A Darkening Age- The Libertarian Reign Of Terror

Subject:	The UK Gulag
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:13:38 +0000
From:	Guy Leven-Torres <senorburrito@hotmail.co.uk>
To:	<senorburrito@hotmail.co.uk>

A Darkening Age- The Libertarian Reign Of Terror- 'You Will Be Free (To Sin), Or We Will Persecute/Prosecute You!'

Guy Leven-Torres


11^th March 2012

Britain is now statistically a totalitarian ruled nation ranking behind countries like Brazil but just above China but below Russia. The United States is now just above us. We are at 47 while it ranks at 45. Sweden ranked by the UN and Daily Mail as the best country to live in, is ranked 53. Norway is ranked 41. These statistics will never be revealed in any of the State controlled media papers, TV, radio or journals that today pass for Britain's 'free press'. The report I have been shown was compiled by a private think tank of traditional real libertarians, more than aware of the true state of Islamifying Europe. Totalitarian states begin at rank 32. It doesn't say much for the governments of the world. Iran ranked 184, Saudi Arabia 182, Turkey 63.

However, given that our e.mails are routinely monitored, our phones bugged, and cameras across the length and breadth of the land that photograph and film us via CCTV on average 20/40 times a day and more, the United Kingdom now ranks as a totalitarian state with more personal information collected and collated upon the individual than any other country in the world, who is spied and filmed upon more so than in North Korea or Red China, we are indeed a totalitarian state. The 'liberal' despots in charge with their endless quotas demanding equality this and equality that, have effectively turned Britain into an open air Gulag UK. They don't need to imprison us behind walls and bars yet- it will come sooner rather than later- but nobody escapes the all seeing eyes, hidden and seen of the all powerful 'Open Society' state. We are to be model for the rest of Europe and even the globe from what I have been informed. We know nothing about 'them', the state watchers, many of them private employees of huge corporations but they know everything about you- believe me. I saw this demonstrated in the last few days. I also received this reply to my attempt to philosophically answer why 'same sex marriage' is an oxymoron, since marriage between a man and woman was one of nature's self-evident truths or tautology.

'You are not allowed to write opinions like this, even if you claim they are 'philosophical' or 'academic'- They are not. They are a hate crime. I will not warn you again and the consequences next time maybe severe for you. I am sure your wife and children would not like to see you jailed? Behave yourself and accept the way the world is today and you cannot change it. I say this to you Guy, as a concerned human being and I know how ill you are, being banged up would probably finish you both physically and mentally having a criminal record as well, if you continue to write controversial material. I know how much you guard your reputation.'

I had to read the reply several times to take in the content. The writer was a state official. I had been reported to by an annoyed reader. This is not the first time but what struck me was the 'nice human concern' for my safety and freedom. This is where we are at in the UK today- a country wherein a state employee can feel it his duty to warn me about my writings. I have received e.mails from police officers before and in one case I circulated it. I have also been told only recently by a nurse of all people charged with my treatment, much the same as the busy body above said this evening. The message seems to me most sinister in its 'caring for your safety' aspect. How the hell did we arrive at such a pass? Whatever happened to Voltaire's- attributed maxim 'Sir I may not agree with what you say but by God I will defend your right to say it unto death'?

Most people know my utter contempt and openly expressed hatred of these creatures and the fact I will refuse come what may, as I have done for nigh on seven and more years now to be cowed or intimidated by them. I now live in a state of constant low level fear, expressed by a numb feeling of unease in my gut expecting e.mails like the above, or the knock at the door. Both have happened to me. Despite this my strong sense of injustice and bloody mindedness overcomes my fear. I simply cannot live like this. I must be free. I would rather die than submit to this shameful condition. Somebody accused me if being a coward the other day since I 'should learn to live with it like everybody else'. Am I a coward perhaps? Should I 'bravely' shut up and suffer in silence like the rest?My wife thinks I should as do others close to me, I must admit. They worry about me but I simply cannot betray my sense of self respect and conscience. Is this selfish perhaps?

Today I read of brave Norman Scarth fleeing to Austria. I know of at least two others who have fallen foul of the liberal despots that lord it over us and long to micro manage our daily lives. Never did I think it possible that I would end up living in a British Gulag. Since Breivik assisted the elite by his murderous actions, the daily atmosphere in the UK and across Europe is increasingly Soviet or Nazi like. What is even more appalling is that the British and other European populations, have not only succumbed to this Reign of Liberal Terror but who actually collaborate with it enthusiastically. Well sorts the men from the mice. I hate rodents. the same thing happened overnight in Nazi Germany- everybody became a good Jew hating Nazi, even Jews.

I find the very idea that some other human being or 'creature'- a being the same as myself, in most physical and mental respects and supposedly equal before the law, should dictate not only what I am allowed to say but also to think absolutely disgusting. No other word than 'disgusting' describes my feelings towards such creatures. What unspeakable arrogance but as I keep trying to educate people to accept we are ruled by people and groups who are in many cases, perhaps most certifiably insane by any required medical standard, or with serious dysfunctional sociopathic personality disorders and indeed dangerous to all humanity that to myself, even if not to you, betray the amoral and lunatic attitudes of people who should be locked away for their safety and ours. And please do not, as some have in the past point out that 'You are being like them since you want to incarcerate them in the same way!' This is an amoral equivalence that does not stand scrutiny and what is so appalling, is the complete lack of critical thinking among even those charged with doing so, their opinions replaced by the self-serving and banal.

My reply is that as eccentric as I might be like a lot in my profession, even idiosyncratic, I do not wish to legalise gay marriage, import wholesale migrant or racial minorities, impose sharia and Islam onto a formerly Christian land, or wish to do away with the native British population in a slow genocide, hand over the UK and its culture to a European Communist regime, bring in child sex, steal children for paedophile gangs in the ruling elite, rob public monies, bankrupt banks and UK industries or try to force my views on others with menaces like the creep above did to me this evening. In short people are quite at liberty to tell me what they think, to dislike and disagree with me, tell me to go away but nobody has the right to tell me what I am allowed to think, speak and write.

Our media, those like the 'London Broadcasting' or 'London's Big Conversation' are totally controlled now by the state- believe me when I tell you this. The above radio talk show was once a beacon of free speech but is today nothing but a modern version of Volkischer Beobachter, the old Hitlerite Party journal. Get your name mentioned in that rag in the 1930s after Hitler came to power and one had to run like hell, before the SA and Gestapo came to beat you up or worse.

For the last eight months since the idiot Breivik butchered 80 young Norwegians and others, LBC has gone through the hour to hour daily exercise of questioning every aspect of 'racism', 'homophobia', 'Islamophobia', making out that anybody that expresses any concern or dislike of homosexuals, Moslems, blacks or any one of a hundred favoured minority rent-a-causes of our multicultural 'libertarian' jailers, is Public Enemy Number One to be exposed, ridiculed and killed by mob fury on sight. It has reached the point where every caller is pro-homo, pro-Moslem, pro-ethnic minority, anti-smoking, pro-vegan, this and that and if a brave soul does call in with an opposing view, he or she soon realises that they are the token scapegoat for the interviewer to abuse and cow his audience into permitted state sanctioned thought and speech. The station is now a parody of its former self, like all the rest and utterly predictable in the use of its state speak and politically correct views. Only this evening I heard a native cockney speaker from East London try to express his views, his stuttered words drowned out by the abuse and ridicule of the shameless presenter. The cockney bravely tried to make his point as he was condemned as a 'racist', the palpable fear ever so clear in his voice. I long desisted in calling into such shows. One presenter even threatened a caller with reportage to the Met police.

This is Britain 2012- a open air Gulag.........

Guy

Below the Liberal Song Of Freedom 'And You Will Be Free!'

http://www.youtube.com/v/SkV1ZbU7eqs&fs=1&source=uds&autoplay=1

GLOBAL TAKEOVER:
WHY WE ARE FOREWARNED… BUT STILL TAKE NO ACTION

A general awareness of some, if not all, of the seventeen strategies of
globalisation has permeated the bulk of the Australian population and so the
critical factor of forewarning is no longer the issue it was five years ago. We are
faced now with a much more serious issue: response diffusion.

Response diffusion is the nurtured product of two hundred years of intense
propagandisation by the coalition of bankers, aristocrats, media-owners and
other architects of re-feudalisation (which, philosophically speaking, is what this is
really all about). Knowing full well that you cannot fool all of the people all of the
time, the globalists sowed seeds of distraction and energy dispersal in the form of
reactive and institutionalised salvation. The most obvious of these are: redefining
political language, constitutions, bills of rights, insurrection, alternative media,
leadership forums, law reform, electoral reform, and political parties.

 Exploiting dubious definitions of democracy, various optional and
preferential systems of voting were devised which ensure that a
tweedledum/tweedledee two party system prevails, thereby denying all
citizens access to policy formulation. Monopolisation of the media replaced
candidate door-knocking which, prior to 1973, stimulated at least minimal
voter influence on politicians.

 Redefining democracy, away from that which was so well understood by
Thucydides, the Irish Monks, Thomas Paine, Abraham Lincoln, and Lord
Acton (government by the people); and replacing this with the
understanding that electing a politician to do our thinking for us is the same
thing, was probably the most pivotal strategic achievement by the global
elitists.

 Many people see constitutions as the answer, the penny never dropping
that no constitution contains the world democracy; not very surprising
considering that globalists edited every constitution ever written. Likewise,
bill-of-rights enthusiasts rarely comprehend that the US version was a
massive ooops when it was realised that the crucial words of Thomas Paine
(from The Rights of Man) had been removed from the American
Constitution prior to ratification. The 27 amendments were prevented from
containing he critical clauses.

 Insurrection has always been a globalist fear, but with the population
disarmed this is without potential in Australia.

 As to the various legal reforms, lawyers are always in place to castrate such
efforts; and in fact to use these to further alienate private ownership or
citizen's rights, as we saw with Aboriginal land rights. It should be noted
that those Aborigines who had always lived on their spirit-sourced land
have actually experienced cultural and social destruction at a more rapid
rate than those who were not so fortunate; yet preventing this was the
rationale for land rights in the first place. Once again, lawyers intervened
(ie the Law Reform Commission and Land Councils). The single act that
would have genuinely empowered Aborigines, engaging all consultation in
their own languages, has been adamantly refused for 224 years.

We have massively underestimated the organisational extensiveness and
creativity of the globalists. We should have just presumed that any obvious
weapon placed at our disposal will somehow be used against us. But there
is a single exception... the Internet. This was not anticipated, and as a
vehicle to accumulate people power, expression of which is what the
globalists really fear, it is now realised by the globalists that we must be
disarmed. We have perhaps one or two years before the Internet is closed
to us forever, so this prospect should create some urgency. We do not
have the luxury of strategies that will take longer than one year to
implement.

Another factor is that the international situation that so preoccupies many
of us, is irrelevant to Australian redemption. Why? Because we live in the
only country in the world that is potentially self-sufficient; which means we
can walk away from all trade and international banks; which means that we
are impervious to attack by trade embargoes and sanctions; and to
financial strangulation. As to military punishment: which since 1946 has
already been meted out to 44 nations who dared to be non-compliant,
Australia is the world's most difficult country to successfully attack and
occupy. Not only is it a logistical nightmare for any invader, we are host to
the US/NATO spy and navigation satellite relay bases, which can be taken
over at will and used to run aircraft-carriers aground, to make aircraft fall
out of the sky, and to make missiles boomerang.

In other words, the only thing stopping us Australians from saving our
country is our own timidity and indecisiveness.

Having said that, there must be a single first action we can take that:

1. Will be widely supported by the national electorate;
2. That will create instant enabling and investment wealth;
3. That will disarm the international enemy;
4. That costs nothing to launch;
5. That can be implemented within a year.

That we all do not know this already illustrates just how successful the enemy has been in sowing discord and confusion. We are all waving different banners and charging in disparate directions. Yet the means of defeating the enemy has been in front of our noses all along... a unanimous national demand that all Australian manufacturing and domestic food production be protected from unfair foreign competition.

In other words, Bring Back Tariffs. This means revoking the unmandated secret
treaties that purportedly tied us to the Lima Agreement, the WTO, the WB, all
FTAs, the IMF, and more recently, to the Rothschild-owned Bank for International
Settlements.

Restoring tariffs will immediately recreate our manufacturing sector and return
Australian foods to our tables. Manufacturing will re-create the three million full
time jobs lost to tariff removal, and will quickly create at least two million more.

Our second move should be to dissolve the Oil Price Parity Agreement and fuel
tax, which would reduce bowser prices to 12 cents per litre (or 25 cents, if Lyndon LaRouche is correct). Meanwhile, manufacturers will move swiftly to making gas-fuelled motors. The effect of this will be to create among the world's lowest industry and food production overheads, and knock $100 off each family's
domestic budget.

Obviously, this new expression of people power would lead to the breakup of the media monopoly, grocery duopoly, major political parties, and then to all the
reforms that the electorate supports, but the very first enabling move must be to
Bring Back Tariffs. Our most recent survey of the national demographic (July
2010) shows that 86% of Australians already support the restoration of tariffs, so
what are we waiting for?

Tony Ryan

An illusion

 

 

From: annette rose smith <annette-rose-smith@hotmail.co.uk>

Date: 4 March 2012 12:21:20 GMT

Subject: FW: [MRG] Fwd: Fw: illusion

1 IT’S AN ILLUSION Members of parliament are in fact, ”DIRECTORS OF A CORPORATION” which will keep heading in the same direction no matter who is elected. POLITICS: Pertaining to POLICY, or the ADMINISTRATION of the GOVERNMENT. POLICY: A plan or course of action, as of a GOVERNMENT, POLITICAL PARTY or CORPORATION- a WRITTEN CONTRACT or a CERTIFICATE of INSURANC ACTS of PARLIAMENT become STATUTES; PRIMARY LEGISLATION which in turn are ENACTED and ENFORCED by STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS; SECONDARY LEGISLATION. COUNCIL TAX is a STATUTORY INSTRUMENT ENACTED on 1st April 1993 under its PRIMARY LEGISLATION the LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1992. STATUTORY: Created, defined or relating to a STATUTE; conforming to a statute. INSTRUMENT: A WRITTEN LEGAL document such as a CONTRACT, lease, deed will or bond. SOCIETY: the SOCIALLY DOMINANT members of a community, a SOCIETY is a number of PERSONS united together by mutual CONSENT, in order to deliberate, determine and act jointly for some COMMON PURPOSE. CONTRACT: an agreement between two or more PERSONS that CREATES or MODIFIES an existing RELATIONSHIP. OFFER, CONSIDERATION and ACCEPTANCE must exist for a CONTRACT to be made. CONSTITUTION; The fundamental RULES, written or unwritten that establishes the CHARACTER of a GOVERNMENT by defining the basic principles to which a SOCIETY must CONFORM. You were not given a choice if you wanted to join this SOCIETY; it was made for you at a time when you could not express a choice. STATUTE: A LEGISLATIVE RULE of SOCIETY given the FORCE of law by the CONSENT of the GOVERNED, a RULE, as of a CORPORATION. STATUTES are not LAWS From the neuter of Latin: STATUS: The LEGAL CHARACTER or condition of a PERSON or thing. It is totally imaginary, not real. UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION The UNITED KINGDOM is a CORPORATION and has employees. The employees are not just civil servants but everyone, if you have a N.I. number you too are an employee of this CORPORATION. 2 COMPANY POLICY of this CORPORATION requires you, as an EMPLOYEE to pay TAX and follow all the LEGISLATIVE RULES of that CORPORATION in this case STATUTES. As in any COMPANY, if you break the RULES you will be DISCIPLINED under that COMPANYS LEGISLATION. The POLICE of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION are all COMPANYS too, run for PROFIT. As CORPORATE POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS their job is to ENFORCE the RULES of the CORPORATION. The COURTS of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION are all COMPANYS too, if you break the RULES they will invite (SUMMONS) you to their place of business to discuss your punishment, except they are not inviting YOU, you have been deceived into thinking that its YOU they’re inviting. Even the highest COURT in the land (THE HOUSE OF LORDS) is a CORPORATION. The POLICEMAN and the CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER The POLICE MAN (HUMAN BEING) has a duty under COMMON LAW to serve and protect and uphold the COMMON LAW. The POLICE OFFICER (FICTION) is a CORPORATE EMPLOYEE a REVENUE COLLECTOR who ENFORCES STATUTES. You are in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION this means that no CIVIL LAW STATUTE applies unless you CONSENT to it. POLICE are a COMPANY which exists to make PROFIT. They PROFIT from you by enforcing STATUTES on you, not LAWS, POLICY. LEGALESE A language can be created and used by a SOCIETY; a CORPORATION can be such a SOCIETY. LEGALESE is such a language, it is English but some words have VERY different meanings... LEGALESE is the language of the LAW SOCIETY. Example; MUST is synonymous with MAY (if someone from a CORPORATION says “you MUST” they are actually giving you a choice, because they can’t force you, they are not allowed to because it’s not LAW it’s only POLICY). Example; SUMMONS is synonymous with INVITATION. When you get a SUMMONS from a COURT of supposedly LAW you are actually being INVITED to a CORPORATE place of business to discuss how much money you are going to give that CORPORATE place of business. Example; UNDERSTAND is synonymous with STAND UNDER. If I say “do you UNDERSTAND” and you reply “yes” that means you have given me authority over you. It’s as simple as that. 3 MINISTRY OF JUSTICE. Also traded as MAGISTRATES COURTS, every one of them is a CORPORATION running for PROFIT. If you go to COURT (CORPORATE place of BUSINESS) you are asked immediately for your NAME, they even presume to know who you are and will ask as such... MR SMITH? -- MR is the title of something with LEGAL PERSONALLITY (STATUS) You were named by your parents but they didn’t call you MR John Smith. If you reply “yes” to the NAME you have agreed to REPRESENT the FICTIONAL ENTITY with LEGALPERSONALLITY i.e. Mr JOHN SMITH/ Mr Smith A man cannot be acted on by STATUTES, nor can a woman, a flesh and blood human being, STATUTES only apply to the FICTIONAL ENTITY with a LEGAL PERSONALLITY. Every TITLE in this land is a FICTION e.g. Mr, LORD, REV etc because it doesn’t apply to a flesh and blood human being, it is the LEGAL STATUS. NATURAL or COMMON LAW applies to you, inherent LAW. You know inherently what is right or wrong. COMMERCIAL POLICY (UCC), CIVIL POLICY and POLITICAL POLICY apply to the FICTION but they need the flesh and blood human being to REPRESENT it because the LEGAL PERSONALLITY does not exist. A COMPANY exists only because a piece of paper says it does but it’s not REAL. COMMON LAW vs. STATUTE RULES/POLICY The only basic principles that any people of any nation need to adhere to are those of NATURAL LAW which are mirrored in COMMON LAW – Never cause HARM or LOSS. This covers every eventuality. COMMON LAW applies to a man or a woman. STATUTE RULES apply to the PERSON only when the man or woman CONSENTS to REPRESENT the PERSON CONSENT can be given by IN-ACTION as well as ACTION. Within COMMON LAW exists the word JUSTICE within STATUTE RULES you will just receive SUMMARY JUDGEMENT- you broke the RULES of the CONTRACT- you lose. You are a man or a woman, you have a PERSON you exist NATURALLY, and you are subject to COMMON LAW JURISDICTION. (JURIS-of law. DICTION-the use of words) you were created by god, nature the divine whatever..... You must never cause another HARM or LOSS or commit FRAUD. You have free and unlimited ability to CONTRACT and settle debt in private under COMMERCIAL LAW. You have been labelled through deception with a fictitious entity the all caps NAME on your birth certificate. 4 The fictitious you was created by GOVERNMENT. The fictional entity is subject to CIVIL POLICY (TAX etc) under STATUTE. The fictitious entity does business in the public and is controlled by CIVIL LAW and CORPORATE COURTS. WHAT IS A PERSON They are inviting a PERSON created by the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION. Your PERSON was created when your birth was REGISTERED and is evidenced by your BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Man created GOVERNMENT which in turn created PERSONS. Your PERSON is not you; it is a LEGAL FICTION which you are falsely identifying with because you have been deceived massively. You don’t get to say what its RIGHTS and DUTIES are, the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION does but it has to MISLEAD into doing so by DECEPTION. DEFINE PERSON Includes natural PERSON, FIRM. CO-PARTNERSHIP, ASSOCIATION, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY or CORPORATION- LEGAL PERSONALLITY (Defining a word with the same word is failing to define anything) PERSON is defined as a FICTION in black’s law 3rd edition. THE CREATION OF A PERSON When you were born your mother/father SUBMITTED a BIRTH CERTIFICATE REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM In the FORMULATION of any LIMITED COMPANY/CORPORATION there is always a CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION to create its LEGAL PERSONALLITY. Your fictional PERSON known as Mr, Mrs or Ms is created by the same means SUBMIT A REGISTRATION APPLICATION When you SUBMIT you are bending to another’s will. When you REGISTER you are handing over LEGAL TITLE of what you are REGISTERING to whoever you are REGISTERING it to, you are REGISTERING to ACKNOWLEDGING or TRANSFERRING the AUTHORITY to another by this PROCESS. When you APPLY, which means to beg, the assumption is made that you know exactly what you are begging for by whom or what you are APPLYING to and you know exactly what you are willing to give up for it, and most of the time you VOLUNTEERED your APPLICATION and you were not forced to APPLY. BIRTH CERTIFICATE. How the PERSON is created as a “BONDED SLAVE” You get a CERTIFIED COPY you don’t get the ORIGINAL. NAME of the PERSON being created- CAPITALISED SURNAME is a FICTION 5 NAME of PERSON father/mother CAPITALISED SURNAMES is the INFORMANT, they have the QUALIFICATION needed to be able to INFORM on the child being born. At the bottom of the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is a DECLARATION, a declaration is in COMMON LAW (a sworn oath of a man or woman) a DECLARATION from a man or woman to prove a man or woman was PRESENT to REPRESENT the PERSON needed to create the new PERSONS LEGAL PERSONALLITY. Then you REGISTER the BIRTH CERTIFICATE to a CORPORATION the GENERAL REGISTER OFFICE. REGISTRATION AND YOUR CHILDREN To this day REGISTRATION still means the same thing i.e. the TRANSFER of LEGAL TITLE to the body you have REGISTERED it with. As you have seen the worst possible way that this process could have been abused is in the REGISTRATION of BIRTHS A simple show of how your child no longer belongs to you is this; mandatory vaccinations, mandatory schooling, holidaying the children when they say you can and not before.....they tell you how to manage their PROPERTY and if you don’t do it their way their APPOINTED GUARDIANS take your children away: the SOCIAL SERVICES PLC a CORPORATION. You have no claim whatsoever to your children because you’ve been duped. PLEASE CONSIDER THIS Could the GOVERNMENT take your car away and crush it LAWFULLY if you actually owned it? It would be totally UNLAWFUL so in the process of REGISTERING your vehicle they dupe you into handing over LEGAL TITLE of that vehicle (ownership) and you get a V5 DOCUMENT as the REGISTERED KEEPER (a PERMISSION to use it as long as it is used in ACCORDANCE with all their RULES) If they did not dupe you into this the very ACT of taking and crushing your PROPERTY would be a CRIME in COMMON LAW. Also by REGISTERING it you, as STATED AGREE to ABIDE by their RULES and do so in their SOCIETY, this is how they LEVY the fuel DUTY, road TAX, MOT REQUIREMENT. You then REGISTER it to another CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT also traded as DVLA. PLEASE REMEMBER When you REGISTER something, anything, you give up ownership of it and instead you get a CERTIFICATE OF TITLE, this is worthless and this is why you own nothing not even your children, house, car etc. FIXED PENALTY NOTICES issued by CORPORATIONS 6 So why are there so many FIXED PENALTY NOTICES being given for the most ludicrous reasons? Parking in a place a CORPORATION deems you can’t. Speed cameras’, not completing a SORN the list is endless, but what are these NOTICES in the real world being ISSUED by these CORPORATIONS which never stop dreaming up reasons for PENALISING you. PENALISED by way of FORFIET: (something surrendered or subject to surrender as a punishment for a breach of CONTRACT) FPN: An OFFER to accept an ADHESION CONTRACT. ADHESION CONTRACT: A type of CONTRACT a LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT between two PARTIES to do a certain thing in which one side has all the bargaining power and uses it to write the CONTRACT primarily to his, her or its advantage. A NOTICE is not a BILL, a NOTICE is not a DEMAND, and A NOTICE is nothing more than an OFFER to discuss the CONTRACT the OFFERER is trying to force upon your PERSON. This is simply a tool for REVENUE COLLECTION. The true reason why these FPNs are forced upon your PERSON is simply to maintain the ILLUSION that they have control over your LIFE, FORTUNE, and FREEDOM because you FEAR their ability to take away from you something you deem valuable. LAWFUL REBELLION Peacefully resist all claims against your PERSON by refusing to CONSENT to the CORPORATIONS POLICY Always ask when stopped by a POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICER “Am I OBLIGED to answer your questions” “Under what AUTHORITY and what LAW are you ACTING” if they say to you “Its under this or that LAW” and you can prove its only an ACT or STATUTE, remind them that “failure to differentiate between a STATUTE and LAW is GROSS NEGLIGENCE which is equivalent to the COMMON LAW CRIME of FRAUD. This applies to anyone who tries to enforce a STATUTE upon you no matter who they are. YOU ARE A MAN/WOMAN IN LAWFUL REBELLION YOU ARE NOT A PERSON You are a man or a woman you are not a PERSON The legal world is the same as your PERSON it is a FICTION an ILLUSION that does not exist in the REAL WORLD That is why the CORPORATE EMPLOYEES must get the man or woman to REPRESENT the PERSON before a contract can be formed. They will ask you your NAME and ADDRESS and if you give it to them they will have JOINDER There is no LAW saying you have to give your NAME and ADDRESS, if you do give it to them you have said “yes I am the PERSON Remember, there is no JUSTICE in this country only SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, for every COURT, even the highest in the land is a FOR PROFIT CORPORATION which is part of THE UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION. http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/02/the-lawful-rebellion-guide-part-1/ http://northetruth.ning.com/ http://scottishsovereignsontheland.ning.com Visit N.E.T at: http://northetruth.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

http://zordana.blogspot.com/2008/10/propaganda-game.html

News with views

Scottish Government Cover Up of Hollie Greig

A similar case is underway in Australia

The story of paedophiles at the top end of town - politicians, Judges and others in senior positions.

In Australia It is known as the Heiner affair in which a young woman was raped over a period of time by senior people. When it came to light a person who later became Prime Minister was the person who ordered the shredding of official documents to cover up the crime.

Hollie Greig in the U.K. was a Mongoloid who was raped over a long period of time by a paedophile ring of senior people and now every effort is being made to prevent punishment of the criminals even to the point of jailing by a crooked judge the person attempting to expose them.

*********************************************************************************

If you are hearing a lot of news these days about Robert Green and Hollie Greig and wondering what all the fuss is about, here is a synopsis, sent to me by one of my contacts, of events explaining the seriousness of the allegations made against the hierarchy in Scotland. it explains why they are attacking Robert with such veracity and why the PEOPLE will just NOT stand for this injustice. The Prosecutor who refused to prosecute, or even order an investigation, retired and was made a DAME! She is herself now being investigated for failing to prosecute in a fraud case (of thousands of pounds).
Share this with your friends and contacts - Let the WORLD know:

Scottish Government Cover Up of Hollie Greig Part 1 - How it all came to light

Saturday, 13 March 2010 12:26 Added by PT Editor Maysaa Jarour

SalmondUK, March 13, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) - I have decide to reveal the Hollie Greig's story in fine detail so that you the public can read for yourself exactly how this sordid story came about and how the Scottish Government suppressed this terrible crime. It covers not only Hollie but also includes other children that fell victim to this ring of pedophiles.
This series will not hold back any information and will include names of the offenders and their victims. It will also include articles that were bouncing around at the time. In writing this series.
It is also an open invitation for anyone to write to the Palestine Telegraph who feel they have information relating to this or any other case involving children in Scotland who may have succumbed to the same group of the so called Scottish Justice System.
I thought it would be best to actually let you read the story overview that was put together by the Investigator of this case - Robert Green who has since become a victim of the Scottish Government without just cause.
Robert's article was titled: The Shocking Story of Hollie Greig and is shown in its entirety as per below. I will also include relevant documentation that is part and parcel of this obscene cover-up by the Scottish Government and its Legal System.
The ultimate blame must rest on the shoulders of the First Minister for Scotland - Alex Salmond who is very much aware of this appalling story but still sits on his hands and does nothing.
We at the Palestine Telegraph will continue to support Hollie and her mum Anne with, continued hardhitting articles until Alex Salmond or Gordon Brown bow down to the pressure.
The "Hollie Army" continue to grow and we can say, with great confidence, that we will not need the assistance of NATO to win this battle...we are strong and will not give up until Hollie and the other children involved have their day in court.
Hollies Story by Robert Green to the BBC "The Shocking Story of Hollie Greig"
Grampian_Police22
In June 2000, Mrs. Anne Mackie, as she then was at the time, following a violent outburst by her husband Denis Charles Mackie, was told by her daughter Hollie, who has Down's Syndrome, that she had been raped and sexually abused by her father and brother Greg. The abuses by her father had been going on for fourteen years. Since Hollie was just six.
Anne went with Hollie to Bucksburn Police Station, Aberdeen, to report the crimes, moving out of the family home, of course.
Late that summer, in August, Hollie revealed that her attackers extended far beyond her father and brother. Denis Charles Mackie had shared his young daughter with members of a pedophile ring operating in Aberdeen, including a Sheriff Graeme Buchanan, a police officer, Terry Major and Hollie's own carer, Helen Macdonald.
After contacting the police again, Anne and Hollie were asked to attend at Bucksburn on 25^th August 2000, to make their allegations.
Whilst Anne was being interviewed, officer Leanne Davidson, who in turn, left Hollie alone with a social worker, Nicola Foot, questioned Hollie.
Foot immediately called Hollie a liar and assaulted her by injecting a needle into Hollie's leg, which must have contained a drug to temporarily disorientate Hollie.
Anne, of course, knew nothing of this until she was driving Hollie home, when she became aware of Hollie's unusual behaviour, which she could not explain fully to her mother due to the effect of the drug.
Anne returned immediately to the police station, demanding that a doctor examine Hollie without delay. Davidson played for time by saying that a doctor was being sought, but after two hours claimed that no doctor could be found.
Even worse was to follow just a few days later.
On the 5th September, a medical team unexpectedly arrived at Anne's home, on the instructions of Dr. Alistair Palin, to literally drag Anne from her home. She naturally resisted, but her clothes were pulled down and she too was forcibly injected by one of the team. Angiolini
She was taken by force to a mental institution run by Palin, where he described her as "schizophrenic." The object was to return Hollie into the hands of her abuser father.
Anne managed to get out of the institution after a few days and had the foresight to demand a full examination by a mental health expert. Dr Helen Smith, who pronounced that Anne was in perfectly good mental health. A result, even Palin had to concede in writing there was nothing whatsoever wrong with Anne.
The police investigation meanwhile, despite medical and other expert witness support fully vindicating Hollie's story, was eventually dropped on the orders of one of Sheriff Buchanan's associates, Elish Angionlini, the Aberdeen's Procurator Fiscal, now Lord Provost.
Anne and Hollie have carried on their battle for justice ever since the, although no independent Scottish solicitor could be found to even take up their case.
Nonetheless, after a few years, with the assistance of Nicola Smith, Hollie was awarded £13,500 by the Criminal Injury Compensation Authority, despite the fact that officially, no crime had even been committed.
None of the experts spoken to have ever heard of such a thing before, the only possible motive being that the award was made in the hope of buying Anne and Hollie off.
This point was picked up by the News of the World in April this year when the story was finally broken, albeit in a very abridged form. A version of this was also published by the Shropshire Star, the local paper now for Anne and Hollie, as they had to flee Scotland due to the danger posed to them.
The BBC's investigative reporter, Mark Daly, then approached us. After requesting that we deal exclusively with the BBC, he assured us, after numerous discussions and examination of documentary evidence, that two programmes had been commissioned, one to be broadcast on Scotland's BBC TV and the other on BBC Radio Scotland, handled by his colleague, Kathy Long.
With Her, and Panorama's team MacDougall, they came to interview Anne and Hollie on 4th June this year at their Shropshire home. They also informed us that their investigations had led to them to other serious cases systematic sexual abuse of minors and adults with learning difficulties in Scotland.
Buchanan2On 10th June, Mark Daly phoned to tell us that not only had the team been prevented by a senior BBC figure from making any further investigations into pedophile rings, but also that the team would be sacked if they continued to persist.
Despite all attempts, Daly and the others refused to divulge who it was who blocked them and efforts to elicit this information from the Director-General and the head of the BBC Trust have thus far failed to find a response.
However, Grampian police, under persistent pressure, agreed to conduct another investigation into Hollie's case, led by Tanya Leiper. No urgency whatsoever was attached to this, however and it was only when a shot was fired at the window of Anne and Hollie’s home this August that any firm action was taken, after I had written to both the Grampian Police and Alex Salmond, who had previously been informed about the case, that I would hold the individuals concerned personally responsible if any hard should befall Anne and/or Hollie.
Tanya Leiper and Lisa Evans came down to Shrewsbury on 8th September to interview both Anne and Hollie. I was able to listen to the interview conducted with Hollie by Lisa Evans from the next- door room of the house.
It lasted around three and a half hours in which Hollie explained and relived her multiple rape ordeals in precise and intimate detail. It was horrifying, but Hollie was magnificently heroic and remained strong and throughout, answering the questions with tremendous composure, squaring exactly with everything I had understood as a result of my own observations.
Let it not be forgotten that she had already endured such an interview on August 25th 2000.
I have previously written to Sheriff Buchanan with a list of his fellow rape gang visitors to the house, along with Hollie's name and a picture of her. He, denied, in writing, any knowledge of any of them. Below is the list:Aberdeen Pedophile Rape Ring Members:Denis Charles Mackie
Greg Mackie
Graeme Mackie
Gillian Mackie
Jack Buchanan
Evelyn Buchanan
Sheriff Graeme Buchanan
David Smith
Wyn Dragan
Terry Major (Police Officer, Grampian)
Sylvia Major
Helen MacDonald (Carer for Hollie Grieg)
Ian MacDonald
Carol Low
Known Victims
Hollie Greig
Richard Dragan
Katherine Major
Jennifer Major
Two children of Ian and Helen Macdonald
Two children of Graeme and Gillian Mackie
I know all these names as a result of my extensive investigations and I believe this to be true.
Robert Green
I have recently listened to the most harrowing interview I have ever experienced, where Hollie Greig spent three and a half hours reliving her multiple rape and sexual ordeals at the hands of Sheriff Buchanan and his gang, mainly conducted in the home of his sister Evelyn.
Surely there are highly placed individuals within the BBC with sufficient integrity and courage to help to expose these appalling crimes and protect some of our country's most vulnerable young people.
I expect an answer from you personally, not someone delegated to do so.
Yours Sincerely
Robert Green, Investigator
Cc Sir Michael Lyons
Kenny_122I found the following statement on the city visitor web page concerning Bucksburn Police: "If you find yourself in trouble or wish to report something suspicious you'll need to call the police in Bucksburn. Police here deal with an array of incidents from domestic violence to stolen goods and vehicles and it's always nice to know that there are helpful and sympathetic people to
call upon during your time of need.
I wonder what went wrong during Hollies years of need!!!
The Hollie story has so far been aired on US Radio Stations, UK and European Radio Stations. Articles have been printed in the US, Middle East and soon in New Delhi. Public demonstrations are starting to get underway in Glasgow, Edinburgh and London.
Many web pages now contain every aspect of Hollie's story and every article written by myself has been forwarded to the following: Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Kenneth Clarke, William Hague, Nick Clegg, Danny Alexander and Ester Rantzen.
Others notified by Robert Green are Alex Salmond - Scottish First Minister, All SNP Scottish Cabinet members, All 43 Aberdeen City Councillors, Colin McKerracher, Chief Constable, Grampian Police, Peter Watson, Levy & McCrae, solicitors, Dr Alistair Palin, Royal Cornhill Hospital, Fiona Palin, Social Work Manager, Ann Begg, MP, George Galloway, MP, Angus Robertson, MP, Ann McKetchin, MP, Jim Murphy, MP and again Nick Clegg, MP, David
Cameron, MP, Gordon Brown, PM.
It must be emphasized that all of the above are "Civil Servants" who are put into office to "Serve the People" and "Listen to the People" and to date not one response...their arrogance will be their failing.... now you know where not to vote at the next General Election!
Part 2 will start to work through the minefield of the Scottish (extremely evasive) legal system. It will show a total lack of duty of care by the Grampian Police and Mental Health etc with appropriate letters relating to Anne and Hollie's case (or should I say no case!).
When one adds the historical lists of pedophiles to the existing FBI list we can see that this reaches all levels of those who are supposed to care for us in Health and Mental Welfare, Schools and Education, Police, Care Homes and Politically... No party is exempt.
There is no limit as to how high this goes in all of the above areas...including of course the upper crust of Freemasons.
We, the public, must remember to keep up all the media activities and the protests until these so-called "Gentlemen of Conscience" (who represent we the people) succumb to the pressure!
The public will be the jury in Hollie's Case, which I will now place before you and you can reach your own conclusions.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 13/3/2010Scottish government cover-up of Hollie Greig, part 2: notification of crime & reaction
Monday, 15 March 2010 11:12 Added by PT Editor maysaa jarour Buchanan222UK, March 15, 2010 (Pal Telegraph; commentary by Peter Eyre) –
In Part 1 of this series we covered the general overview of the Hollie Greig story as told by Robert Green. We will now continue by explaining the initial notification to the Grampian Police and to other authorities and events that followed after this initial response.
It was back in 2000 that Hollie's mum had been beaten by her husband and she decided to leave him and went to a hostel with Hollie.
It was whilst they were alone together in the hostel that Hollie told her mum that they had to go and get the dogs.
Anne said not to worry we will get the dogs but Hollie insisted that they go otherwise he will kill her two pet dogs.
Anne then started to question Hollie on this issue and the story of abuse slowly came out. Apparently her father used this tool as a leverage for him to carry out his activities...he had also told Hollie that he would also kill her mum. Hollie by this time was 20 years old.
The next day Hollie's Carer came around and so Anne decided to discuss this with her. Anne was shocked with her response to the story...it later came out that the Carer was part of the ring of pedophiles.
Anne then decided to take Hollie to the Bucksburn Police station in Aberdeen to report the incident. At this stage it was only concerning the abuse by her father. Hollie spent around three days with the police who cross-examined her over her sexual abuse.
Hollie had told the police that her father had started doing this when they were on holiday in Brazil, which meant that this was when she was only 6 years old. The police had not given any feedback to Anne during, or after, the three-day's questioning.
Brian Adam MSP also wrote a letter to Elish Angiolini (the Procurator Fiscal in Aberdeen) as an introduction to Hollie's case. This letter is shown at the end
of this article
Anne had been at the hostel from May - 10th of July 2000 and eventually was given accommodation by Aberdeen Council and some weeks after this Anne received a call from the Procurator Fiscal's Office at 6-30pm on night to say that they were sorry, that it wasn't because they did not believe Hollie but the evidence provided was not substantial and the case would not be going to court.
Grampian_Police Anne continues talking to Hollie over the summer break and it was then that the involvement with others started to come out.
Hollie had said that her brother was also involved. It appeared that the father first sexually abused her brother and that he had then become a
pedophile and part of the ring.
Apparently Anne's son had been involved in some other incident in Aberdeen but got away with it after a lawyer called Buchanan handled the case.
This lawyer himself was involved in the pedophile ring and later became the Sheriff of Aberdeen (the office he still holds to this day).
Anne then decided to speak with the police officer involved in Hollie's case and asked if there was an expert that Hollie could be referred but the police notified Anne that there was no funding for this.
Anne became very upset about this and told the officer that if he didn't have the funding then she would do this herself. This cost Anne between 600-700 pounds to get hold of a doctor (DR. Jack Boyle) in Glasgow where Hollie was interviewed.
The doctor eventually wrote a full report and told Anne that her daughter had described to him that Hollie had been subject to sexual activity etc.
On the 25th of August 2000 Anne went back to the police station to tell them about these other people in the hope that something would come out of this. Anne was now aware that many people were involved covering the Sheriff of Aberdeen - Buchanan, police officer involved in forensics, fireman, accountant, lawyer, oil engineer, women etc all amounting to around 14 people approximately.
At times it would appear that Hollie was subjected to what can only be described as "Gang Rape."Anne eventually managed to access Hollie's Medical Reports and found out that back in 1990 a Dr.Paul Carter who was connected to the Children Hospital in Aberdeen and Hollie's school had reported to her GP and Headmaster that Hollie had contracted a sexually transmitted disease.
Anne was never told about this despite the fact that Hollie was only 9 years old at the time.
No action was taken on this issue, which would indicate some sort of cover up.
Two years later in 1992 her teacher reported to Dr. Carter that Hollie was showing signs of sexual abuse because she was pelvically thrusting. This was also reported to her GP and Headmaster and again Anne was never told. (The Palestine Telegraph holds Copy of this letter as proof).
The Police also accessed her medical notes and Anne spoke with an Inspector Dowell who was asked if he had read Hollie's medical notes...the Inspector stated that he had not read them personally to which Anne said "I think you should" and went on to describe to him that at the age of 9 Hollie Alex_122had a Sexually Transmitted Disease and in 1992 was showing signs of sexual abuse and that nothing had been done about it.
The fact that Hollie was in a Specialist School one would have thought that any wrong-doings would have involved notification of the parents. It became very clear that one big cover up was going on here.
It later became known to Hollie's mum that the Policeman and his wife who were all involved in the Pedophile Ring knew the Headmaster.
Hollie later told her mum that the headmaster had sexually abused her also.
One has to understand not only the size of the ring of Pedophiles but also the level of sexual abuse that took place. Hollie was subject to being raped both back and front. Hollie complained of pain in her bottom and a medical check was carried out which revealed damage etc.
To recap on this story we have all of the above being reported to the Grampian Police.... the list of offenders, list of other victims and the medical records and still the police did nothing.
The Procurator Fiscal Office had said they couldn't do anything.
Later that summer Anne and Hollie went back to the police station and they were both separated from each other.
Anne was interviewed by Leanne Davidson and a Police Sergeant and she explained what Hollie had told her and Davidson took her statement.
After Anne had finished she joined up with Hollie who was sitting with Nicola Foot (a Social Worker) and Hollie was crying.
Mum told Hollie not to worry and took her for her favourite meal at MacDonalds but Hollie was too upset to eat it.
Anne took Hollie home and on the way Hollie told her mum that the Social Worker had stuck a needle in her leg.
Anne immediately went back to the police station and told them what had happened.
Leanne Davidson said she would try and get a police doctor. They both waited for two and a half hours only to be told that they couldn't find a police doctor so they would have to go home.
Anne managed to get an appointment with a new local GP who refused to do a blood test as in her opinion it was not necessary. The doctor did suggest Hollie does a urine test and to go home and post the sample in. Some days later it came back negative.
Just before the 5th of September 2000 Anne got a phone call from the above GP who asked Anne to come up to the surgery. Anne said what for and the GP said we are concerned about your finger (which had been previously broken by her abusive husband when they split up).
Letter_to_Angiolini22Anne became extremely concerned as to why after such a long period of time the doctor would want her to go up to the surgery...it was obvious that the GP had something else in mind.
The following Tuesday Anne was making up some curtains when Hollie asked her to make her a sandwich. Anne opened a tin of ham and made a sandwich.
She then decided to go down to the bin room to throw it away as her own bin was full. She went to the bin room and on the way to the front door she found police and other men and women standing there. Anne walked past them to the bin room and on the way back was approached by the GP.
The lady doctor addressed her and Anne said, "What's going on here" and the doctor asked her to come inside. Anne again asked the doctor why was she here and the doctor replied "We are here to section you" and replied "There is no way, these are just lies from my husband, something has to be done about this as I am the innocent party"...at that stage four men came and bodily lifted me up and taken into the entrance to the building where I was thrown onto the concrete floor, turned on to my stomach, my trousers and pants were taken down,
I was screaming blue murder at the time and all my neighbours were out shouting leave her alone she has not done anything. I was injected in my backside and knocked out. Hollie was watching all this and must have wondered what the heck was going on.
Anne woke up in a mental hospital with two doctors talking blood out of my arm.
This became the start of another battle for Anne, as she was very concerned as to what had happened to Hollie.
Anne later found out that I was taken away in an ambulance and they went into my home and took Hollie into care. Whilst in care they took her to see her father, despite the fact that they knew that the father had abused her.
It was Social Services who had done this and one would ask why on earth they would do such a thing?
Anne, in the meantime, got a lawyer and also at this time she noticed a board with numbers on it so she phoned help line. The adviser said to her that if she does not agree to what they are saying, they would slap another section on you. She had already been sectioned for three days and if they had done another section it would have been for possibly another six weeks and if you still do not agree they will slap another 6 months on you.
After Anne got out after the three days she accessed her medical notes, under the freedom of information. Whilst she was in the hostel Anne was being watched with an intended plan to section her.... which is what they did...all of this information was in the medical notes.
The two Doctor's watching her were a Dr. Henderson and a Dr. Sweeney.
Anne drove down to Fife to see a lawyer and she put her in touch with a top psychiatrist and both Anne and Hollie went down to Glasgow for that appointment. She spent the whole day with the Doctor and a report was written.
The psychiatrist told Anne she was a normal person and issues a report accordingly. Her lawyer then complained to the authorities that Anne was perfectly ok.
The Mental Health Commission wrote back to the lawyer and said that Anne would have to make this complaint herself.
Anne then wrote a letter of complaint and she got her letter back stating they had received my letter of complaint. Anne lawyer did get a letter back eventually which stated that they had no record of Anne sectioning and no reference to Anne being seen by a Dr Palin or the legal people in Aberdeen etc. One can sense here a total cover up by the Police, the Scottish Legal System and the Mental Health.
It is at this stage that I will stop this story right there and return with Part 3, which will reveal the next horrific chapter in Anne's life concerning the death of her brother Robert under very suspicious circumstances. I again repeat that each of these articles is copied to the Prime Minister's Office, To David Cameron and Nick Clegg with no response whatsoever. It should be noted that on TV last night (The Politics Show) Gordon Brown again said we have to protect our children...So Mr. Brown go and do it. It is left to we the public to continue applying the pressure in order to bring justice for poor Hollie Greig and her mum.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 15/3/2010Scottish government cover-up of Hollie Greig, part 3 – The death of Robert GreigTuesday, 16 March 2010 16:18 Added by PT Editor maysaa jarour
Alex_Salmond_copy UK, March 16, 2010 (Pal Telegraph)-
In my previous article I discussed the initial notification to the Grampian Police and their response in regard to Hollie’s allegations.
Before moving on into the final part of this terrible story we must look at another family tragedy when Anne lost her Brother Robert under very suspicious circumstances.
Anne was preparing for Hollies 18th Birthday and Robert came around for a visit. Anne eventually had to nip out and told Robert. That was the last time that Anne saw her brother.
On the 17th of November 1997, long before any of this had erupted, Robert was found dead in his burnt out car on the outskirts of Aberdeen,
Anne received a knock at the door at around 2130 and found two policemen at her door. They asked Anne if she was the sister to Robert to whom she replied yes and the policeman then requested if they could step inside. They then reported to Anne that her Brother Robert had been found in a burnt our car etc.
Anne eventually went to see the coroner, regarding the death of her brother, to be told that they had found a length of pipe besides the car (which was not attached) and indications show that he was two and a half times over the limit and that they suspected suicide.
Anne obviously was extremely upset and couldn't imagine that Robert would do this.
She later checked her brothers bank transactions and noticed that he had only put 5 pounds worth of petrol in the car, which to Anne was normal for the small amount of running around he did. She did however think that if he had wanted to carry out this act he would have fuelled his car much more.
She was not shown the autopsy report and only received a death certificate; with the cause of death being smoke inhalation and not carbon monoxide poisoning that one would associate with the pipe etc.
Kenny222One year on she received a call from the undertakers to say that Roberts's funeral had still not been paid for and that she would be put on their Black List.
She was shocked to learn this and immediately contacted Ian MacDougall as to why.... he said he would look into it.
What should be pointed out here was that the instructions in the will would reveal that the main bulk of any monies would be paid to Anne and her Husband and any residue would go the children.
It transpired that the funeral was eventually paid out of the children's money and there were clear signs that some sort of fraud had taken place.
Anne decided to investigate this and started to take photocopies of all the dealings.
It was at this stage that her husband beat her up very badly and this caused Anne to leave home with Hollie and go to stay at a hostel
Z9Hollie had revealed to Anne, after her brother's death, that Uncle Robert had walked in on them one day and caught her father interfering with her. He had warned her father that he must never lay a finger on Hollie ever again.
Anne tried to ask Hollie when had this taken place and it would appear it was after their return from Canada in September of 1997.
Anne worked out that her brother actually found out only weeks before his death, which caused Anne to investigate further.
It became obvious to Anne that Robert knew too much and may have died because of this.
She tried to obtain the Autopsy report but without success and it was only on New Years Eve 2009 that she managed to obtain the report. She didn't want to read it as it was New Years Eve celebrations but she decided to take a look.
She was shocked to read that Robert had a fractured skull, broken ribs and a broken Sternum, which is extremely strong and difficult to break.
It became apparent to Letter_to_Alex222Anne that her brother had been brutally attacked and then dumped in the car before it was set alight.
The autopsy revealed that he was still alive at that stage and that burning plastic had dropped onto his legs etc. The report also found brown liquid in
his stomach, which apparently was Whiskey, which Robert hated.
We can see a major cover-up on all fronts and no one can do anything about it because Scotland is controlled by Alex Salmond and by two powerful legal supporters, namely, The Cabinet Secretary for Justice - Kenny MacAskill and The Lord Advocate for Scotland - Elish Angiolini.
These three partners in crime are totally aware of the Hollie Case including the mystery behind the death of Robert Greig and do absolutely nothing.
It is clear that should Hollie's case move forward this could cause the current Scottish Government to collapse.
The manipulation by MacAskill, Angiolini and one of the offenders, Aberdeen Sheriff Buchanen is obscene to say the least and all should be removed from office without delay pending a full inquiry (don't hold your breath).
One should also add that Peter Watson, Levy & McCrae, solicitors has also played a major role in gagging those that may want to talk about this case and
is a disgrace to his profession.
This is a "Name and Shame" list of all those informed to date by various people and still they all sit on their hands and do nothing.
All of my articles are copied to all the political leaders - Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg. The full list is:
Alex Salmond - Scottish First Minister
All SNP Scottish Cabinet members
All 43 Aberdeen City Councillors
Colin McKerracher, Chief Constable, Grampian Police
Peter Watson, Levy & McCrae, and solicitors
Dr Alastair Palin, Royal Cornhill Hospital
Fiona Palin, Social Work Manager
Ann Begg, MP
George Galloway, MP
Angus Robertson, MP
Ann McKetchin, MP
Jim Murphy, MP
Nick Clegg, MP
David Cameron, MP
Gordon Brown, PM
Mrs_CurrieThe letter to Mrs. Currie as described in the letter to Alex Salmond is shown to the left.
We will take a closer look at the response to these letters and other topics relating to Hollie's fight for justice.
In Part 4 we will look into this response and some other interesting aspects of the Dunblane Massacre that took place some years ago.
One can draw one's own conclusions as to who is or was abusing their power of authority and who is still clearly in office manipulating the law for their own hidden agenda.
It is ironic that Scotland will host the ICC Conference on the 7-10 October 2010, which is advertised as follows:Scotland to host ICC BiennialScotland is to host a major international conference for National Human Rights Institutions.
The 10th International Conference of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) will take place at the Scottish Parliament from 7 - 10 October 2010.
Delegates from over 80 countries including national human rights institutions (NHRIs), international and regional experts, United Nations officials, government representatives, civil society and business organisations will discuss human rights issues on the theme of Business and Human Rights, and the role national institutions can play in improving human rights in a globalised world. It will be the first time an official United Nations-supported event has taken place in Scotland.
I am sure you would all agree that if the Hollie Case does not come before the courts by the time this event takes place.... we would all know where to hold a protest.
It would be impossible, given normal circumstances, for this case not to be before the courts based on current available evidence. The big question now is can we all continue to maintain the pressure in order to gain a result. The pressure must remain relentless and timely protests should be maintained.
There is extremely good international support now and I believe we are close to having some sort of action in the pipeline that will force this out into the open.
Remain strong and with your determination we can turn this around...we owe this to Hollie and her mum and not forgetting dear Uncle Robert who paid for his life as a result of knowing too much.
Bless you all and keep up the good fight.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 16/3/2010
Scottish government cover-up of Hollie Greig, part 3 – The death of Robert Greig Tuesday, 16 March 2010

The coming Joys of the EU

A Brief Mention…
We thought you would like to know…….


EU plans….
1) HST (trains) to Birmingham and all cities in UK
2) Boris Island airport hub is also EU instruction.
3) Seizure of empty housing and dispossession of old folk ‘persuaded’ to live in a home for aged while their own is rented out to homeless.
4) This may or may not be a prelude to making all private property publicly owned as by Brussels with local authorities given oversight of sale and rent and application to local social needs.
5) Sales tax on all property
6) Increase in inheritance tax with view to preventing transfer of wealth in to private hands but into EU coffers. Eventually all housing will be state controlled.
7) Deployment of foreign Police into Britain including Eurogend.
8) Use of British Army to police streets.
9) ‘Tobin tax’ on all financial transactions.
10) Birth permits- prior assessment for all couples of single people to have children that will be deemed ‘state property’ (already are). The child will be ‘loaned’ to successful couples and monitored until adulthood with appointed state mentor.
11) Limitation on size of families.
12) Abolition of Christmas and Easter (Yes this is true) and official encouragement of state secularity with active discouragement of displays of Christian symbols in sensitive migrant areas.
13) Migrant areas to live under own laws.
14) Migrant holidays to be given official recognition as ‘national’ festivals.
15) Further reductions in British armed forces.
16) Closing down or limitation of Internet.
17) Licensing to use Internet (who can who cannot)
18) Compulsory viewing of adverts for products. This is a proposal that first saw light in United States demanded by big corporations. Overturned in Congress but currently being proposed in EU. Expected to go through by 2020.
19) Council officials given powers of arrest and confiscation.
20) ‘Citizen Communities’ Champions’ given powers to fine.
21) European Corps of Youth- similar to USSR ‘Young Pioneers’.
22) Increased restrictions on free speech (already happening).
23) Making it a criminal offence to deny Global Warming.
24) Making it a criminal offence to criticise migrant and sexual minorities.
25) Classification of Christians and Nationalists like UKIP and BNP as Terrorists.
26) Sales of meat products to be discouraged in a replay of the ban on cigarettes, the latter itself to be outlawed by 2017.
27) Encouragement of ‘vegan’ lifestyles.
28) Limitation on what one can own- ‘inappropriate’ hoarding of ‘old goods’- house inspections by council operatives with power to seize goods they deem ‘not needed’. It is planned to recycle and redistribute.
29) Increasing restrictions on use of motor vehicles with a view to all people using public transport. Ban on cars over 10 years old. This will be law by 2022.
30) Increasing measures to discourage small private companies and entrepreneurs by penal taxation and paperwork but also costs like pension schemes and Human rights that are totally unaffordable and meant to be so, leaving a clear field for the corporations.
31) Public bank accounts, removal of cheques (EU orders) and public control of all expenditure by private citizens. End of cash society but a system of credit. All will be supplied with ‘public’ credit cards. The Oyster Card is the first step in this process.
32) The above means that criminals or people who have upset the authorities will be ‘de-socialised’ (actual EU term used) and refused access to state credit to buy food and pay bills.
33) State internment schemes for ‘mentally ill’ citizens who object to all the above.
34) Severe limitation on vehicle ownership and access to fuel that will be rationed.
35) Classification of all cars into new ‘pollution codes’.
36) Encouragement of children to ‘try out’ alternative sexual lifestyles.
37) Compulsory sex education from 3 years old.
38) Formal abolition of all marriages, even existing ones and instead a looser scheme based upon current Civil Partnership schemes first used for same sex ‘couples’.

Just thought you would all like to know the coming joys of membership of the EU.

Guy