-----Original
Message-----
From: Alpha14
[
Sent: 28 January 2016
11:58
To: Nikolai Tolstoy;
DGrayFisk@aol.com
Cc:
beveridge1@me.com; sunbeam@newbury.net
Subject: RE: Rply: We Want Our Country
Back
Dear
Delphine and Nikolai,
Thank
you both for your replies and I apologise that this response might become a
trifle lengthy.
My
email to Nigel was of course the question, “Given that we see little publicised
activity by UKIP to remove Britain from the EU so far, and in view of the
ramping-up of pro-EU propaganda through people’s front doors in readiness for
the forthcoming EU referendum (if we actually get one) to cajole a greater IN
vote, when is UKIP likely to start showing its strength of conviction and what
level of activity might we expect to see ?”.
I
fully understand that funding is crucial and that without the massive financial
support enjoyed by the three main parties, UKIP must use its resources carefully
and to the utmost benefit. However, as
Joe public on the street and with a deeply ingrained sense of justice for our
country, I see little evidence other than Nigel’s masterly speeches to
demonstrate what UKIP is actually doing to extricate us from the ever tightening
EU grip on our lives permitted and endorsed by so many so-called British
politicians. As things are, Britain will
shortly become irrevocably lost as a fully integrated part of the EU disaster, a
situation from which we shall never be permitted to free ourselves. I am not alone in this
view.
My
email sought to remind of the total illegality and lack of basis in law of
Britain’s EU “membership” and the ease and simplicity with which legitimate and
unquestionable withdrawal can be immediately made. If one is not a member of the Conservative
Party for example, one is not duty bound to take part in it and one certainly
does not need the consent of the chairman to leave.
So
far, the nation has waited very many years for somebody to take Britain out of
its ridiculous and relentless political suicide. But that has not happened. And time to act is now rapidly running out
before a pro-EU referendum timed with intent, unlawfully seals our illegal
fate.
It
is all very well to wait for lawful democracy to put things right. But that too, is not going to happen so long
as the three main parties together oversee Britain’s deliberate
destruction. By higher order, they will
never relinquish their strangle
hold and will spend inordinate amounts of taxpayers’ money to aggressively
protect their position against all opposition such as, not so long ago, their
determined attempt to destroy the BNP for its escalating public support and
serious threat to LibLabCon domination.
They did not manage to
destroy the BNP but doubtless by infiltration, they certainly caused that party
to split into numerous ineffectual side shows each incapable of mounting a
political campaign. This might also now
be happening to UKIP, but the LibLabCon dictatorship will never be unseated by
democratic means and while absolutely everybody I know voted for UKIP at last
year’s general election, the Conservative win was curiously known two weeks
before it even took place - and UKIP gained one seat.
So corrupt is Britain’s
political system that attempting to rectify it by lawful democratic means is
clearly a non starter. Unless something
dramatic happens, we are heading one way increasingly
quickly.
Many
people I know had hoped by now to see at least counter EU leafleting to redress
the stark imbalance of pro-EU material being pushed at people. Those I speak to are of the opinion that UKIP
makes excellent speeches but there it all ends.
How do you suppose that looks to the British public when all manner of
pro-EU literature, biased TV News and skewed programming are aimed at a gullible
electorate and UKIP appears to remain silent ?
Even
the BBC seems to have adopted the EU flag as its backdrop in political TV
programmes. Many people now seem to fear
that support for UKIP will fade as, to all intents and purposes, their faith is
made to rely solely upon Nigel’s excellent speeches. So the IN Campaign wins,
then.
Nothing
appears to have been made of how UKIP will run Britain, given the
opportunity. The Party might well have a
manifesto and policies for a resurgent Britain but unless the public are made
unmistakably clear about these, nobody will know.
Many
still see UKIP as a one horse show.
Leave the EU - and then nothing.
A
good many are also deeply concerned about UKIP’s welcoming acceptance of
Muslims. Early Muslim settlers are of
course peace-loving and gentle folk. But
you will know of the four stages of Islamic conquest (see attached) and I urge
you to read the 60 page “Jihad, Islam’s 1300
Year War On Western Civilisation” (Arthur Kemp, ISBN
978-1-4092-0502-9) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Jihad-Islams-Against-Western-Civilisation/dp/1409205029.
When Islam in
Britain reaches critical mass, Muslim UKIP membership will abruptly take on a
very different appearance and, not least by their far greater cultural birth
rate than ours which declines year on year, UKIP and our country will suddenly
no longer be ours but theirs by majority vote, claims of maltreatment, cultural
supremacy, racist accusation, intimidation, threat of violence and aggressive
personal attack.
English
Constitutional and Common Law would never have permitted such influx of foreign
nationals as has been intentionally invited and welcomed by LibLabCon who, as
you know, work not for Britain the country of their sworn allegiance, but a
completely different agenda. For years,
LibLabCon have institutionally side-stepped, over-ruled and ignored our
inviolable English Law. That is called
high treason. Tony Blair still believes
he has repealed the important treason laws.
Far from it.
You
will perhaps know that over the last two or three years a concerted effort was
made by more than 300 people across Britain to report treason committed by David
Cameron, Nick Clegg, Tony Blair, John Major, Francis Maude and Douglas Hurd (as
a start) to every national police force.
A large number of those police forces immediately accepted the
allegations as bone fide cases to answer and referred them to the Metropolitan
Police Commissioner for investigation and further action. But there they remain.
The
Commissioner, faced with solid, irrefutable evidence referred to him by his own
Chief Constables for his investigation has refused to act according to his sworn
oath of office, instead preferring the enormity of his own misprision of treason
and compounding the treason, let alone his dereliction of duty and misconduct in
public office. He immediately sought
early retirement but was refused.
Had
the allegations run their course, Britain’s political parties will have been in
total disarray as the proof of treason extends much wider than just those few
senior officials. The truth of the
political parties’ activities and aims will have become exposed to public
knowledge and (I’d have thought) UKIP will have collected considerable
additional support from a totally angered British public outraged that LibLabCon
had so intentionally contrived to deceive and betray them. Other separate allegations and evidence
against Tony Blair for example, have also not succeeded because of similar
trickery.
It
seems to me that where LibLabCon together demonstrate such psychopathy toward
their own country and people, UKIP could do no better than require the
Commissioner to fulfil his lawful duty and also to make widely public just what
the other three parties have been secretly up to since the 1960’s.
This would not be a dirty tricks campaign as the others freely use, but simply
informing the British people just what has been going on behind their backs in
their name and to what criminally purposeful end. With much greater effect than a mere 300 or
so ordinary people, the Party might successfully cause the treason allegations
to be properly and fully investigated and the result widely published for all to
see.
There
is no doubt whatsoever of the treachery committed by many politicians and as
English law continues to prevail, the follow-on from such investigations will be
automatic.
Kind
regards,
Rex
Poulton
