aftermath of Heath’s signing, and the sudden realisation of what had occurred, and what they had been party to, striking home,

Oh my God - what have we done - we’re party to treason, close ranks, least said - soonest mended.

Equally worrying, is the failure of the Judiciary, and the constitutional watchdogs, to draw attention to old but still relevant, statutes and charters, such as Magna Carta, and the Bill of Rights.

Finally, what of the nation’s ultimate guardian, the Queen as Head of State, surely she would step in, but then did her councillors advise otherwise, as any action would draw attention to one’s assent to the signing of the Treaty of Rome, too embarrassing by far.

So for many years after 1973, the subject was 'disappeared ' from our press and broadcast media, the public were fed the opium of the masses and lost interest, occasionally revived, by the press, when stuck for copy, ran : straight banana type stories, good for a cheap laugh, and just standard Frankfurt School broadcasting practise.

If the story were to have a happy ending, the original culprits would be arraigned, and found guilty, as the evidence against them is overwhelming, Heath Hurd, Rippon, Reddaway, etc and those who came after them, guilty of failing to bring them to justice.

Mrs Thatcher signed the Single European Act, and Major signed Maastricht and Blair signed Nice and Brown signed Lisbon.

Failure to report treason, is a crime, second only to treason itself?

Ed. -- - -Bromsgrovia.

Misconduct and Compounding Treason at Common law

Dear Chief Constable

I understand from Kim Campbell Personnel Assistant to Simon Parr Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Constabulary that he has received advice from the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) that allegations of treason will not be investigated.

The Chief Constable is a member of the ACPO and has conspired, with others, to commit the major crime of Misconduct in Public Office and compounding treason with the intention of perverting the course of Justice. This has had the effect of preventing the trial of past and present Government Ministers who have committed treason. Your action is therefore required in dealing with this issue.

ACPO do not make the laws of England! Neither can they repeal or negate them, they can only give general advice which does not carry the force of law.

You hold the ancient office of constable. This office if far older than 1829 when Sir Robert Peel placed the office on its present footing as a paid professional police service. As the holder of the office of constable you took an oath which binds you, to uphold the laws of England as they are written and not as ACPO advise.

The actions of ACPO in offering this advice constitutes a Conspiracy at Common Law to commit the major crimes of Misconduct and Compounding Treason at Common law.

One of the allegations of treason advanced to you was against Anthony Lynton Blair one time Prime Minister, David Cameron Prime Minister and Nicholas Clegg Deputy Prime Minister who were all reported for treason over their actual or proposed changes to the Common Law arrangements to the House of Lords. These allegations were advanced under Sec 3 of the 1848 Treason Felony Act.

The Ministry of Justice attempted to slip through the repeal of Sec 3 of the 1848 Treason Felony Act by hiding it in with a batch of 309 laws they wished to repeal. They did this without following the normal procedure of going via the Law Commission, the statutory body set up to look at old laws past their sell-by date. This criminal attempt was spotted and the Justice Ministry were forced to make a public admission that had they repealed the Sec 3 OF the 1848 Treason Felony Act they would all have gone to prison for life.

If you are a member of ACPO you are requested and required to appoint an officer from another force who is not an a member of ACPO with the instructions that he is to investigate all ACPO officers for the major crimes of a Conspiracy to Commit Misconduct and Compounding Treason at Common Law.

Respectfully submitted

BBC and the Climate Con.

Just in case you might believe all the BBC's subtle, and not so subtle, hints that the recent storms are all down to climate change...
  Not to mention Sir John Beddington, recently retired government chief scientific adviser (!), on BBC Radio 4's Today programme this week, who stated they were due to increased CO2 in the atmosphere! And of course David Cameron today.

Historic windstorms

• Grote Mandrenke, 1362 – A southwesterly Atlantic gale swept across England, the Netherlands, northern Germany and southern Denmark, killing over 25,000 and changing the Dutch-German-Danish coastline.
• Burchardi Flood, 1634 – Also known as second Grote Mandrenke", hit Nordfriesland, drowned about 8,000–15,000 people and destroyed the island of Strand.
• Great Storm of 1703 – Severe gales affect south coasst of England.
• Night of the Big Wind, 1839 – The mmost severe windstorm to hit Ireland in recent centuries, with hurricane force winds, killed between 250 and 300 people and rendered hundreds of thousands of homes uninhabitable.
• Royal Charter Storm, October 25–26, 1859 –  The Royal Charter Storm was considered to be the most severe storm to hit the British Isles in the 19th century, with a total death toll estimated at over 800. It takes its name from the Royal Charter ship, which was driven by the storm onto the east coast of Anglesey, Wales with the loss of over 450 lives.
• The Tay Bridge Disaster, 1879  Severe gales (estimated to be Force 10–11) swept the east coast of Scotland, infamously resulting in the collapse of the Tay Rail Bridge and the loss of 75 people who were on board the ill-fated train. ^[36]
• Eyemouth Disaster, 1881 – A severe storm struck the sooutheast coast of Scotland. 189 fishermen were killed, most of whom were from the small village of Eyemouth.
• 1928 Thames flood, January 6–7,, 1928 – Snow melt combined with heavy rainfall and a sttorm surge in the North Sea led to flooding in central London and the loss of 14 lives.

Severe storms since 1950

• North Sea flood of 1953 – Considered to be the worrst natural disaster of the 20th century both in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, claiming over 2,500 lives.
• North Sea flood of 1962 – The Storm reached the German coast of the North Sea with wind speeds up to 200 km/h. The accompanying storm surge combined with the high tide pushed water up the Weser and Elbe, breaching dikes and caused extensive flooding, especially in Hamburg. 315 people were killed, around 60,000 were left homeless.
• Gale of January 1976 January 2–5, 1976 – Widespread wind damage was rs reported across Europe from Ireland to Central Europe. Coastal flooding occurred in the United Kingdom, Belgium and Germany with the highest storm surge of the 20th century recorded on the German North Sea coast.
• Great Storm of 1987 – This storm affected southeastern England and noorthern France. In England maximum mean wind speeds of 70 knots (an average over 10 minutes) were recorded. The highest gust of 117 knots (217 km/h) was recorded at Pointe du Raz in Brittany. In all, 19 people were killed in England and 4 in France. 15 million trees were uprooted in England.
• 1990 storm series – Between 25 January and 1 March 1990, eight severe storms crossed Europe including the Burns' Day storm (Daria), Vivian & Wiebke. The total costs resulting from these storms was estimated at almost £13 billion.

English Law

To: The Lord Chief Justice
Subject: ENGLISH LAW

 

 

My Lord,

 

It has long been my understanding that England can have only one system of law.  English Constitutional and Common Law has prevailed for centuries, was put in place specifically for our everlasting protection and has never been renounced by those who use and live by it, the English people.  Yet we are incessantly told by Parliament that we live under European Law, something imported by them without the people’s consent and under which the vast majority of us have no wish to subsist.  Our English system of law is far superior.

 

When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972, Edward Heath knowingly and wilfully deceived and betrayed the British people into the hands of a gathering foreign power, the EEC/EU.  His was the most calculating and grievous treason in British history.  Upon signing, his treason instantly removed him from lawful office and his treasonous act failed to become legally binding because treason has no legitimacy and cannot do that.  His then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly as a treasonous government in having no legitimacy, is not lawful.

 

No parliament can bind a successor.  But no following parliament has ever reversed Heath’s treachery.  Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and deliberately lied to reinforce Heath’s unthinkable pretence that Britain had knowingly and willingly consented to foreign rule.  Neither he nor they ever had such authority and their actions are contrary to English law for acting against the nation’s known interests,  its sovereignty and for acting in the political interests of a foreign power.

 

No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or action by an unlawful assembly.  English law therefore, stands as it was immediately prior to signing of the 1972 Act.  Thus Britain is not and can never have been part of the EU as all Treaties are treasonous, unlawful, null and void.  They are bad “law” and bad law is not law.  As a consequence, European Law can have no lawful influence upon Britain as claimed.  In any case, the supremacy of English law (particularly our Constitutional Law) would intercede and immediately strike it down.

 

For years now, political power has been taken without permission or lawful authority.  The House of Commons has attempted to degrade Her Majesty from Sovereign Queen to citizen of Europe, supported dismantling Her Commonwealth, neutered the House of Lords, attempted to close and replace it with an elected senate, removed Royal Assent by the Monarch, withdrawn homage to Her Majesty and they forcefully control the people’s elected representatives.  They are destroying our legal system and constitution built around the teachings of the Holy Bible such that even the Queen’s Coronation Oath is no longer capable of being honoured and they have demeaned God’s Law of heterosexual marriage. 

 

They approve inundation by foreign immigrants whom Government claim they are powerless to stop, allow the creep of Sharia Law into Britain bolstered by runaway aggression of Islamic migrants claiming our country as theirs by right, slash our ability to defend ourselves with swingeing cuts to our Armed Forces and have reduced our world leading Police Service to a paramilitary force.  The Commissioner of Police even refuses to investigate evidential reports of high treason against senior politicians referred to him by national police forces and the general public.

 

All these treasonous acts will have been prevented (but can be reversed) by English Law were it not sidelined, ignored and pretend-repealed by the Commons whose callous and programmed rampage is steadily destroying our country for foreign political purpose against the will of British people.  The Commons now claim that Britain needs a new Bill of Rights (doubtless of their own chosen terms) when our existing one has amply served its purpose since 1689.  The Executive is now virtually free to do as it wishes according to the doctrine of “Politicians’ Divine Rights”. 

 

Sovereignty lies with the people who then entrust it to the Monarch.  It may not be given away as neither can the Constitution, handed down by our forefathers for our unending protection as the most perfect constitution known to man.  It is the property of the nation,  not those who exercise government (Thomas Paine).  But we live under an elected three political party dictatorship that aggressively ensures its autocracy, is intent upon ever tighter control from Brussels and seeks obliteration of England from world knowledge.

 

English Constitutional and Common Law has protected Britain against such despotism for centuries.  Is its lawful primacy really never to be acknowledged again ?

 

Yours sincerely, 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10546394/Europe-is-slowly-strangling-the-life-out-of-national-democracy.html

Europe is slowly strangling the life out of national democracy

Decisions affecting the lives of voters are being taken by bureaucrats and unelected 'experts'

Photo: GETTY IMAGES

By Peter Oborne

9:23PM GMT 01 Jan 2014

1720 Comments

Every so often one comes across a book, a poem or a work of art that is so original, perfectly crafted, accurate and true that you can’t get it out of your head. You have to read or look at it many times to place it in context and understand what it means.

In the course of two decades as a political reporter my most powerful experience of this kind came when a friend drew my attention to a 20-page article in an obscure academic journal.

Written by the political scientists Richard Katz and Peter Mair, and called “The Emergence of a Cartel Party”, it immediately explained almost everything that had perplexed me as a lobby correspondent: the unhealthy similarity between supposedly rival parties; the corruption and graft that has become endemic in modern politics; the emergence of a political elite filled with scorn and hostility towards ordinary voters. My book, The Triumph of the Political Class, was in certain respects an attempt to popularise that Katz and Mair essay.

Several months ago I was shocked and saddened to learn that Peter Mair (whom I never met) had died suddenly, while on holiday with his family in his native Ireland, aged just 60. However, his friend Francis Mulhern has skilfully piloted into print the book he was working on at the time of his death. It is called Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, and published by Verso. In my view it is every bit as brilliant as the earlier essay.

The opening paragraph is bold, powerful, and sets out the thesis beautifully: “The age of party democracy has passed. Although the parties themselves remain, they have become so disconnected from the wider society, and pursue a form of competition that is so lacking in meaning, that they no longer seem capable of sustaining democracy in its present form.”

Related Articles

• Wolfson: EU has become hungry for power
  30 Dec 2013
• Ukip will 'shake up' British politics in 2014, says Farage
  31 Dec 2013
• Latvia joins euro, but controversy rages on
  31 Dec 2013
• The EU is taking over defence policy by stealth
  07 Dec 2013
• EU: Britain is moving closer to the exit
  30 Nov 2013

The first half of Mair’s new book concentrates on this crisis in party democracy. He tracks the sharp fall in turn-out at elections, the collapse of party membership (the Tories down from three million in the Fifties to scarcely 100,000 today, a drop of 97 per cent) and the decay of civic participation. Mair shows that this is a European trend. All over the continent parties have turned against their members. Political leaders no longer represent ordinary people, but are becoming, in effect, emissaries from central government.
All of this is of exceptional importance, and central to the urgent contemporary debate about voter disenchantment. However, I want to concentrate on the second half of Mair’s book, because here the professor turns to the role played by the European Union in undermining and bypassing national democracy.
He starts with a historical paradox. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990 was in theory the finest moment for Western democracy. But it was also the moment when it started to fail. Mair argues that political elites have turned Europe into “a protected sphere, safe from the demands of voters and their representatives”.
This European political directorate has taken decision-making away from national parliaments. On virtually everything that matters, from the economy to immigration, decisions are made elsewhere. Professor Mair argues that many politicians encouraged this tendency because they wanted to “divest themselves of responsibility for potentially unpopular policy decisions and so cushion themselves against possible voter discontent”. This means that decisions which viscerally affect the lives of voters are now taken by anonymous, unaccountable bureaucrats rather than politicians responsible to their voters.
Though the motive has been understandable, the effect has been malign, making politicians look impotent or cowardly, and bringing politics itself into contempt. In Britain, for example, David Cameron can do virtually nothing to head off Bulgarian or Romanian immigration. The prime ministers of Greece, Portugal and Spain are now effectively branch managers for the European Central Bank and Goldman Sachs. By a hideous paradox the European Union, set up as a way of avoiding a return to fascism in the post-war epoch, has since mutated into a way of avoiding democracy itself.
In a devastating analogy, Mair conjures up Alexis de Tocqueville, the 19th-century French thinker who is often regarded as the greatest modern theorist about democracy. Tocqueville noted that the pre-revolutionary French aristocracy fell into contempt because they claimed privileges on the basis of functions that they could no longer fulfil. The 21st-century European political class, says Mair, is in the identical position.
To sum up, the European elites have come very close to the abolition of what we have been brought up to regard as politics, and have replaced it with rule by bureaucrats, bankers, and various kinds of unelected expert. So far they have got away with this. This May’s elections for the European Parliament will provide a fascinating test of whether they can continue to do so.
The European Union claims to be untroubled by these elections. A report last month from two members of the Jacques Delors Institute concluded that “the numerical increase of populist forces will not notably affect the functioning of the [European Parliament], which will remain largely based on the compromises built between the dominant political groups. This reflects the position of the overwhelming majority of EU citizens”.
I wonder. In France, polls suggest that the anti-semitic Front National, which equates illegal immigrants with “organised gangs of criminals”, will gain more votes than the mainstream parties. The Front National has joined forces with the virulently anti-Islamic Geert Wilders in Holland, who promises to claim back “how we control our borders, our money, our economy, our currency”. In Britain it is likely that Ukip will win in May. Anti-European parties are on the rise in Denmark, Austria, Greece and Poland.
These anti-EU parties tend to be on the Right, and often the far-Right. For reasons that are hard to understand, the Left continues enthusiastically to back the EU, even though it is pursuing policies that drive down living standards and destroy employment, businesses and indeed (in the case of Greece and Spain) entire economies. In Britain, for example, Ed Miliband is an ardent supporter of the European project and refuses even to countenance the idea of a referendum.
Like Miliband, Peter Mair comes from the Left. He was an Irishman who spent the majority of his professional life working in European universities in Italy, the Netherlands or Ireland. And yet he has written what is by far and away the most powerful, learned and persuasive anti-EU treatise I have come across. It proves that it is impossible to be a democrat and support the continued existence of the European Union.
His posthumous masterpiece deserves to become a foundation text for Eurosceptics not just in Britain, but right across the continent. It is important that it should do so. The battle to reclaim parliamentary democracy should not just belong to the Right-wing (and sometimes fascist) political parties. The Left and Right can disagree – honourably so – on many great issues. But surely both sides of the ideological divide can accept that democracy is still worth fighting for, and that the common enemy has become the European Union.

Why the English are Angry in this Big Year for Britain

Lindley-French's Blog Blast: Speaking Truth Unto Power

A regular commentary on strategic affairs from a leading commentator and analyst. Forthcoming Book: "Little Britain? Twenty-First Century Strategy for a Middling European Power" (Publish date: January 2014).

 

Wednesday, 1 January 2014

Why the English are Angry in this Big Year for Britain

Alphen, Netherlands, 1 January.  Happy New Year!  Well, apparently not if you are English. 

According to the much of the Press as I write hordes of Bulgarians and Romanians are en route to Dover courtesy of yet another diktat from loathed, lamentable Brussels. 

With another wave of immigration likely elections to the European Parliament and the Scottish referendum there are lots of contentious issues in a 2014 that will be a big and possibly disastrous year for Britain. 

The impact of these linked but distinct issues is that for the first time in many years the views of the English are suddenly in the political spotlight. 

For the past decade and more the English have either been ignored or seen as a lab for some ghastly, failed political experiment in social engineering that destroyed the England I knew. 

Five issues dominate the pub – poverty, Scotland, the EU, freedom, and of course immigration.

 

Firstly, England is becoming rapidly more populous but poorer.  The main crutch supporting hyper-immigration has been that it grows the economy. 

With the British economy likely to grow between 2.5% and 3% next year there may be some truth to that. 

However, with immigration growing faster than the economy the net result is a bigger economy and poorer people, a phenomenon most clearly seen in the rise of youth unemployment.

Secondly, the English have been marginalised in Britain. 

Although some 90% of Britain’s 67 million people live in England devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland has undoubtedly come at the expense of the under-represented, politically-marginalised English.  Moreover, with Scots contemplating an independence referendum on 18 September Westminster will spend much of the year appeasing the Scots at the expense (again) of the English. 

Thirdly, Euro-scepticism is a very English phenomenon.  The EU is seen as a form of foreign legislative occupation that has failed the English badly costing them far more than they gain. 

Brussels is perceived by much of the English population as openly anti-English fronted by a London Establishment unwilling to fight England’s corner. 

The English were told that joining the then European Economic Community back in 1973 would strengthen Britain and make the English more prosperous. 

Internationally Britain (and by extension England) has been profoundly-weakened by an EU first dominated by France and Germany and now dominated by Germany. 

Domestically, by transferring so much funding power to the EU Brussels is steadily replacing London as the decisive locus for decision-making.   

Fourthly, England’s sense of self is being steadily undermined.  Britain was built on ancient English concepts of freedom. 

By signing up to EU treaties that fundamentally change the relationship between leaders and led and human rights legislation that fundamentally changes the relationships between rights and obligations belief in the efficacy of representative democracy is fast collapsing in England. 

If power is elsewhere what is the point voting for people who cannot actually do anything?  Indeed, the EU is seen by many as an illegitimate, bureaucratic assault on ancient English rights and liberties. 

Perhaps the most hated phrase in England these days is “new European regulations…”

Fifthly and finally immigration is again on the rise.  In many ways immigration has indeed been a good thing for England as the best and brightest of many poor societies have been cherry-picked to support an ageing society.  

However, immigration has also imported real hatreds, intolerance and criminality into England and has done grave damage to English society. 

A close friend of mine is a black community leader in Salford in the north of England.  He told me recently a chilling story about the impact of Eastern European organised crime on his community. 

The Yardee gang drawn mainly from the Afro-Caribbean community tried to resist.  A battle for the streets ensued lasting three days before the Yardees were forced to retreat in the face of utter brutality.  London as usual is in denial.

For all that blaming immigration and immigrants for England’s woes is far too simplistic and wrong. Immigration is rather a metaphor for the collapse of trust between the English and an unworldly, failed Westminster political class. 

The real problem is the dangerous gap between a political class that has retreated steadily into a private conversation between themselves about fantasy policy, pretend power and political correctness. 

Today, the gap between that which politicians say, what they can do, and what they actually do is now a gulf of credibility open to political exploitation. 

However, in his big year for Britain the English must also be clear what it is they want.  The only way for England to be again a self-governing country is to let the Scots go, leave the EU and establish an English Parliament with real power. 

And yet many English people are confused, trapped between romantic Englishness, romantic Britishness, failed Europeanness and hard-headed political calculation.  I am no different. 

The English simply no longer believe their politicians have their best interests at heart…and they are right!

 

 

Give a politician enough rope and he will lower himself into the bank vault.

We the people, must act to survive.

Alvechurch Bugle  4 – 001  ( 1 – 1 – 14 )

We the people, must act to survive. 

As we commence this New Year, the British electorate, nay the entire population, stand outlined under the flickering lights of a political Last Chance Saloon.

Bankrupt, borrowing to service our debt, barely 300 tonnes of gold reserves, misruled, overburdened with other nations baggage, and in the grip of a foreign power.

Be in no doubt, our survival is in our hands, but our demise is certain if we get it wrong, the lights will go out, and stay out for a very long time.

This Lib Lab Con, one party, overpaid, overrated, over privileged, clique, is two elections away from destroying this nation.

The remedy could not be simpler, and we have the same two opportunities to prevent them doing it .   

The first is on May 21^st  when the European, and some local government polls take place, and the second will be the 2015 general election, and the indications are that the electorate will vent their accumulated anger on L.L.C. and particularly on Lib Con.

It will be their first opportunity since May 2010 to say to 650 elected disappointments in Westminster, a hearty, and heartfelt thank you !  

Thank you for heeding our call for sensible immigration policies !    

Thank you for the years we have endured the threat, from the Brussels imposed, Chiltern destroying, HS 2. and the blight on our property values ,  oh, and lying about the cost.

Thank you in fact,  for lying to us on just about everything , but particularly about introducing fair banking practices, and stopping our pension pots being pilfered by crooked annuity providers .

Thank you for denying us the means of terminating our illegal EU membership, or delaying it with no justification until  2017, when half of you will be in prison.

In three and a half years, this : London/Home Counties centric administration, has initiated nothing that indicates that they have any answers to the problems they inherited in 2010 and to which they have greatly added since.     

Perhaps, 50 years ago one could laugh at the perceived ineptitude of those in government, fairly secure in the knowledge that they did  actually know what they were doing,  and the nation was in good hands,  but that would be extremely unwise today.

The EU meanwhile, is achieving precisely what its founders intended, the destruction of Great Britain and, every vote for Lib Lab Con from now on, will be a vote for a continued and increasingly rapid decline, in these islands.

It all raises the question,  what realistic options are open to responsible citizens,  witnessing their elected government effectively destroying them and their way of life  ?.

Ed.  -   -   -   Bromsgrovia.