With
the following Daily Express announcement on Monday 26 January, two gravely
serious and consequential facts are being conveniently
overlooked.
1. Britain is NOT lawfully any part of the
EU.
2. Metrication in Britain is
treason.
The
following documents are attached.
1. Britain Is Not Part Of The
EU
2. The Absurdity Of Metrication In
Britain
3. The Treason Of Metrication In
Britain
I
urge you to read all of these as, according to
the Express article, a very serious criminal act upon Britain is likely to be
committed.
Surveys
consistently show that over 90% of British people object to and refuse to accept
metrication in this country.
Please
also note that at her
Coronation in 1953, Her Majesty the Queen solemnly undertook to uphold and
protect English law and custom. As the
current holder of the Office of the Crown, her lifelong obligation under the
common law of Kingship, is to protect and preserve the United Kingdom for her
successors, as she received it.
The
Queen cannot change those laws or customs as she is herself subject to
them. That means that she cannot
interfere with established English law or alter English custom by imposing or
allowing to be imposed upon her subjects, foreign rule or any system of
(foreign) metric measurement. Such acts
are treasonable contrary to English Constitutional and Common Law, specifically
those mentioned below. They carry very
serious penalties.
What
the Queen cannot do, her servants in Parliament cannot do. Neither can public servants in local
government, government agencies or major companies acting on Britain’s
behalf. To attempt to do so is to place
oneself above the Queen. That is to
imagine the death of Her Majesty. Both
of these are major acts of High Treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act, also
the 1559 Act of Supremacy and the 1848 Treason Felony
Act.
Yours
sincerely,
Rex
Poulton
Wilts
1
BRITAIN IS NOT PART OF THE EU
When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972, Prime Minister Edward Heath
knowingly and wilfully tricked, deceived and betrayed the British people into foreign rule
by the EEC/EU under the pretence that they’d be joining a European common trading
agreement. The true intention was to surrender Britain’s sovereignty.
His was the most calculating and grievous High Treason in British history. He gave away
his country. Upon signing, his treason instantly removed him from lawful office and his
treasonous act failed to become lawfully binding because treason has no legitimacy and
cannot do that. His then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly
as a treasonous government is not lawful and has no legitimacy.
No parliament can bind a successor. But no following parliament has ever reversed Heath’s
treachery. Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and
deliberately lied to reinforce Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly and
willingly consented to foreign rule. As public servants, neither he nor they ever had such
authority and their actions are highly treasonous contrary to English law for acting against
the nation’s known interests, intention to surrender its sovereignty, using wilful deception to
deliberately betray the nation and for acting in the political interests of a foreign power. It is
effectively to declare war on the British Crown and the nation and is treason contrary to the
1351 Treason Act and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Every parliament since Heath’s therefore, is and has been an unlawful assembly. With no
legitimacy and in knowingly committing the most evil act of treason against their own people,
each has invited and imposed foreign rule over their own country. Since 1972, not one has
acted within the law. Having solemnly sworn lifetime oaths of loyalty and allegiance to serve
and protect Britain, each has conspired in this treason and they persist in deceitfully
concealing the truth of their illicit activities from the public as it has long been known that the
British people would never accept it and would object most violently were they ever to find
out.
But they are finding out. Parliaments’ history of treason and corruption is a matter of public
record with an increasing number of research documents, newspaper and magazine articles,
TV documentaries and an overwhelming amount of Foreign and Commonwealth Office
documentary evidence released to the public domain. Over 600 pages of it can be
downloaded and read at http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/downloads/treason-relateddownloads/ and this evidence is also verified in Hansard with a full and complete record of
politicians’ statements.
No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or intent by an unlawful assembly.
English law therefore, stands as it was prior to signing of the 1972 Act. Thus Britain is not
and can never have been part of the European Union as every Act, EU Treaty and every
statute since 1972 whether or not given the Royal Assent, is treasonous, unlawful, null and
2
void. Not one has the force of law. In any case, the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties provides that a signatory power may abrogate any treaty unilaterally where
corruption can be demonstrated in respect of procuring the treaty in the first place or in
respect of any dimension of it's implementation. This means that the known and proven
treason by Heath and his successors and the widely recognized and often reported deep
corruption within the EU render every EU Treaty “signed” by Britain, invalid.
The European Union has no legitimate influence in Britain whatsoever. Neither does its
Napoleonic European Law. Their authority exist only in the minds of certain politicians in
furtherance of the European Union political agenda. Britain may walk away at any time
without a second thought as she is not a part of it anyway. Moreover, the supremacy of
English law in Britain automatically intercedes and strikes down any attempt to repeal,
subvert, overrule or replace it. The deceit, pretence and false enforcement of Britain’s
“European involvement” is none other than parliamentary make-believe and pure theatre
designed at the highest levels to deceive and subjugate the people to foreign rule against
their will for others’ political purpose contrary to Common Law. It is WILFUL TREASON.A succession of unlawful British parliaments therefore, having no legitimacy, illegally
and without mandate, wilfully and criminally import and impose upon their own people,
foreign rule and influence that has no authority in Britain.
English Constitutional and Common Law is beyond parliamentary reach to alter or repeal
and cannot be ignored. Parts are, in any case, by contract directly between the King and
his people. Thus Parliament is not a party to those arrangements and can have no input.
Importantly, this English law is immutable and in perpetuity, written specifically to forever
protect the British people from despotic governance.
Even Her Majesty the Queen cannot change or ignore these laws as she is herself subject
to them. She cannot surrender Britain’s sovereignty that she holds in trust from the British
people, for her successors. Neither can she relinquish Britain’s independence and freedom
of self determination to a foreign power. Her solemn obligation is to protect and preserve
the United Kingdom for her successors, as she received it. What she cannot do, her servants
in Parliament ALSO cannot do.
A succession of British parliaments has since 1972 attempted to do the very things the Queen
cannot. In so doing, each has placed themselves above the Queen which is to imagine her
death. Each of these acts is the most serious treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act.
Thus their treason is compound in plotting and attempting to give away their country and in
considering themselves above the Queen whose death they casually assume.
The Common Law imposes strict and enduring duties upon every British subject from birth.
Every British subject is duty bound in allegiance and loyalty to the nation and in the reporting
and prevention of treason. These obligations are absolute and inseparable wherever one
may be around the world and cannot be resigned except by renouncing British nationality.
They far pre-date the Bill of Rights 1689 which protects Britain from all foreign influence or
rule by any power or authority: “No foreign Prince, person, Prelate, State, or Potentate, hath
or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre eminence, or Authority
Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm.”
Britain’s pretend EU membership is contrary to (among others) the 1351 Treason Act, the
1559 Act of Supremacy, the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 and the Treason Felony ActBritain Is Not Part Of The EU3
1848. These laws, remember, are beyond the reach of Parliament to amend, repeal or to
disregard and just because modern day lawyers are not trained in these laws does not mean
they do not exist or that serious offences against them have not been and are not committed.
Under the Act of Settlement 1700 S4, these English Constitutional and Common Laws are
the birthright of the people and cannot be taken away.
The treason committed by Britain’s politicians is being reported by a growing number of
angered people across the country, to the police for prosecution. The police have accepted
the evidence as prima facie cases to answer with a view to further action being taken. Under
English Common Law anyone who is aware that treason is contemplated or has or is being
committed but who do nothing to report or prevent it, commits the equally serious offences
of ‘Misprision of Treason at common law’ (knowing of treason committed but doing nothing
to report or prevent it) and ‘Compounding (the) Treason at common law’ any act or inaction
which effectively condones, supports or allows the treason to continue). These are tried in
court as the original treason. The legal obligation to report known treason extends to every
British national.
Treason continues to be regarded as so serious an undermining attack upon the British
nation that it is still a hanging offence. Ignorance of the law is, of course, no defence.
Lawful Britain
THE ABSURDITY OF BRITAIN’S METRICATION
This is a matter of national importance. Of serious criminality and of law.
Surveys show that 90% of British people are angry at Britain’s metrication against their will.
For centuries, Britain led the world with well thought-out imperial measurements. Their
convenient size, simple whole numbers and instantly relatable measures however, are being
energetically derided by Europhiles as clumsy and old fashioned when the world has itself
far preferred imperial’s better qualities and refused to adopt the metrication political agenda
unless enforced by tyranny and despotism.
Contrary to law we are being forced, to our detriment, to accept poorly conceived, inferior
foreign standards. It is as consequential as being compelled to give up our English language
and what is not realised by many is that Britain’s metrication is not about “easing trade with
Europe” as we are expected to believe. That is a conveniently contrived lie. Told we must
be metric in order to trade with Europe, we have successfully traded with the world for
centuries (and the world with us) using imperial measurement which many nations have
preferred and benefited from and continue to choose. The real purpose of metrication is to
remove imperial measurement as yet another step in eliminating the English as a people.
Just as mass immigration, it is part of a covert programme of genocide against the British
by attacking our cultural structure, indoctrination of our young and destabilising the nation
by dividing and setting rival groups. It is part of the calculated destruction of our English
society because it obstructs subjugation and total foreign rule. Just like immigration, it is
planned cultural replacement by stealth.
Britain’s metrication also has to do with the purposeful dumbing-down of society. Where for
centuries, man has successfully worked with nature’s multiples of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and
16, his mental capacity is being intentionally degraded to a primitive aptitude with multiples
only of 10. As one headteacher put it, “It is a serious insult to our children and abuse of their
thinking capability to deliberately limit their mental agility by imposing such a restricting
system of measurement as metrication”(Daily Mail). Many parents, apparently, agree.
Does it not occur to you that Britain’s metrication was never offered for public consideration?
It is imposed with a religious fervour by public servants presuming to be lord and master,
conspiring in an illegal agenda against their own people. That in itself is treason quite apart
from metrication being treasonable contrary to English law as we shall see below.
At her Coronation in 1953, Her Majesty the Queen solemnly undertook to uphold and protect
English Constitutional and Common Law and the customs of the United Kingdom and the
then Empire. The Queen cannot change those laws and customs as she is herself subject
to them. What she cannot do, her parliament as her servants also cannot do. That a
succession of parliaments since the early 1970’s has sought to impose metrication in Britain
2
contrary to those protected laws and customs means that besides acting criminally contrary
to law and custom, each of those officials has placed themselves above the Queen. That
in turn means that they imagine the death of the Queen. Both of these are acts of the most
serious treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act.
Britain’s metrication is thus treasonable on two counts. Treason contrary to the laws
themselves and treason in the manner of its introduction beyond those officials’ authority.
Imperial weights and measures for all purposes protected by English Constitutional and
Common Law were expressly authorised years earlier by Parliament in Westminster. No
amending Act has ever been introduced. British industry refused to adopt metrication until
criminally threatened with prosecution and certain imprisonment. Now, industry is forced to
act illegally and to oblige its British customers to do so as well. The Metric Martyrs
(http://www.metricmartyrs.co.uk/) lost their court battle to use imperial weights and measures
solely because of treasonous governmental chicanery and manipulation.Britain will never be a “metric” nation
Despite the proclaimed importance and necessity for metrication, Britain is never likely to
become a metric nation. Critically, the people do not consent. Survey results repeatedly
show they reject metrication as “inferior, restricting, inflexible, problematic, unfit for daily
purpose” and “of limited utility”. Ask any person on the street. They instinctively know their
height, weight and approximate distance from home in English imperial measurement. A
vast majority of those taught metrication in school even, do not know what those are in metric
units and choose imperial measurement over metric anyway.
Our roads, distances and road signs will never become metric. The financial and political
cost of conversion is far too colossal for any government ever to consider risking its electoral
reputation for such an unpopular matter. The United States, too, will never be metric for all
the same reasons and American people reject metrication just as strongly. In Canada,
metrication proved so unpopular that the Government backed down and reinstated people’s
freedom to choose imperial measurement. Australian and other English speaking peoples
also choose imperial despite governments’ claims otherwise. Many “metric” nations use
metric units in imperial quantities because only those suit life’s needs. Metric units do not.
The argument that Britain must adopt international measurement standards is unfounded.
There is no international standard. Every metric nation uses a slightly different version while
many of their people use imperial instead. So while nations in their nationalism reject the
international principle, their populations for reason of practicality still choose imperial. The
world-leading German optics industry, for example, pay lip-service to metrication as European
law demands but they convert all their calculations into imperial units for greater utility.
International law, moreover, demands that all aviation and sea going measurements be
imperial. The metre can never replace altitudes in feet as radio communication dictates the
simple clarity of whole round numbers and practical flying height above ground level cannot
be divided into the necessary range of safely separated altitudes, quadrantal cruise levels
and flight levels when the metre is much too cumbersome for such precision.
All air and sea distances are in nautical miles, yards, feet and inches and quantities are in
ounces and pounds, tons, pints, quarts and gallons. Note the generally monosyllabic nature
of these for radio communication clarity. Aviation fuel is measured in pounds compatibleThe Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication3
with aircraft weight and balance calculation and all aircraft instrumentation is in imperial as
is air traffic control. Cloud cover is quantified in oktas (eighths). Imperial units are chosen
universally for their practicality and application. The metric accounting system is unsuitable
as it is workable only in 10s.
The majority of those in Britain who use metric measurement terms do so not out of conscious
choice but because they have been deceitfully made to believe it fashionable or obligatory
by law. What they do not realise, is that fashions are often impractical and short lived
frequently for some arbitrary frame of mind, that the nation as a whole rejects metrication
and that there is no law that requires it. If the metric system offered the claimed improvement
over traditional measurement, then it will have been eagerly adopted across the world long
ago. But it has not. The millions of the world’s people have consistently rejected it. Why ?
Because it offers only obstruction in people’s lives.Problems with the metric system
An arbitrary construct arising from anxiety during the French Revolution, the metre was
conceived by the very people who tried to abolish the Christian calendar and even Christianity
itself. In their obsession to reduce every quantity to ten, they have never succeeded in
decimalising time, angles or the degrees in a circle. Metrication as a system did not receive
the depth of serious consideration for its practicality as did imperial measurement. Nature
does not conform to man’s contrivances and even space and the planet we inhabit have
from time immemorial, been measurable in multiples of six squared. For its base 10 principle,
metrication is a system of accounting not measuring. Life’s dimensions, unfortunately, do
not obey this strict principle of measurement in 10s and there is even doubt as to its suitability
in science where many regard it prone to disastrous error and purely a political expedience
to progress bureaucratic meddling.
Metrication suffers intractable problems. Unlike imperial, it offers too few units each of ill
conceived, impractical size. This involves unduly complex numbers frequently necessitating
decimal fractions for accuracy whose decimal point is easily misplaced (catastrophic in
medicine and science), unseen or omitted altogether. Long number strings are in any case,
off-putting and far from easy to scale or mentally calculate. Unlike imperial, its units have
no readily identifiable reference in the world or relationship with man’s existence on Earth.
This means their dimensions are unrelatable unlike imperial’s instantly recognised parts of
the human anatomy or commonplace articles for immediate assessment, appreciation and
ease of communication.
Whether one accepts the metre as being one ten-millionth part of the distance from the North
Pole to the Equator along the Paris Meridian at sea level (how did they ever measure that
precisely ?), or the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of
1/299,792,458 of a second, it is actually meaningless. Neither can be visualized much less
offer any kind of perception. The most recent incarnation of the metre as declared by the
International Committee for Weights and Measures is as a “unit of proper length” whose
definition is restricted to “lengths ℓ which are sufficiently short for the effects predicted by
general relativity to be negligible with respect to the uncertainties of realisation”. But still the
metre cannot be readily identified. The imperial foot can - and has for millennia.
As standard divisions on scales and rulers, the inch is divided into 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20,
24, 32, 48, 50 and 64 for instant application and accuracy. The metre offers only 10thsThe Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication4
(centimetres) and 100ths (millimetres). Ask yourself which is more useful. These metric
terms are not just excessively wordy, but 10ths and 100ths are not particularly practical with
life’s countless sizes. So for fine measurement, you invariably end up with decimal
fractions because the metric scale does not lend itself to the task. Perhaps not surprisingly,
some modern rulers and scales offer inches only in 10ths on one edge and centimetres and
millimetres on the other as if this choice satisfied every possible measuring requirement. It
cannot and rarely does. The two are entirely incompatible so one is left struggling with
imagined parts of either. This would suggest an ill-considered political decision as the
frequently used 1/32 of an inch is finer than the millimetre and would more practicably
associate directly with the inches edge as a workable system.
When using imperial, how sensible is it to base every measurement from several miles down
to a matter of inches, on the yard (3 feet) ? Did you assess every weight as a decimal fraction
of not quite two and a quarter pounds and did you measure liquid in multiples of less than a
quart (quarter of a gallon) ? How practical was it to use (say) “0.762 yard” (30 inches, the
standard door width) instead of simply saying “2 foot 6” or even “2-6” ? A standard door is
2-6 by 6-6.
When did you ever measure empty space (oven size, car boot size) in gallons ? We used
width, breadth and depth which gainfully conveyed something to us, or maybe cubic measure.
The metric procedure quantifies volume by liquid equivalent - which conveys little and cannot
be visualised. Just how big is a 20 litre oven ? How often did you consider that your airliner
was flying at the standardised flight level of 10666.6 yards (32,000 feet) ? Why are imperial
measurements the international choice ? Because they are practical, appropriately sized,
use simple whole numbers, are easily to mentally calculate and have considerable utility.
Metrication’s few measures are all impractical. A kilo of produce is far more than people
want. The English pound was designed to be well suited. There is no viable metric unit in
use between centimetres and metres. We usefully have inches, feet and yards, all
interrelating, designed for a variety of purposes and identifiable yet distinct for life’s ranges
of size. There is nothing between metres and kilometres. We benefit from yards, furlongs
(traditionally in horse racing) and fathoms at sea and very conveniently, standard simple
quarters or halves of a mile. And there is nothing between kilograms and tonnes. We have
ounces, pounds, stones, hundredweights and tons for every conceivable range of weight.
All imperial units offer instant application in simple whole numbers for any size or purpose.
Metrication involves large and anomalous complex numbers in too few units often requiring
a decimal point easily omitted, misplaced or unseen. It is not so simple or instant to work
with. What is so telling, however, is that many metric sizes and quantities in use throughout
the world are in complex part units that approximate to the imperial sizes that life demands.
So the imperial measures were right all along then - and they use simple whole numbers.
Another frequent decimalisation problem is that it cannot use imperial’s simple whole round
numbers. Has it ever occurred to you that the imperial system was conceived to provide a
measure size suited to every quantifying need while allowing simple whole round numbers
for instant comparison, mental calculation and communication ? You cannot do these things
with metric units. Though metrication has been taught in schools to satisfy the pro-metric
lobbyists, it is interesting to note that even the Prime Minister has recognised and demanded
the importance of our children learning the imperial measures as the lawful and most sensible
system of measurement.The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication5
Unbelievably, we now find the “apolitical” BBC and other TV companies and producers using
their unthinkable and unlawful political influence to improperly sponsor and impose
metrication upon unsuspecting viewers in public broadcast and websites. Not only that, but
they presume to instruct independent TV producers in this illegal activity and the general
public as to the metric measures they must customarily, and illegally, use. As the British
people reject metrication, this is outright treason. Yet such is the BBC’s understanding of
British measurement that we are told the imperial yard (36 inches) is greater than the metre
(39.370 inches).
From wherever around the world they report, TV companies insist upon giving every
measurement in metric units presumably to emphasise the “foreignness” of the location
completely ignoring that British people do not understand, indeed refuse to understand, these
foreign terms so glibly foist upon them. In TV programmes and films we are now given
dimensions in metric units even though few people understand them and they convey nothing
to us. Just so long as it is in metric, is all that matters.
It is not beyond the wit of man to realise that British viewers (and indeed many others) expect
imperial units they understand and which will convey something of meaning. To convert
metric to imperial for people’s comprehension is a very simple act for producers to undertake
and is surely part of the broadcasting service they are paid for. Why not otherwise do away
with English and broadcast programmes from other countries in their native tongue ? Many
viewers, apparently, simply change channels as programme value has gone and all trust
and confidence in the broadcasting companies’ service is thereafter lost.
We also find that TV companies ridiculously believe it shrewd to use miles for large distances
in Britain but metres for everything else. First, two entirely incompatible systems cannot
work together. There is no correlation or continuity. Assessing metric measurements with
miles becomes impossible. Second, it demonstrates a gratuitous determination to pursue
the metric political campaign regardless of sense or logic, with no thought for the confusion
and hostility it causes, or the obscuring of information offered and loss of public trust. In this
manner, moreover, companies unmistakably advertise themselves as serial law breakers.NOW THE LEGAL PART.
Lawyers these days are not trained or versed in English Constitutional and Common Law.
Thus few comprehend that these laws actually exist, remain in force as written or that crimes
against them are routinely committed. Such crime therefore goes unrecognised, unheeded
and consequently becomes “acceptable” behaviour. This is why society is so insensible and
lawless and it is why foreign (European Napoleonic) law is so casually imported and allowed
to freely prevail in Britain’s judicial system.
Treason is historically an important part of English law. It is why many laws were written in
the first place. These English laws, importantly, are immutable and in perpetuity. They
cannot be altered, repealed or ignored by Government and they were written specifically to
forever protect British people from despotic governance. Even the Queen cannot change
these laws as she is herself subject to them. What she cannot do, her servants in Parliament
also cannot do.
Treason is betrayal or breach of faith against the will or the interests of the person or the
nation. In speech, intent or action, it is disloyalty or to violate one’s allegiance or obligationThe Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication6
to another, to one’s own people and thus to one’s country in support of any other principle,
state, power or authority. It carries very serious penalties.
To use or represent the metric system in Britain as the accepted legal standard British units
of measurement is to undermine and mislead the British public mind. Most commonly found
in government services and British TV broadcasting, its use is to influence the nation into
believing that Britain has accepted and adopted this alien system of measurement when in
fact, the people flatly reject it. To undermine or mislead the British nation against its will is
a serious offence. It is TREASON.
Imperial weights and measures for all purposes are protected by English Constitutional and
Common Law. They have been expressly authorised in law by the British Parliament in
Westminster. No amending Act has ever been introduced. No law, ruling or edict exists that
requires Britain’s metrication. No White or Green Paper, political party manifesto, Queen’s
speech, parliamentary legislative programme or popular mandate has ever suggested that
Britain should or would adopt the metric system.
The imperial scales therefore remain the lawful standard British measurement system in
official and exclusive use in this country, required and protected by law. BY LAW. Nothing
else is legal or permitted.
The government inspired mantra “The UK took the decision to adopt the metric system in
1965” has been clearly exposed as the deliberate lie that it is. It was contrived for political
purpose and is widely known as “the Myth of 1965”. The UK has never “decided” to adopt
metrication. The public have never been consulted. Their agreement or consent has never
been sought, let alone given and metrication has never been debated in Parliament. The
myth arises solely from the personal hope of two 1960’s pro-Europe civil servants and Harold
Wilson’s failed sop to the French who refused UK admission to the EEC anyway. These do
not justify, legalise or authorise Britain’s metrication against people’s will.
Britain is not and has never been part of the European Union. Metrication therefore has no
claimed purpose.
When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972, Prime Minister Edward Heathknowingly and wilfully tricked, deceived and betrayed the British people into foreign rule
by the EEC/EU. His was the most calculating and grievous treason in British history. He
gave away his country. Upon signing, his treasonous act instantly removed him from lawful
office and it failed to become legally binding because treason has no legitimacy and cannot
do that. His then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly as a
treasonous government is not lawful and has no legitimacy.
No parliament can bind a successor. But no following parliament has ever reversed Heath’s
treachery. Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and
deliberately lied to reinforce Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly and
willingly consented to foreign rule. As public servants, neither he nor they ever had such
authority and their actions are highly treasonous for conspiring against the nation’s known
interests, intention to surrender its sovereignty, using wilful deception to deliberately betray
the nation and for acting in the political interests of a foreign power. It is effectively to declare
war on the British Crown and the nation which is treason contrary to the 1351 Treason Act
and the Treason Felony Act 1848.The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication7
Every parliament since Heath’s therefore, is and has been an unlawful assembly. With no
legitimacy and in knowingly committing the most evil act of treason against their own people,
each has invited and imposed foreign rule over their own country. Since 1972, not one has
acted within the law. Having solemnly sworn lifetime oaths of loyalty and allegiance to serve
and to protect Britain, each has conspired in this treason and they persist in deceitfully
concealing the truth of their illicit activities from the public as it has always been known that
the British people would object most violently were they ever to find out.
But they are finding out. Parliaments’ treason and corruption is a matter of public record with
an increasing number of research documents, newspaper and magazine articles, TV
documentaries and an overwhelming amount of Foreign and Commonwealth Office
documentary evidence released to the public domain. Over 600 pages of it can be
downloaded and read at http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/downloads/treason-relateddownloads/ and this evidence is also verified in Hansard with a full and complete record of
politicians’ statements.
No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or intent by an unlawful assembly.
English law and supremacy of the imperial system of measurement therefore, remain as
they were prior to signing of the 1972 Act. That means that just as before 1972, metric
measurements have no place whatsoever in Britain. It also means that Britain is not and
has never been part of the European Union as every Act and EU Treaty since 1972 whether
or not given the Royal Assent is treasonous, unlawful, null and void. So too, is any attempted
standard use of the metric scales in Britain, even as metric equivalents to imperial quantities.
It is illegal.
As a further consequence, the European Union has no lawful influence in Britain whatsoever.
Neither does its Napoleonic European Law. Their authority exist only in the minds of certain
politicians of whose criminal actions the public are already very well aware. In any case, the
outright supremacy of English law automatically intercedes and strikes down any attempt to
repeal, subvert, overrule or replace it. The pretence of European authority and influence
and of metrication is pure theatre and make-believe designed at the highest levels of
Westminster to deceive and subjugate Britain to foreign rule against the people’s will for
others’ political purpose contrary to law. It is WILFUL TREASON.A succession of unlawful British parliaments therefore, having no legitimacy, illegally
and without mandate, wilfully and criminally import and impose upon their own people,
foreign rule and influence that have no force of law in Britain.
This criminality includes such unlawful documents as the Weights and Measures Act 1985,
the Metric Regulations 1994 and all EEC/EU Regulations and Directives, all of which are
null and void so far as Britain is concerned. Not one has the force of law as each was brought
by an unlawful assembly of government ministers having no legitimacy (thus could not enact
legislation) in the clear parliamentary knowledge that it was treasonable contrary to English
Constitutional and Common Law. Though the Weights and Measures Act 1985 was relied
upon as the authority in the metric martyrs case and others, such legislation while held to
be rightful at the time, never had legitimacy or force of law. And as Chief Justice Beresford
of the Common Pleas ruled, “There is no such thing as a bad law for if it is bad it is not law”.
Metrication in Britain then, is based solely upon the deliberately contrived lie that “The UK
took the decision to adopt the metric system in 1965” when in fact the people knew nothingThe Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication8
about it, would never have consented and have been knowingly and purposely deceived and
betrayed by those paid to serve them and who have each solemnly sworn oaths of loyalty
and allegiance to serve and to protect the security of the British nation.
For the avoidance of any doubt, all of the above is historical fact. It is evidenced in public
documentary record and is acknowledged by the Attorney General, the Lord Chancellor, the
Lord Chief Justice and others. This knowledge also exists in living public memory, press
and TV coverage recorded for all time in public archives and much of it has been referred in
treason reports by members of the public to numerous police forces that have accepted the
evidence as prima facie cases to answer with a view to prosecuting action being taken.
Britain’s metrication is directly contrary to the 1351 Treason Act, the 1559 Act of Supremacy,
the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 and the Treason Felony Act 1848 among others.
These laws are beyond the reach of Parliament to amend, repeal or to disregard and just
because modern day lawyers are not trained in these laws does not mean they do not exist
or that serious offences against them have not been and are not, committed. Under the Act
of Settlement 1700 S4, these major Constitutional and Common Laws are the birthright of
the people. Supremacy of imperial measurement in Britain, protected and required by these
laws, is thus the birthright of the people and cannot be removed. Acknowledged in law for
all purposes by Parliament, no amending Act has every been introduced. Only imperial
measurement may be used in Britain.Realising the truth
Not only is Britain’s metrication entirely contrary to law, but the people flatly refuse to accept
it. It serves no gainful purpose and is far from any improvement over imperial. It is a political
intent criminally and enthusiastically imposed by uncompromising Europhiles not seeing that
the true purpose of this Frankfurt School subversion technique is to remove yet another part
their own culture for ulterior motive not in our interests - the collective consequences of
which even their own families will have to live with. They ardently pursue its adoption and
are quick to put down anyone who disagrees. Thus they wantonly encourage the commission
of treason against the British nation - their own children’s rapidly diminishing inheritance.
If metrication had offered the advantages claimed, then it will have been eagerly adopted
around the world without need for such tyrannical imposition and ongoing attempts to
convince of its benefits. Hundreds of millions of the world’s people cannot all be wrong in
their rejection of it.
Born of the 18th Century French notion that everything on Earth should unworkably conform
to units of 10, it ignores nature’s laws of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16. Is the structure of crystals
decimal ? Is the structure of snowflakes decimal ? Imperial measurements were conceived
specifically to relate directly with nature and man’s existence on Earth using practical
everyday measures of relatable dimension in instantly scalable simple whole numbers.
Metrication’s 10’s can do none of those things. Even worse than its few impractical units,
its greatest unforeseen downfall perhaps, is its decimal point so catastrophic if lost, left out
or disastrously misplaced.
With no physical reference, metric measures convey nothing relatable. They are arbitrary
and imaginary. Ridiculed by metriphiles as “awkward and antiquated” on the other hand,
imperial measurement given the world by Britain, has single-handedly enabled man’s every
The Absurdity of Britain’s Metrication
9
refinement in life including construction, manufacture, industry, scientific progress, micro
electronics, internet technology, medical advancement and manned exploration of space.
It brings considerable advantage over metrication’s poorly conceived inadequacies.
Why, then, should we ever need the nonsense of an inferior measurement system that
conspicuously offers less utility? Rather than for Britain’s advancement, metrication is to
help accomplish a dark political agenda - Britain’s subjugation, destruction of her English
sophistication and culture and elimination of the English as a people. To reduce everybody
to one primitive level.
Lawful Britain
Select further reading
Protecting the interests of British weights and measures - http://www.bwmaonline.com/
Caution, metric signs are illegal. Keep it imperial - http://www.activeresistance.org.uk/
You should earnestly read this http://www.freedom2measure.org/Our%20Units.html#right
Truthful views about metric - http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/estatopia/inch.htm#intro
The benefits of English weights and measures - http://home.clara.net/brianp/ametric.html
Metrication is unnecessary, unwanted and undemocratic http://www.angelfire.com/ok4/iaml/
THE TREASON OF BRITAIN’S METRICATIONTreason is treachery, a betraying or a breach of faith and in law denotes the grave crime of treachery
toward the Sovereign as head of the State and any betraying of the State itself. (Moriarty’s Police Law.
17th edition, page 202.) Treason is to betray or violate one’s duty of allegiance to one’s own people and
thus to one’s country in support of any other intention, state, power or authority. It is disloyalty,
duplicity and to undermine your own country. Regarded as so serious an undermining attack upon
the British nation, treason is still a hanging offence.
To use or represent the metric system in Britain as the accepted legal standard British units
of measurement is to undermine and mislead the British public mind. Most commonly found
in British TV broadcasting and government services, it is to influence the nation into believing
that Britain has accepted and adopted this foreign system of measurement when in fact, the
people are flatly opposed to it and reject it outright. It is a serious offence to undermine or
mislead the British nation against its will. It is TREASON.
Since 1897 the people of Britain have consistently rejected the metric system as “inferior,
restricting, inflexible, problematic” and “of limited utility”. They have also refused it as a
second rate foreign influence prone to considerable, sometimes disastrous, error (misplaced
or omitted decimal point), having too few units each of impractical size and as an accounting
system unsuited to measuring needs. These views also extend to the sale of commodities
in metric quantities all of which are illegal under English law and are considered far less
practical in use. It is a fallacy that the British public use metric terms willingly. Surveys
repeatedly show that more than 90% of British people refuse to accept or adopt the metric
system.
Much more serious still however, is that Britain’s metrication is not about “easing trade with
Europe” as we are expected to believe. That is a conveniently contrived lie. Britain has
never needed the metric system in order to trade with the rest of the world. The real purpose
of metrication is to remove imperial measurement as yet another step in eliminating the
English as a people. Just as mass immigration, it is part of a covert programme of genocide
against the British by attacking our cultural structure, indoctrination of our young and
destabilising the nation by dividing and setting rival groups. And just like immigration, it is
planned cultural replacement by stealth.
Imperial weights and measures for all purposes are protected by English Constitutional and
Common Law. They have been expressly authorised by the Parliament in Westminster. No
amending Act has ever been introduced. No law, ruling or edict exists that requires Britain’s
metrication. Indeed, no White or Green Paper, political party manifesto, Queen’s speech,
2The Treason of Britain’s Metrication
parliamentary legislative programme or popular mandate has ever suggested that Britain
should or would adopt the metric system. The imperial scales therefore remain the lawful
standard British system of measurement in official and exclusive use in this country, required
and protected by law. BY LAW. Nothing else is permitted.
The government inspired mantra “The UK took the decision to adopt the metric system in
1965” has been publicly exposed as the deliberate lie that it is. It was contrived for political
purpose and is widely known as “the Myth of 1965”. The UK has never “decided” to adopt
metrication. The public have never been consulted, their agreement or consent has never
been sought let alone given and metrication has never been debated in Parliament. The
myth arises from the personal hope of two 1960’s pro-Europe civil servants and Harold
Wilson’s failed sop to the French who refused UK admission to the EEC anyway. These do
not justify, legalise or authorise Britain’s metrication against the people’s will.
Britain is not and has never been part of the European Union. Metrication therefore has no
claimed purpose.
When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972, Prime Minister Edward Heathknowingly and wilfully tricked, deceived and betrayed the British people into foreign rule
by the EEC/EU. His was the most calculating and grievous treason in British history. He
gave away his country. Upon signing, his treasonous act instantly removed him from lawful
office and it failed to become legally binding because treason has no legitimacy and cannot
do that. His then treasonous government immediately became an unlawful assembly as a
treasonous government is not lawful and has no legitimacy.
No parliament can bind a successor. But no following parliament has ever reversed
Heath’s treachery. Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously
and deliberately lied to reinforce Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly
and willingly consented to foreign rule. As public servants, neither he nor they ever had
such authority and their actions are highly treasonous for conspiring against the nation’s
known interests, intention to surrender its sovereignty, using wilful deception to
deliberately betray the nation and for acting in the political interests of a foreign power. It
is effectively to declare war on the British Crown and the nation and is treason contrary to
the 1351 Treason Act and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Every parliament since Heath’s therefore, is and has been an unlawful assembly. With no
legitimacy and in knowingly committing the most evil act of treason against their own people,
each has invited and imposed foreign rule over their own country. Since 1972, not one has
ever acted lawfully. Having solemnly sworn lifetime oaths of loyalty and allegiance to serve
and protect Britain, each has conspired in this treason and they persist in deceitfully
concealing the truth of their illicit activities from the public as it has always been known that
the British people would object most violently were they ever to find out.
But they are finding out. Parliaments’ treason and corruption is a matter of public record with
an increasing number of research documents, newspaper and magazine articles, TV
documentaries and an overwhelming amount of Foreign and Commonwealth Office
documentary evidence released to the public domain. Over 600 pages of it can be
downloaded and read at http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/downloads/treason-relateddownloads/ and this evidence is also verified in Hansard with a full and complete record of
politicians’ statements.
3
No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or intent by an unlawful assembly.
English law and supremacy of the imperial system of measurement therefore, remain as
they were prior to signing of the 1972 Act. That means that just as before 1972, metric
measurements have no place in Britain whatsoever. It also means that Britain is not and
has never been part of the European Union as every Act and EU Treaty since 1972 whether
or not given the Royal Assent is treasonous, illegal, null and void. So too, is any attempted
standard use of the metric scales in Britain, even as metric equivalents to imperial quantities.
It is illegal.
As a further consequence, the European Union has no lawful influence in Britain whatsoever.
Neither does its Napoleonic European Law. Their authority exist only in the minds of certain
politicians of whose criminal actions the public are very well aware. In any case, the outright
supremacy of English law automatically intercedes and strikes down any attempt to repeal,
subvert, overrule or replace it. The pretence of European authority and influence and of
metrication is pure theatre and make-believe designed at the highest levels of Westminster
to deceive and subjugate Britain to foreign rule against the people’s will for others’ political
purpose contrary to law. It is WILFUL TREASON.A succession of unlawful British parliaments therefore, having no legitimacy, illegally
and without mandate, wilfully and criminally import and impose upon their own people,
foreign rule and influence that have no force of law in Britain.
This criminality includes such unlawful documents as the Weights and Measures Act 1985,
the Metric Regulations 1994 and all EEC/EU Regulations and Directives, all of which are
null and void so far as Britain is concerned. Not one has the force of law as each was brought
in the clear knowledge that it was treasonable contrary to English Constitutional and Common
Law. Though the Weights and Measures Act 1985 was relied upon as the authority in the
Metric martyrs case and others, it and other such legislation while held to be rightful at the
time, never had legitimacy or force of law.
The 1985 Act was brought as part of a political agenda by an unlawful assembly of
government ministers having no legitimacy (thus could not enact legislation) due to their own
acts of treason and their failure to rectify the treasonous acts of others as explained above.
They acted illegally and without authority in wilful support of foreign rule and influence against
Britain’s interests. The Metric Regulations 1994 are equally as unlawful and EEC/EU
Regulations and Directives have no legitimacy here anyway.
Not only has the 1985 Act never had lawful authority, but it is ‘bad law’ having been brought
for treasonable purpose by deceitful and unauthorized officials through illegal means. It was
therefore never possible for it to become legitimate law and as Chief Justice Beresford of
the Common Pleas ruled, “There is no such thing as a bad law for if it is bad it is not law”.
The 1985 Act and 1994 Regulations while known to be High Treason from the outset, are
null and void. In any case, English Constitutional and Common Law (Higher Law)
immediately interceded and struck them down. Statute law cannot amend or impliedly repeal
constitutional law and as the imperial scales of measurement are protected by that Higher
Law, their supremacy remains unchallenged. Britain is not a metricating nation. The law
prohibits it.
Metrication in Britain then, is based solely upon the deliberately contrived lie that “The UK
took the decision to adopt the metric system in 1965” when in fact the people knew nothingThe Treason of Britain’s Metrication4
about it, would never have consented and have been knowingly and wilfully deceived and
betrayed by those paid to serve them and who have each broken their sworn oaths of loyalty
and allegiance to Britain.
For the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, all of the above is historical fact. It is a matter
of public documentary record not just in the evidence mentioned above but is acknowledged
by the Attorney General, the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice and others. Much of
this knowledge is also in living public memory, press and TV coverage recorded for all time
in public archives and much of it has been referred in treason reports by members of the
public to numerous police forces that have accepted the evidence as prima facie cases to
answer with a view to prosecuting action being taken.
In committing the most unimaginable treason against their own people, every parliament
since 1972 has consciously and purposefully contravened English Constitutional and
Common Law. This includes inter alia, the 1351 Treason Act, the 1559 Act of Supremacy,
the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 and the Treason Felony Act 1848. These laws are
immutable and in perpetuity. They are beyond the reach of Parliament to amend, repeal or
disregard. Just because modern day lawyers are not trained or versed in these laws does
not mean they do not exist or that major offences of treason against them have not been and
are not, committed. Under the Act of Settlement 1700 S4, the laws of England are the
birthright of the people. Exclusive use of the imperial measurement system in Britain as
required by law, is thus the birthright of the people and cannot be removed.
Imperial measurements are the international standard legally required for air and sea use
around the world. Worldwide distances are measured in nautical miles, yards (sea depths
are also in fathoms) and feet and inches. Quantities are in ounces and pounds weight, tons,
pints, quarts and gallons. This is because imperial units are chosen universally for their
design practicality and application in all uses over the metric accounting system that is
workable only in multiples of 10.
The British Government confirms that transportation and road use are never likely to become
metric in view of the financial and political cost of conversion, far too colossal for any
government ever to consider risking its electoral reputation for such an unpopular matter.
Though some people mistakenly believe that centimetres, metres, kilometres, kilos and litres
are the politically correct units to use, their use in public is a criminal offence at law. Some
even believe that centimetres and metres should be used for small dimensions and that
imperial miles be used for large distances. While unworkable, this too is contrary to law.
The two scales are entirely incompatible. Metres do not relate to miles in any way.
The legal and official units in Britain are the inch, foot, yard, mile, ounce, pound, pint, quart
and gallon that the law requires. Despite political intention to mislead and disinform, the
imperial system of weights and measures has never been replaced. Though metrication has
been taught in schools to satisfy the pro-metric lobbyists, it is interesting to note that even
the Prime Minister has recognised and demanded the importance of our children learning
the imperial measures as the lawful and most sensible system of measurement.
British industry and retailing have been purposefully deceived and compelled into metrication
under political false pretence and threat of imprisonment. They have been forced to act
illegally and to oblige their British customers to do so as well. The British Government’sThe Treason of Britain’s Metrication5
stance that business supports compulsory metrication is in fact, a contradiction in terms. If
business wanted to go metric, the unlawful regulations enforcing it would not be necessary.
Had the metric system been as beneficial or expedient as claimed, it will have been adopted
readily by nations around the world, most particularly in North America and Britain. Some
400 million people in the U.S. and Britain alone cannot all be wrong in rejecting metrication
and their exclusive choice of imperial measurement. In Canada, metrication proved so
unpopular that the government backed-down and restored freedom to choose imperial units.
No nation in the world has willingly accepted the metric system. Its adoption has necessitated
corrupt or dictatorial enforcement and it is universally associated with totalitarianism. Yet
despite such obligation, a great many of the world’s people still choose imperial units for their
flexibility, ease of use, practicality and immediate application.
The majority of those in Britain who use metric measurement terms do so not out of conscious
choice but because they have been deceitfully made to believe it fashionable or obligatory
by law. What they do not realise however, is that fashions are often impractical and short
lived frequently for some arbitrary frame of mind, that the nation as a whole rejects metrication
and there is no law that requires it. With no popular support or basis in UK law, metrication
offers less practicality. Many consider it an insult.
Britain already has the world class imperial system of measurement emulated around the
world and designed for every quantifying need using simple whole numbers. The metric
system has failed spectacularly even to replace Sumerian measurement of time, angles or
the degrees in a circle and is far less viable because nature’s dimensions and weights do
not conveniently obey ready assessment by 10. The metric accounting system is just that.
With no ready physical reference of any meaning, metric measures convey nothing
relatable. They are arbitrary and imaginary. Ridiculed by metriphiles as “clumsy and old
fashioned” on the other hand, imperial measurement given the world by Britain, has singlehandedly enabled man’s every refinement in life including construction, manufacture,
industry, scientific progress, micro electronics, internet technology, medical advancement
and manned exploration of space. It brings considerable advantage over metrication’s
poorly conceived inadequacies.
The Common Law imposes strict and enduring duties upon every British subject from birth.
Every British person is duty bound in the reporting and prevention of treason and in allegiance
and loyalty to the nation. These obligations are absolute and inseparable wherever one may
be around the world and they cannot be resigned except by renouncing British nationality.
They far pre-date the Bill of Rights 1689 which protects Britain from all foreign influence or
rule by any foreign power or authority: “No foreign Prince, person, Prelate, State, or Potentate,
hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre eminence, or Authority
Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm.” The Common Law remember, is immutable
and in perpetuity.
The treason of Britain’s unwanted metrication is being reported by a growing number of
angered people across the country, to the police for prosecution. Under English Common
Law anyone who is aware that treason is contemplated or has or is being committed but who
do nothing to report or prevent it, commits the equally serious offences of ‘Misprision of
Treason at common law’ (knowing of treason committed but doing nothing to report or prevent
The Treason of Britain’s Metrication
6
it) and ‘Compounding (the) Treason at common law’ any act or inaction which effectively
condones, supports or allows the treason to continue). These are tried in court as the original
treason. The legal obligation to report known treason extends to every British national.
Not so long ago, William Joyce was convicted and hanged for treason for just such misleading
and undermining broadcast against the British people’s interest as described above. Today’s
media personalities, government officials and line managers (directing minds) who endorse
metrication are no different. The treason laws have not changed. They are as effective
today as the day they were written despite certain politicians’ personal attempts to repeal or
change them. Treason continues to be regarded as so serious an undermining attack upon
the British nation that it is still a hanging offence. Ignorance of the law is, of course, no
defence.
Lawful Britain
