Informative exchange of emails regarding the illegal EU

-----Original Message-----
From:]
Sent: 29 November 2015 01:33
To:
Subject: THE FOUR STAGES OF ISLAMIC CONQUEST

BRITAIN IS WELL INTO STAGE TWO POSSIBLY STAGE THREE

http://worldtruthsummit.com/media-files/Islam-Nutshell-The4StagesOfIslamicConquest.pdf

STAGE ONE: INFILTRATION

First migration wave to target non-Muslim society. Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the target non -Muslim society. Characterized by professed tolerance of others and their beliefs. Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful religion and Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism. Images of women and children used to portray Muslims. Establishment of mosques as power bases (today globally funded by Gulf countries oil revenue). (Mosques are safe havens for Jihadi recruitment and subversive projects). Muslim leaders promote large push for increased Muslim births in target non-Muslim society to increase native Muslim population. Misrepresentation of their intentions or aims as a cover up for clandestine operations. (Al-Taqyyia – deceit, lying and evasion of truth)

STAGE TWO: CONSOLIDATION OF POWER

Proselytizing efforts increase. Establishment and recruitment of fundamentalist Jihadi cells. Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population of target non-Muslim society to Islam. Revisionist efforts to Islamize history. Efforts to destroy all evidence of incriminating historical evidence and sources that reveal true character of Islamism. Intellectual Jihad to discredit non-Muslim culture. Assault on cultural assumptions and icons of the nonMuslim world, such as democracy, law and science. Increased dissemination of anti-western propaganda and anti-western psychological warfare.

Alliances with the enemies of the Western society particularly anti capitalism leftists. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint. Efforts to infiltrate education system to propagate pro-Islamic points of view. Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslim intellectuals and leaders. Efforts to introduce blasphemy laws into nonMuslim society in order to silence critics. Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim births and migration to target non-Muslim society. Use of first and second generation Muslim citizens of target non-Muslim society as Jihadist foot soldiers and public fronts. Use of charities to recruit supporters. Use of crime and fraud to obtain funds to finance activities. Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of nonMuslim society from within. Development of Muslim political base in target non -Muslim society. Efforts to penetrate political and legal structure of country so as to support Islamic growth from within. Use of bribes and blackmail of non-Muslim authorities to get them to disregard establishment of subversive activities. Islamic Financial networks strengthened to fund political growth, large acquisition of land and resources by any means. (Today they are funded by Muslim charities; Gulf countries Oil revenue and criminal activities). Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition. Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes and greater demands are placed upon Muslims to adopt strict Islamic conduct.

STAGE THREE: OPEN WAR WITH TARGET NON-ISLAMIST SOCIETY'S LEADERSHIP AND CULTURE

Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, killings, bombings. Intentional efforts to spread chaos in the target country to undermine its government and culture. Acts of barbarity and fierceness as a deliberate policy intended to foster submission of opponents. Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society. All opposition, no matter what kind, is challenged and either eradicated or silenced. Widespread ethnic cleansing with Islamic militias. Rejection and defiance of target society secular laws or culture. Murder of all opposition political, religious and intellectual leaders of target society. Murder of all moderate Muslim intellectuals who envision other alternatives to radical Islam. Toppling of government and usurpation of political power. Imposition of Sharia law. Mass execution of non-Muslims, ethnic cleansing.

STAGE FOUR: ISLAMIC THEOCRACY

The Qur’an and the Sharia becomes the "law of the land. " All non-Islamic human rights cancelled. Freedom of speech and the press eradicated. All Religions other than Islam are forbidden and destroyed. Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim population. Destruction of all evidence of non-Muslim culture, groups and symbols in country.

It would appear that atrocities by militant Muslims is not a new thing. 

Below is a saying by Marco Polo:

“The militant Muslim is the person who beheads the infidel, while the moderate Muslim holds the feet of the victim.”

From: Alpha14 [
Sent: 25 January 2016 16:17
To: Nigel Farage MEP
Cc: Bill Etheridge MEP; Caroline Stephens North Wilts; Daniel Hannan; Dave Hodges; David Coburn MEP; Diane James MEP; Donald Martin; Gerard Batten; Gerard Wadsworth; Gerrard Batten; Gillian Savory; Gordon Helm; James Gulleford; Jane Collins MEP; Janette Gulleford; Janice Atkinson MEP; Jeremy Allison; Jill Seymour MEP; Kenneth Gulleford; Louise Bours MEP; Margot Parker MEP; Mike Hookem MEP; Mike Nattrass MEP; Paul Nuttall; Richard Coke; Robert Brown; Steven Woolfe MEP; Stuart Agnew MEP; Tim Aker MEP; Timothy Congdon; UKIP; UKIP East Admin; UKIP Mail; UKIP Web Editor; Victoria Ayling; William Earl of Dartmouth
Subject: WHEN WILL UKIP ACT ?

Dear Mr Farage,

I have supported UKIP fervently for years as I have believed your speeches and press quotes that you and the Party are absolutely intent on getting Britain out of the EU. 

You will know just how unlawful the EU is, how illegal its Treaties are and that in law (English Constitutional and Common Law and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 & 1986), Britain may simply walk away and there is nothing the EU can do about it.  You will know of the gross treason committed by so many of our politicians since the 1960’s  -  which fact alone, renders Britain’s “EU membership” null and void.  So you will also know that Britain is, in law, not actually any part of the EU and that European law can have no effect in this country whatsoever.  English law continues to prevail.

It would seem the last general election was rigged since the Conservatives KNEW they’d won two weeks before it was held.  We now receive massively funded pro-EU propaganda through the front door and scores of organisations are strongly pushing the EU-IN vote.  We might get an EU referendum if Mr Cameron finally so decides, worded to accord with his openly pro-EU stance.  

But no matter how it might be worded, voting in such a referendum would in law, cement Britain’s part in the EU as it would legitimise what is currently an illegal sham with no grounding in law.

As such a “promised” EU referendum theoretically draws closer, one would expect to see UKIP officials in overdrive to counter the strong pro-EU drive with campaigns, posters and billboards, leaflets and other handouts making sure that absolutely every person in the country knows and is fully aware of the harm and cost the EU is causing us, just how destructive full EU membership will be and how Britain will be infinitely better off out of the Union.  That we shall breathe easily once again and be free to trade with the world without interference as now.

But we see none of this from UKIP.  Your speeches are masterly.  But speeches without action amount to nothing because the Europhiles will simply smile and ignore what you say until they see things beginning to change through action.  Only then will they take what you say, seriously.

Though the Party has claimed for years that it will robustly get Britain out of the EU and given the passionate support it received at last year’s General Election, why has it not done anything discernable to leave the EU so far ?  

As Britain has no lawful commitment to Europe anyway, why has UKIP not simply walked our country away from EU clutches as it legally and freely may ?  

Since the three main parties have so treacherously lied and deceived this nation into foreign rule and dictatorship, English law will still enable UKIP to take us out - today.  UKIP would gain a very considerable membership increase upon doing so.

Time in which to achieve that is now so very short before our opportunity is forever lost.  The loss of our country will cause a very large number of people to become incandescent with rage that UKIP could have done far more than we have so far seen. 

Will you tell me when UKIP is to act decisively and what we can expect to see, please ?

Yours sincerely,

Rex Poulton

  Sent: 26 January 2016 13.43
To:
Cc:
Subject: Rply: We Want Our Country Back

Dear Mr Poulton,

I have received a copy of your open letter to Nigel Farage.  Whilst I have every sympathy with your frustrations  what, precisely, do you envisage Farage and UKIP can actually do further, in addition to informing and promoting UK withdrawal?

Ideally, in my view, we need a government ready and willing to unilaterally repeal the 1972 European Communities Act.  With a Conservative government in power, and just one UKIP MP, regrettably there is little chance of that. 

So please elaborate upon your proposals.

Regards,

Delphine Gray-Fisk

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing
Edmund Burke 1729-1797

Sent: 26 January 2016 15:46
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country Back

A sadly inadequate effusion, which as you say Delphine has nothing to propose.  Did Mr Poulton reflect for a moment on what practical measures are needed which are not already being implemented?

Nikolai

-----Original Message-----
From: Alpha14 [
Sent: 28 January 2016 11:58
To: Nikolai Tolstoy; DGrayFisk@aol.com
Cc: beveridge1@me.com; sunbeam@newbury.net
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country Back

Dear Delphine and Nikolai,

Thank you both for your replies and I apologise that this response might become a trifle lengthy. 

My email to Nigel was of course the question, “Given that we see little publicised activity by UKIP to remove Britain from the EU so far, and in view of the ramping-up of pro-EU propaganda through people’s front doors in readiness for the forthcoming EU referendum (if we actually get one) to cajole a greater IN vote, when is UKIP likely to start showing its strength of conviction and what level of activity might we expect to see ?”.

I fully understand that funding is crucial and that without the massive financial support enjoyed by the three main parties, UKIP must use its resources carefully and to the utmost benefit.  However, as Joe public on the street and with a deeply ingrained sense of justice for our country, I see little evidence other than Nigel’s masterly speeches to demonstrate what UKIP is actually doing to extricate us from the ever tightening EU grip on our lives permitted and endorsed by so many so-called British politicians.  As things are, Britain will shortly become irrevocably lost as a fully integrated part of the EU disaster, a situation from which we shall never be permitted to free ourselves.  I am not alone in this view.

My email sought to remind of the total illegality and lack of basis in law of Britain’s EU “membership” and the ease and simplicity with which legitimate and unquestionable withdrawal can be immediately made.  If one is not a member of the Conservative Party for example, one is not duty bound to take part in it and one certainly does not need the consent of the chairman to leave.  

So far, the nation has waited very many years for somebody to take Britain out of its ridiculous and relentless political suicide.  But that has not happened.  And time to act is now rapidly running out before a pro-EU referendum timed with intent, unlawfully seals our illegal fate. 

It is all very well to wait for lawful democracy to put things right.  But that too, is not going to happen so long as the three main parties together oversee Britain’s deliberate destruction.  By higher order, they will never relinquish their strangle hold and will spend inordinate amounts of taxpayers’ money to aggressively protect their position against all opposition such as, not so long ago, their determined attempt to destroy the BNP for its escalating public support and serious threat to LibLabCon domination.  

They did not manage to destroy the BNP but doubtless by infiltration, they certainly caused that party to split into numerous ineffectual side shows each incapable of mounting a political campaign.  This might also now be happening to UKIP, but the LibLabCon dictatorship will never be unseated by democratic means and while absolutely everybody I know voted for UKIP at last year’s general election, the Conservative win was curiously known two weeks before it even took place  -  and UKIP gained one seat.  

So corrupt is Britain’s political system that attempting to rectify it by lawful democratic means is clearly a non starter.  Unless something dramatic happens, we are heading one way increasingly quickly.

Many people I know had hoped by now to see at least counter EU leafleting to redress the stark imbalance of pro-EU material being pushed at people.  Those I speak to are of the opinion that UKIP makes excellent speeches but there it all ends.  How do you suppose that looks to the British public when all manner of pro-EU literature, biased TV News and skewed programming are aimed at a gullible electorate and UKIP appears to remain silent ?  

Even the BBC seems to have adopted the EU flag as its backdrop in political TV programmes.  Many people now seem to fear that support for UKIP will fade as, to all intents and purposes, their faith is made to rely solely upon Nigel’s excellent speeches.  So the IN Campaign wins, then.

Nothing appears to have been made of how UKIP will run Britain, given the opportunity.  The Party might well have a manifesto and policies for a resurgent Britain but unless the public are made unmistakably clear about these, nobody will know.  

Many still see UKIP as a one horse show.  Leave the EU  -  and then nothing.  

A good many are also deeply concerned about UKIP’s welcoming acceptance of Muslims.  Early Muslim settlers are of course peace-loving and gentle folk.  But you will know of the four stages of Islamic conquest (see attached) and I urge you to read the 60 page “Jihad, Islam’s 1300 Year War On Western Civilisation” (Arthur Kemp, ISBN 978-1-4092-0502-9) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Jihad-Islams-Against-Western-Civilisation/dp/1409205029.  

When Islam in Britain reaches critical mass, Muslim UKIP membership will abruptly take on a very different appearance and, not least by their far greater cultural birth rate than ours which declines year on year, UKIP and our country will suddenly no longer be ours but theirs by majority vote, claims of maltreatment, cultural supremacy, racist accusation, intimidation, threat of violence and aggressive personal attack.

English Constitutional and Common Law would never have permitted such influx of foreign nationals as has been intentionally invited and welcomed by LibLabCon who, as you know, work not for Britain the country of their sworn allegiance, but a completely different agenda.  For years, LibLabCon have institutionally side-stepped, over-ruled and ignored our inviolable English Law.  That is called high treason.  Tony Blair still believes he has repealed the important treason laws.  Far from it.

You will perhaps know that over the last two or three years a concerted effort was made by more than 300 people across Britain to report treason committed by David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Tony Blair, John Major, Francis Maude and Douglas Hurd (as a start) to every national police force.  A large number of those police forces immediately accepted the allegations as bone fide cases to answer and referred them to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner for investigation and further action.  But there they remain.  

The Commissioner, faced with solid, irrefutable evidence referred to him by his own Chief Constables for his investigation has refused to act according to his sworn oath of office, instead preferring the enormity of his own misprision of treason and compounding the treason, let alone his dereliction of duty and misconduct in public office.  He immediately sought early retirement but was refused. 

Had the allegations run their course, Britain’s political parties will have been in total disarray as the proof of treason extends much wider than just those few senior officials.  The truth of the political parties’ activities and aims will have become exposed to public knowledge and (I’d have thought) UKIP will have collected considerable additional support from a totally angered British public outraged that LibLabCon had so intentionally contrived to deceive and betray them.  Other separate allegations and evidence against Tony Blair for example, have also not succeeded because of similar trickery.

It seems to me that where LibLabCon together demonstrate such psychopathy toward their own country and people, UKIP could do no better than require the Commissioner to fulfil his lawful duty and also to make widely public just what the other three parties have been secretly up to since the 1960’s.  

  This would not be a dirty tricks campaign as the others freely use, but simply informing the British people just what has been going on behind their backs in their name and to what criminally purposeful end.  With much greater effect than a mere 300 or so ordinary people, the Party might successfully cause the treason allegations to be properly and fully investigated and the result widely published for all to see.  

 There is no doubt whatsoever of the treachery committed by many politicians and as English law continues to prevail, the follow-on from such investigations will be automatic.

Kind regards,

Rex Poulton