From: Jane Birkby
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:18 PM
Subject: Reason to debate - Reply
I would be grateful if you could print as much of this
letter as possible, because the content is important and informative for the
public.
Dear Viewpoint,
Bernard Regan (Telegraph May 19-25) doesn’t see merit
in other aspects of the EU Referendum debate, including “who we choose to rule
over us”.
Like a banker, Jean Monnet, the EU Commission, or an oligarch
he only sees the immediate financial picture, which is divorced from the well
being of the actual ordinary people of Europe.
- What about the hideous cost of implementing all those diktats, which officials of the EU churn out by the bucket load, and which add costs to goods and services?
- What about the fact that David Cameron ignored the Council of Europe’s own Code of Practice on Referendums, which prohibits the use of public funds for campaigning purposes, he spent £9 million of taxpayers money hoping to influence the vote before the proper campaign was allowed to start?
- The Remain campaign booklet is using virtually the same arguments as the 1975 Common Market information, and the original was in German.
- Anna Soubry, the industry minister argues that the EU is about trade and prosperity, not politics. Not so, the EU is entirely political and power hungry.
- Jean Monnet, the prime visionary and instigator, was President of the Action Committee for the European Superstate, which is not a myth; it is the intent.
- Monnet wrote: “Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”
- Trade and prosperity are merely a red herring; the EU’s true destination is to remove democratic government, and replace it with unelected committee.
This is not going to be a fair fight, because the EU who have
the most to lose, are throwing European taxpayers money at the Remain campaign
and the BBC, to persuade us that we are better off staying in than staying out,
just as they did in 1975 for the Common Market vote.
Britain is in grave danger of colonisation and takeover,
thanks to free movement through open borders, and the ever increasing number of
member countries (Original 9 - now 28), with Turkey, Albania, Macedonia,
Montenegro, and Serbia being considered for membership.
This referendum is just as much a Battle for Britain and our
heritage, as it was in WWI & II, it is just that the weapons have changed,
the Foreign and Commonwealth Office have a section jokingly referred to as “The
Camel Corp”, and they are working to a Lancaster Plan to hand the country to
Islam.
Every woman in the country must vote “OUT”, or we as a country
will disappear under the latest Ottoman invasion, who are rapidly changing the
demographics in this country, by having more children than the native
population.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Jane Birkby
full address supplied
North Lincolnshire
No comments:
Post a Comment