We cannot allow politicians to decide

We cannot allow politicians to decide the fate of our nation and people; we did that before and look at where they led us! Therefore, we must make it very clear what the politicians MUST now do and it has been suggested that we create posters with the following information:

THE TREASON OF THE EU HAS BEEN EXPOSED

DUE TO THE TREASONOUS MANNER IN WHICH GREAT BRITAIN WAS SUBJUGATED UNDER EU RULE, ALL OF THE EU LEGISLATION MUST NOW BE THROWN IN THE BIN.

THE BRITISH PEOPLE WILL ACCEPT NOTHING LESS THAN COMPLETE CONTROL OF OUR OWN NATION, WITHOUT ANY CONDITIONS, WHATSOEVER!

WE MUST MAKE LARGE POSTERS OF THE EU TREATIES AND IMAGES OF THE TRAITORS THAT SOLD OUR COUNTRY OUT – ROME (EDWARD HEATH); MAASTRICT (JOHN MAJOR) & LISBON (GORDON BROWN) – AND THOSE POSTERS SHOULD BE FILMED BEING TORN TO SHREDS!

ALL BRITISH LAWS MUST NOW REVERT BACK TO THE POSITION THEY WERE IN PRIOR TO BRITAIN’S SUBJUGATION UNDER EU RULE, IN 1972. THIS INCLUDES ALL OF OUR RIGHTS, INCLUDING FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, EXPRESSION AND SPEECH.

ALSO, THE POLITICALLY CORRECT NONSENSE, INCLUDING HEALTH & SAFETY; POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION FOR MINORITIES; ANTI-WHITE AND ANTI-BRITISH RACISM LAWS, MUST ALL BE THROWN IN THE BIN, ALONG WITH ANY BUREUCRATS THAT INSIST ON IMPOSING THOSE UNFAIR AND ANTI-DEMOCRATIC REGULATIONS.

THE BORDERS OF GREAT BRITAIN MUST BE CLOSED WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT AND WE MUST NOT TRUST ANY POLITICIAN THAT WANTS TO ALLOW IMMIGRATION TO CONTINUE. REGARDLESS OF ANY DEALS OR COERCION, IMMIGRATION MUST STOP, NOW!

ALL OF OUR BORDERS, FERRIES AND AIRPORTS MUST BE MANNED BY BRITISH PEOPLE, TO ENSURE THAT THE CUSTOMS AND POLICE OFFICERS ARE ONLY ALLOWING IN THE SMALL PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE THAT HAVE VISA’S. BRITISH SOLDIERS MUST RETURN HOME FROM FOREIGN WARS TO PROTECT BRITISH PEOPLE AND OUR BORDERS!

ROYAL NAVAL VESSELS AND TUG BOATS SHOULD PATROL OUR FISHING AREAS TO PROTECT OUR PRE-1972 EXCLUSION ZONE!

PRIORITY MUST BE APPLIED TO BRITISH PEOPLE IN BRITISH TERRITORY AND PUBLIC SPENDING MUST BE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL PARTS OF BRITAIN, PER CAPITA – SO THAT MINORITY POLULATION AREAS ARE NOT TREATED ANY BETTER OR ANY WORSE THAN MAJORITY AREAS.

IT IS NOW UP TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE – AND THAT MEANS EVERY ONE OF YOU – TO SET THE RULES OF HOW WE ARE TO BE GOVERNED, AND SUCH RULE MUST REVOLVE AROUND OUR ANCIENT COMMON LAW.

MAKE NO MISTAKE; IF WE LEAVE IT TO THE POLITICIANS, THEY WILL LET US DOWN AND THEY MAY EVEN STAB US IN THE BACK, AGAIN!

'DIRTY WORK -- The CIA in Western Europe

'DIRTY WORK -- The CIA in Western Europe', 1978
Edited by Philip Agee and Louis Wolf

...The CIA Backs the Common Market

by Steve Weissman, Phil Kelly, and Mark Hosenball

Cord Meyer Jr.'s main task as head of the U.S. Central Intelli-
gence Agency's operation here may be to ensure Britain's entry
into the Common Market. New evidence developed by investi-
gators in Britain and America shows that Meyer and his prede-
cessor as head of the CIA's International Organization Division,
Tom Braden, engaged in a major operation in the 1950s and 60s
to secretly build up the groups which are now pushing Britain
into Europe.

The European Movement, the elite international pressure
group which takes much of the credit for the founding of the
Common Market, took secret U.S. funding. Its British Council
is currently leading the "Keep Britain In" Campaign. The Euro-
pean Youth Campaign, which was the European Movement's
most active component in the Fifties, was almost totally funded
by the American government. Members of organizations affili-
ated to the campaign are still active in pro- Europe circles.

[This article first appeared as "Uncle Sam Goes to Market"
in the May 23, 1975, issue of Time Out. in London.]...

https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-9MwmH_nnJ4eOmL66/Philip%20Agee%20&%20Louis%20Wolf%20-%20Dirty%20Work%20%281978%29_djvu.txt

“who we choose to rule over us”.

From: Jane Birkby

Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:18 PM

To: Scunthorpe Telegraph

Subject: Reason to debate - Reply

I would be grateful if you could print as much of this letter as possible, because the content is important and informative for the public.

Dear Viewpoint,

Bernard Regan (Telegraph May 19-25) doesn’t see merit in other aspects of the EU Referendum debate, including “who we choose to rule over us”.

Like a banker, Jean Monnet, the EU Commission, or an oligarch he only sees the immediate financial picture, which is divorced from the well being of the actual ordinary people of Europe.

• What about the hideous cost of implementing all those diktats, which officials of the EU churn out by the bucket load, and which add costs to goods and services?

• What about the fact that David Cameron ignored the Council of Europe’s own Code of Practice on Referendums, which prohibits the use of public funds for campaigning purposes, he spent £9 million of taxpayers money hoping to influence the vote before the proper campaign was allowed to start?

• The Remain campaign booklet is using virtually the same arguments as the 1975 Common Market information, and the original was in German.

• Anna Soubry, the industry minister argues that the EU is about trade and prosperity, not politics. Not so, the EU is entirely political and power hungry.

• Jean Monnet, the prime visionary and instigator, was President of the Action Committee for the European Superstate, which is not a myth; it is the intent.

• Monnet wrote: “Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”

• Trade and prosperity are merely a red herring; the EU’s true destination is to remove democratic government, and replace it with unelected committee.

This is not going to be a fair fight, because the EU who have the most to lose, are throwing European taxpayers money at the Remain campaign and the BBC, to persuade us that we are better off staying in than staying out, just as they did in 1975 for the Common Market vote.

Britain is in grave danger of colonisation and takeover, thanks to free movement through open borders, and the ever increasing number of member countries (Original 9 - now 28), with Turkey, Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia being considered for membership.

This referendum is just as much a Battle for Britain and our heritage, as it was in WWI & II, it is just that the weapons have changed, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office have a section jokingly referred to as “The Camel Corp”, and they are working to a Lancaster Plan to hand the country to Islam.

Every woman in the country must vote “OUT”, or we as a country will disappear under the latest Ottoman invasion, who are rapidly changing the demographics in this country, by having more children than the native population.

Yours faithfully

Mrs Jane Birkby

full address supplied

North Lincolnshire

Dick Loots from the Netherlands.

Hi folks, this is Dick Loots from the Netherlands. 

I'd like to post a message over here to brighten up some things about the EU. The EU and euro haven't been good to all of us, That was the reason for the Dutch to vote NO in 2005 for the european constitution. What did Bruxelles do? They changed a few lines and dots and changed the name into "Lisbon treaty" and without refering the people, the Bruxelles autocracts ratified this "constitution" 

They said "oh you didn't really understand what is going on" Believe me, I do understand what's going on. And what I see is what I strongly dislike. Do you want a country like Turkey to become one of our european "provinces"? 

We knew already that Turkey is bad news for Europe , but the European runaway-train must keep on rolling according to EU politicians. East Germany would cost around the 310 billion to bring it up to west-European level. Till this date they spent MORE THAN 2000 BILLION and it's still not where it should be, financialy backward and whenever I'm driving through it I still get this uncomfortable "eastern-Europe" feeling. 

If you read the treaty made with Ukraine you'll find out that contrary of what they tell you, they will get financial help like all other European countries in the east, and further down the road, free working and travelling throughout the whole EU. 

Now we already have the financial trouble with Greece. Spain and Italy are also candidates in the future for financial aid. Ukraine is a vast country and it is calculated that if you bring it up to the prommised level it will cost a multiple of the east- German aid. 

Add Spain, Portugal and Italy and we have a public debt bigger then in the USA . That is why we voted NO in the last referendum 2 months ago. YOU AND ME are the ones paying those bills in the end.Bills you and I don't ask for. We'll become 2nd world countries. So we have to make cut backs again at our own fascilities. Whilst paying more taxes than ever. 

I've already seen over here what it does to healthcare. My late mum (thank god she passed away) , was in a home for dementing elderly people and the treatment she got there was inhumane. All due to budget cuts they had to make from our government in the Hague. 

Eu sends as much as 4.6 billion a year to Turkey as financial aid. With dictator Erdogan and his private fortune of 128 billion dollar. Less then 25 years ago he stood in front off an audience and told them pointing at his wedding ring : "This is all Mr Erdogan posesses. If you ever in the future find Mr Erdogan with a fortune you are looking at Erdogan the thief" (?????????) This is where your money goes to. And mine as well. 

Wisely Mr Juncker, Barosso, Timmermans and Tusk ( I can't remember I voted for one of these people and nobody I know did. Do you know someone who voted for them? That's called democracy) didn't tell you yet about the raise that they have in mind for membership of the EU. They wait for the Brexit referendum to pass and tell it just THEN. 

Trying to prevent a negative result. Because they are afraid. Not for you and me. But for their own jobs.Once founded to secure peace in Europe the main goal nowadays of the EU is POWER. Those idiots in Bruxelles think they have to create some kind of "3rd Reich" "Bigger than USA and China" 

Remember the EU delegation at the Maidan Square in Ukraine? Overthrowing a, however corrupt, but democraticly chosen government. The Ukranians should have sent this government home in the next elections, but the Bruxelles autocrats wanted them to leave now. The EU is a room full of Chamberlaines. They keep assuring you that everything is oke . 

In the meantime there is chaos. Another 10 billion sent to Greece. Believe me when I say that it's not the last time we have to bail them out. Next year again. And again. Because they will never be able to pay back if the Greek dont change their mentallity and that mentality is to pay 0 taxes. I know this for fact. 

There is however ONE WINSTON CHURCHILL in the room. And his name is NIGEL FARAGE. I wish we had a guy like him over here. Don't believe what they all come up with next days/weeks. Stars will fall from the sky. The plague will return. Everybodies car will have a flat tire tomorrow. War will come to us. DONT BELIEVE THEM. Europe has since ww2 never been more divided than now. 

In the EEC period there was growth and stability. Now all I see is deterioration. Be wise. Be smart. And keep your independance and right of self-determination. EEC=YES and EU=NO.  Way better for all of us. 

If one sheep is over the bridge the rest will follow. So PLEASE vote LEAVE. I hope you British will free us from Tirany once more. We will be gratefull for that.  

Regards, Dick Loots, Dutch citizen. (excuses for my bad English)

Sent from Samsung Mobile

DID ELIZABETH WINDSOR CONSPIRE TO END BRITAIN?

DID ELIZABETH WINDSOR CONSPIRE TO END BRITAIN ?

(too old to reply)

Have we been sold out at the very top ?

The following article from Bob Lomas, Chairman and founder of the Magna Carta Society, is a disturbing discussion of the role of Elizabeth Windsor in the slow but unrelenting surrender of Britain to the Franco-German Axis, which raises very serious questions indeed about her conduct over the last 30 years.

In 1972 it might have seemed important to engage with the EEC and seek to control the re-emergence of Germany.
And it might have been argued then that we needed privileged access to the European market, over which they were building malicious and exclusive control.

That both of these objectives have failed miserably - and that we have lost much and gained nothing - as we predicted then and have since been repeatedly proved correct - puts a different light on the matter today, as it has done, and beyond question, for a very long time.

But if she was playing a "long card" reluctantly to gain some hoped for benefits then, why did she see fit to make Heath and the EU fifth columnist, Sainsbury, members of the Order of the Garter, which is in her own gift ?

This article makes stunning accusations about the role of the Windsors and is worth reading right through to the end.

Note especially that the EEC was designed originally by the Nazis in 1942 - and the chilling claim by Elizabeth Windsor in her Paris speech that she and France had agreed to combine their political and economic futures !!!

Alignment with France might be seen as a counter weight to the now re-arming Germany - but I do not think that the British electorate has, or ever would, agree to the surrender of our political or economic independence to a malicious enemy like France - or that such a move is necessary to control Germany. It looks far more like a back door sell out to the "EU" - the most dangerous enemy of the Anglo-American alliance and the only guarantee of our impendence - to say nothing of our liberty and democracy - which it has underpinned for all of the last 60 years.

Readers must make up their own minds about the arguments put forward by Bob Lomas in this article, but in the absence of any meaningful response to the 100's of thousands of letters, petitions and representations made to the Palace over the last 30 years, all of which have been met with stone walling, prevarication and vague side stepping, his arguments are powerful and must be considered.

Please take the time to read it right through ......


2005, THE END OF A NATION.

The Europaisch Wirtshaftsgemienshaft, ( The European Economic Community ), was drawn up in Berlin in 1942. It was the plan for the uniting of Europe into one Reich of regions on the German Lander system once Germany had won the war.

In 1945 Germany lost her challenge to establish the Thousand Year Reich by force of arms , but quickly engaged in a new initiative to realise her dream, this time utilising her more subtle skills, intrigue, duplicity and deceit, skills the Germanic people have excelled at for centuries. By 1951 Germany had established the European Coal and Steel Community. In 1957 the Europaisch Wirtshaftsgemienshaft was resurrected, slightly restructured but basically the same in principle, under The Treaties of Rome. The Reich was again emerging as Germany's WW II allies and sympathisers, Spain, Italy and much of France fell back into line behind her.

Despite the Allies virtual annihilation of Germany, the spirit of the Reich had once more risen like the Phoenix from the ashes as it did following the Great War, and just as she ignored the Treaty of Versailles in the 1920/30s, Germany is re-arming on an escalating scale, in total defiance of the constraints imposed by the Allies in 1945. At present Germany has a standing army of 300,000, she has retained national service and so has as many again in reserve, these include fighter pilots which she has been training in numbers far exceeding her defence needs for over twenty five years. Germany is developing a new super tank and U-Boats, and shows every indication that she is developing nuclear weapons.

(Our intelligence is that Germany already had them. W)

German politicians are now openly stating their intention to become a major military power in the world.

In 1972 Queen Elizabeth II, who the British people had elected to be the official Governor and political leader of the nation, used her position to surrender the supremacy of her office as Sovereign Head of State, the supremacy of the peoples laws and the supremacy of the peoples sovereignty to the Europaisch Wirtshaftsgemienshaft. It is not without significance that the Europaisch Wirtshaftsgemienshaft when resurrected was referred to internationally as the European Economic Community, arguably for the same reasons that the name of the Royal family was changed from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor.

In 1972 the Queen gave Royal Assent to the European Communities Act, which agreed to the surrender of the peoples sovereignty and the supremacy of their laws to the Community. The Queen then commanded her plenipotentiaries, Heath, Hurd and Ripon to go to Brussels to sign the Treaty of Accession to the Treaty of Rome on her behalf, for which she later honoured them. As the Treaty of Rome is very clear in its design to do away with the nation states of Europe, and the principle that national law will always be subordinate to Community law, the Queen could not have used her authority to sanction this action of capitulation, for by so doing she would have exceeded her lawful authority.

Never the less, the Queen used her position to surrender her governance of the nation to an unelected and unaccountable foreign power, a third party bearing no allegiance to the Crown or the British people. Parliament could not have undertaken this action on its own, for had it attempted so to do those involved would have instantly become subject to the Treason Felony Act 1848, under which it is an offence to engage in, even to discuss, any action which might endanger or disrupt the Constitution. There can be no doubt that the Queen knew exactly what she was doing, for there had been much discussion in both Houses on the issues involved going back to the mid 1960s, and the Queen would have been kept fully informed on all such discussions.

As Constitutional Head of State the Queen would also have been fully aware of our principle constitutional documents, especially the Magna Carta 1215, the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Supremacy 1559, which states: "...all usurped and foreign power and authority...may forever be clearly extinguished, and never used or obeyed in this realm...no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate...shall at any time after the last day of this session of Parliament, use, enjoy or exercise any manner of power, jurisdiction, superiority, authority, pre-eminence or privilege...within this realm, but that henceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this realm for ever."

Over the past thirty years the Queen has upheld her decision of 1972 by giving her Royal Assent to the subsequent European treaties, in particular the Treaty of Maastricht which purports to make the Queen a citizen of the EU, as was announced in the house of Commons by Prime Minister Major, a statement which under normal circumstances would have been considered treasonous. Just as Heath was not impeached for his treasonous actions, or his committing perjury in the House of Commons in 1972, Major was not impeached for his statement, which must raise the question, is the Queen still Monarch and Governor of this nation, for clearly no one can be both Monarch and citizen at the same time.

When in 1972 the Queen surrendered the supremacy of her office to the EU, her action was in effect her abdication of office, there can be no sovereign head of state in a country that is no longer sovereign, and no official governor in a nation that is no longer self governing. This being so, it suggests that the Queen has for the past thirty years engaged in a sham, a charade to give the impression that nothing has changed, while all the time  Parliament, acting as an administration for the EU, has been preparing for the eventual destruction of all that we are as a nation state. It must not be over looked that according to the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Coronation Oath Act 1688 the Monarch is the Governor of the nation, and that the government formed from a political party of the peoples choice is subordinate to the Governor who retains the power of governance on the peoples behalf, thus the people retain the supreme power in the land.

It is the obligation of the Monarch, being the physical embodiment of the peoples sovereignty, to uphold the peoples power in Parliament by exercising the power of veto vested in her by the people at the time of her Coronation. With the Monarch removed, be it by her abdication, deposition or mediatisation, the people have no means of exercising their sovereign supremacy over a despotic and dictatorial Parliament, and this it seems is the present situation. Clearly we now have a subjected and politicised judiciary, which openly claims in the courts that Parliament is above and beyond the constraint of the law, ignoring its own oaths of allegiance and the Coronation Oath.

It is upon the office of the Monarch therefore that the whole structure of our Constitution and rule of law hinges. Under the present and prevailing circumstances we must seriously consider the position of the Queen according to available evidence. The question arising is, in 1972 was the Queen deposed, mediatised or did she abdicate? Bearing in mind that the Queen took a solemn oath to govern us according to our laws and customs, which essentially would mean upholding and maintaining our Constitution and the supremacy of our laws, the Queen could not have lawfully acted as she has done over the past thirty years were she still Monarch, during which time it is claimed she has given legitimacy to Acts of Parliament which are not only illegitimate according to our laws but subject to the Treason Acts, most pertinently the Civil Contingencies Act, which gives the government the right to suspend all our constitutional rights and liberties.

It does not seem likely or feasible that the Queen was forcibly deposed or mediatised by Parliament, or some conspiratorial force within Parliament, for at the time of her Coronation we the people vested in her enormous powers to enable her to protect us from a despotic Parliament. These powers include her right to dismiss her ministers and dissolve Parliament,
and to ensure she has the backing to so act we made her Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces which takes an oath of allegiance to her and her alone, making it completely separate from Parliament.

From the available evidence therefore it would seem that in 1972 the Queen abdicated of her own free will, and since that time has acted complicitly with unlawful Parliaments to destroy us as a nation state in the process of building the new Reich under the Trojan Horse disguise of the EU. Although this may seem totally inconceivable, the truth of it may be found in two of the Queen's recent speeches. In her Paris speech the Queen stated that she and France had agreed to combine their political and economic futures.

The Queen used the word "we", but she could not have been speaking for the British people who have left her in no doubt that the majority wish to leave the EU, and she is fully aware that we did not have any say in whether or not we wished to join it in the first place.

In her more recent State Opening of Parliament speech, the Queen stated that her government would be preparing for a referendum on whether or not we should accept the EU constitution which if accepted would completely and irrevocably destroy the supremacy of our laws, the very laws she swore to uphold in the sight of God. As any action that might disrupt the Constitution would be subject to the Treason Felony Act 1848, the Queen was saying that she and her government will be acting complicitly in an act of treason against the state, and that the people are to be invited to participate in an act of treason against themselves.

Should there be any doubt about it, one must consider this, the words of the EU Constitution - Article (I-10) are ground breaking because of the first two words:

"The Constitution and law adopted by the Union's Institutions in exercising competences conferred on it shall have primacy over the law of the Member States".

Winston Churchill once spoke of the British Empire and the Commonwealth lasting for a thousand years. It did not. Hitler spoke of the thousand year Reich, which was most unlikely. We as a nation have lasted for a thousand years, but unless we can now clarify and expose the present true position of the Queen, and bring to heel our unlawful and duplicitous Parliament, short of civil unrest possibly leading to civil war, this nation is unlikely to last another decade as a nation state.

Bob Lomas. The Magna Carta Society. December 2004.

The Fourth Reich is here

The Fourth Reich is here - without a shot being fired

The arsenal of fear must almost be nearly exhausted. Those daring to vote to leave the EU will inflict on Britain collapsing house prices (according to George Osborne and Christine Lagarde of the IMF, who should worry about the EU’s unemployment-soaked economies); a “technical” recession (Mark Carney, a “technical” Irish-Canadian with a long record of error, who for this disgraceful political interference should be kicked back to Ottawa); and, of course, the Third World War (Mr Cameron). It’s clearly a Corporal Jones moment for the Remainers, though any cries of “don’t panic” come far too late: they are manifestly drowning in it.  Anyway, two can play at this game. What must we fear if we stay? Not merely relentless uncontrolled immigration (and the lies told about it), putting such burdens on our schools, hospitals and infrastructure that UK citizens suffer, but the inevitability of our nation’s destiny being increasingly subject to the wishes of foreigners whom we don’t elect. I am not talking about the amorphous idea of “Brussels”: I’m talking about Germany.

Five years ago I wrote a piece referring to the control Angela Merkel exerted over Europe as “the Fourth Reich”. I was accused of a horrible breach of taste. However, when one looks at German power today one realises that, when I wrote, she had hardly even started. The key to German success is this: it participates in a weak currency (whose value would collapse without it) enabling its exports to sell far more cheaply than had it retained the Deutschmark. Therefore, it continues to grow in economic strength relative to its partners – including us – but especially those in the eurozone, notably France and Italy, who would benefit greatly from restoring the Franc and the Lira.

Any net exporter in the EU – which we are most certainly not, given our £24bn trade gap with our partners in the first three months of 2016 – also benefits hugely from the vast and incomprehensible welter of EU regulations on products and employment law, which keep external competitors at arm’s length and pile costs on them if they wish access to the single market. Germany is so rich, and getting richer at the expense not least of its partners, that it can afford to pretend globalisation isn’t happening. We are not so fortunate, and leaving the EU to avoid all these regulations and take proper advantage of the wider world is not the least reason why we must vote to get out.

If we stay in we are going to suffer immense collateral damage from two crises that the Germans will precipitate. First, there will be one in the eurozone. My friend Dr Savvas Savouri, chief economist at the leading investment business Toscafund, predicts a “detonation of devaluations around the periphery of the eurozone” in his latest briefing to clients. So incapable are non-eurozone countries such as Hungary, Romania or Poland of competing with the German-dictated economic model that devaluation and the instability that will bring are their only options. So anyone who thinks our staying in the EU is like buying a ticket to a place of permanent prosperity wants his or her head examined.

Worse for Britain, Dr Savouri predicts Germany’s economy “will not come off lightly”, not least because its clients and customers will find its goods suddenly more expensive. And when Germany starts to struggle, God help the rest of the EU: because when the German chequebook closes, economies it is shoring up – such as Greece’s – will be on their own. And Greece’s economy is one-eleventh the size of France’s, which is a basket-case, and cannot go on as it is.

Dr Savouri also points out that if we stay in the EU there will be huge costs for us from all this chaos, despite being out of the eurozone. “Having renewed our vows to remain in the EU 'through sickness and in health’ we will be required to contribute to funding the fiscal efforts being applied to our ever more sickly EU partners,” he writes. The costs will be huge, and once we have committed ourselves to remain we will be forced to join the communal effort to save ailing partners. He calls it “the EU’s version of a Rooseveltian New Deal.”

He also argues that such a wave of economic hardship will propel more impoverished Europeans across open borders into the UK: and don’t forget what Iain Duncan Smith disclosed last week, that Mr Cameron deleted a passage about controlling immigration from a speech he made because he was told it would upset the Germans. That is the reality of our relationship with the EU: if we choose to stay in, the Germans will ensure that we become ever more obedient to their policies – so stand by for their next project, Turkey’s admission to the EU, and all that would entail.

It was not just deeply offensive, but ironic, that Mr Cameron should last week have evoked the idea of another world war in his latest intelligence-insulting act of hysteria aimed at making us vote to stay in the EU. It is not just that our fathers and grandfathers fought in two world wars to allow Britain the right to continue to rule itself, rather than to be ruled by Germans: Mr Cameron plainly won’t admit that German domination of the EU means it has conquered without war, and signing up to the EU is signing up to the Fourth Reich.

Ask the Greeks if you think I exaggerate: Germany runs Europe without firing a shot. It forces far weaker partners to stay in a currency zone that is crippling them, and uses its economic muscle to dictate immigration and other key policies. And if you believe the Germans won’t take a UK vote to stay in as a signal to continue and intensify their control over the EU, and to make us help pay for its baleful effects, then you aren’t paying attention. It’s not war we should fear, but what the Germans do in peace.

===============================================================

Christina 

=

An unlawful referendum

COMMENT:-    Please distribute this widely, as it seems most of the British people are still blissfully unaware that they are no longer British Subjects but citizens of the EU and as such committed to  the demands, constraints and obligations of that citizenship.  BL.

AN UNLAWFUL REFERENDUM.

Very shortly the British people will be voting in an unlawful referendum, unlawful because our national sovereignty is the birth right of generations yet unborn just as it was ours and therefore not in the gift of any one generation to decide whether or not they wish to return to being a free sovereign people of self political determination, or remain a satellite state subordinate to the German based European political empire.

The majority will be so doing without the slightest understanding of the issues involved and the consequences and potential perils of their actions, because just as it was in 1972 when the then Conservative government, acting without mandate or regard for due lawful procedure, took the nation into the then EEC by hiding from the people the factual implications under the terms and conditions of the Treaty of Rome.  

Prior to that now historic  treachery in 1972 the people were led to believe that the issue was one of economics and that national sovereignty would not be effected and today’s Conservative government is virtually peddling   the same dishonest and deceitful lie, all be it they are now simply smothering the issue of national sovereignty with a great play on the claimed but totally hypothetical advantages of being permanently subordinate to an unelected, unaccountable and undemocratic foreign political power.

Most importantly the essential issue of this coming  referendum is not about politics or economics, it is about national sovereignty and freedom, the most highly valued thing known to man and for which mankind has time and again been prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice to defend and secure. 

Little wonder the people are divided on the issue which is one of utter confusion as it was deliberately planned so to be. Also as planned, if the people were to be informed of the truth behind our present unlawful governance it would doubtless be met with utter disbelief for such circumstances are expected to be found in third world countries, not in the land of Christian principles and honest integrity, presided over by an elected sovereign monarch and the mother of all parliaments. 

The sad truth is that in 1972 a parliamentary political coups by the Conservative party deposed the office of the monarch, dismissed the people’s common law constitution and surrendered the supremacy of the Crown, together with the people’s law and the nation’s sovereignty to a foreign political power.

As things presently stand the economies of the world are in a state of flux which does not make for any form of monetary or political stability and the EU is no exception, yet our politicians and a number of very wealthy international speculators are attempting to persuade us to risk a thousand years of constitutional stability by placing ourselves permanently under the dictate of unelected foreign bureaucrats,  whose nations histories have never experienced democracy as we understand it - and all in the pursuit of financial speculation.

Important though the issues of trade and investment are, man does not live by bread alone, there are other important aspects and issues that are essential to social cohesion and political stability, such as principle, integrity, truth, transparency and fairness; our ancient word ‘fair’ which summarises all that we are as a people,  has no equivalent in any other language.  It is these social assets we have in our national disposition and from which our democracy is sustained and gives lead and example to the civilised world, a far greater value than the handful of silver for which our politicians would sell our lawful rights and freedome.

For the past half century the British people have been deceived, lied to and denied the truth of their inalienable common law rights and liberties. Before 1972 we had a thousand year old written common law constitution that summarised, represented, expressed and upheld all that we were as a nation state and upon which our system of law was based. 

Under the terms, principle and demands of the Treaty of Rome this had to be ignored, buried, forgotten and banished from the nation’s education curriculum's, it being the antitheses of the code  Napoleon on which European law is based, not least on such issues as the presumption of innocence and trial by one’s peers in the form of a jury.

Not surprisingly very few people, including politicians, understand what the Treaty of Rome is all about. The principle and objective of the Treaty of Rome, based on the German High Command document Europaisch Whitshaftsgemeinshaft 1942, is to realise the planned destruction of the nation states of Europe by the eradication  of the principle of national sovereignty. 

Prior to the Conservative government signing up to the Treaty of Rome in 1972 there was deceitful and misleading propaganda proffered by that government that we would not be losing but would be sharing our sovereignty, despite sovereignty being absolute and indivisible. In reality our national sovereignty was surrendered and replaced by the political sovereignty of the EEC. Before the surrender we were a constitutional monarchy, this was ended along with the monarchy for there is no provision in the Treaty of Rome for a constitutional monarchy.

Clearly the monarch had either abdicated, or been treasonously deposed, as there can be no sovereign monarch in a country that is no longer sovereign. Under the Coronation Oath Act 1688 the monarch was also the official Governor of the nation with extensive powers of governance as vested in the monarch by the people at the time of the coronation. 

The government of the day was no more than a delegated authority with no powers of its own, its only powers being those loaned to it by the people for its temporary duration and was mounted by the monarch on the people’s behalf for a strictly limited period. The power of governance remained with the monarch and through the monarch to the people, the monarch and the people being as one, as established and proclaimed in a marriage, as part of the  Coronation ceremony. 

In summery, before 1972 this nation was not about Parliament and the people, it was about the people and their elected monarch, Parliament being no more than a temporarily  appointed national administration and legislature;

a national servant.

With the unlawful dissolution of the monarchy and the surrender of the supremacy of the Crown, in accord with the terms and conditions of the Treaty of Rome, Parliament, which formerly drew its legitimacy from the Crown became an illegitimate and therefore unlawful assembly and has remained so since 1972. 

The abdication of the monarch was later officially confirmed when following the signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, again by a Conservative government, the then Conservative prime minister John Major announced in the House of Commons that all British people had been officially made citizens of the EU including the Queen, the implication being that all, including the Queen were bound by the demands, obligations and restrictions of that foreign citizenship. 

Had John Major not been correct he would have been ‘imagining the death of the monarch’ and so subject to charges of treason under the Treason Felony Act 1848 but no action was taken against him. 

Also, clearly no one could be both monarch and citizen at the same time.  By his statement John Major was also making sure that everyone fully understood that they were NO LONGER BRITISH SUBJECTS.

Unlawful though this coming referendum is, as it invites the British people to engage in an act of treason against themselves, it could at least give expression to those wishing to return to being British subjects and once more under lawful governance.

To those who will be voting......

If you wish to return to being a British subject.

If you wish to have the Crown and the monarchy reinstated.

If you wish to return to lawful governance  and the rule of law administered through a legitimate national parliament.

If you wish to see a return to the lawful recognition of our ancient Common Law Constitution.

If you wish to ensure your descendants grow up and live in a free and sovereign country of self political determination, there is only one way to vote and that is, for this nation to leave the politically chaotic and financially corrupt European Union. 

Do so with a will and be mindful of the hundreds of thousands of foreign immigrants surreptitiously brought here to vote against you, and the hundreds of thousands of those born here of foreign immigrants, who have no historic affinity with this country, be it politically or spiritually. 

Digest the facts that are hereby laid out  and check them out for yourself, should you have a mind to and should you be of a spiritual belief, pray that the sword of truth and enlightenment does ultimately prevail.  

Bob Lomas.

While Britain slumbers on

WHILE BRITAIN SLUMBERS ON

Britain’s sovereignty was given away in 1972 by Edward Heath in the most grievous act of treason in British history.  Diligently pursuing his treachery, every following parliament has been an unlawful assembly unqualified to legally govern.  This means that every Act and EU Treaty since 1972 is null and void as treason has no authority in law.

Putting foreign political agenda before sworn allegiance, British politicians have since the 70’s overseen the silent removal of Britain’s industry, fishing grounds, democracy, culture, rights and freedoms and replaced them with political correctness, unstoppable immigration, growing unrest and overlooked foreign cultural domination.  Our world class legal system, police and armed forces have been wilfully decimated and billions of our money squandered to prop up the ruinous EU.

  We are told blatant lies of beneficial EU membership and why giving up our country is good for us while the EU controls our media to lull us into false belief in the failing totalitarian disaster unfolding in Europe.  Once IN, our NHS will be killed off and our savings taken at will to plug exponential EU debt.  Yet millions of British lives were lost in two world wars to save and protect us from these things.

From birth, the law demands a strict duty of allegiance from every British subject.  That means YOU.  But do not think that voting in the EU referendum will resolve anything as it will likely reflect EU intention, not yours.  “If voting made any difference, we wouldn't do it”, Peter Mandelson once said.  In 2015 the nation voted UKIP.]  We got Cameron. 

 While Britain slumbers on, only when the nation becomes ANGRY can it be saved.  And time is now very short indeed.  

It’s up to you.

Rex Poulton

EVERY British person needs to read this.

In 1972 we were told we were joining a trading agreement between member states of Europe. There were three main sticking points for the UK:

1.                  Our traditional bonds with the countries of the Commonwealth.

2.                  Refusal to join a customs union and wanted to maintain a free trade.

3.                  We were opposed to the long term aim of surrendering national sovereignty.

When the Heath Government was negotiating our entry, Edward Heath instructed Sir Con O’Neil, the UK’s chief negotiator, to ‘Swallow it whole and swallow it now!  In other words accept whatever conditions they offer. Membership was sealed when the UK joined in 1973.

Before entry, Edward Heath wrote to his Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, asking if there were any Constitutional limitations on joining the EEC? In his reply Lord Kilmuir stated: ‘I agree with you that there are important constitutional issues involved’. He went on to say: ‘I have no doubt that if we do sign the treaty, we shall suffer some loss of sovereignty’ and confirmed this by making these three points:

1.                  Parliament would be required to surrender some of its functions to the organs of the community.

2.                  The Crown would be called on to transfer part of its treaty-making power to those organs of the community.

3.                  Our courts of law would be sacrificed to some degree of independence by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the European Court of Justice.

In 1973, that Britain was joining a political union was deliberately withheld from the people.  They were knowingly and wilfully deceived and betrayed by Conservative leader Edward Heath.  He said that “There is no question of eroding any national sovereignty; there is no blueprint for a federal Europe. There are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty. These fears, I need hardly say are completely unjustified.”

Thirty-seven years later in 2012 we see that this was a lie. Sir Edward Heath admitted as much in 1989 by remarking that ‘the project was always political.’

A Government White Paper on the EU Constitution, issued in September 2004, stated that: ‘The legal primacy of European law was accepted by Parliament when we joined the EEC’. Yet the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Geoffrey Rippon, moving the motion on the 15th February 1972, for the Bill which took us into the EEC, said: “there would be no essential surrender of sovereignty…”. This mantra, in one form or another, was repeated throughout the campaign and the debates in Parliament. So we see a Government White Paper attempting to bury the truth.

Joining the EEC (EU) was an act of outright treason against the people of this country.  Heath’s treachery was THE most grievous act of high treason in British history.

Our membership of the EU is therefore illegal as treason can have no effect in law and Heath’s government instantly rendered itself an unlawful assembly (having no effect in law or lawful ability to govern the country.

  

All subsequent Parliaments have also been unlawful assemblies as they failed to reverse Heath’s treachery.  Instead they committed further treason continuing the pretence of our membership and adding further commitments to the EU by signing additional treaties, ALL of them with no effect in law.  Treason is a capital offence and still carries the death penalty.

 We joined the EU (EEC) in 1972. After 38 years of pretence that we are part of it, we now know:

1.                   The European Union’s six constitutional treaties build a three-tier politburo dictatorship.

2.                   The EU has the laws of a police state – which are being increasingly enforced.

3.                   The EU’s 120,000 regulations will bring us a soviet style command economy and abject poverty.

4.                   Unelected EU dictators will control the nuclear weapons of former nations of Britain and France.

5.                   The EU’s illegal six treaties will compel us to hand over all our armed forces to the EU.

6.                   Our armed forces and police have been told they will swear a new oath to the EU, or be fired.

7.                   The EU’s 120,000 regulations will rigidly control our personal lives – more than any nation in history.

8.                   EU regulations now cost us £100 billion a year. (Better Regulation Commission annual report 2005)

9.                   When enforced, those illegal regulations will destroy most of our 4.5 million small businesses.

10.               Up to 13.5 million will be unemployed after EU regulations close small businesses.

11.               The 120,000 regulations WILL MAKE US SUBJECT TO CONTINUAL ARREST (SOCPA 2005).

12.               There are now 3,095 “Crimes against the EU state” on the British statute book.

13.               The EU’s Constitutional treaties replaced the British Constitution on 1st January 2009.

14.               The independent nation of Britain was finally abolished by the Lisbon Treaty on 1st Jan 2009.

15.               EU Bilderbergers control our parties: Ken Clarke, Maude, Cameron, Millibands, Mandelson, Clegg

16.               The EU’s Road Pricing and personal ID chips will inform the state of our exact location and activity 24 hours a day.

17.               Huge taxes/fines by the EU’s Road Pricing, Congestion Charging and global warming policies.

18.               The EU Regionalisation Plan will abolish England and our 48 counties in favour of 9 EU regions.

19.               The 9 EU regions will report direct to Brussels, not to Westminster, which will be defunct.

20.               The EU Regionalisation Plan will abolish our 19,579 councillors.

21.               British common law mainly replaced by EU corpus Juris by 1992. Government is now above the law.

22.               Police have shot 30 innocent people dead since 1992 and have not been successfully prosecuted.

23.               1,100 deaths in police custody since 1992 and no successful prosecutions.

24.               Police Shoot to Kill policy now in force; illegal under British common law, OK under EU corpus juris.

25.               EU conceived in Germany from 22nd June 1940 as the EEC – speech by Hermann Goering.

26.               First EEC conference Berlin University 1942, 13 nation summit Berlin 1943 run by von Ribbentrop

27.               After fall of Germany, the Germans switched the EU from a Nazi to a communist basis in 1946.

28.               Hitler’s Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence Department (DVD) still controls EU development.

29.               Edward Heath, Geoffrey Rippon, Roy Jenkins recruited by the DVD in 1958 as saboteurs.

30.               DVD has arranged finance to put pro-EU ownerships into British newspaper groups.

31.               EU has been sabotaging Britain with German Frankfurt School techniques since the 1950’s.

32.               The EU’s main subversive organisations in Britain are senior Freemasonry and Common Purpose

33.               The EU’s Common Purpose (CP) has trained 40,000 local leaders for “the post democratic era”

34.               CP controls the NHS, and is wrecking it with Frankfurt subversion techniques (eg continual change).

35.               Common Purpose has 400 staff inside the BBC censoring-out anti-EU news and and current affairs.

36.               Common Purpose has staff in hundreds of local newspapers censoring out anti-EU news

37.               Common Purpose is transferring power from councillors to the unelected council executives.

38.               Common Purpose has built the EU gravy trains inside local and national government.

39.               CP and Freemasonry snatch 4,500 children a year from good parents for forced adoption.

40.               CP has built most of Britain’s 8,500 quangos costing us £167 billion pa (Cabinet Office 2007 figs)

41.               These quangos bribe compliant, pro EU local officials and businessmen with £150,000+ salaries.

42.               ALL OUR JUDGES ARE NOW FREEMASONS, WHICH IS WHY BRITISH JUSTICE AND OUR COURTS ARE UTTERLY CORRUPT.

43.               The EU is corrupt and cannot account for 95% of its expenditure (yes, NINETY FIVE % LOST)

44.               The EU has over 200,000 offshore bank accounts from which it pays bribes.

45.               We now lose £45 billion a year trading with the EU. Outside, we had an even balance of payments.

46.               EU Constitution is similar to the Soviet. And EU Commissioners similar to Soviet Politburo members.

47.               The EU parliament is a sham with no power – just like the old Soviet parliament.

48.               THE LEADERSHIP OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY HAS BEEN CONTROLLED BY EU BILDERBERGERS SINCE THE 1960’S.

49.               The Labour and Lib Dem leaderships EU controlled for 20 years – that’s why your vote doesn’t count.

50.               The Amsterdam Treaty 1997 gave the EU control of our immigration, now running at 2.6 million pa.

51.               Our infrastructure can’t cope with the 10 million immigrants the EU has let in since 1997.

52.               380,000 highly qualified British emigrate annually to escape from the EU and its overcrowding.

53.               The EU and their Bilderbergers have moved 50,000 pro-EU people, freemasons and CP up into all positions of power over 40 years. You don’t progress in British government unless you are pro-EU.

Source: eutruth.org.uk