Genocide/treason

To change the face of a country beyond recognition through unwanted immigration and without the consent of the people - is treason. Moreover, it's classed as genocide under Article 2(c) of the 1948 Convention:

Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_Convention

Britain was abolished as a nation on 1st January 2009.

This brief article below, itemises in very simple terms, some of the main strategies and purposes of the Lisbon Treaty, which came into full effect in November 2014....which is why Cameron dated a possible referendum after 2015!  Below is only the very first part!

Note items 8A-1 and 8A-4 especially!

This may come as a surprise to some of you - but some of us have known about this for a long time. 

Telling people has made no difference!  People don't believe you, for starters!

I would draw your attention to these two comments, from the bottom:

"There are no provisions for elections to Westminster, which will close. The EU's 120,000 regulations will close most of Britain's 4.5 million small businesses and control our lives more closely than were Soviet citizens..."

"...as far as the EU, their puppet government in Westminster and our corrupted courts are concerned, the EU became our nation, and Britain was abolished as a nation on 1st January 2009."

If only we could get this message across to the British people, they might just see what a monster these people have created! A destroyer of individuals and individual nations - and this is only one plank in the Agenda 21 global plan! Many other nations and continents will follow - and are already, following!

How many of you know that America, Canada, Brazil and "all that huge landmass" are scheduled to be one solitary section of the world?  The EU (which will include Russia, incidentally) is another block of the seven blocks envisaged globally and planned - over many decades...not tomorrow - they are planning long-term!

Now do you see the creeping progress they are making - destroying communities and nations with their immigration open-door plans and policies? 

The pieces of the puzzle are very slowly all coming together - as I have witnessed over the past 15 years!

What did the Queen say in Her Christmas Broadcast...."there are dark forces at work!"

Enjoy!

Stan.

28th May/15  6.00pm  UK

PS: I write nothing below these double lines!

====================================================

LISBON TREATY IN FULL EFFECT NOV 2013 

 

Is anti-democratic EU the Fourth Reich Hitler dreamed of?
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=164216#164216

The Lisbon Treaty will come into full effect in November 2014 which is why Cameron offered a 2015 Referendum

Lisbon Treaty Summary

The 294 page Treaty of Lisbon sets up a three tier politburo dictatorship, and came into force on 1st January 2009. It gives the EU more powers than the 465 page EU Constitution by amending and adding the missing clauses to the existing five treaties. So you need to read all six treaties together, thousands of unreadable pages which includes Maastricht; and then see through its concealment and deception to get the full picture. There will be no more treaties: the six complete the EU.
http://www.eutruth.org.uk/lisbononepage.html

Article 1-1a 

Unlike Britain, the EU nation is atheist; its laws are not based on Christianity. 1-4 New article 2. It is the EU's values that count, not the wishes of the people. The state comes first, soviet style.

1a and Article 2.1-6 make it very clear our new nation will be the European Union, not Britain.

2-2 and 2.3 Our former borders will mean nothing.

2-4 Gives the EU the power to force Britain into the Euro.

3a Puts the EU's former nations into the same position that Soviet satellite states enjoyed.

3a-3 Compels former nations to obey the EU. They shall carry out the EU's tasks, and may not oppose it.

3b-1 Conferral - the EU will not exceed the powers it has taken in the Treaties. Negated by 3b.3:

3b-3 If local powers can better be used by the EU, the EU will use them.

3b-4. Proportionality: The EU will not use more force than is necessary to compel us to comply with the Treaties.

Article 6 The EU recognises its own Charter of the EU's Rights of 2007.

6-2 The EU accedes to the EU Convention on Human Rights, but not where it affects the EU's power.

6-3.c Paves the way for The European Council to become independent of Heads of State, and become a politburo.

Article 8. Equality. In glorious Soviet style. We are forced to accept EU citizenship.

Article 8A-1 to 4 Prepares the way for the abolition of Westminster:

8A-2 Heads of state can be bypassed in favour of "government;" National Parliaments bypassed direct to citizens.

8A-3. Decisions to be taken as close as possible to the citizen. Eurospeak for Regions, not Parliaments.

8A-4. Will be used to abolish our Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem Parties.       

It's the old EU constitution I-46-4 word for word: Political parties to be at the European level. The Madrid conference defined this in 1999 as parties with voters in 10 or more former nations. Our parties count voters in just one nation. Goodbye to the Lib-Lab-Con.

8B-3. The Commission may use consultation. Ballots, elections, referendums or democracy are not to be its way.

8B-4 One million citizens may petition the Commission to implement the glorious EU Treaties. We can only agree, Soviet style. Old EU constitution clause I-47-4.

9 and 9A Implement EU constitution clauses I-19 to I-27 List of Institutions. Confirms their interest in the Regions. There are three governing bodies which are unelected politburos, soviet style, each with up to 27 members:

9B The European Council is made up of heads of state, or "government" which could be any politician of their choosing. It meets 4 times a year, and chooses (and can fire) its President for 2.5 years, two terms maximum. He can be anyone from anywhere but not a head of state; he can fire a Commissioner.

9C The Council of Ministers, now The Council, is senior bureaucrat level; controls laws, the budget and policy.

9D The third level is the Commissioners, 20 people, anyone, from each country, provided (clause 3) he is not anti-EU. The Commission is the executive, the government or bureaucracy.

These three are politburos where EU politicians choose politicians; there are no elections to positions of power. Unlike Westminster, the EU Parliament in Brussels, the only elected body, has no executive power; it is a sham.

9E An EU foreign minister shall be appointed, and will be a Vice President of the Commission.

9F EU courts and EU judges shall enforce the six EU Treaties and former nations shall comply.

Article 10 Enhanced Cooperation: Former nations may wish to reinforce the EU's integration using any powers remaining outside the EU's absolute power. If they don't, the Council can enforce enhanced cooperation if former nations won't cooperate. Clause 3: Only cooperating nations may vote in the council.
10-4 We must obey the acquis communautaire, 170,000 pages of active EU law. (EU regulations millions of pages)

10A c-3 Scores of clauses like this one confirm the EU is a military union. A military dictatorship.

That is just the first 26 pages of the 294. The six treaties repetitively remove all Westminster's powers.

There are no provisions for elections to Westminster, which will close. The EU's 120,000 regulations will close most of Britain's 4.5 million small businesses and control our lives more closely than were Soviet citizens. 

Harmonising our laws with the EU over 36 years has given us the laws of a police state, which the EU will enforce. 

Lisbon (illegally) 'took primacy' over the British Constitution, which it nullifies, and as far as the EU, their puppet government in Westminster and our corrupted courts are concerned, the EU became our nation, and Britain was abolished as a nation on 1st January 2009.

+44 (0)7786 952037

www.thisweek.org.uk

Our Constitution is NOT negotiable.

   

   Our Constitution is not negotiable.

 

    A referendum implies that our own Constitution is negotiable. Our Constitution is not negotiable. Our elected leaders should understand that overthrowing the Constitution is treason, conspiring to overthrow the Constitution is treason, contemplating overthrowing the Constitution is treason and inciting the people to overthrow the Constitution, as in calling for a referendum, is also treason. Our elected leaders should understand that our rights and freedoms belong to the people and it is not in their power to sign them away.

    I would refer to the Vienna Convention for Treaties, which confirms that Heath's treachery meant our EU membership was null and void.

Britain will be forced by Brussels

“Britain will be forced by Brussels to accept Mediterranean refugees.” 

Report in the paper today. 

And there’s actually nothing our government can do because on 21 November 2014, immigration and border control was just one of many policy areas that was moved from “unanimity” to “QMV” (Qualified Majority Voting) a rather important change that our politicians and mainstream media didn’t feel it worth mentioning during the election.  

Here’s what happened - In the EU, the Council of Ministers is supposed to make a lot of the key decisions about the main legislation to be passed by the EU. 

In the Treaty of Nice, many of the areas where the EU wished to legislate required unanimity of the Council of Ministers. 

So Britain had the option of vetoing any legislation it disagreed with.

But, in order to ‘improve the quality of decision making’, the Lisbon Treaty moved a huge number of areas from ‘unanimity’ to “QMV”. 

Moreover, the threshold for QMV was lowered from countries with over 70% of the EU’s population to countries with just 65% of the EU population.

So, Britain can now be outvoted by Merkel and her stooges on virtually any EU decision.

The areas which moved from ‘unanimity’ to ‘QMV’ are all of these:

Area of decision-making Nice Lisbon.

Initiatives of the High Representative for Foreign Affairs- was Unanimity now QMV.

Rules concerning the Armaments Agency Unanimity - QMV

Freedom to establish a business Unanimity- QMV

Self-employment access rights Unanimity- QMV

Freedom, security and justice – cooperation and evaluation Unanimity- QMV

Border checks Unanimity - QMV

Asylum Unanimity- QMV

Immigration Unanimity- QMV

Crime prevention incentives Unanimity- QMV

Eurojust Unanimity- QMV

Police cooperation Unanimity-QMV

Europol Unanimity- QMV

Transport Unanimity- QMV

European Central Bank Unanimity QMV (in part)

Culture Unanimity- QMV

Structural and Cohension Funds Unanimity- QMV

Organisation of the Council of the European Union Unanimity-QMV

European Court of Justice Unanimity- QMV

Freedom of movement for workers Unanimity- QMV

Social security Unanimity- QMV

Criminal judicial cooperation Unanimity- QMV

Criminal law Unanimity- QMV

President of the European Councilelection (New item) QMV

Foreign Affairs High Representative election (New item) QMV

Funding the Common Foreign and Security Policy Unanimity-QMV

Common defense policy Unanimity-QMV

Withdrawal of a member state (new item) QMV

General economic interest services Unanimity- QMV

Diplomatic and consular protection Unanimity QMV

Citizens initiative regulations Unanimity- QMV

Intellectual property Unanimity QMV

Eurozone external representation Unanimity QMV

Sport Unanimity QMV

Space Unanimity QMV

Energy Unanimity QMV

Tourism Unanimity QMV

Civil protection Unanimity QMV

Administrative cooperation Unanimity QMV

Emergency international aid Unanimity QMV

Humanitarian aid Unanimity QMV

Response to natural disasters or terrorism (new item) QMV

Economic and Social Committee QMV QMV

Committee of the Regions Unanimity- QMV

Economic and Social Committee Unanimity-QMV

The EU budget Unanimity-QMV

So, on 21 November 2014 we said goodbye to the UK as an independent country, because after 21 November 2014, Britain was no longer be able to block any legislation which was against our national interests. 

No wonder Cameron, Miliband, Clegg and all their self-serving sycophants in the mainstream media never mentioned 21 November 2014. 

After all, if we plebs had understood how our quisling leaders were handing over control of our country to Germany, more of us might have supported UKIP.

Peter Hitchens on Facebook

 Peter Hitchens FB page

'The truth is that both major parties are now just commercial organisations, who raise money wherever they can get it to buy their way into office through unscrupulous election campaigns. They then presumably reward their donors once they are in office. The electorate are a constitutional necessity for this process, but otherwise their fears, hopes and desires are largely irrelevant. They are to be fooled and distracted with scares (‘The other lot will privatise the NHS!’ ‘The other lot will nationalise your children’s toys and then wreck the economy!’ ) or with loss-leader cut-rate offers, like supermarkets (‘Vote for us and get a cheap mortgage!!’ ‘Vote for us and have your rent frozen!’) . Even if these wild pledges are implemented, the customer will pay for them through higher taxes elsewhere, just as with supermarket loss-leaders. By playing our part in this ludicrous pantomime, we license it to continue forever. I have thought for years that the key to ending it was simple and obvious. We could revenge ourselves on these fakes by refusing to vote for them. The arrival of new parties, UKIP on one side, the Greens on the other, made such a revolt and redemption even easier.

But I must now admit that the people of this country actually seem to prefer to live the same experience over and over again, and seem astonishingly ready to believe the crudest propaganda. I seethe with frustrated amazement at the Tory claim to have fixed the economy, so blazingly untrue that in commercial advertising it would get them into serious trouble with the authorities. Ailing GDP figures just before the election were barely mentioned in the media, but easily-obtained statistics on productivity, trade, manufacturing and construction, are all bad and the Tories have missed their own target (whether wise or not)on deficit reduction. In any case, the Tory record on the economy is dreadful.The idea that they are economically competent in general simply doesn’t stand up to examination. Leave aside Winston Churchill’s disastrous decision to force us back on the Gold Standard , have we all forgotten the ERM catastrophe, in which a Tory government threw £27 Billion into the sea for nothing, because their best brains had mistakenly lashed sterling to the EU’s exchange rate ? What about the irresponsible Reggie Maudling boom of the early 1960s (Maudling left a note for his Labour successor , Jim Callaghan, saying ‘Sorry to leave it in such a mess, old cock’ which was almost certainly what Liam Byrne had in mind when he left his famous note saying ‘Sorry there’s no money’. What of Harold Macmillan’s decision to spend wildly in 1958 which caused his entire Treasury team to resign in protest , the irresponsible Tony Barber boom of the early 1970s, and of course the devastation of manufacturing industry in the early years of the Thatcher government? Now we have a dangerous housing bubble, official money-printing and the organised theft from savers by the abolition of interest on deposits. I’m not actually saying Labour are much better, or any better, but to vote Tory because you think the economy is safe in their hands is actually daft.

As for the Scottish scare, this is if anything even more shocking. Mr Cameron’s macho mishandling of the referendum, refusing an option for Devo Max, came close to bringing about a pro-secession vote. So did his generally cack-handed management of the campaign. Then, his partisan and petty pursuit of ‘English votes for English laws’ (plus his discourteous gloating about the Queen allegedly ‘purring’ at the result) infuriated Scottish voters who had until then taken the ‘vow’ of maximum concessions seriously. It probably precipitated the landslide to the SNP (one of the few occasions when this expression ‘landslide’has been justified). I have written here about Michael Portillo’s interesting admission that he no longer clung to traditional Unionism. I think we have every reason to suspect that many others in the Tory Party would privately be quite happy to say goodbye to Scotland.

A Tory Party really concerned about the loss of Scotland would have done as Norman Tebbit suggested, and urged its supporters to vote Labour to stop the SNP. Instead, to the dismay of elder statesmen and experts such as Michael Forsyth, it talked up the SNP, paying elaborate compliments to Nicola Sturgeon after the leaders’ debate (George Osborne and Michael Gove were observed doing this) . To claim, while behaving in this fashion, that the Tory Party is a bulwark against the SNP and Labour is in their clutches is absurd. The SNP are delighted by the Tory victory, which makes it all but certain that they will get a repeat landslide in next year’s Scottish general election, with a manifesto commitment to a second referendum, which I think they will then win. Let us see how Mr Cameron now copes with the SNP’s sweeping victory, for which he must take so much of the blame... 

As for the famous EU referendum, who really thinks that the propaganda forces which got Mr Cameron his unexpected majority won’t also be activated to achieve a huge vote to stay in the EU? And then the issue will be closed forever.

What is the point of saying all this now, when it’s all over? Because it is true, and because to speak the truth is valuable in itself, at all times.'

Letter about betrayal

Dear Editor,

 

One wonders how many viewers who watched the BBC 1 coverage of the VE Day Commemoration Service in Westminster Abbey understood the cruel hypocrisy of the event and the blatant betrayal of those who gave so much and the thousands who made the ultimate sacrifice to ensure this nation remained a free and sovereign people of self political determination.

 

Today, seventy years after that great victory over German domination, how many people understand that in 1972 a British government surrendered  our national sovereignty to the covert German aspiration - which was then disguised as a European Trading Agreement?

This made our own lawful self governance totally subordinate to German domination, administered by its unelected and unaccountable puppet government in Brussels, which in 1992 created all British people - including the monarch, citizens of the EU and subject to the constraints and obligations under that citizenship, presided over by  an unelected and unaccountable puppet President!

 

Very few of the brave souls who engaged in that terrible conflict are still living and those people who remain and experienced and remember the hardships of those harshest of times are now in the minority, but they will not forget those dreadful times, nor will they forget the despicable betrayal of this nation state some twenty seven years later, by those in whom they placed their trust.

 

Yours Faithfully,   Bob Lomas.  

Magna Carta Society