-----Original
Message-----
From:]
Sent: 29 November 2015 01:33
To:
Subject: THE FOUR STAGES OF ISLAMIC CONQUEST
From:]
Sent: 29 November 2015 01:33
To:
Subject: THE FOUR STAGES OF ISLAMIC CONQUEST
BRITAIN IS WELL INTO STAGE TWO POSSIBLY
STAGE THREE
STAGE ONE: INFILTRATION
First migration wave to target
non-Muslim society. Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the target non
-Muslim society. Characterized by professed tolerance of others and their
beliefs. Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful
religion and Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and
racism. Images of women and children used to
portray Muslims. Establishment of mosques as power bases
(today globally funded by Gulf countries oil revenue). (Mosques are safe havens
for Jihadi recruitment and subversive projects). Muslim leaders promote
large push for increased Muslim births in target non-Muslim society to increase
native Muslim population. Misrepresentation of their intentions or aims as a
cover up for clandestine operations. (Al-Taqyyia – deceit, lying and
evasion of truth)
STAGE TWO: CONSOLIDATION OF POWER
Proselytizing efforts increase.
Establishment and recruitment of fundamentalist Jihadi cells. Efforts to convert
alienated segments of the population of target non-Muslim society to Islam.
Revisionist efforts to Islamize history. Efforts to destroy all evidence of
incriminating historical evidence and sources that reveal true character of
Islamism. Intellectual Jihad to discredit non-Muslim culture. Assault on
cultural assumptions and icons of the nonMuslim world, such as democracy, law
and science. Increased dissemination of anti-western propaganda and anti-western
psychological warfare.
Alliances with the enemies of the
Western society particularly anti capitalism leftists. "The enemy of my enemy is
my friend" Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint. Efforts to
infiltrate education system to propagate pro-Islamic points of view. Increased
efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslim intellectuals and
leaders. Efforts to introduce blasphemy laws into nonMuslim society in order to
silence critics. Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing
Muslim births and migration to target non-Muslim society. Use of first and
second generation Muslim citizens of target non-Muslim society as Jihadist foot
soldiers and public fronts. Use of charities to recruit supporters.
Use of crime and fraud to obtain funds to finance activities. Covert efforts to
bring about the destruction of nonMuslim society from within.
Development of Muslim political base in
target non -Muslim society. Efforts to penetrate political and legal structure
of country so as to support Islamic growth from within. Use of bribes
and blackmail of non-Muslim authorities to get them to disregard establishment
of subversive activities. Islamic Financial networks strengthened to fund
political growth, large acquisition of land and resources by any means. (Today
they are funded by Muslim charities; Gulf countries Oil revenue and criminal
activities). Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate
opposition. Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes and greater demands are placed
upon Muslims to adopt strict Islamic conduct.
STAGE THREE: OPEN WAR WITH TARGET
NON-ISLAMIST SOCIETY'S LEADERSHIP AND CULTURE
Large-scale destruction of population,
assassinations, killings, bombings. Intentional efforts to spread chaos in the
target country to undermine its government and culture. Acts of barbarity
and fierceness as a deliberate policy intended to foster submission of
opponents. Open and covert efforts to cause
economic collapse of the society. All opposition, no matter what kind, is
challenged and either eradicated or silenced. Widespread ethnic cleansing with
Islamic militias. Rejection and defiance of target society secular laws or
culture. Murder of all opposition political,
religious and intellectual leaders of target society. Murder of all
moderate Muslim intellectuals who envision other alternatives to radical Islam.
Toppling of government and usurpation of
political power. Imposition of Sharia law. Mass
execution of non-Muslims, ethnic cleansing.
STAGE FOUR: ISLAMIC THEOCRACY
The Qur’an and the Sharia becomes the
"law of the land. " All non-Islamic human rights cancelled. Freedom of speech
and the press eradicated. All Religions other than Islam are forbidden and
destroyed. Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim
population. Destruction of all evidence of
non-Muslim culture, groups and symbols in country.
It would appear that
atrocities by militant Muslims is not a new thing.
Below is a saying by
Marco Polo:
“The militant Muslim
is the person who beheads the infidel, while the moderate Muslim holds the feet
of the victim.”
Sent: 25 January 2016 16:17
To: Nigel Farage MEP
Cc: Bill Etheridge MEP; Caroline Stephens North Wilts; Daniel Hannan; Dave Hodges; David Coburn MEP; Diane James MEP; Donald Martin; Gerard Batten; Gerard Wadsworth; Gerrard Batten; Gillian Savory; Gordon Helm; James Gulleford; Jane Collins MEP; Janette Gulleford; Janice Atkinson MEP; Jeremy Allison; Jill Seymour MEP; Kenneth Gulleford; Louise Bours MEP; Margot Parker MEP; Mike Hookem MEP; Mike Nattrass MEP; Paul Nuttall; Richard Coke; Robert Brown; Steven Woolfe MEP; Stuart Agnew MEP; Tim Aker MEP; Timothy Congdon; UKIP; UKIP East Admin; UKIP Mail; UKIP Web Editor; Victoria Ayling; William Earl of Dartmouth
Subject: WHEN WILL UKIP ACT ?
Dear Mr Farage,
I have supported UKIP fervently for years
as I have believed your speeches and press quotes that you and the Party are
absolutely intent on getting Britain out of the EU.
You will know just how unlawful the EU is,
how illegal its Treaties are and that in law (English
Constitutional and Common Law and the
Vienna Convention
on the Law of Treaties 1969 & 1986), Britain
may simply walk away and there is nothing the EU can do about it.
You will know of the
gross treason committed by so many of our politicians since the 1960’s - which
fact alone, renders Britain’s “EU membership” null and void. So you will also
know that Britain is, in law, not actually any part of the EU and that European
law can have no effect in this country whatsoever. English law continues to
prevail.
It would seem the last general election
was rigged since the Conservatives KNEW they’d won two weeks before it was
held. We now receive massively funded pro-EU propaganda through the front door
and scores of organisations are strongly pushing the EU-IN vote. We
might get an EU
referendum if Mr Cameron finally so decides, worded to accord with his openly
pro-EU stance.
But no matter how it
might be worded, voting in such a referendum would in law, cement Britain’s part
in the EU as it would legitimise what is currently an illegal sham with no
grounding in law.
As such a “promised” EU referendum
theoretically draws closer, one would expect to see UKIP officials in overdrive
to counter the strong pro-EU drive with campaigns, posters and billboards,
leaflets and other handouts making sure that absolutely every person in the
country knows and is fully aware of the harm and cost the EU is causing us, just
how destructive full EU membership will be and how Britain will be infinitely
better off out of the Union. That we shall breathe easily once again and be
free to trade with the world without interference as
now.
But we see none of this from UKIP. Your
speeches are masterly. But speeches without action amount to nothing because
the Europhiles will simply smile and ignore what you say until they see things
beginning to change through action. Only then will they take what you say,
seriously.
Though the Party has claimed for years
that it will robustly get Britain out of the EU and given the passionate support
it received at last year’s General Election, why
has it not done
anything discernable to leave the EU so far ?
As Britain has no
lawful commitment to Europe anyway, why has UKIP not simply walked our country
away from EU clutches as it legally and freely may ?
Since the three main
parties have so treacherously lied and deceived this nation into foreign rule
and dictatorship, English law will still enable UKIP to take us out -
today. UKIP would gain a
very considerable membership increase upon doing so.
Time in which to achieve that is now so
very short before our opportunity is forever lost. The loss of our country will
cause a very large number of people to become incandescent with rage that UKIP
could have done far more than we have so far seen.
Will you tell me when UKIP is to act
decisively and what we can expect to see, please ?
Yours sincerely,
Rex Poulton
Sent: 26 January 2016 13.43
To:
Cc:
Subject: Rply: We Want Our Country Back
To:
Cc:
Subject: Rply: We Want Our Country Back
Dear Mr
Poulton,
I have
received a copy of your open letter to Nigel Farage. Whilst I have every
sympathy with your frustrations what, precisely, do you envisage Farage and
UKIP can actually do further, in addition to informing and promoting UK
withdrawal?
Ideally, in
my view, we need a government ready and willing to unilaterally repeal the 1972
European Communities Act. With a Conservative government in power, and just one
UKIP MP, regrettably there is little chance of
that.
So please
elaborate upon your proposals.
Regards,
Delphine
Gray-Fisk
All
that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing
Edmund Burke 1729-1797
Edmund Burke 1729-1797
Sent: 26 January 2016 15:46
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country Back
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country Back
A sadly inadequate
effusion, which as you say Delphine has nothing to propose. Did Mr Poulton
reflect for a moment on what practical measures are needed which are not already
being implemented?
Nikolai
-----Original
Message-----
From: Alpha14 [
Sent: 28 January 2016 11:58
To: Nikolai Tolstoy; DGrayFisk@aol.com
Cc: beveridge1@me.com; sunbeam@newbury.net
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country Back
From: Alpha14 [
Sent: 28 January 2016 11:58
To: Nikolai Tolstoy; DGrayFisk@aol.com
Cc: beveridge1@me.com; sunbeam@newbury.net
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country Back
Dear
Delphine and Nikolai,
Thank
you both for your replies and I apologise that this response might become a
trifle lengthy.
My
email to Nigel was of course the question, “Given that we see little publicised
activity by UKIP to remove Britain from the EU so far, and in view of the
ramping-up of pro-EU propaganda through people’s front doors in readiness for
the forthcoming EU referendum (if we actually get one) to cajole a greater IN
vote, when is UKIP likely to start showing its strength of conviction and what
level of activity might we expect to see ?”.
I
fully understand that funding is crucial and that without the massive financial
support enjoyed by the three main parties, UKIP must use its resources carefully
and to the utmost benefit. However, as
Joe public on the street and with a deeply ingrained sense of justice for our
country, I see little evidence other than Nigel’s masterly speeches to
demonstrate what UKIP is actually doing to extricate us from the ever tightening
EU grip on our lives permitted and endorsed by so many so-called British
politicians. As things are, Britain will
shortly become irrevocably lost as a fully integrated part of the EU disaster, a
situation from which we shall never be permitted to free ourselves. I am not alone in this
view.
My
email sought to remind of the total illegality and lack of basis in law of
Britain’s EU “membership” and the ease and simplicity with which legitimate and
unquestionable withdrawal can be immediately made. If one is not a member of the Conservative
Party for example, one is not duty bound to take part in it and one certainly
does not need the consent of the chairman to leave.
So
far, the nation has waited very many years for somebody to take Britain out of
its ridiculous and relentless political suicide. But that has not happened. And time to act is now rapidly running out
before a pro-EU referendum timed with intent, unlawfully seals our illegal
fate.
It
is all very well to wait for lawful democracy to put things right. But that too, is not going to happen so long
as the three main parties together oversee Britain’s deliberate
destruction. By higher order, they will
never relinquish their strangle
hold and will spend inordinate amounts of taxpayers’ money to aggressively
protect their position against all opposition such as, not so long ago, their
determined attempt to destroy the BNP for its escalating public support and
serious threat to LibLabCon domination.
They did not manage to
destroy the BNP but doubtless by infiltration, they certainly caused that party
to split into numerous ineffectual side shows each incapable of mounting a
political campaign. This might also now
be happening to UKIP, but the LibLabCon dictatorship will never be unseated by
democratic means and while absolutely everybody I know voted for UKIP at last
year’s general election, the Conservative win was curiously known two weeks
before it even took place - and UKIP gained one seat.
So corrupt is Britain’s
political system that attempting to rectify it by lawful democratic means is
clearly a non starter. Unless something
dramatic happens, we are heading one way increasingly
quickly.
Many
people I know had hoped by now to see at least counter EU leafleting to redress
the stark imbalance of pro-EU material being pushed at people. Those I speak to are of the opinion that UKIP
makes excellent speeches but there it all ends.
How do you suppose that looks to the British public when all manner of
pro-EU literature, biased TV News and skewed programming are aimed at a gullible
electorate and UKIP appears to remain silent ?
Even
the BBC seems to have adopted the EU flag as its backdrop in political TV
programmes. Many people now seem to fear
that support for UKIP will fade as, to all intents and purposes, their faith is
made to rely solely upon Nigel’s excellent speeches. So the IN Campaign wins,
then.
Nothing
appears to have been made of how UKIP will run Britain, given the
opportunity. The Party might well have a
manifesto and policies for a resurgent Britain but unless the public are made
unmistakably clear about these, nobody will know.
Many
still see UKIP as a one horse show.
Leave the EU - and then nothing.
A
good many are also deeply concerned about UKIP’s welcoming acceptance of
Muslims. Early Muslim settlers are of
course peace-loving and gentle folk. But
you will know of the four stages of Islamic conquest (see attached) and I urge
you to read the 60 page “Jihad, Islam’s 1300
Year War On Western Civilisation” (Arthur Kemp, ISBN
978-1-4092-0502-9) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Jihad-Islams-Against-Western-Civilisation/dp/1409205029.
When Islam in
Britain reaches critical mass, Muslim UKIP membership will abruptly take on a
very different appearance and, not least by their far greater cultural birth
rate than ours which declines year on year, UKIP and our country will suddenly
no longer be ours but theirs by majority vote, claims of maltreatment, cultural
supremacy, racist accusation, intimidation, threat of violence and aggressive
personal attack.
English
Constitutional and Common Law would never have permitted such influx of foreign
nationals as has been intentionally invited and welcomed by LibLabCon who, as
you know, work not for Britain the country of their sworn allegiance, but a
completely different agenda. For years,
LibLabCon have institutionally side-stepped, over-ruled and ignored our
inviolable English Law. That is called
high treason. Tony Blair still believes
he has repealed the important treason laws.
Far from it.
You
will perhaps know that over the last two or three years a concerted effort was
made by more than 300 people across Britain to report treason committed by David
Cameron, Nick Clegg, Tony Blair, John Major, Francis Maude and Douglas Hurd (as
a start) to every national police force.
A large number of those police forces immediately accepted the
allegations as bone fide cases to answer and referred them to the Metropolitan
Police Commissioner for investigation and further action. But there they remain.
The
Commissioner, faced with solid, irrefutable evidence referred to him by his own
Chief Constables for his investigation has refused to act according to his sworn
oath of office, instead preferring the enormity of his own misprision of treason
and compounding the treason, let alone his dereliction of duty and misconduct in
public office. He immediately sought
early retirement but was refused.
Had
the allegations run their course, Britain’s political parties will have been in
total disarray as the proof of treason extends much wider than just those few
senior officials. The truth of the
political parties’ activities and aims will have become exposed to public
knowledge and (I’d have thought) UKIP will have collected considerable
additional support from a totally angered British public outraged that LibLabCon
had so intentionally contrived to deceive and betray them. Other separate allegations and evidence
against Tony Blair for example, have also not succeeded because of similar
trickery.
It
seems to me that where LibLabCon together demonstrate such psychopathy toward
their own country and people, UKIP could do no better than require the
Commissioner to fulfil his lawful duty and also to make widely public just what
the other three parties have been secretly up to since the 1960’s.
This would not be a dirty tricks campaign as the others freely use, but simply
informing the British people just what has been going on behind their backs in
their name and to what criminally purposeful end. With much greater effect than a mere 300 or
so ordinary people, the Party might successfully cause the treason allegations
to be properly and fully investigated and the result widely published for all to
see.
There
is no doubt whatsoever of the treachery committed by many politicians and as
English law continues to prevail, the follow-on from such investigations will be
automatic.
Kind
regards,
Rex
Poulton
